Nigeria’s judiciary is teetering on the brink of a catastrophic crisis, its credibility and independence hanging by a thread. For the first time in the nation’s history, two female judicial leaders—Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun and President of the Court of Appeal Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem—are at the center of intense national and international scrutiny. Their perceived failure to shield the judiciary from political interference has cast a dark cloud over their leadership and placed the entire judicial system in jeopardy. With over 25 politically charged cases tied to Rivers State and the aggressive maneuvers of Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister Nyesom Wike, the integrity of Nigeria’s courts is precariously close to collapse.

The Looming Danger of Judicial Missteps

Rivers State has become the epicenter of a looming national crisis, its stability threatened by Wike’s relentless bid to maintain control at any cost. Masquerading as legal battles, these cases are part of a calculated strategy to destabilize his successor, Governor SiminalayiFubara, and reassert dominance over the political landscape of Rivers State.

This deluge of politically motivated cases, many filed outside Rivers State in Abuja courts, paints a troubling picture of judicial manipulation. Under Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun and Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem, the judiciary is increasingly perceived as a willing accomplice in this power struggle, raising questions about its role as an impartial arbiter of justice.

Judges operating within this system must confront some hard truths: Why has one man, Nyesom Wike, managed to hijack judicial processes? Why are courts inundated with cases that appear more about political vendettas than the pursuit of justice? The judiciary, once regarded as the last hope of the common man, is dangerously close to being weaponized for political warfare.

The fallout from this judicial entanglement is not just a domestic embarrassment but a global concern. Nigeria’s judiciary, led by two of its most prominent female leaders, now stands accused of enabling a political scheme that threatens to erode public trust, destabilize Rivers State, and set a dangerous precedent for judicial complicity in political power plays. The stakes could not be higher, and the consequences of inaction are too dire to ignore.

A Judiciary Under Siege

Wike’s strategic moves—including constructing court buildings, hosting ceremonies, and providing housing for judges—have placed the judiciary in an ethically precarious position. These actions, though veiled in benevolence, carry the sinister undertone of creating indebtedness. Judges must remember their loyalty is to the constitution and the law, not to political actors or their extravagant gestures. Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun and Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem must break this cycle of entanglement and reclaim the judiciary’s dignity.

The Courts Are Not INEC: A Judiciary at Risk

The judiciary is not, and should never be, an extension of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). Its mandate is to uphold the law impartially and serve as the cornerstone of justice and democracy. However, under the leadership of two women—Chief Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun and Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem—the judiciary’s credibility and independence are under serious threat. This perception has fostered a troubling erosion—of integrity, independence, and, most alarmingly, public trust.

While there are undoubtedly judges within the court system led by these two women who remain committed to delivering impartial justice, the overall atmosphere of the judiciary, especially in the eyes of Nigerians and the international community, has become deeply troubling and shaming. The institution once seen as the last hope of the common man is now mired in accusations of complicity in political gamesmanship.

How Have These Two Women Allowed This Decline?

The judiciary, once revered as a symbol of fairness and impartiality, now finds itself entangled in controversy. These two women, entrusted with safeguarding the independence of the courts, stand accused of failing to shield the judiciary from the clutches of political actors like Nyesom Wike. Wike’s calculated use of the courts to maintain dominance in Rivers State and undermine his successor has cast a long shadow over the judiciary’s ability to act independently.

This association—whether through attendance at politically charged events or rulings perceived as partisan—has only deepened suspicions about the judiciary’s neutrality. What was once an institution held in the highest regard is now viewed as a participant in political schemes rather than a bastion of justice.

A Call for the Two Women to Restore Judicial Integrity

For the judiciary to reclaim its lost integrity, these two women must take decisive action to draw a firm line between the courts and political interference. Justice Kekere-Ekun and Justice Dongban-Mensem must lead by example, steering the judiciary back to its role as an impartial and independent institution.

The world is watching, and Nigerians are demanding accountability. The failure of these two women to act decisively will not only tarnish their legacies but will also threaten the nation’s democratic institutions and further alienate an already disillusioned public. Justice must not only be done but be seen to be done, and it is their responsibility to ensure the judiciary rises above this troubling period to restore trust and confidence in the courts.

The Atmosphere of Judicial Compromise

The global and national perception of Nigeria’s judiciary is increasingly one of compromise. With over 25 politically motivated cases linked to Wike’s faction flooding the courts, the judicial system appears vulnerable to manipulation. Judges within this system are now faced with decisions that could either restore the public’s faith or deepen the narrative of judicial partiality. Yet, the visible entanglement of the judiciary’s leaders in politically charged events, coupled with rulings that seem to favor Wike’s faction, continues to erode its integrity.

This atmosphere of judicial compromise is not only shaming but also dangerous. It signals to the world that Nigeria’s judiciary is no longer above the fray, that it has been dragged into the messy and divisive politics of power. This perception damages the nation’s democratic standing and invites scrutiny from international observers who are closely watching these developments.

The Weight of Leadership

Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun and Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem bear the heavy burden of safeguarding judicial independence, but they have failed woefully. Their reckless decision to attend political and celebratory events hosted by Nyesom Wike—whose cases could land in their courts—has not only shattered the judiciary’s credibility but cast a dark shadow over every judge under their leadership.

