In a fiery Easter Sunday state-of-the-nation address delivered in Lagos, Tunde Bakare, the serving overseer of the Citadel Global Community Church, delivered a stinging rebuke of President Bola Tinubu’s leadership, accusing him of fostering a dangerous form of politics that threatens Nigeria’s democratic fabric.

Bakare, a former presidential aspirant and one-time running mate to Muhammadu Buhari, warned Tinubu against the perils of absolute power, urging him to “stop playing God” and lead with humility and empathy in a time of national crisis.

A Nation on the Brink

Addressing congregants and the wider nation, Bakare painted a grim picture of Nigeria’s political and economic state under Tinubu’s administration. He decried the descent into what he described as “a mafia state,” driven by legislative rascality, institutional decay, and unchecked executive authority.

“The two main contenders in the ongoing institutional immorality Olympics are the executive and the legislature,” Bakare said, citing the suspension of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and the controversial declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State as signs of overreach and systemic rot.

He also lambasted the Senate’s dismissal of Akpoti-Uduaghan’s sexual harassment allegations against Senate President Godswill Akpabio. The conduct of Onyekachi Nwebonyi during the hearings, particularly his verbal assault on former minister Oby Ezekwesili, was described by Bakare as “street-level vitriol,” further reinforcing his concern over the degeneration of political decorum.

Economic Hardship and Human Suffering

Turning to the economy, Bakare highlighted the severe hardship Nigerians are facing under Tinubu’s reforms. He pointed to soaring food prices, a 430% increase in fuel costs, and widespread poverty as evidence of policy failure. Citing data from the Nigerian Economic Summit Group, he noted that the country now ranks among those with the highest misery indexes globally.

Bakare recalled the tragic stampede deaths during food distribution efforts in late 2024, especially the horrific reports of parents throwing their children over fences in desperation. “These scenes,” he said, “are haunting reminders of a nation in distress, and eerily reminiscent of biblical famines.”

Call to Action: From Prayers to Pragmatism

While acknowledging some gains—such as a $5 billion rise in reserves—Bakare stressed that prayer alone can no longer carry the weight of national recovery. “People of faith have prayed to the point of weariness,” he said. “Any call for prayer now appears to be a mere religious ritual. What we need is action.”

He urged Tinubu to heed wise counsel and adopt a “coordinated programme” to rescue Nigeria. This includes emergency survival interventions, economic stabilisation, debt reengineering, structural reforms, and industrialisation.

Central to his proposed recovery strategy is the creation of a “Consolidated Value Investment and Development Fund”—a reimagined version of the COVID Fund he advocated during the pandemic. This fund, he said, should be decoupled from oil dependency and geared toward inclusive, sustainable growth.

A Personal History, A Longstanding Rift

Bakare’s sharp critique also carries a personal edge. Once close political allies, there is no love lost between him and Tinubu. Bakare has long questioned Tinubu’s political morality, dating back to his tenure as Lagos governor. On the eve of Tinubu’s 2023 inauguration, Bakare declared he would not call him “my president,” citing alleged electoral malpractice.

Though he has been accused of staying silent during Buhari’s controversial administration—perhaps due to their past alliance—Bakare insists his advocacy for good governance remains steadfast.

Conclusion: A Nation at a Crossroads

In his closing remarks, Bakare appealed to the conscience of the nation and its leaders: “No man is wise enough nor good enough to be trusted with unlimited power. Mr President, please stop playing God.”

He called for psychological evaluations for political aspirants and stressed that only responsible leadership, rooted in humility, honesty, and vision, can bring Nigeria back from the brink. “With courageous, empathetic, and visionary leadership,” he said, “Nigeria can live again.”

The Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission has started investigating some universities and banks for allegedly engaging in fraudulent activities that prevented students from receiving payments allocated to them under the Federal Government’s student loan scheme.

This is just as the House of Representatives declared its intention to investigate allegations against some banks and tertiary institutions withholding disbursed funds from students.

This development follows an investigation by the National Orientation Agency, which uncovered widespread unethical practices in the administration of the initiative.

According to findings from the NOA’s Community Orientation and Mobilisation Officers, some universities, in collusion with certain financial institutions, deliberately withhold the disbursement of approved loans. This has left many students stranded despite having secured funding through the Nigerian Education Loan Fund.

