OTHERS' VIEWS

OTHERS' VIEWS

Putin is nearby. Precisely, Russia’s ambitious global influencer of  illiberal  order has docked next door. In Niger Republic to be exact. At the end of April, the military junta in Niger kicked out the American military advisers and tiny troop contingent from their country. Earlier, they had forced the U.S drone and surveillance base in Agadez to shut down. As part of a half-hearted diplomatic move to repair military relations with Niger, an American delegation went to hold talks with the regime in Niamey.

Almost on the same day, officials of the junta were reportedly showing a Russian military advance party around what used to be the American military base. The intent was obvious. The Russians were in the process of being handed the keys of what used to be a US base or at least preparing the grounds for an active security relationship with Moscow. Though the janitors are yet to hand over the keys of the former US base to the Russians, the signals are clear.

Earlier on, the military junta in Niger had chased away the French ambassador to the country, thus ending centuries of French influence in the country. Of course, the military dictators were towing the same line as their colleagues in Burkina Faso, Mali and Guinea. A rushed end to French presence and influence in these former French colonies has since become the central foreign policy doctrine of the new autocrats in what used to be Francophone West Africa.

Official Moscow is still predictably silent on its intentions. But what is clear is Moscow’s preparations to replace the West, specifically the United State and France as the strategic influence in Niger Republic and its environs. And with the exit of both French and American military presence in Niger, the door has been thrown wide open for their replacement by Russia. Of course Russia’s interest in Africa especially West and Central Africa has never been disguised in recent times.

Prior to the demise of the bullish Yevgeny Prigozyn and the decline of his Wagner mercenary force, Russian commercial and security presence in these parts of Africa had been quite pronounced but diplomatically muted. Now what began as an expeditionary mercenary commercial interest is about to graduate into a full blown strategic military and security presence and interest from Moscow. 

The presence of US troops and the drone base coupled with the presence of a French protection force in West Africa remained  for a long time part of the international arrangement to keep jihadist terrorists from drifting towards the south of West Africa. Countries like Nigeria were prime beneficiaries of the US presence in Niger. It was more importantly part of an international strategic engagement to barricade the region from a rampaging Jihadist onslaught from the Sahel.

This logic of containment and protection remained the major plank of Western influence remained valid until the rapid  reduction of French presence and influence in the region by new military regimes. It all began with Mali which had earlier evicted French diplomats from Bamako. This was followed by the withdrawal of French protection troops from Mali and subsequently the other major West African former French territories now under military dictatorship: Mali, Guinea, Burkina Faso, Niger and possibly Chad.

There a historical context to Russia’s residual appeal in parts  of Africa. Instructively, in the wake of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the world was gripped by anxiety. On March 2nd, the UN General Assembly voted on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Of the 54 African member states, 28 voted against Russia while 17 abstained and 8 refused to show up. Towards Russia or more precisely the old Soviet Union, some nostalgia among an ageing generation of elite.

Many of these older African elite  recall the days of the Cold War and the old USSR’s identification with Africa’s causes especially anti colonialism and anti Apartheid. Ideological nostalgia towards the Red Empire is strongest in places like Mozambique, Angola, Zimbabwe, Namibia and South Africa where political parties that pioneered the independence and anti racist struggles were backed by the old Soviet Union.

At the present time, Russian influence in Africa remains sporadic and uncoordinated but cannot be ignored as a significant part of the strategic future of the continent. In 2019, the inaugural Russia-Africa Summit in Sochi was attended by 43 African countries. It was a forum for Mr. Putin to critique the West’s policies towards Africa.

Nonetheless, Russia’s  trade with Africa is only 2% of Africa’s goods trade with the rest of the world. A Russian bank VEB now under Western sanctions is a shareholder in the African Development Bank. Even then, Russia’s economic and military interest and roles in some African fragile states remains considerable. Russia is the largest arms supplier to African countries, a net extractor of mineral and other resources and a prop for fragile even if unpopular regimes. But with all its noisy presence in world affairs, Russia remains an unlikely agent of economic benefit for African countries.

The Russian economy is about the size of that of Italy. So, Russia is not in a position to act as an attractive agent of development in Africa. Russia is still a relatively poor country. Its companies playing in the African economic theatre are most extractive industry interlopers and state sponsored thieving entities. Russian infrastructure companies are still not interested in contracts in African countries. African tourist and business travel interests in Russia is next to zero. So, by and large any renewed Russian interest in parts of Africa will remain a matter of limited mutual convenience. Security assistance in return for opportunities for Russian rogue companies to come in and make some quick cash while the Russian state increases its foothold  and authoritarian leverage against the Western liberal order.

For Nigeria, the implications of the exit of two major Western powers from our immediate northern frontier are many and far reaching. Nigeria’s exposure in this regard are threefold. First, the security safe corridor  against jihadist terrorist expansion from the Sahel is instantly closed. Without American drones, intelligence and French troops on the ground, Nigeria is exposed. Our national security is further compromised. The jihadists are now free to roam free from centres in Niger into the troubled northern parts of Nigeria.

Secondly, the military presence of Russia in Niger and other parts of what used to be French West Africa immediately signals a decline of Western influence in the region and its replacement with an antithetical Russian influence. Russian security presence and strategic influence in an area now under military dictatorship effectively means the shrinking of the frontiers of freedom and democratic rule and its replacement with an authoritarian influence. Russian is not known to be a patron of democracy and freedom anywhere in the world. It cannot possibly export what it does not have at home.

Hidden under the above two meanings is a clear and present threat to Western influence in West Africa. The timing of this development in world history is fortuitous. We are in an era where the Cold War has been replaced by an increasing hemispheric war of nerves and rhetoric between Western democracies as we have come to know them and a rising authoritarian counter force. The counter force  is being guaranteed by the growing influence and fortunes of China.  Russia, North Korea, Iran and other client states of the same ilk are taking shelter under China’s bloated bank accounts to keep the West uncomfortable.

Nigeria’s political response to the developments in Niger have shown little of an enlightened national self-interest. At the time the coupists toppled Niger’s democratic government, Nigeria was in a position to  prevent the coup and its nasty consequences. Former president Buhari had a close personal relationship with the democratic leadership in Niger.

Even after Buhari’s tenure, his successor Mr. Tinubu woefully failed to use his position as the new Chairman of ECOWAS to neutralize the coup in Niger. Nigeria was in an eminent position to use its economic and military preponderance in the region to stifle the Niger coupists. We failed.

A few tepid diplomatic threats and fickle sanctions failed to deter the dictatorship in Niamey. The junta got stronger, compared notes with those in Burkina Faso, Mali and Guinea. They got stronger together and became a threat to ECOWAS from which they threatened a pullout. ECOWAS’s solidarity was broken. The bloc buckled. Its military weakness was on open display as they could neither effect an ultimatum to use force if necessary. Individual member nations reached out to the Niger and other dictators and made individual deals.

Nigeria’s resolve was broken. We shamefully restored electricity supply to Niger, lifted our limited and effete sanctions. And now the Niger junta has dug in and  has admitted a potential destabilizing force  into our immediate northern frontier. By creating room for the exit of the West from Niger and the tacit admission of Russian influence into the region, Nigeria has shot itself in the foot.

There is something more frightening in our political response to this development. The possibility that the United States and France could decide to pitch tent in Nigeria by negotiating military basing footholds here is far fetched. But even then, it is being opposed vehemently by some politicians instead of being welcomed enthusiastically.

In Nigerian political circles, the debate has been as to whether Nigeria should allow France and the United States to establish military bases in its territory. As is typical in our lazy politics of sectarianism, regionalism and divisiveness, the most eloquent voices of opposition to possible Western military bases in Nigeria have come from northern political voices. This is not only sad but also not backed by any iota of strategic insight and knowledge of basic national interests.

Ironically, the  North is the region immediately exposed to the  consequences of the withdrawal of Western forces from Niger. It has become the epicenter of national insecurity and instability of the kind associated with increasing jihadist activities. It is the home base of banditry. It is a free market for the spread of small and medium arms from the theatres of trouble in the Sahel, Northern Africa and the Middle East. It is the area where schools are being sacked and farming disrupted. It is the source of herdsmen turned into killers, armed robbers and kidnappers.

More pointedly, there is nothing that says that should Nigeria consider it strategically wise, Western military bases in the country must be located in any particular zone of the country.

Such bases can be located anywhere in the country. And they often have collateral economic benefits to the host communities as in places like Djibouti, South Korea and Germany where US military bases are part of the local economic life.