These two women have placed even the most honorable judges in a position of uncertainty, forcing good judges and magistrates to work within a judiciary increasingly seen as compromised. Former President Obasanjo’s scathing critique of a ‘captured judiciary’ is a damning reflection of their leadership. If they fail to change course, they will forever be remembered as the architects of Nigeria’s judicial collapse.

Nigerians and the international community are watching. The judiciary cannot afford to continue down this path of perceived compromise. Its leaders must act decisively to reaffirm the independence of the courts, ensuring that justice is not only done but seen to be done. Anything less would be a betrayal of the judiciary’s sacred role in upholding the law and protecting democracy.

Rivers State: The Spark for National Unrest

The situation in Rivers State transcends political disputes; it is now a flashpoint for potential national chaos. If rulings from the appeals court or Supreme Court appear to favor Wike’s side, they will be seen as judicial complicity in his relentless pursuit of power. This perception could trigger unrest reminiscent of Nigeria’s darkest periods.

The controversial ruling barring Rivers State from receiving allocations exemplifies this growing public anger. This decision, widely criticized, is seen not as a punishment of the state government but of the citizens themselves. Such rulings deepen resentment, spark outrage, and fuel the narrative of a judiciary that has lost its way. The public will not blame Wike or President Tinubu for the resulting chaos—they will squarely blame these two female judicial leaders for failing to act decisively to protect the integrity of the courts.

A National Embarrassment

The conduct of the judiciary under Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun and Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem is rapidly becoming a national embarrassment. Their perceived complicity in politically charged events and rulings that favor Wike’s faction tarnishes the judiciary’s image. How have Nigeria’s most respected judicial offices become synonymous with partisanship and manipulation? How have they fallen so far from their sacred duty to be impartial arbiters of justice?

The world is watching, and Nigeria’s judiciary is now under a microscope. The consequences of inaction are dire—a collapse of public trust, the erosion of democratic values, and a potential descent into widespread unrest, beginning in Rivers State and spreading like wildfire.

A Call to Action

Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun and Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem must seize this moment to redefine their leadership and restore the judiciary’s integrity. They must draw a firm line between the judiciary and political actors like Wike. This is not a time for complacency or complicity; it is a time for courage. These leaders must reassert the judiciary’s foundational principles of impartiality and justice.

The judiciary must rise above the fray and demonstrate its independence. Nigeria cannot afford a judiciary that exacerbates division and unrest. Without decisive leadership, these two women risk cementing their legacies as architects of a judicial crisis that plunged the nation into chaos.

The courts are meant to deliver justice, not ignite conflict. Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun and Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem must act swiftly and decisively to avert a national disaster. The nation is watching, the stakes could not be higher, and history will not be kind to those who fail to act.

John Egbeazien Oshodi

Professor John Egbeazien Oshodi, born in Uromi, Edo State, Nigeria, is an American-based police and prison scientist, forensic/clinical psychologist, public policy psychologist, and legal psychologist. He’s a government advisor on forensic-clinical psychological services in the USA and the founder of the Dr. John Egbeazien Oshodi Foundation for Psychological Health. With a significant role in introducing forensic psychology to Nigeria through N.U.C. and Nasarawa State University, he’s also a former Secretary-General of the Nigeria Psychological Association. He’s taught at esteemed institutions like Florida Memorial University, Florida International University, Nova Southeastern University, and more, and is currently an online faculty member at ISCOM University,  Weldios University and Walden University.

Chimamanda’s recent post on her X handle, @Ode_Luwa, offers a powerful and cautionary message for women in relationships. Her words, “Don’t ever make a mistake of disrespecting your MAN because you have some boys showing you attention. Respect is the BEST gift you can gift your man. MEN value RESPECT so much. You might be attractive for FUN ‘and’ not to be kept for Marriage,” serve as a poignant reminder of the role respect plays in sustaining healthy and meaningful relationships.

The post, although concise, carries layers of wisdom that can guide women navigating the complexities of love and partnership. It emphasizes that while physical attraction or fleeting attention might offer short-lived validation, respect is what cements a man’s commitment and builds a lasting bond.

In fact, respect in relationships goes beyond words; it is reflected in attitudes, actions, and the way partners treat each other during both good and challenging times. For many men, respect is not just a desired trait but an essential one. It communicates value, trust, and admiration, three pillars that keep the foundation of any relationship strong.

Chimamanda’s statement highlights an often overlooked truth: respect is not a one-off act but a continuous choice. It involves listening without judgment, valuing a partner’s contributions, and maintaining boundaries that honor the relationship.

In a society where fleeting attractions and distractions abound, the act of respecting one’s partner becomes even more significant. The temptation to seek validation from “boys” or external admirers may seem harmless at first but can have long-term consequences for trust and emotional intimacy.

Chimamanda’s reference to “some boys showing you attention” speaks to a common pitfall many women face in relationships, external validation. Attention from others can feel flattering, especially during moments when insecurities arise. However, it is crucial to distinguish between superficial compliments and genuine admiration.

While the former might boost ego, it often comes with no depth or commitment. “Boys,” as Chimamanda aptly puts it, may find a woman attractive for fun but not for the long haul. In contrast, a man who has chosen to invest in a relationship deserves respect and loyalty.

The pursuit of external validation can lead to a slippery slope. What starts as harmless flirtation may evolve into behaviors that undermine the trust and foundation of the relationship. Chimamanda’s cautionary words are a reminder to women to evaluate the worth of temporary attention versus the enduring value of respect within a committed partnership.