The loan scheme, which was inaugurated last year as part of President Bola Tinubu’s efforts to fulfil his campaign promise of improving access to higher education, began with a N35bn take-off grant approved by the Federal Government.

The programme, operated by NELFUND, was designed to provide financial support to qualified Nigerian students for tuition, mandatory fees, and living expenses in recognised higher education and vocational institutions across the country.

Under the scheme, NELFUND credits the institution directly for the tuition and fees, while a monthly upkeep allowance of N20,000 is paid into students’ accounts.

However, NOA alleged that some tertiary institutions, in collaboration with certain banks, were sabotaging the process and depriving students of their entitlements.

In a statement, the NOA’s Deputy Director of Communications and Media, Paul Odenyi, confirmed that several institutions and banks had been implicated in fraudulent activities that prevented students from accessing the funds meant for them.

The issue came to light during a high-level meeting between the NOA Director General, Mallam Lanre Issa-Onilu, and the Managing Director of NELFUND, Mr Akintunde Sawyerr, last weekend in Abuja.

Issa-Onilu disclosed that preliminary findings showed that some institutions, in collusion with banks, intentionally delayed payments to students for dubious financial gain.

He further revealed that some universities failed to acknowledge loan disbursements made by NELFUND, while demanding fees directly from students.

On his part, Sawyerr warned that NELFUND was prepared to pursue legal action against any institution or individual found culpable.

However, the ICPC confirmed to Sunday PUNCH that it had commenced a full-scale probe into universities accused of withholding or diverting loan funds.

The spokesperson for the anti-graft agency, Demola Bakare, disclosed that the ICPC had received a petition from the NOA for the investigation of universities involved in the fraudulent act.

“We are working on the allegations. The following day after the allegations were disclosed by NOA, a formal report was brought to the commission by NELFUND.

“The ICPC chairman ordered an investigation into the matter, and I know we have started work on it and the NOA is assisting too,” Bakare said.

He added that another round of investigation to expose more schools had started.

NOA also said it would turn its searchlight on more tertiary institutions in a bid to uncover their involvement in the malfeasance.

The spokesman for the agency, Odenyi, told Sunday PUNCH that the revelation by the agency was the first phase of the probe.

He said, “This is just a pilot phase. We have asked our officers to do it across the country so that we will be sure where these things are happening.”

Confirming the intention of the House of Representatives to probe universities short-changing students, the National President of the National Association of Nigerian Students, Olusola Oladoja, said the Chairman of the House Committee on NELFUND, Ifeoluwa Ehindero, pledged the committee’s commitment to involve the ICPC in the process of funds disbursement and implementation.

He disclosed that the leadership of NANS met with the committee on NELFUND on Thursday and discussed ways of resolving the issue.

He said, “Following our agitations about the allegations against some banks and institutions withholding disbursed funds from students under the NELFUND scheme, the NANS leadership, led by its National President, Olusola Oladoja, had a deliberation with the House of Representatives Committee on NELFUND.

“During the deliberation, we presented the concerns of Nigerian students over the issue, and we reiterated that if such action persists, it would undermine the welfare of our students and affect their ability to access affordable education.”

Students lament

Speaking with Sunday PUNCH, some of the affected students lamented that the situation had not only caused them emotional distress, but also put their academics on the line.

Some said they were unable to complete registration or sit examinations due to the non-reflection of the loan disbursements in their school accounts.

A student of the Kwara State Polytechnic, Rahmon Kehinde, said he applied for both the upkeep and school fees.

While the upkeep funds were credited to him, the school fee of N96,000 remained unresolved.

“According to NELFUND, the money was disbursed to the school, but the school has not given any reasonable explanation,” he said.

Kehinde lamented that he had to source money elsewhere to pay his school fees so that he could sit his exams.

He said, “I have written several letters and visited different offices, but no one has told me where the money is. Before my exams, the bursary told me to pay the fee myself and sort the issue out later. I had to look for the money. Now I’m stuck, who will refund me?

“The situation is becoming frustrating because I don’t know who is going to pay me back. This has been going on since January. Either the school should refund NELFUND, or NELFUND should pay me back because the money is hanging in the air.