In the world of modern technology, possible Western military bases can be located anywhere in the country. Advanced intelligence gathering and surveillance systems now allow major world powers to gather intelligence, order operations and manage military outcomes from virtually anywhere. The drones that decimated Al Queda in Afghanistan and Pakistan emanated from drone command bases in the deserts of far away Nevada. Donald Trump ordered the drone assassination of Iran’s General Soliman at Baghdad airport from the comfort of the Oval Office in far away Washington.

The long term strategic and overall national interest of Nigeria are better served if we rise above petty regional narrow views of the developments unfolding in our Northern frontier. First, we need to protect the nation from the spread of jihadist insurgency and terrorism. We need to remain enlisted in the international effort to defeat Jihadist terrorism  decisively. We need to protect freedom and democratic rule as a heritage after more than four decades of military dictatorship in our history. Consequentially, we need to act in concert with the rest of the free world to discourage Russia’s active promotion and tacit marketing of authoritarianism and anti democratic ideas around the world.

Incidentally, among the salesmen of authoritarianism in the world, Russia is handicapped. Unlike China, Russia is neither an agent of economic development nor a model of cultural inclusiveness and universalism. Few free and happy people want to make Moscow their preferred holiday or business travel destination.

Last modified on Monday, 13 May 2024 02:47

Segun Olatunji, the General Editor of an online publication whose abduction and detention by men in uniform, acting Gestapo-style, raised a lot of dust, has resigned his appointment. Olatunji resigned because he disagrees with the decision of his employers - the owners/management of First Media Network Limited, publishers of FirstNews newspaper - to retract the story that had led to his travail as well as offer public apology to Mr. Femi Gbajabiamila, former Speaker of the House of Representatives, now Chief of Staff to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

Gbajabiamila had kicked against FirstNews’ story, demanding its retraction as well as public apology from the online newspaper. I need not repeat the FirstNews story here since it has been retracted by its publishers. Restating allegations already retracted by its original source is unprofessional and unethical, though the uninformed and vendors of “yellow journalism” can still tactically, even if mischievously, hide under the cover of reportage to do so . It amounts, however, to committing the same infraction afresh and anew.

FirstNews newspaper was not an online publication that I had come across before the Segun Olatunji abduction saga. I am not sure the massive story it published also got as much traction before the abduction of Olatunji as it got after his arrest and detention. In other words, the abduction and detention of Olatunji advertised the story and made Olatunji himself more popular than he ordinarily was before the event. So many people who, ordinarily, would not have been aware of the story or of the newspaper itself and its editor got to know of their existence because of the clampdown on Olatunji.

Sometimes one wonders what kind of professional media advice those in sensitive government positions get before deciding to dance naked in public. Whether true or false, I can vouchsafe that those who will believe the story in question will be far numerous than those who will disbelieve it, the retraction and public apology by the publishers notwithstanding. Any harm done, which the abduction and detention further accentuated, cannot now be adequately redressed.

FirstNews at first talked tough; it sided with its editor and stood by its story, as we say in this profession. The publisher of FirstNews newspaper, one Daniel Iworiso-Markson, minced no words as he insisted that the Gbajabiamila story was based on facts. Said he: “The management of FirstNews is using this opportunity to call on the military high command and the security agencies to let us know (Olatunji’s) whereabouts and the reason why he was arrested. FirstNews (online and print) is a reputable independent digital news network that prides itself on being a front line media outfit committed to engaging its world-class audience with factual, authentic, and credible information.

“We conduct our journalism activities with strict observance of the high standards of ethics, accountability, professionalism, and legality while exercising our rights to freedom of expression and information, all in a bid to ensure credible reporting of the news behind the news in politics, business, education, sport, health, entertainment, and many more. If there was any infraction that bothers on national security, Olatunji should have first been formally invited rather than this Gestapo style of arrest that reminds (us) of the dark days of the military era, where press freedom was stifled”

Strong words from someone sure of his onions! Buoyed by this, I suppose, all the professional journalism bodies - NUJ, NGE, NPAN, name it - Labour and civil society organizations packed themselves full behind FirstNews and Olatunji. Disgruntled politicians and all manner of elements with an axe to grind wasted no time in joining the fray. The military did not help matters with their serial denial that they knew nothing of the abduction and detention of Olatunji. Eventually, they buckled under pressure and not only admitted that Olatunji was with them but also released him from illegal detention after 14 gruesome days. The detainee’s detention diary described his experience as harrowing.

“You maltreated me”; “we did not maltreat you” was the exchange of fireworks between captive and captors before the latest bombshell of Olatunji’s resignation as the General Editor of FirstNews. His resignation was instigated by the decision of his newspaper’s management to eat the humble pie by recanting, retracting the story which they had earlier stoutly defended, and tendering an unreserved apology to Gbajabiamila.

I do not envy FirstNews! Doing what the newspaper has done is what newspapers and editors detest most. It’s a nightmare. It rubbishes the professional integrity of the editor and tarnishes the image of the newspaper. It reduces the standing of both in the estimation of every right-thinking member of the public. Professionalism and credibility are called into question. Who, again, will believe another “exclusive” story broken by such a publication?

FirstNews’ apology was abject in every material particular; it said the story on Gbajabiamila, “was handed over to us as facts by a misleading source, which was highly negligent on our part and for which we deeply tender an unreserved apology to the Chief of Staff to the President (as well as) publish a retraction of the said story”

If journalism is still what it used to be in my own days, the day FirstNews published its “unreserved apology” to Gbajabiamila would be a sad day in the history of that newspaper organization. The mood in the entire newspaper, the newsroom especially, would be mournful. It would be as if someone very important has just died. Lawyers to complainants have found a way of making retractions doubly unpalatable in the way they couch the wordings of the retraction they hand over to cornered newspapers to publish, with some of such mean lawyers insisting that not a word of it must be altered, thus forcing the bitter pill down the throat in a pitiless and remorseless manner.

Now, the more painful aspect of retractions is that the story being retracted may be correct substantially (if not in full) and the person being apologized to may not in the least deserve it. The Gbajabiamila story as published by FirstNews was massive. It is the type you publish only after you have safely deposited all supporting documents in the vaults of the World Bank! As we say in this profession, there is no smoke without a fire. I think that may be the point Olatunji was trying to make when he broke ranks with the Management of his newspaper and chose resignation as a noble option. But does he have impeccable documents to support the allegations against Gbajabiamila?

A maxim of the journalism profession is that a reporter is as good as his source. So, we usually talk of “competent sources”, ”impeccable sources”, ”usually reliable sources”, etc. Once your source of information is none of the above, it means he or she "has fallen your hand", as they say. You are done for! Stories can be planted by enemies to draw you out for the kill. As editor of The PUNCH/Saturday PUNCH, especially during the struggle for the revalidation of the annulled June 12, 1993 presidential election won fair and square by MKO Abiola, we experienced a lot of that. The military junta and its apologists sent classified documents and outright fabrications our way, waiting for us to publish so they could pounce!

Going by the retraction published by FirstNews, a “misleading source” and “negligence on their own part” were the twin-evils their story on Gbajabiamila suffered. Now, as stated earlier, there are dishonest and interested sources angling to grind an axe with this or that person for this or that reason or purpose, but there are also sources who, meaning well originally, may become “misleading” for reasons beyond their control. As a senior reporter with the now defunct Ibadan-based Sketch newspapers, I wrote a story on a parcel of land at Milverton, Ikoyi, Lagos belonging to my native state, Ondo, but which a retired military officer had partially alienated for his personal use.

A highly-placed Ondo State Government official gave me the story, with a pledge to make all relevant documents available. Their intention was that the intruder would cut and run once the matter became public knowledge. I wrote the story; my newspaper published it. The intruder, rather than run, dug in! His lawyers wrote to us, demanding that we retract the story, publish an apology and pay damages! I ran to Akure to collect the documents they had promised. Sorry, they told me: the retired officer had got in touch with the military president who had ordered the military governor to back off! Order from above!

I was stranded! My job was on the line but thank God for native intelligence! I called the man’s lawyer and told him I had a follow-up to my earlier story and I wanted their own side of the story before going to press. I recounted what happened at Akure and told him I had everyone on tape, including the governor and the attorney-general. Everyone would be embarrassed - the military president, the military governor, and the retired military officer himself! It was now their turn to sue for peace!