For men, respect often ranks as one of the most important elements of a fulfilling relationship. It goes beyond admiration and taps into a deep-seated need for recognition and support. Respect tells a man that his efforts, decisions, and contributions matter.

Disrespect, on the other hand, can manifest in subtle ways, sarcasm, belittling remarks, or dismissiveness, and over time, it can erode the bond between partners. Chimamanda’s post serves as a reminder to women to be mindful of their words and actions.

Respect is not about blind agreement but about finding ways to communicate disagreements constructively. It is about being a partner who uplifts rather than undermines, who supports rather than criticizes unnecessarily.

At this juncture, it suffices to opine that for women who wish to cultivate respect in their relationships, that there are a few practical steps inspired by Chimamanda’s wisdom:

First is that respectful communication involves listening as much as speaking. Avoid interrupting or dismissing your partner’s feelings, and choose your words carefully, especially during disagreements.

Second is appreciate his efforts. Acknowledge the little things your partner does for you. Whether it is providing support during tough times or handling responsibilities, showing appreciation reinforces his value in the relationship.

In a similar vein, one of the quickest ways to breed resentment is by comparing your partner to others. Focus on his unique qualities and strengths rather than dwelling on perceived shortcomings.

Also, set boundaries with others. This is as external attention can sometimes blur boundaries. Therefore, ensure that your interactions with others do not compromise the trust and respect within your relationship.

Again, encourage his growth. This is as respect also involves supporting your partner’s goals and aspirations. Be his cheerleader, encouraging him to achieve his best without feeling threatened by his success.

Without a doubt, there are consequences of disrespect of one’s husband. Disrespect can take a toll on a relationship in ways that are both immediate and long-lasting. When a man feels undervalued or belittled, it can lead to emotional withdrawal. Over time, this emotional distance can create a rift that becomes increasingly difficult to mend.

Chimamanda’s advice serves as a warning against taking a partner’s commitment for granted. While physical attraction or other superficial qualities might catch someone’s eye, it is respect that ensures longevity in a relationship.

The proverb “A stitch in time saves nine” perfectly encapsulates the essence of Chimamanda’s post. It speaks to the importance of addressing issues early before they escalate. In relationships, this means being proactive about recognizing and rectifying behaviors that might come across as disrespectful.

Catching yourself in moments of irritation or frustration can prevent you from saying or doing things you might regret. It’s about prioritizing the relationship over ego and choosing to act in ways that strengthen rather than weaken the bond you share with your partner.

Without any scintilla of hyperbole, Chimamanda’s post is not just advice; it is a challenge to women to reflect on their attitudes and behaviors in relationships. It calls for intentionality in treating their partners with the respect they deserve, regardless of external distractions or fleeting temptations.

This challenge also extends to redefining what respect looks like in modern relationships. It is about balancing independence with partnership, ensuring that neither partner feels diminished in the process.

Chimamanda’s words serve as a timeless reminder of the power of respect in relationships. In a world where distractions are plentiful, choosing to respect and honor your partner is a testament to the depth of your commitment.

Let her caution inspire women to evaluate their priorities and focus on what truly matters. A respectful partnership not only nurtures love but also lays the groundwork for a fulfilling and enduring relationship.

In the end, Chimamanda’s wisdom reminds us that respect is not just a gift to your partner; it is a gift to yourself, a reflection of your values, intentions, and the kind of love you wish to cultivate. So, let us take her advice to heart and ensure that respect remains at the forefront of our relationships. A stitch in time does not just save nine; it saves love, trust, and the promise of a brighter future together.

In the ever-evolving Nigerian music industry, where diverse sounds and personalities converge, some artists manage to capture attention with their audacity and raw talent. One such figure is Habeeb Okikiola, better known as “Portable”. Known for his vibrant energy and unapologetic authenticity, Portable has once again stirred the conversation by expressing his desire to collaborate with Afrobeats superstar Tiwa Savage. This move underscores his confidence, artistic ambition, and a deep-seated belief in his abilities, despite the controversies and criticisms that often surround him.

Portable’s rise to fame has been anything but conventional. From humble beginnings in Sango Ota, Ogun State, his breakthrough came with the viral hit “Zazoo Zeh”, featuring Olamide and Poco Lee. This song not only catapulted him into the limelight but also showcased his unique ability to capture the pulse of the streets.

Unlike many artists who conform to industry norms, Portable thrives on being unconventional. His music is a raw reflection of his roots, blending street slang with energetic beats to create anthems that resonate deeply with everyday Nigerians. Tracks like “Azaman”, “Expensive OG”, and “Zazoo Zeh” reveal an artist who understands his audience and delivers music that mirrors their struggles and triumphs.

It is this authenticity that sets Portable apart. While some see him as a chaotic personality, his loyal fanbase views him as a voice for the underrepresented, a griot chronicling the realities of life in the trenches.

Given his move, not a few fans of the Afrobeats diva, may have asked, “Why Tiwa Savage?” The answer to the foregoing cannot be farfetched as it is no doubt a strategic and creative choice.  This is as Tiwa Savage is considered to be an icon in her own right. Dubbed the “Queen of Afrobeats”, her influence spans continents, and her music is synonymous with elegance and sophistication. Collaborating with her is no small ambition, especially for someone like Portable, whose style contrasts sharply with Tiwa’s polished artistry.