“Nobody is telling us what is going on; the money is hanging between the school and NELFUND, and according to NELFUND, the money has been disbursed.”

A student from the Kebbi State University, who spoke on condition of anonymity, shared a similar concern.

He noted that NELFUND had informed students that their school fees had been paid, but the university withheld the funds.

“The school told us to go and borrow money to pay our school fees. If we had that kind of money, we wouldn’t have applied for the loan. Our exams begin on Tuesday, and many of us haven’t completed registration,” he added.

He described the situation as “frustrating and humiliating,” noting that students were already threatening to protest.

“We are starting exams by Tuesday, and a lot of us have not even done registration because of the delay in paying the school fees. This is challenging as we depend on NELFUND for the funds. NELFUND has released our money since last year, but the school has not done anything.

“The school insists that we must find the money and pay our school fees before we are allowed to sit our exams. Where do we start running to now? We want NELFUND to look into this issue so that students who don’t have the means to pay can be allowed to sit their exams.

“What is the essence of NELFUND releasing the fund since last year, and why are our school fees still not cleared? This money is a gift to us, but it is a loan that we will still have to repay. Students are already threatening to protest,” he said.

But reacting, the Public Relations Officer of the Kebbi State University, Mustapha Monsur, denied any wrongdoing on the part of the institution.

He stated that the university had not withheld any funds.

“What you need to ask those complaining is whether they were cleared by NELFUND when they applied for the loan, and how much is their allocation by NELFUND? They should come out with evidence that NELFUND has disbursed money to the school.

“Many of the students complaining were either not cleared by NELFUND, maybe because of one discrepancy or the other, and this is probably the reason why NELFUND is not paying them,” he said.

When asked to confirm if NELFUND had disbursed money to the school, Monsur said, “Honestly, I cannot tell you that now because anything that has to do with finance, I have to get the directive of the vice chancellor to disclose any financial information regarding the university.”

…, to then run in 2031 for President

•Why CPC or SDP is a potential platform

The Nigerian political atmosphere is awash with speculation about the 2027 presidential election, particularly as it concerns a potential alliance involving former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and Labour Party’s 2023 presidential candidate, Mr. Peter Obi.

Atiku first hinted about the alliance in 2024 after what he described as a “friendly meeting” with Obi sparked speculations.

He, however, confirmed the coalition talks in an interview with the BBC Hausa. “Yes, it’s very much possible. We can merge to achieve a common goal. So, it’s possible and nothing can stop it if we so wish to achieve that,” Atiku was quoted to have said.

The latest rumour around the alliance was ignited by the former vice president’s visit to former President Muhammadu Buhari in Kaduna penultimate Friday.

On the list of those who accompanied Atiku to see Buhari were known political actors and gladiators, including a former Governor of Kaduna State, Malam Nasir El Rufai; a former Speaker of the House of Representatives, who was also the former Governor of Sokoto State, and now a senator, Aminu Tambuwal; a former Governor of Adamawa State, Senator Bindu Jibrila; a former Governor of Benue State, Senator Gabriel Suswan, and a former Governor of Imo State, Chief Achike Udenwa.

However, the meeting, according to reports which was first carried by theeagleonline.com and confirmed to Sunday Vanguard by multiple sources close to the alliance, was not just a Sallah visit as claimed by the Atiku media team.

The sources at that meeting said behind the scenes was a meeting to tell Buhari what plans have been put in place ahead of the 2027 elections and get his support.

Before Atiku’s visit, some All Progressives Congress, APC, governors had also visited the former President.

Sunday Vanguard gathered that part of the fallout from that visit by the governors was the fact that some of them were already discussing the possibility of taking out the Congress for Progressive Change, CPC, the platform on which Buhari ran for presidential election three times and did not make it, and which was among the political parties that formed the APC, out of the ruling party at the federal level.

The permutation is that the CPC arm of the APC is going to be useful for the coming election.
For those who are reading into the political scene ahead of the 2027 elections, the feeling is that these two visits are interwoven, though done separately.

It was gathered that those who went to see Buhari are now ready to set up a structure that they believe can defeat the incumbent President and his party. According to the coalition proponents, with the right structure in place, it is possible to successfully challenge Tínubu in the upcoming election in 2027, citing alleged lopsided appointments, worsening security situation, alleged anti-people policies, frequent travels out of the country, and the internal crisis in APC as reasons.