As editor at the PUNCH newspapers, I encountered similar incidents on a number of occasions: saving my reporters, myself and the newspaper from unpleasant circumstances required God’s benevolence and native intelligence. The “madness” or temporary insanity that grips reporters and editors alike once they think they have a “world exclusive” in their grip and the daily rush to beat deadlines could, once in a while, lead to the “high negligence” which the FirstNews management blamed itself for in this Gbajabiamila saga.

Was it right for Olatunji to have resigned? His letter gave “the stance of the company’s Management” and “the safety of my person and (of) my family” as reasons for his resignation before waxing prophetic: “In no distant time, the truth will come out and, then, it will be my word against theirs…” I salute Olatunji’s courage and sense of professionalism. For a man being owed a whole year’s salary to resign in these harsh economic times takes uncommon courage. When a team loses a critical match, the coach resigns. Brave sailors and pilots prefer to go down with their ship or craft rather than bail out. When the PUNCH newspapers were invaded by military goons during the June 12 struggle, I as the editor walked into the premises to be arrested and detained even though I had the opportunity, like the others, to run away.

In 1984, Tunde Thompson and Nduka Irabor of The Guardian newspaper chose to go to jail rather than disclose their source of information. In 1993, Bayo Onanuga, Dapo Olorunyomi, Babafemi Ojudu, Kunle Ajibade, Seye Kehinde and others founded TheNews. Onanuga, as editor of African Concord magazine, had rejected the promptings of their Publisher, Chief MKO Abiola, to apologize to military president Ibrahim Babangida over the magazine’s story titled “Has Babangida given up?”

For choosing to toe the same line as his illustrious senior colleagues mentioned above, Olatunji may also have etched his own name in gold. As for the authenticity or otherwise of the Gbajabiamila story, “In no distant time”, to quote Olatunji's words, “the truth will come out”!

Last modified on Monday, 13 May 2024 02:47

Nigeria’s sports development suffered a major derailment between 2004 and 2006.

That situation sustains till now, unfortunately.

 
 

This sad state of affairs was created inadvertently by government (the Ministry of Sports) in the process of trying to stop a ‘rebel’ group in Nigerian football that wanted to perpetuate itself in office, and halt government’s seeming control of football leadership in the country.

The product of that ‘confrontation’ created a ‘virus’ that has infected all other sports federations and even the architecture of sports administration in the country.

In short, the struggle for control of the leadership of the Nigeria Football Association during the elections of 2004/2006 is the root cause of the ineffectiveness of essential interventions by the sports ministry since then to stimulate development.

Needless to go into the minute details of that event here even though a brief summary will provide some background to my position.

In 2004 to 2006, the Ministry of Sports was tied in knots. Its power was rendered impotent by Ibrahim Galadima who was drawing power from the Independence clause in the then constitution of the NFA to outlaw any external interference (including by the NFA’s primary funder, the government) in its affairs as a means to reinstating himself as Chairman. With FIFA’s threat dangled over Nigeria’s head should the government interfere, Galadima temporarily had his way, reinstalled himself, but drew government’s ire in the process. That confrontation cost Nigeria a World Cup ticket, and tied down Nigerian football from any major development for the next two years.

No one fights government and wins. Galadima was not going to be an exception.

In order to regain some control, the sports ministry, under the guidance of the most powerful administrator in Nigeria’s sports history at the time, Dr. Amos Adamu, planned and executed a coup d’état. His ‘people’ infiltrated the NFA, got some ‘rebel’ members to force a re-visit of the constitution of the Association, introduced some new strategic political rules, and, aided by Nigeria’s loss of a World Cup qualification with Angola from a misjudgement by Galadima, successfully conducted new elections and removed Galadima.

 

That story will be properly told one day by anyone of Fanny Amun, Amanze Uchegbulam, Abba Yola, Sani Lulu, and so on, all principal actors in that government action.

Unfortunately, although government achieved its objective, it came with a high cost, a massive amendment to the correct structures and constitution of the NFA. With that ‘victory’, government inadvertently created a new knot that the even the government itself has been able to untie since then. The knot became cancerous, spreading to the entire sports apparatus, including the Nigerian Olympic Committee, that prides itself as fully independent of government. That’s the product of applying a purely political pill to cure a technical problem in Nigerian sports.

Since then, from election to election in several sports associations now, the civil courts are being brought into the picture to untie the resultant political knots without much success.

So, returning to the proper order of sports administration since then has become impossible. The strategic ‘illegality’ introduced to oust Galadima has become the norm. Its creator, the federal government, through successive Ministers, has been grappling without success to understand why the Ministry finds it difficult to align its vision with those of sports associations that have become recalcitrant and seemingly untouchable. With the exit of several old staff in the ministry from service the situation gets worse with time.

Elections into the Federation boards have become convoluted, complicated, expensive, political campaigns (even with rallies) and movement of election venues on the basis of political strength, State government funding of particular interests, etc. ‘Wrong’ has now become ‘Right’, with unending crisis. Sports are the worse for it.

 

A body of ‘experts’ set up under the guidance of Amos Adamu, tampered with and re-wrote a new constitution for the Nigerian Football Association in order to achieve the new numbers of delegates that can vote and oust Galadima. The body took a new political route of using the State Sports Associations to carry out the hatchet job.

The State associations were actually non-registered administrative bodies created by States using the National Federation guidelines to conduct football activities at State level. At best, they attended the annual General Assembly meetings of the Nigeria Football Association along with other members, affiliates, stakeholders and even an invited public.

As a group of State associations, they had only one vote in the election of the Chairman of the NFA, like every other member.

In 2006, the State football associations were suddenly empowered to the status of full, independent individual membership of the National Association without any justification other than the optics of being like an arm of the National Association. This move made each of the State associations a full member of the NFA, a member of the General Assembly and a member of the electoral body!

Think of it this way. Each State Coaches Association to become a full member of the NFA. Or the State associations of the Referees.

 

With their new number in the membership of the National Association increased from one (or two, when Secretaries were even admitted into it in another political dispensation) to 37, or 74 at a time, ordinary administrative affiliates, without any business at the national level, became full individual members of the national Federation. They now determined who became the Chairman. They took over the reign of governance and sports development.

They simply used their new numbers to vote out Galadima, and terminated his ambition as well as his regime.

That’s how administrative affiliate bodies became full, individual members of the NFA.

Meanwhile, that whole process of making State Football Associations to become full members was wrong and illegal.

The activities of State sports associations do not go beyond the States. Expanding their status, place and roles as direct, full members of the National Federations was and continues to be the Achilles heel of sports development in Nigeria. It was a grave mistake in the story of sports administration in the country.

 

Simply put, every national sports association (federation) is made up of the following full and independent members (existing, or when they eventually exist):

  1. One rep. of each of the Leagues (any number of them that are registered for competitions)
  2. Rep. of the national body of Coaches
  3. Rep. of the national body of Referees
  4. Rep. of the national body of Schools
  5. Rep. of NAPHER
  6. Rep. of the national body of Football Academies (when they are registered)

Other admissible stakeholders and affiliates are:

A representative of the Ministry of Sports, a representative of the national body of Players, a representative of the national body of State Sports Associations (called Chairman of Chairmen), and one representative of any other stakeholders registered by the federation or recognised.

It is these representatives, all elected by their different constituencies, that shall form the board of the national sports federations and shall from amongst themselves elect a Chairman or President without the shenanigans of political manipulations and brazen illegalities.

The process of electing a Chairman or President will become equitable, inexpensive, without any room for open political manipulations. The constitution must once again be amended to restore order and legality, removing what obviously was constructed to serve a special purpose in 2004 in Port Harcourt. It has served that purpose and must now be discarded.

 

The Minister must be strategic in approaching this subject matter.

Without addressing and solving it, his dreams of advancing the cause of sports will be hinged not on his plans but on the whims of State Sports association chairman that control the levers outside the proper national federations with which his ministry interacts.

My postulation, of course, requires interrogation and careful examination by the Minister for verification of the claims that I make. The Minister should set up a committee to do so immediately, with some time still available before new elections into boards. This way he will avoid the endless cycle of conflicts, and restore justice, equity and order to sports administration and development in Nigeria.

I know I am stirring the hornet’s nest by this piece, but truth must be told, even if nothing will be done!

Last modified on Monday, 13 May 2024 02:57

City FM is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.