However, this stark contrast is precisely what makes the idea so intriguing. Portable’s raw energy paired with Tiwa’s melodious finesse could result in a groundbreaking collaboration that bridges two different musical worlds. It is a testament to Portable’s creative vision and his willingness to take risks.

For Portable, this is not just about enhancing his profile; it is an opportunity to show his versatility and expand his reach. For Tiwa, a collaboration with Portable would highlight her openness to exploring diverse sounds and working with unconventional artists.

In the view of this writer, rather than questioning Portable’s audacity, it should serve as a lesson in self-belief.  In fact, Portable’s decision to publicly express his desire to work with Tiwa Savage reflects his audacity and self-belief. It takes courage to aim for such a high-profile collaboration, especially for an artist often stereotyped as a “street act.”

This audacity has been a defining characteristic of Portable’s career. He refuses to be boxed in by societal expectations or industry norms. His boldness is a reminder that greatness often requires stepping out of one’s comfort zone and challenging conventional thinking.

By setting his sights on Tiwa Savage, Portable is sending a clear message: talent transcends boundaries, and dreams are valid no matter one’s background.

Portable is no stranger to controversy. From his unfiltered social media posts to his run-ins with authorities, his name is often in the headlines for reasons beyond his music. However, these controversies should not overshadow the immense talent that has earned him a dedicated fanbase.

Portable’s music is a celebration of resilience and grit. His lyrics, often delivered in Yoruba and Pidgin English, capture the essence of street life in Nigeria. Songs like “ZazooZeh” are not just catchy; they are cultural phenomena that reflect the realities of his listeners.

Despite his unpolished persona, Portable possesses a deep understanding of rhythm, melody, and storytelling. His ability to craft songs that resonate with the masses speaks to his creative genius. His approach to music is intuitive and heartfelt, making him one of the most authentic voices in the industry today.

If this collaboration comes to fruition, it could mark a turning point in Portable’s career. It would provide him with a platform to showcase his versatility and challenge the stereotypes that have defined him.

For Tiwa Savage, working with Portable would demonstrate her ability to embrace and uplift raw, unconventional talent. The resulting track could be a fusion of Portable’s high-energy street vibes and Tiwa’s smooth, melodic sophistication, a blend that has the potential to break new ground in Nigerian music.

Such a collaboration could also inspire other mainstream artists to collaborate with emerging and unconventional talents, fostering inclusivity and diversity in the industry.

Portable has faced his fair share of criticism, with many dismissing him as a fleeting sensation or a controversial figure. However, his journey reveals a deeper story of resilience and determination.  Portable’s ability to weather criticism and stay true to his craft is a testament to his character. While detractors focus on his controversies, his fans see an artist who refuses to be silenced or sidelined. His boldness in pursuing a Tiwa Savage collaboration is yet another example of his refusal to let public opinion dictate his path.

Portable’s ambition to work with Tiwa Savage is not just about music; it is a lesson in dreaming big and taking bold steps toward those dreams. It is about believing in one’s talent, regardless of societal perceptions or limitations.

This ambition resonates beyond the music industry. It is a universal reminder that success often requires risk-taking, resilience, and a willingness to defy expectations. Portable’s journey is a source of inspiration for aspiring artists and creatives, proving that raw talent, when combined with audacity, can break barriers.

Portable is a polarizing figure in Nigerian music, but his creativity and talent are undeniable. His pursuit of a Tiwa Savage collaboration reflects his desire to evolve as an artist and push the boundaries of his craft.

While some may view this as an audacious move, it is a testament to Portable’s belief in his abilities and his willingness to explore new horizons. If this collaboration becomes a reality, it could redefine perceptions of both artists and highlight the power of diversity in music.

Portable’s story is one of raw talent, resilience, and unyielding ambition. As he continues to defy odds and challenge stereotypes, one thing is clear: Portable is much more than his controversies, he is a force of creativity worth celebrating.

Bitcoin has been setting new records regularly as investors hope that Trump will bring about a golden age of cryptocurrency, complete with more pro-business regulations and a possible national strategic bitcoin reserve or stockpile.

A surge in funding rates and open interest on the futures market precipitated this most recent action, putting the pioneer crypto asset within the $100K level on Friday.

The Bullish Debate

Social media speculation has exploded as Santiment data revealed that Bitcoin is poised to reach a six-figure market value for the first time in history, currently standing at a new all-time high of $99K.

Together, X, Reddit, Telegram, 4Chan, and BitcoinTalk are bringing up the $100K BTC price level at the fastest rate ever (naturally).

• However, this might be fueled by traders’ lack of confidence in this rally, as evidenced by unusually high mentions of lower price levels. Thank your fellow bears and non-believers for continuing this historic run, as the cryptocurrency markets move against the expectations of the majority.
• Data from CryptoQuant indicates that premiums in spot markets decreased around the same period. A surge of short liquidations, totaling over $120 million in a single day at one point, was also sparked by Bitcoin’s recent increases, which caused the price to rise overnight, according to CoinGlass.
• A few years ago, the $100K symbolic threshold might have seemed unattainable, but markets are now certain that it will happen soon because of its architecture’s features (a maximum of 21 million units and lack of a central authority to regulate it) and the appeal it has strengthened among traditional financial institutions like BlackRock and Goldman Sachs.
• U.S. President-elect Trump made a remarkable comeback during the campaign, despite being categorized as “anti-crypto,” primarily because he was aware of the growing number of users and their voting rights. Additionally, the U.S. cryptocurrency market contributed the most to his campaign funding.