Programme: CITY TALKS WITH REUBEN ABATI

Time: 12:00pm

Guest: Mr Johnson Chukwu
(Founder and Managing Director, Cowry Asset Management Limited)

Topic: "Cyber Security Levy: Matters Arising"

Date: 11th May, 2024

Join Zoom Meeting
https://zoom.us/j/92877141732?pwd=VEJWb29OL2VVekZUTHRpdWYxK0xxZz09

Meeting ID: 928 7714 1732
Passcode: 600206

Last modified on Monday, 13 May 2024 02:57

Which one of you started this new campaign of ‘women enslaving men’ again? I have been seeing the articles on different platforms about how women have a playbook on how they will make men become their slaves. And their text is taken from a book called The Manipulated Man written by Esther Vilar in 1971. Yes 1971. Originally written in German and later translated to English. Guys, are we still on this matter? Why are you like this, seriously? 

How are we enslaving you and why do you need a 53 year-old book as reference in the year of our Lord 2024? 

Come on, it is your world and you have run things the way you designed them for centuries.  These are things you have enjoyed tremendously and rubbed women’s faces in. You wanted us in the kitchen, we stayed there.  You wanted us in za ozza room, we stayed there.  You wanted us to be seen and not heard, we obeyed. You wanted many wives and concubines, we bore it all. Did women stop men from doing anything? What exactly are we being blamed for, please?

There is a way men want the world to work and that is the way they have skewed it since the Garden of Eden. They have socialized us poor girls to accept a certain way and we have accepted our lot over the year. For centuries, we have been blamed for everything from how Adam ate the forbidden fruit and why it is Eve’s fault. There is also the unsaid implied thought behind that saying: “behind a successful man is a woman”. Is someone saying Adam had no free will, something that God installed in every human male and female? Adam could have turned down Eve’s offer and gone to the other side of the garden. But nope, he gobbled down the apple, probably stepped it down with very cold water and then blamed Eve for his pleasure.

Why do you guys blame us for your pleasure? Why? You made love to a woman very deeply and passionately for 12 straight months, refusing to wear condom each time, and then it’s the woman’s fault that she’s pregnant. 

A modern man in this age and tech century fills a woman up with millions of his seeds for 52 weeks and then announces like a dumdum: “I’m not ready to be a Father”. “You want to trap me with this pregnancy.”

What did the ‘efulefu’ think he was doing when he was pumping the chick up? Did he think you can delete sperm like you can delete your WhatsApp storage when the phone announces it is dangerously low on space?

Mean men and their pumping skills that they crown with shameless irresponsibility, isn’t that how  they filled the world with single mothers? Please who is enslaving who here? The man who wants skin-to-skin, unhindered access to the woman’s womb but refuses to accept the fruits of his labour when they germinate? Who is the slave? The man who moves on to the next open womb or the depressed woman who has to face the shit and shame of being an unwed mother?

Let’s look at the unsuccessful man and what is behind him. He has a university degree. His wife has one too. They both lose their jobs. She goes to learn cake-making and how to tie gele. He continues to apply for a Nine-to-Five job. She tells him to go learn photography. His eye almost pops out of his socket. His veins threatened to pop. How can you? She faces her new hustles and add event planning. Soon, she has a staff of 10 plus a personal assistant to monitor her commitments. She invites her husband to join in the business. He accuses her of wanting to turn him into her apprentice. Ten years later, she has a clentele list that has First Ladies and blue-chip companies and Oga is still a struggling nine-to-five manager. 

‘She has used his head.’

‘She did not help him.’

‘See what she wears and see the car he drives.’

It’s her fault again. She’s the woman behind the unsuccessful man. Men, why are you like this? She’s now picking bills a man should and would prefer to pick, making her the slave. Yes, yet, we are the ones manipulating you. Please, what’s the colour of your problem?

I just finished reading a story of how men do and undo themselves. Two children had decided to take their mother to a shopping mall in Ibadan on her birthday. Nice kids just wanted to do something for their mother. 

Imagine their shock and pain when they saw their father in the food court buying a meal for another woman on his wife’s birthday? Thank God for level-headed girls. They took their mother elsewhere. Of course, the he-goat Daddy has ruined their mum’s birthday. Would it have killed the man if he had given the wife a treat on her birthday and postpone the side-chick’s outing till the following day? No. He had to hurt her. Do you know any woman who will forget that slight? And what did my friend, Dr. Lasisi Olagunju have to say in defence of his fellow man? He said women like to monitor their husbands like monitoring spirits! I’m yet to recover from his mischievous logic. Anyways, let’s fast forward to 15 years from now. Picture those children in Canada with their mother. They decide to keep her with them so they could take care of her hypertension. 

Daddy of side-chick fame is now in his 70, dodging Okada and goats while he tries to cross the road to buy ‘Ewa Aganyin’. His girlfriend has moved on, he now lives alone. Someone like my friend, Dr. Laz will accuse the children of being mean and their mother of witchcraft.

‘Those children he trained have now abandoned him.’

‘Only his wife is enjoying the fruits of his labour. ‘

So unfair, they want the man to die alone’

Someone rescue me. E gbami o. Did Daddy not know that there’s more to Daddyhood than paying school fees, assuming he actually paid and paid in full? Did nobody tell Daddy that the children were taking judicial notice of how he was maltreating their mother?  Did Daddy Wa not read what I wrote about ‘Amen Junction’ and how men always have the consequences of their actions waiting for them later in life?

Guys, my point is, do not turn things on their heads. Stop quoting from books to manipulate facts. What you buy is what you get. You said you wanted a man’s world, women agreed and all we are doing is living in it with you. Where then is the slavery there?

Last modified on Monday, 13 May 2024 02:56

At the 11th Bola Tinubu Colloquium on March 29, 2019, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, then only a powerful but unofficial pillar of the APC, gave us an ominous presage of his administration that we all either ignored or sniggered at but which is now eerily materializing. 

“If we reduce the purchasing power of the people, we can further slow down the economy," he said to a mysterious ovation from the audience. “Let’s widen the tax net. Those who are not paying now, even if it’s inclusive of Bola Tinubu, let the net get bigger and we take in more taxes. And that is what we must do in the country.”

Many people were genuinely bewildered and wondered what Tinubu meant. I was, too. For one, there is clearly neither economic logic nor even moral merit in reducing the purchasing power of a people, slowing down the economy, and then taxing the same people whose purchasing power has been reduced in a depressed economy. Why would anyone propose that as the anchor of his economic policy?

It’s defensible to suggest the broadening of the tax base of an economy, but not even the most ruthless, unfeeling, sadistic, and misanthropic tyrant would openly advocate the mass pauperization of the people as an economic policy.

 So, many people, including me, concluded that Tinubu merely slipped up. What he meant to say was inconsistent with what he actually said. It was a fair concession. But there was more to the slip-up than many of us cared to accept at the time.

I am a student of Sigmund Freud. I was exposed to his psychoanalysis in my secondary school days by one Steven Omolaiye, a 1984 University of Ibadan sociology graduate, who was the project supervisor of a hospital the European Economic Community built in my hometown. 

He was from Ogori-Magongo in what is now Kogi State. I have no idea where he is now—or if he is even alive—but I first learned about Freudian slip and of Sigmund Freud from him. When I got to Bayero University, Kano, for my undergraduate degree, I read almost every book Freud wrote, even though I was a mass communication student.

I am bringing this up to establish my non-credentialed bona fides to psychoanalyze Tinubu’s 2019 slip-up in light of what his administration is turning out to be. When Tinubu idealized increasing the tax burden of the people at the very moment that their purchasing power is weak and the tempo of the economy is decelerated, he was betraying, without he himself realizing it, a subconscious, deep-seated longing for the sort of invidiously stratified, anti-poor regime he creates and strengthens with every policy.

“From error to error, one discovers the entire truth,” Sigmund Freud once said. In other words, errors in speech and in writing sometimes serve as lenses that help reveal an unconscious, suppressed, or subdued desire or internal thought.

If I had written this in 2019 or, especially, in 2023, I might have been accused of being “sponsored” (everyone who writes what we don’t like is “sponsored” in Nigeria) to undermine Tinubu’s chances at election.

It bears repeating that Tinubu’s first act upon being inaugurated as president was to announce the removal of petrol subsidies which, in one fell swoop, reduced the purchasing power of the people and slowed down the economy in unexampled ways. 

The “floating” of the naira merely strengthened the wickedness that the removal of petrol subsidies unleashed. The astronomical increase in electricity tariffs and the foxy dilly-dallying over increasing the national minimum wage are metaphoric rubbing of salt in the wounds of reduced purchasing power and slow economy, the necessary precursors to Tinubu’s next stage: widening the tax net.

The “next stage” of Tinubu's economic masterplan started in earnest on May 6 when he directed the Central Bank of Nigeria to require banks to assess a 0.05 percent “cybersecurity” fee on every electronic bank transaction—in addition to multiple bank fees that have already made Nigerian banks notorious for being the only banks where you lose money by saving it there.

While I was seething with angst at the unceasingly escalating economic assault on the poor and the weak in Nigeria in the less than one year that Tinubu has been president, I saw a headline in the Daily Trust of May 9 that almost ruined my day and convinced me beyond all shadows of doubt that Tinubu is single-mindedly determined to push through the dystopian economic vision he inadvertently articulated in 2019.

The headline was, “More Burden For Nigerians As Tax Committee Recommends VAT Hike.” The paper reported that “The Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax reforms has recommended an upward review of the Value Added Tax (VAT).” 

Apparently, even the chairman of the committee, identified as Taiwo Oyedele, is aware that there would be an outcry, so he quickly said poor people and small businesses won’t be affected by the proposed increase in VAT. 

 “We would ensure that it doesn’t affect businesses,” he said. “The only thing is to look at basic consumption from food, education, medical services and accommodation will carry zero percent VAT. So for the poor and small businesses, no VAT.”

Of course, even a novice in economics knows that when companies are burdened with higher taxes, they transfer this burden to consumers, which invalidates Oyedele’s assurance that poor people and small businesses would be exempt from the impending VAT hike since inflation, which higher taxes on businesses will activate, is an ill wind that blows nobody any good.

But Oyedele thinks Nigerians are unthinking chumps. He said the government had extracted a commitment from businesses that they won’t jack up the prices of their goods and services in response to the increased tax obligation they will have to contend with. “We have spoken to businesses about it, and they won’t increase the product price,” he said. “We want to make sure when we do VAT reform, no one will increase the price of commodities. We will work the mathematics with the private sector.”

Why does he think Nigerians would be persuaded by his false assurances? When Tinubu announced the removal of petrol subsidies on May 29, 2023, and petrol marketers suddenly increased the pump price of petrol from less than 200 naira to more than 500 naira on old stock that was subsidized by the Nigerian taxpayer, the government didn’t intervene.

It was the most nakedly immoral, government-sanctioned predation of the people that I have seen anywhere in the world. Why would a government that tolerated, even encouraged, that sort of rape of the people be trusted to persuade businesses not to increase the prices of their goods and services in response to increases in their tax liabilities?

In any case, we now know from a retrospective reading of Tinubu’s 2019 speech that his grand plan is to economically disempower the people, depress the economy, and tax people and businesses to death.

 I am honestly at a loss what Tinubu hopes to gain from this other than to make the vast majority of the people so economically disaffiliated that they are vulnerable to manipulation, as I pointed out last week. But I hope he is aware that he is sowing the seeds for a spontaneous eruption of a disabling convulsion. There is a limit to what even the most docile humans can tolerate.

My genuine hope is that Tinubu and the people close to him understand that they are brewing the ingredients of a potentially all-consuming conflagration and beat a strategic retreat. It’s not late.

 
Last modified on Monday, 13 May 2024 03:01

As the Igbo would say, the man who sets out to marry a wife and celebrate his wedding in the Village square while wearing stolen and brightly coloured clothes of another should pray that the owner of the apparel on his back does not turn up in the Village Square while he is rocking his new-found body gear of questionable origins. And this saying has an extension: He who prays that the owner of the stolen clothes he chose to wear to a public event should not attend the event and see him should remember that the village is a small place and that the original owner of the clothes has friends and relations who will carry home a report that would make the thief unable to sleep after close of the day’s business.

But the matter of whether Ohaneze was planning to embark on a begging expedition or not has been laid to rest for good. Just when it was beginning to look like a crescendo was about to be attained by drivers of the campaign of calumny, the project ran out of gas. Untruth may rear its head, and even display some bright colours you cannot ignore, but it can never last long enough to challenge the truth. The mischief makers who tried to float the totally reprehensible narrative lost out in the end. But there is still the after-smell of un-sanctity in the air. No matter.

In reaction to the shocking tale of beggary, the President-general of Ohaneze and the organization’s Secretary General rolled out the tanks of public discourse and drowned out the ridiculous, but viral, claim that the organization came up with the had the hare-brained idea going on some kind of begging expedition to the northern part of the country. To begin with, there was nothing remotely resembling that thought in the two-day Ohaneze retreat where the idea was alleged to have sprouted.

I was at the event. I was also the Lead Speaker at the retreat held in Enugu. My presentation, and other presentations, were focused on new paradigms for Igbo self-actualization in the nation that essentially undergirded by a conspiratorial, and not openly and freely competitive, political economy. It was a soul-searching and truth telling outing. The ensuing Communique spoke to the issues discussed, as well as the new programmes and focal concerns of Ohaneze Ndigbo, Worldwide. So where did the tale of begging and supplication come into it?

Ohaneze, and Ndigbo generally, had a chance to “beg” the North or, more specifically, the Fulani, for support about a year ago. That was before the Last presidential elections, when Peter Obi was a candidate. They did not such thing. Instead, a meeting was called some five months before the elections between the South East Elders Forum and the Northern Welders Forum. In attendance covered the confederacy of all otherwise distinct platforms from both parts of the country, all with a common interest on the issues the coming elections were likely to put   the table.

Prof Ango Abdullahi led the Northern team, while the South east team was led by Chief Simon Okeke, for Chairman of the Police service Commission (PSS) and Chairman of the Anambra Public Officers and Elders Forum (ASPOF). The atmosphere was sombre. The air was charged with barely concealed expectations of horse-trading proposals, since it was a question of an election wherein the highest position in the land was being sought by an Igbo man.

There was a smell of “What is in it for us” in the air. So, it was for the South East Elders Forum to “Make their case” and convince their counterparts that a Peter Obi Gamble was worth their while. The Northern Elder presented Dr Hakeem Baba Ahmed as spokesman, while the South East Elders presented Prof Okey Ikechukwu, mni, as spokesman. And so, Ikechukwu was invited to address the Northern elders after the leaders of the two teams had put forth their opening pleasantries.

As one of the very highly respected and also very old Northern Elders later quipped, after the three-hour interaction and exchanges, “We did not see it coming at all. That your Ikechukwu just compelled some of us to thinks about things we probably have bever adverted my mind to in the politics of the momen”. So, what really happened?

As the designate spokesperson for our own side of the table, I started by saying that we had come with a central message; which is captured in the statement: “Come let us reason together”. I said the we had not come to beg them to vote for Mr. Peter Obi, or to ask them to support our son and brother, no. Instead, had come to compare notes with them, on the good product that Nigeria needed a tthat historical hour.

I pointed out that Obi’s choice of their son and brother as running mate was based on his assessment of the latter, as enlightened, successful, and hands-on manager of human and material resources. Obi chose one of their best, who, in addition to being broad-minded, was also known for his substantial, and sustained, investments in human capital development. So, let us reason together, with these questions in mind: (1) “What  sort of leadership and navigational skills do we need to save Nigeria. (2) What type of person can deliver on this, and is Peter Obi, alongside his running mate, the type of team that dan do this job well?

Then came my clincher: “Gentlemen and elders, what every one of us here has in common is that we have all the attributes of people who can be kidnapped for ransom. are prime targets for kidnappers. That is not to say that we are wealthy by any stretch of the imagination in the conventional sense of Nigerians who can routinely sign off millions of naira, or eve n dollars, without blinking; no”!

I pointed out that we all came in more than passably clean air-conditioned vehicles; all in relatively good condition. We all look a little less harassed and less desperately hungry than the average person out there. So, anyone seeing us, and who has caught unto the new-fangle trade of capturing human beings in order to release them again after being paid, will see a potential product he can secure and use to make money”. Everywhere was dead quiet.

I continued: “No bandit, kidnapper or terrorist who accosts any of us on the road will first try to find out who we are, how good or bad we are and whether we are doing our best for humanity and for our fatherland. We would all be just, “ransom-able commodity” and nothing more. Professor, Imam, Senator, Senior military officer, students, name is!

Turning to the Prof Abdulahi, I said: “Recall, sir, that your son was one of the unfortunates of the Kaduna-bound train mishap. Fortunately, no stray bullet found him. But unfortunately, he was taken captive alongside everyone else they people could get hold of after derailing the train and killing some of the passengers. The young man’s identity as your son your son did not make any difference to them, or to anyone for that matter. No! with all the sacrifice you and many other people have made over the last 50 years?