The campaign cost cryptocurrency companies like Coinbase more than $130 million. Trump’s term also suggests higher budget deficits, possibly higher inflation, and adjustments to the dollar’s global role—all of which would boost the price of Bitcoin.

The Bearish Argument

Bitcoin reaching $100,000 in the next few minutes appears more like a short-term end-of-rally goal than a turning point that would instantly push the asset to a much higher level. Although it is impossible to predict with certainty whether the digital asset will remain above the $100,000 mark for an extended period, we can assume that a correction towards the $75,000/$80,000 range would then be reasonable, especially in a market environment where the dollar has strengthened (+7 percent for the Dollar Index since the beginning of October), and headline interest rates have experienced a powerful rise (more than 90 basis points in two months).

• Rates and the dollar are recovering at a time when investors are unsure of how quickly the Fed will cut rates following Donald Trump’s election, and when the most recent price indices released in the U.S. demonstrate resilience, including the PPI (producer price index) and the CPI (consumer price index), not to mention the surprising increase in import prices last month. Jerome Powell’s most recent remarks affirmed that the Fed is not in a rush to cut interest rates.
• Several campaign pledges are anticipated to be fulfilled following his election, including establishing a national bitcoin reserve, providing a regulatory environment that is advantageous to businesses operating in the space, and appointing a pro-crypto individual to lead the SEC (the U.S. financial regulator). According to press rumors, the White House is considering hiring a crypto specialist. All of this helps the industry as a whole flourish.
• The cryptocurrency market has demonstrated its sensitivity to U.S. monetary policy, especially in 2022. Therefore, it is reasonable to ask whether Bitcoin will correct at this time. Technically speaking, this might occur if the old oblique makes contact again during the April and October 2021 peaks.

A price correction in that direction is likely in play. A stronger “pullback” might also push prices back toward the previous high of roughly $74,000 in March 2024. However, historical data has shown that Bitcoin is popularly known for disappointing skeptics and maintaining its bullish momentum.

[Nairametrics]

The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Thursday has accused the All Progressives Congress (APC) led by Kapuepue, the younger brother of Tony Adun ( aka Tony Kabaka), of allegedly invading the  (PDP),  secretariat destroying and carting away properties worth millions of naira.

The party alleged that the thugs also destroyed doors, windows, and office equipment at the party’s Secretariat.

Reacting to the incident, the Publicity Secretary of the Edo PDP Caretaker Committee, Chris Osa Nehikhare, condemned the attack in the strongest terms, describing it as a desperate and reckless attempt by the APC to intimidate the PDP and frustrate the party’s efforts at reclaiming its mandate stolen at the September 21 governorship election.

He said, “It is pretty disappointing and unfortunate that the APC mobilised thugs to attack our party Secretariat on Thursday in their desperation to frustrate and halt efforts by our great party to reclaim the mandate duly given to it by the Edo people at the September 21 governorship election.

“The thugs led by Kapuepue, the younger brother of Tony Adun (aka Tony Kabaka), invaded the Secretariat, destroying and carting away properties worth millions of naira.

“If the APC are confident that they won the election free and square and have nothing to hide, why are they jittery and mobilising thugs to attack the PDP Secretariat.”

Nehikhare further noted, “This is barbaric and condemnable, and we urge relevant security agencies to investigate the attack thoroughly and ensure that the perpetrators of this dastardly act are brought to book.

“The PDP remains resolute and will not be intimidated or deterred in its pursuit for justice and the restoration of our mandate.”

He charged, “We are calling on our party members and supporters to remain calm and resolute in the face of the provocations as we explore every legal channel to reclaim our mandate.

But responding, the APC’s Publicity Secretary, Peter Uwadiae-Igbinigie, described the allegation as baseless and urged the PDP to settle its internal crisis, warning them not to drag the APC into their messy affair.

He said it was absurd to label those who allegedly attacked the PDP office as APC thugs, wondering if the thugs wore APC uniforms or had APC paraphernalia on them.

He noted that the APC government in the state had already embarked on projects the PDP government had failed to carry out, adding that his party was still basking in the euphoria of its victory and putting the state in the right direction.

He said, “How can the PDP say that the thugs that attacked their party secretariat are that of APC? Did the people have anything on them to show that they are APC members? The allegation is baseless, and there is no proof.

“The allegation is weighty and criminal, so the PDP should be sure they have proof before making it. We will urge the PDP to sort out its internal problem and not drag the APC into it.

The Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF) has suspended its chairman, Mamman Mike Osuman, over what it described as ‘unauthorised statement’.

The ACF in a statement by Alhaji Bashir Muhammad Dalhatu and Alhaji Murtala Aliyu, Chairman, ACF Board of Trustees and Secretary General respectively said, “Mr Osuman was quoted as saying the North will back a northern candidate for the presidency, come 2027.”

They said the statements were made by the NEC chairman without consulting with other leaders and members of the ACF and thus, reflected Mr Osuman’s personal opinion only.