I spoke if the demand for ransom and of the fact that the criminals held unto the young man until the full ransom was fully paid. Shortly thereafter, an incident involving the kidnap of another of your relations, this time with four of your beloved grand children in tow, was reported. It was all Ango Abdullahi’s problem while it lasted.

“The concern for us at the South East Elders Forum had more to do with a desperate need to rescue even our humanity as a people, in addition to all the hullabaloo about elections and positions after the elections. The coming elections, we held, must be sued as a tool for the restoration of the people-centred leadership ideals that characterized the era of the Ahmadu Bellos, Ziks, Awolowos, and so many others of that era.

I reminded us of the circumstances under which Prof Onyemelukwe lost his life in Anambra State, at the age of 84. He was accosted on the road by armed young men. Then they discovered that he was a saboteur working with the Fulanis in Nigeria against Igbo interests. Yes! And they had clear evidence and proof of his treachery before their very eyes. They also told him about this evidence and proof before they shot him. Guess what proof of his treachery and betrayal of Ndigbo they had against him? The 84-year-old man was wearing a caftan. That was all. He had to be executed for wearing Fulani dress in Biafra Land. That was the end of a great scholar of international repute and community leader.

Traditional rulers hitherto thought to be untouchable in various parts of the country are now routinely picked off their royal stool in their kingdoms and emirates like hapless chickens I nan exposed cage. Alongside the foregoing several other issues that were discussed in confidence on both sides.

Baba Ahmed was at his eloquent, and also very realistic best when it was his turn to speak for his side of the table. He raised all the relevant issues, forever focusing on the things that mattered the most. There was neither begging nor demand for begging. The gathering did not query, or try to impugn, the reputation or aspirations of other candidates besides the ones we had on the table at our meeting.

Then the meeting rose, agreeing embark of serious group reflections and introspection, and to reconvene soon thereafter to determine next steps. It was about Nigeria, about or physical, economic, political and moral survival as a people facing common problems that we needed to “reason together” and chart a way forward.

Imagine if a man who, as Vice chancellor of Ahmadu Bello university, did so much to fast-track tertiary education for Northerners were to lose his son to criminals at whose current means of livelihood is the fact that they had no education and no socially useful survival skills. The north stood by and Ango’s son was held captive for months. Just as the East watched the husband of Dora Akunyili bumped off in broad daylight by gunmen.

Going back to the matter of whether Ohaneze was planning to beg anyone or not, ”Untruth may rear its head, and even display some bright colours you cannot ignore. But it can never last long enough to challenge and permanently displace the truth”. Begging? I beg your pardon!

Last modified on Monday, 13 May 2024 03:01

Nimbo community in Uzo-Uwani Local Government Area of Enugu State has become a metaphor for the dastardly actions of suspected Fulani herdsmen who have terrorised it for decades. At night and in broad daylight, innocent men, women and children of the community are gruesomely murdered by the marauders who desire their homeland for grazing their cattle. 

The beautiful grassland have been turned to killing fields and the people who try to resist the take-over of their ancestral homelands have become the guinea-pigs in a chilling experiment in forceful land grab. 

Penultimate Sunday, the marauders who have encircled the community and set up camps in the deep forests, paid one more visit to the community and as usual, left behind sorrows, tears and blood. Not only were four members of the community slaughtered like rams, most of the inhabitants of the village have now been forced to desert their homes and run for dear lives.

For long, Nimbo has not known peace. Everyone who has lived there in the past 2 decades has somehow learnt how to sleep with only one eye closed. Their land is fertile and they are preponderantly farmers; they pride their community as Enugu State’s food basket. But the vast farmlands have been targeted by herdsmen who crave it, instead, for their cattle. 

The gruesome event of penultimate Sunday was not the first of that magnitude but it caught national attention because of its similarity with the carnage of April 2016. Exactly eight years ago, they had attacked the villagers at night, killed many and set scores of houses ablaze. 

 

Gov. Peter Mbah of Enugu State

Governor Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi, barely a year in office, had promptly visited the traumatised community. He came face to face with the wounded, the bereaved and saw the wreckage of burnt homes. The village was empty, save for the frightened few who sneaked in from nearby communities to receive him. 

The visit was going well as the governor took in the carnage and empathised with the people, until he was overtaken by emotion. He bowed his head at one point and shed a few tears. The crying drama earned him much criticism: of what use are tears to the villagers who expected their governor to stand strong with them? 

But there was a heartbreaking side to why the governor broke down in tears. A few days before the killings, he had received security reports about a possible attack on Nimbo but at the State Security Council meeting which he summoned to discuss it, he was assured by the Commissioner of Police that the situation was under control.  He was assured that the Area Commander of the State Anti-Robbery Squad was on ground in Nimbo. Sadly, in the early hours of the next Monday, reports of the carnage reached him. He was totally let down.

Ugwuanyi picked courage after the visit, and issued the usual threat to bring the perpetrators of the carnage to justice and take measures to strengthen security structures that would endure. For whatever it was worth, the people heaved a sigh of relief. 

Nimbo and the larger Uzo-Uwani area remained the same. In fact, the herdsmen have since become more brazen in their attacks and the people’s misery has increased.The killings and displacement have continued with impunity and many more people have been killed, some in their farmlands, while a large number of their homes have been torched. 

Sadly, not much was done to prevent a repeat. The Commission of Inquiry set up by the administration only scratched the surface; if it made any far-reaching recommendations at all, they only probably exist somewhere in the books. 

A community on the state’s borderline, Nimbo has largely remained forgotten, attracting the attention of government for the wrong reasons. While the people lament the lack of government attention by way of projects and facilities, their sons and daughters are not integrated into government by way of political positions. They have long concluded that they are abandoned to their fate.

Last week, it was at Ugwuijoro that the terrorists struck. The villagers had gathered to mourn their dead and deep into the obsequies, the gunmen wielding sophisticated weapons, struck. The unsuspecting villagers were easily overpowered and by the time their operation was over, four men lay dead with many more seriously wounded. 

Those killed, according to reports, are Okeh Simon Ugwu Oruku, Okeh Chukwuebuka, Julius Ogbonna Odiegwu and Gabriel Ugwor Ezea. Those who could afford to run, abandoned their homes for fear of more attacks. 

The following day, a Monday, Governor Peter Mbah of Enugu State did what his predecessor did exactly eight years earlier, minus the tears. He paid a visit to the community within 24 hours and repeated the usual condemnation  of the people who have taken the indigene’s open arms of welcome for granted. He announced a scholarship programme for children whose parents were killed during the attack, promised that the marauders would be brought to justice and to ensure stronger protection for the people. 

Whether the people believed him is another matter, considering how previous promises turned out to be meaningless. 

The strong police presence Ugwuanyi promised eight years ago is not there. The influx of strange faces with trailer-loads of cattle has continued on a daily basis in spite of the promise of monitoring activities in the forests. It has been easy for the herdsmen who had reinforced in nearby forests around Adani, Opanda and Ugboda, all within Uzo-Uwani Local Government Area, to consistently attack and overwhelm the unsuspecting locals.

They have largely succeeded in terrorising the villagers because government at state and federal levels that should guarantee their safety, chose to handle the terrorists with kid gloves. Some locals even accuse the federal forces of complicity while much has not come from the state government, beyond the occasional treats against forceful take-over of community land by herdsmen. 

The ceaseless attacks on Nimbo and the deaths of the innocent villagers send a strong signal across Enugu State that government has failed to guarantee the people’s safety. It tests the resolve of the government to deal with the criminals who are sworn to forcefully annex that juicy swath of Igboland. If enough, truly, is enough, as the Governor Peter Mbah declared after visiting the crime scene,  he should go beyond platitudes and give the people reason to live safely and peacefully in their ancestral homes.

Last modified on Monday, 13 May 2024 03:01

Our environment is undoubtedly fouled up. The physical is there for whoever cares to see. Of course, there are a great many who do not see and, therefore, do not care while there are those who see but do not care; they cannot be bothered. The inconveniences they may have caused to their fellowmen, what diseases may have issued from filth to threaten their compatriots resulting from their attitudes do not move them. Chambers 21st Century Dictionary defines environment as “the surroundings or conditions within which something or someone exists.” Thus we talk of the business environment; we talk about the economic as well as political environment. So is it that we also speak of cultural environment, school environment, or social environment. An environment can be hostile. On the other hand, it can be peaceful, harmonious, and uplifting. The dictionary even goes further, saying the environment could be external: “the combination of external conditions that surround and influence a living organism.” It is not infrequent that some people speak of the professional environment. The environment comes under the all-encompassing tangibility and the intangibility, either with waves of influence, the former assailing our eyes and the latter our feelings and sense of well-being if it is disagreeable.

Governments at different tiers make laws and bylaws to regulate the environment to make it beautiful, enchanting, and welcoming for the overall well-being of the citizenry. Consider heaps of refuse or gutters not cleared. These make for ugliness, an eyesore, and an incubating shelter for diseases. The gutters soon begin to send out a disgusting stench. Think of the great harm and destruction to life and property that unconscionable blockage of waterways and flood-control channels can inflict on the generality of the populace. Water whose pathway is blocked will always find its way. To avert widespread disaster, affecting even the unsuspecting members of the community, the decisive action of a government especially in flood-prone terrain becomes a blessing in disguise to the society as a whole.
A conducive environment by way of law and order triggers business or investment instincts and confidence. These make for economic development and the social well-being of a people. But there is more to the environment. It encompasses the wider unseen world with by far greater influence on our earthly existence and in our lives later in the Beyond, in the ethereal world. What our state here on earth, hardly realised, is moulded in the world unseen. It is, therefore, often stated that it is the environment that moulds the man and that man is a product of his environment, his fortune or misfortune, his experiences et al. The influence the environment impacts, it is argued, is such that the fate of a man is as sanctioned by the conditions of his environment. In the enlightenment of these times, we now know that this settled notion is erroneous. In other words, the station or situation in which a man may find himself is arbitrary and it is not so. It is similar to the “mystery” surrounding why good people suffer and why manifestly evil men prosper! Why should a good man be born in abject poverty and a wicked man into opulence? This is a thought we human beings have grappled with for thousands of years. They are questions for which strenuous efforts have been made in the search for answers.

The questioning has arisen from a lack of understanding of man himself and more importantly mankind’s perception of God and His Nature. The result is that there is a wrong image of God the Almighty Father. He is often reduced to the level of an earthly King, or at most the King up there a few miles above the clouds, overlooking every human being and every creature. He is so placed to be able to read everybody’s mind. What we must recognise is that The Almighty in His Omnipotence is infinitely and inconceivably greater than that. We must get it clear that arbitrariness is impossible in the ways of the Creator, the Almighty. It is His Wisdom that rules the world. It is the Wisdom manifesting in the Creation- Laws which He uses as mechanisms to govern His Creation. Consider it if it were not so: The incomprehensive and inconceivable vastness of Creation alone, the seven universes in the material world, that is the World of Gross Matter which abuts the Creation proper separated by a ring of the Animistic where animals have their origin. The Creation proper is where the Paradise of we human beings is. Consider the billion galaxies in our universe called Ephesus. The earth is only a planet in our solar system anchored around the sun. The sun itself is only one of billions of stars in our galaxy, the Milky Way. Each of the seven universes has its own solar systems and galaxies and each solar system and galaxy with its own planet—all Creation in living activities, working and weaving, and weaving and surging, and sparkling, energy fields far away from and to regions incomprehensible to human reasoning, and immeasurable.

It is little known that the Ethereal World which is the Beyond is by far bigger than our earth. It is vastly populated in its own different planes by human spirits still developing or trapped by errors and misconceptions as well as wrong teachings spread while on earth. These are different from multitudes in the Dark Region. On earth today, the population is said to be about 7.8 billion human beings. How is God Almighty to deal with every individual on earth and those struggling to shrug off the burden of their guilt if he were to relate to us in the manner as is generally believed? Scant attention is paid to neither His Omnipotence nor His Omnipresence, both attributes of the Creator which are least understood. It is knowledge and understanding of His Wisdom expressed in the Laws, the principles that reveal how sublime His Ways are and how unrelenting, ceaseless, immutable and just the mechanisms that govern life are.

With the understanding of the mechanisms, that is the Creation/Divine Laws, it will be seen that it is man who forms his environment. He is the architect of his own fortune. He forms his environment with radiation threads he supplies for weaving at the loom of life manned by the Nature Beings–where they are at work. The radiations flow from his thought volition, speeches, or actions in the exercise of his free will, asserting his freedom of thought, freedom of speech, and action. Man in the exercise of his free will is free to think and choose. Didn’t the Lord Christ say that it is not what goeth into a man’s mouth but what cometh out of it that defileth a man? However, he bears spiritual responsibility for what he thinks or does. Thoughts may be unseen, speeches could be heard and actions seen or felt. Laws govern the whole of Creation. In the knowledge mediated to man today, we are permitted to recognise the fact that these Laws are perfect, uniform, immutable, and self-acting not just in the whole of Creation but in the activities therein as well. The Laws which govern by extension a man’s placement, whether the choice of family or social relationship are the Laws of Attraction of Homogeneous Species, the Law of Reciprocal Action, the Law of Spiritual Gravitation, and the Law of the Cycle. These constitute the manual of Creation as they are the expression of the Will of God Almighty.

The manual of any product is produced by the manufacturer. For a pilot and flight captain of an aircraft to fly their aircraft successfully and safely, they must be conversant with the manual of the model of their aircraft and abide by it, its content, and the direction it gives. It is the same with automobiles. The manual for a car tells us about tyre gauge, oil gauge, water gauge, speedometer, and when to change accessories. The car guarantees safety and gives pleasure and joy to him who is familiar with the manual. The Almighty Creator is the Author of Creation’s manual. Those who sojourn under the folds of His Creation have the bounden duty to be familiar with this manual so they do not constitute a hindrance and nuisance to the harmonious working of Creation. Legislators give expression to the will of their constituents through laws. With all the mechanisms in place, living and self-acting, indeed self-policing, the Almighty does not need to directly intervene in the cares of men and world conditions. These are left to the living and incorruptible mechanisms of life, the outworking of the Holy Spirit, the Creative Will and Justice of God personified, the eternal Mediator.

A set of Nature Beings weave the ethereal radiation threads from thoughts into forms in accordance with the contents of the thoughts so issued. Another set does the same with the radiations that stream out of speeches. Ethereal waves go out of actions and are woven into forms. These forms bear energies within them and through the Law of Similarity and Like attracting Like, they attract similar thought forms from any part of the world. The thoughts are thereby reinforced and they form power centres. All the forms are firmly linked with the author of the deeds, thoughts, speeches, or actions. They are seeds in the soil of life. When they have gone through maturation processes like the seed of any plant, the fruits ripen for harvest by the sower. The harvest can be in the form of a darkened environment around the sower.

The forms and power centres are not necessarily those of evil alone. There are power centres from where blessings flow as well. Good seeds will produce good fruits. As such returns from the power centre that consists of goodness form light environment around the sower and he feels light and glows. He knows joy and happiness, peace and harmony. He senses some wholesomeness in Creation. Thus, in the words of Herbert Vollmann in his The Gate Opens: “The environment does not form and mould man, but man forms the environment, in that his nature attracts other homogeneous kinds or is attracted by these, as with incarnation. Thus he creates for himself that environment in which he lives, with which he associates or ‘keeps company’. Hence the saying: ‘A man is known by the company he keeps.’ We could also say that our environment is our mirror image!

However, the ethereal environment has been darkened and is now full of filth because evil is more prevalent in countries and the world in general as of these times. What with the devastation, mindless killings, and destruction of properties in the Russia-Ukraine War and the Hamas-Israeli War! The bloody conflict in Sudan counts as part of the evil sweeping through the world for which there will be dire consequences for the perpetrators in another earthlife. What with the air of forebodement resulting from the unabating insecurity challenges in Nigeria: banditry, kidnappings, and killings!

Because of the pressure of the Light through the Power of the Holy Spirit, power sweeping through all lands, in the proverbial End -Time that has already descended on the earth, there is intensification and acceleration of events and closing of cycles—the end going back to the beginning and therewith the ripening of fruits, and harvesting. The darkened environment is laden with tribulations and misery as consequences of wrong actions, the breach of the incorruptible Laws. Today, the animated darkened environment is pushing for manifestation in all parts of the world. Intuitive perception which is the infallible guide for man is masked resulting in the collapse of values and high-mindedness. We are told that mankind is at the moment living in a time of the Cosmic Turning Point, the last Turning point when our universe, Ephesus, is moving to the last phase! It is a phase of compulsion to knowledge invoked by unbelievably harrowing experiences; a phase where negligence and carelessness will avenge themselves bitterly. Only goodness as a way of life and purity of thoughts can reverse the darkening of the environment and the impending doom.