According the statement, “The attention of the Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF) has been drawn to widely reported statements credited to Mr Mamman Mike Osuman, SAN, Chairman, ACF National Executive Committee (NEC), which were made during the meeting of the NEC, held on Wednesday, November, 2024, at ACF Headquarters, Kaduna. In particular, Mr Osuman was quoted as saying that the North will back a northern candidate for the presidency, come 2027.

“The statements were made by the NEC chairman without consulting with other leaders and members of the ACF and thus, reflected Mr Osuman’s personal opinion only.

“ACF rejects Mr Mamman Mike Osuman’s statements in their entirety. For this reason, the leadership of the ACF’s Board of Trustees (BOT) and that of its NEC has decided to place Mr Mamman Mike Osuman on suspension with immediate effect. A committee has been constituted for further investigations.”

[DailyTrust]

The Jigawa State Hisbah Board says importation, sale and consumption of alcohol remain prohibited in the state.

Commandant of the board, Ibrahim Dahiru disclosed this on Thursday while responding to questions from newsmen.

He said the move was part of the state government’s commitment to reform the board and reduce social vices in the state.

Ibrahim explained that in continuation of its operations, the command seized 78 cartons of assorted alcoholic drinks in Kazaure Local Government Area.

He said the alcohol was seized at three beer parlours during an early morning raid in the area.

The commander said no arrest was made during the operation, as suspected owners fled before the arrival of the Hisbah personnel.

He noted that the command would continue to enforce the order and arrest violators.

Ibrahim said the confiscated items would soon be taken to court.

[DailyPost]

A former Nigeria’s Permanent Representatives to the United Nations (UN), Prof. Ibrahim Agboola Gambari, yesterday said he never wanted to be a diplomat but a teacher.

Even after becoming one of Nigeria’s most celebrated diplomats, Gambari said he prefers to be called a teacher by training and diplomat by accident.

This, he said, reflected his childhood and educational background.

The former Chief of Staff to ex-President Muhammadu Buhari said this in Ilorin, the Kwara State capital, at the launch of a book titled: Readings in Diplomacy, Democracy, Peace, and Development.

The event, which was organised in his honour by the Commonwealth Scholars and Fellows Alumni Association Nigeria (COSFAN), coincided with his 80th birthday anniversary.

Gambari said: “’They plan, I plan, but God is the best planner,’ says the Holy Qur’an. Up till now, I still tell people to refer to me as teacher by training and diplomat by accident because I did not want to be a diplomat. But look at what the Almighty Allah has done to compel me from a person who went to a primary school in Bode Saadu and Malete in the now Moro Local Government Area of Kwara State to become one-time President of United Nations Security Council (UNSC).

“I served my country as the longest-serving ambassador at the United Nations (UN). That was not also a happy period because I was constant in Nigeria’s standing in the world when we had so many issues at home. I had five Presidents during my period as ambassador: Ibrahim Babangida, Chief Ernest Shonekan, Sani Abacha, Abdulsalami Abubakar and, briefly, under President Olusegun Obasanjo.

“Now, if somebody who started in a village primary school in Bode Saadu and another senior village primary school in Malete, then to Ilorin Provincial Secondary School, now Government Secondary School (GSS), Ilorin; then really, the sky is the limit for everyone, with God’s guidance and protection.

“How could I have imagined that the primary school I attended in Malete could then become a location of the first Kwara State-owned university, and I was made the first pioneer Chancellor of the university?

“I thank God. We’re all in the hands of the Almighty God. His will shall be done. We only need to do our best and leave the rest in the hands of the Almighty.

“Charity begins at home. That’s why I have not been far from home and never been far from my own people. I look forward to spend the rest of my life in the service of, first, my people, the state, the nation, Africa and the rest of the world.

“That’s the essence of the concentric cycle of the foreign policy which I have always advocated. The centre must be the state; the next, our neighbour, our region (ECOWAS), Africa and the rest of the world. Now, foreign policy shifts from administration to administration, but in essence, it must be pursued in those frameworks and context.

“Foreign policy is the definition of the interests of your country and the projection of those interests so that in the process, you will say what you want as a nation in the world and how you conduct yourself in such a way to attain them in the interest of your country.”

Kwara State Governor Abdulrahman AbdulRazaq, who was represented by Deputy Governor Kayode Alabi, said the state was proud that the mention of Prof. Gambari always commanded respect and honour across all spectrums “owing to his contributions to scholarship, international diplomacy and world peace, as well as national unity and development at various times”.

The governor enjoined fellow Nigerians, especially, to read the book, saying: “Our world evolves and grapples with emerging challenges of the new media and unfettered freedom, the rise of non-state actors with differing perspectives on the concept of diplomacy, democracy, peace and development, and the shifting nature of the international system and power dynamics.

“While many of these issues may defy textbook prescriptions, I believe firmly that scholarly research and insights on such topics are always useful in our search for practical and sustainable solutions.”

The book reviewer and a former Nigeria’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations (2018-2019), Tijjani Muhammad-Bande, noted that insecurity in Nigeria and especially in the North, was caused by poverty, ignorance, mining activities and weak traditional laws.

He urged the government to improve efforts at addressing the causes of insecurity to restore peace and development in the country.

The Chairperson of the Local Organising Committee, Dr. Abiola Adimula, described the occasion as a celebration of excellence, service and leadership.

She lauded Prof. Gambari as a “distinguished academic, resourceful professional, astute technocrat, and world diplomat” whose contributions to international diplomacy, democratic development and global peace remain indelible.