Last modified on Monday, 13 May 2024 03:12

Africa is always in perpetual struggle for survival. It is the world’s second largest and second-most populous continent after Asia, but its past and future always seem to be in constant collision. In the past, our forebears confronted slavery, enslavement and colonialization, and this gave birth to pan Africanism. Now, the continent is at the crossroads of historical occurrences. The clash of civilizations between Islamic fundamentalists and the West; the fight for geopolitical dominance between China and the US; the breakout of war in Europe for the first time since the end of the Second World War and the growing wealth gap between the global north and global south are some of the forces that African leaders have to deal with to chart the continent’s socioeconomic direction in the coming decades.

Africa is also facing what appears to be another round of colonialism characterized by massive exploitation of its natural resources by agents of foreign countries notably, China and Russia. Illegal mining of natural resources in many African countries, including Nigeria, DRC, Niger Republic, Chad and many others are the major causes of insecurity, violence and poverty. A new wave of migrant from the continent pours into Europe and America every day. Without a doubt, our continent remains the most exploited continent in the world. In the welter of all these, the continent suffers from incompetent, corrupt and weak leadership.

Worried by the fate of their continent, a group of African academics, professionals and civic society activists have come together in search of a new generation of pan Africanists who will save their continent from collapse. Although Pan Africanism was born in the struggles of African people against enslavement and colonization, and this struggle goes back to the rebellions on the slave ships and plantations across the West, the new generation of pan Africanists are fighting at intellectual level, trying to decolonize the minds of Africans. They have established an organization known as The Pan African Dialogue Institute (TPADI). It was conceived in 2016 by a couple of African academics and professionals led by Nigeria’s Dr. Effiong Udo of the University of Uyo and Prof. Mutombo Nkulu-N’Sengha, a US citizen originally from the Democratic Republic of Congo. TPADI is headquartered in the University of Uyo. Dr. Udo has unfathomable passion for pan Africanism. I caught up with him in his office at the University of Uyo last week as he was preparing for hosting an international conference on Dialogue and Pan Africanism.

 TPADI, he says, is a network of academics, professionals, civil society and grassroot leaders in different fields of life, within Africa and the diaspora, who are motivated by the best principles of Pan Africanism to serve the continent and its people worldwide. It is a civil society think tank for the study, practice and propagation of Pan-Africanism. Its programs and activities revolve around three thematic areas: education, policy and projects. On education, the institute hopes to create programs to educate ourselves, all Africans and other interested persons in Pan-Africanism. It offers certificate, executive and postgraduate programs in Pan-Africanism and create public awareness through seminars, workshops, webinars and convoke cultural events and academic conferences on dialogue and Pan-Africanism. On policy, it engages in local, continental, and global policy analysis, formulation and advocacy, within the threshold of Pan-Africanism. The aim is to inform and advise stakeholders and decision-makers on resolving African problems with African solutions.

 On projects, TPADI conducts needs assessment to identify, design and implement projects to build and advance the living conditions of African communities and empower our peoples. ‘’Our educational, policy and project engagements intersect under social, economic, political, religious and cultural issues, as well as scientific, environmental, educational, legal, gender and business domains’’, he said, gesticulating frantically. ‘’This is why we have 10 dialogue commissions who regularly engage with these issues. So far, we have members from 22 African countries. Some of them are based in the Americas, Europe and United Kingdom’’. Dr. Udo said he was inspired into Pan-Africanism when he attended a program at the University of California in 2016 and had to team up with many Africans in diaspora on a research program. ‘’The experience opened my eyes to what is wrong with Africa and the fact that it is only Africans that can create African solutions to our problems’’, he told me.

Pan Africanism emerged as a response to the long history of the indignities of colonization, enslavement, and systemic oppression and exploitation faced by African people across the globe. The African Union defines Pan-Africanism as: “… an ideology and movement that encourages the solidarity of Africans worldwide. It is based on the belief that unity is vital to economic, social and political progress and aims to ‘unify and uplift’ people of African descent. The ideology asserts that the fates of all African peoples and countries are intertwined. At its core, Pan-Africanism is “a belief that African peoples both on the continent and in the diaspora, share not merely a common history, but a common destiny.” From the early days of Pan Africanism till today, the advocacy for the unity, solidarity, and empowerment of people of African descent worldwide continues to be a potent force driving discussions on identity, liberation, and socio-political progress of the continent and its people.

The Pan African Dialogue Institute (TPADI), according to Dr. Udo, is therefore established to pursue the decolonization of the mind through education, policy analysis, policy building and advocacy around multi-faceted issues within the threshold of Pan-African principles. He said, ‘’Our job is to inspire excellence and best practices in Pan Africanism, promote African values of community, hospitality, respect for human and environmental dignity, unity in diversity, love and solidarity with all, as encapsulated in the Ubuntu philosophy. We are seeking to reverse the mentality that Africans are not capable of helping themselves and solving their problems’’.

‘’We want to reverse that culture of dependency on external assistance that unfortunately still prevails on the continent. If people become too reliant on getting their support, their nourishment and their safety from outside sources, they do not strive to find the power within themselves to rely on their own capacities. Pan Africanism calls upon Africans to drawn on their own strengths and capacities and become self-reliant. Again, we are seeking to celebrate our Africanness, the unity, resilience and collective identity as Africans. And, we want to achieve all these by using dialogue and collaboration among individuals, communities, institutions and nations’’, he said.

The institute is marking the 2024 International Africa Day with pomp and pageantry. Nigeria is among the multitude of African countries that have never celebrated Africa Day which is May 25. It was on May 25, 1963, that leaders of the then 32 independent African States signed a founding charter in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, which brought the Organization of African Unity into existence. In 2002, the OAU established its own successor, the African Union, and adopted May 25 every year as a day to celebrate Africa and highlight the continent’s continued struggle against neocolonialism, exploitation and adversity. Surprisingly, ever since the day was declared, only nine African countries (The Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Lesotho, Mali, Mauritania, Zambia and Zimbabwe) are known to observe May 25 as public holiday with celebrations. The other 46 countries, including Nigeria are less aware of this very important day. By marking the day with many festivities next week, TPADI is has made Nigeria join the other nine countries to celebrate Africa Day for the first time ever.

‘’Our institute will be formally launched on May 25 in a grand ceremony at the University of Uyo with former President Goodluck Jonathan as the chairman of the occasion. Akwa Ibom State Governor, Pastor Umo Eno, the Vice Chancellor of the University of Uyo, Prof. Ndaeyo and hundreds of distinguished personalities from Nigeria and outside the country will be present. Gov. Umo Eno will lay the foundation for the International Headquarters of the Institute at the University. There will be speeches, fairs, cultural displays and other events on the Africa Day’’, Udo enthused. Between May 23 and 26, 2024, the institute will host the first international conference on “Dialogue and Pan Africanism’’. The conference is held in collaboration with Centre for Deep Dialogue and Critical Thinking, Directorate of International Programmes and faculties of Arts, Law, Social Sciences, and Communication and Media Studies of the University of Uyo.

Already, Professor P.L.O Lumumba has confirmed his participation as the keynote speaker at the conference, while plenary speakers will include Prof. Wole Soyinka; Prof. Mutombo Nkulu-N’Sengha (DR Congo/USA), Prof. Mary Nyangweso (Kenya/USA), Prof. Emmanuel Akpabio (Nigeria), Amb. Daniel Guttierez (Rep. of Belize), Prof. Joseph Ushie (Nigeria), Dr. Donatus Ukpong (Nigeria), Prof. Chris Ekong (Nigeria), Prof. Peter Esu (Nigeria), Dr. Jean-Louis Ikambana (USA), Prof. Aniekan Brown (Nigeria), Prof. Mojisola Iseyin (Nigeria), Prof. Gabriel Umoh (Nigeria), Dr. Ubong Essien Umoh (Nigeria), among others. The conference seeks to provide informed Pan-Africanist perspectives on a wide range of issues affecting Africa and its people everywhere in the world. Presenters are expected to explore the trajectories of development in the continent from the lens of Pan-Africanism. They will probe the different approaches, theories, philosophies or ideologies that have been adopted at community, national and continental levels by key players to drive developmental efforts.

Last modified on Monday, 13 May 2024 03:15