[TheNation]

A former Deputy National Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party, Chief Bode George, has advised former Vice President Atiku Abubakar to end his 31-year-long bid to be President.

Noting that Atiku’s bid to be President dated back to the year 1993, George said it was high time the former Vice President retired from such a contest, especially in the 2027 election.

Addressing a press conference at his Ikoyi, Lagos office, on Thursday, George urged Atiku to assume the position of an elder in the nation and leave his bid to posterity.

“To Atiku, my advice is this, you will be 81 years old in 2027, and you have been contesting for the presidency since 1993. This is the time for you to calm down and act like an elder. I appeal to you in the name of the Almighty Allah, that you serve, to take it easy and leave everything for posterity,” George said.

George decried that the PDP was on the verge of crumbling because people uplifted their personal interest and individual ambition above national interest.

He criticised the “divisive, arrogant, haughty” members of the party romancing the ruling All Progressives Congress yet failed to defect from the PDP, describing them as cowards.

“We are where we are today because of a self-inflicted crisis; we should bury our individual ambitions now and not allow the PDP to crumble, please. Elders of the party should tell some of these funny characters to cool off and think of our national interest instead of their personal interest.

 “Nigerians are angry and hungry. Instead of telling the APC the truth, some divisive, arrogant and haughty members are busy romancing the ruling party and they are quick to refer to themselves as elder statesmen. Instead of instigating a crisis in our party, why are they not bold enough to defect to the APC? Do they really fear God at all? No member is big enough to hold the party to ransom,” George added.

Particularly pointing to the crisis between Rivers State Governor, Siminalayi Fubara, and his predecessor and Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike,  George urged Wike to immediately “cool off” from wanting to “bring down” Fubara.

George said it was worrisome that some party members rather than bringing the two parties to mediation further fuelled the Fubara/Wike crisis for their selfish interests.

“My advice to Wike is very simple. You are my political son. I am therefore appealing to him to cool off immediately. I know he was injured by friends during the last PDP presidential contest but I am advising him as a father to please take it easy. Nobody is bigger than any party. Forget what happened in the past and let us work together in the interest of this party.

“I want to ask the elders at the helm of affairs of our party today, ‘What exactly is the offence of Governor Siminalayi Fubara of Rivers State?’ What exactly is the offence of this gentleman that some elders of our party are trying to throw him under the bus because of political expediency? What exactly is going on that some party members don’t feel bothered about the happenings in Rivers State? Governor Fubara was helped by Governor Wike to become the number one citizen of the oil-bearing state. The governor himself acknowledged this on several occasions.

“Must the governor now behave like a slave to his predecessor and other characters because of this concept of godfatherism which is a misnomer in our politics? Why are some party members encouraging his predecessor to bring him down? He is in Abuja; he wants to control what goes on in Rivers State.

“Did the governors before him behave this way? Why are the party leaders not eager to mediate and bring both groups to normalcy? The PDP cannot continue like this. Why can’t we learn from our past mistakes? Is our party jinxed? Why can’t we tell all these troublemakers to go and sit down if they don’t want this party to move forward?”

N’Assembly approves life jail for drug traffickers

Tope Omogbolagun, Abuja

The National Assembly has amended the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency Act, prescribing life imprisonment for drug offenders and traffickers.

This decision followed the adoption of the harmonised report by the Senate and House of Representatives on the NDLEA Act amendment.

Presenting the report, the Chairman of the Senate Conference Committee, Senator Tahir Monguno, explained that the amendment sought to impose stricter penalties to deter illegal drug activities.

The amendment specifically stated: “Any person who unlawfully engages in the storage, custody, movement, carriage, or concealment of dangerous drugs or controlled substances and, while doing so, is armed with an offensive weapon or disguised in any manner, commits an offence under this Act and is liable, upon conviction, to life imprisonment.”

The Senate approved the recommendation through a voice vote during Thursday’s plenary, presided over by the Deputy Senate President, Barau Jibrin.

In addition to the NDLEA amendment, the Senate also passed a bill to empower the Revenue Mobilisation, Allocation, and Fiscal Commission.

The proposed legislation, known as the Revenue Mobilisation, Allocation, and Fiscal Commission Bill, of 2024, sought to replace the existing RMAFC Act of 2004.

The updated law revises the commission’s composition and operational framework to ensure federal, state, and local governments receive constitutionally mandated resources to address governance and developmental challenges.

Presenting the bill, the Chairman of the Senate Committee on National Planning and Economic Affairs, Yahaya Abdullahi, highlighted the urgency of reforming the commission in light of Nigeria’s dwindling revenues and growing population.

Abdullahi explained that the bill aims to strengthen RMAFC’s mandate as the constitutionally recognised body responsible for monitoring revenue generation and ensuring its equitable distribution among the three tiers of government.

“The Act, last revised over 20 years ago, no longer reflects Nigeria’s evolving economic realities. This bill proposes additional funding and a restructured operational framework for the commission to improve its efficiency,” he said.

He further emphasised that adequate funding from the Federation Account was critical for RMAFC to perform its constitutional responsibilities effectively, noting that funding challenges had previously hindered its performance.

The Senate endorsed the bill following deliberations and a majority vote.

It now awaits President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s assent to become law.

[Punch]

THE first one thousand days of the Russo-Ukrainian War was on Tuesday, November 19, marked in Europe like an anniversary rather than a day of reflection. The European Commission draped its building with the Ukrainian flag, while the European Parliament sat to stirring speeches, including a standing ovation for Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelensky.

Those hailing Zelensky in Brussels are not doing the dying. Those who have made an early exit to Heaven include more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians with about 27,000 injured. Over six million Ukrainians have become refugees, while the population has fallen by one quarter. Military casualties on both sides are in their hundreds of thousands.

Three days earlier, Zelensky had seemed sober and was talking about peace. The reasons for this might include the fact that in-coming United States, US, President, Donald Trump is unpredictable and the Russians are making significant gains on the battlefield. Other reasons might include Russian President Vladimir Putin and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz on Friday, November 15, 2024 skirted around peace talks and, the Palestinian-Israeli War eclipsing the Ukrainian War.

So Zelensky, who hitherto had insisted there would be no negotiations with Russia, was on Saturday, November 16, 2024, talking peace. In an interview with Ukrainian radio, he said: “For our part, we must do everything we can to ensure that this war ends next year. We have to end it by diplomatic means.”

However, three days later, Zelensky was back to his war rhetoric. I think his change of mind is the result of the renewed support he got from various quarters, including the US State Department approving a new $100 million sale of weapons and, Denmark making a new $138 million donation for arms. However, the most decisive factormight be President Joe Biden authorising Ukraine’s use of long- range US ATACMS missiles. To Zelensky, this could be a game changer as the missile has a range of 300 kilometres, which means it has Russia largely fully within coverage. Secondly, his hope is that this might lead to the United Kingdom and France allowing Ukraine to use their long range missiles. Thirdly, the authorisation might be an indication that the US and its allies want an escalation of the war rather than negotiations to end it.

Zelensky immediately put the US missiles into use. Ukraine fired six of such missiles, with Russia claiming it shot down five of them, while the sixth hit a military facility in the Bryansk region, 110 kilometres inside Russia.

Russia had warned against such authorisation, claiming these missiles cannot be fired without direct US personnel support. This, to Russia, means that their use is an indication of direct US military intervention in the war.

The missile’s range of up to 300 kilometres is much shorter than some Russian missiles, including its hypersonic Kinzhal weapon with a range of 2,000 kilometres. So Ukraine’s use of such missiles is unlikely to change the course of the war.

However, Russia was so angered by the American authorisation that on November 19, it changed its rules of engagement on the use of nuclear weapons.

The new rules state that any attack against Russia by a non-nuclear country with the “participation or support of a nuclear power” would amount to a “joint attack on the Russian Federation”. This means that if the use of the ATACMS missiles by Ukraine was facilitated by US personnel, it would amount to a joint US-Ukraine attack.

 It also provides that any attack against the country by a member of a military bloc, would amount to “an aggression by the entire bloc”. This means that an attack against Russia by any of the 32 countries in the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, NATO, would be seen as an attack by the entire military alliance.

The new order also states that Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to a conventional weapons attack that threatens its “sovereignty and territorial integrity”. It means that if Russia reaches the conclusion that Ukraine’s use of the ATACMS missiles threatens it in a fundamental manner, it could resort to the use of nuclear weapons.

In interpreting the new Russian rules of engagement, its former President, Dmitry Medvedev, wrote: “Russia’s new nuclear doctrine means NATO missiles fired against our country could be deemed an attack by the bloc on Russia. Russia could retaliate with [weapons of mass destruction] against Kiev and key NATO facilities, wherever they’re located. That means World War III.”

Indeed, this may be closer to a nuclear war than we think. As it stands, Russia and the US, with over 5,000 nuclear war heads each, have the highest number of nuclear weapons. China comes a distant third with 500, France has 290 and UK, 225. Less than one per cent of the estimated 12,000 nuclear warheads is enough to destroy major parts of the world.

This war, like most wars, was avoidable, and, having started, could, and can be quickly ended. But the reason why it festers is that it is a proxy war. So, rather than take steps to end the war, what we witness are blame games and a sense of justification.

Basically, this war, is an expansion of the Ukrainian Civil War in which Russia and its allies support Eastern Ukraine and NATO and its allies threw their weight behind the other part of the country. The Ukrainian Civil War itself was the result of two undemocratic incidents in that country.

The first was the 2004 presidential election in which the victory of Viktor Yanukovych from Eastern Ukraine, was rejected by crowds in Kiev, the capital. This was dubbed the ‘Orange Revolution’. That election was then annulled and, in the new election, the rival candidate, Viktor Yushenko, was declared winner. The politics of that election was that the former was pro-Russia and the latter pro-West.

Six years later, Yanukovych again won the presidential election. This time his victory was not disputed. But four years into his tenure, he was overthrown for refusing to sign the Ukrainian–European Union Association Agreement which would have pushed the country into the orbit of the West. This coup split the Ukrainian people and the military and, led to the civil war. The first part of the country to secede and join Russia was the Crimea. In the civil war between Eastern and Western Ukraine, Russian military units openly defended the former. So, technically, Russian troops were in Ukraine nine years before the “Russian Invasion”.

There were efforts to reconcile the warring factions in Ukraine which led to two signed agreements: Minsk I and II. So, there can be no solution to the war in Ukraine without the resolution of the Ukrainian civil war.