Lagos

They are of the opinion, according to sources, that if Obi could win Tínubu in Lagos when the APC in the state was a one bunch, it would be a walkover now that the party is in disarray following the way the President handled the Speaker Mudashiru Obasa and State House of Assembly crisis which has polarized the party in the state.

Obi, in the 2023 election, got 582,454 votes in Lagos in what was considered a massive upset while Tínubu scored 572,606 votes.

The thinking is that this will likely repeat itself, and most likely on a wider margin in 2027.

The impending alliance between Atiku and Obi presents an interesting dynamic in the lead-up to the next election and, if realized, it could significantly alter the political landscape of the country.

The Plan

According to sources, Atiku is planning to run for President with Obi as his running mate, leveraging their combined strengths to challenge Tinubu.

This alliance, it was learnt, aims to capitalize on Atiku’s influence in the North and Obi’s appeal in the South-East, potentially creating a formidable opposition force against the ruling APC.

Another point believed to be working for the alliance is the fact that a lot of people in the North are already disenchanted with the government of the day.

This has been reechoed by the apex socio-political group in the North, the Arewa Consultative Forum, ACF, which has clearly expressed its displeasure with the way the country is being governed by Tínubu.

With the ill-feelings towards Tínubu in the North, Sunday Vanguard learnt that Atiku had been assured of the backing of the ACF ahead of the 2027 polls.

And with the ACF and its structure readily available for Atiku, it is certain he will gather more support and votes from the North this time around.

Sharing Agreement

A key aspect of this plan is a reported power-sharing agreement, where Atiku would serve one term (2027-2031) and then hand over to Obi, who would serve two terms as President.

Analysts believe that with Obi’s remarkable appeal and acceptability, particularly among young Nigerians, and with some of the philanthropy that he has done across the country, especially in the North, an alliance with Atiku could provide him with a stronger political platform and access to broader resources.

This arrangement is said to be part of the negotiations between the two leaders.

They are looking in the direction of the North for greater support than they got in the 2023 election.

Party Platform

With the LP and PDP enmeshed in self-inflicted crisis, the pair is reportedly considering using either the CPC or the Social Democratic Party (SDP) as their platform.

It is alleged that Atiku and his group have decided to abandon the PDP to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, FCT, Nyesom Wike, who has been accused of creating problems for the party in order to serve the APC’s interest.

The CPC, being one of the parties that merged to form the APC, might offer a strategic advantage, while the SDP has shown potential with its recent activities. Recall that El Rufai, who was on the trip to visit Buhari, has moved into the SDP. A source close to the former Kaduna governor revealed that the SDP’s national leader who was the presidential candidate of the party in 2023, has said he would not contest the 2027 presidency if he sees a good presidential material.

Strategic calculations

The Atiku-Obi alliance is built on several strategic calculations such as regional balance, diverse support base, and opposition to APC.

Combining Atiku’s northern influence with Obi’s South-Eastern appeal could create a strong regional balance.

Therefore, it is believed that merging their support bases might attract a broader coalition of voters.

The alliance also aims to challenge the APC’s dominance, capitalizing on growing discontent with the current government.

Political analysts are already tinkering with the figures.

They have combined the votes of Atiku and Obi in 2023 to arrive at the conclusion that it is possible to beat the incumbent.

Nigeria has a total of 93,469,008 voters. In 2023, the turnout was just 26.71 percent of that figure.
While Tínubu won in 12 states with 8,794,726 votes, which is about 36.61 percent of votes, Atiku also took 12 states with 6,984,520 votes, which is about 29.07 percent of the votes, and Obi won in 11 states, technically 12, because he also won in the FCT, with 6,101,533 votes, which is 25.40 percent of the votes cast.

Combining Atiku and Obi’s votes amounted to about 13,086,000 votes whereas Tínubu had 8,794,726 votes. The calculation is that Atiku and Obi can get more votes with the perceived poor performance of the present administration.

Concerns

Much as this alliance seems to present beautiful opportunities, it also faces challenges.
Differences in ideology and ambition might lead to internal conflicts.

Again, the choice of party platform and power-sharing agreement might face opposition from within their parties or from other aspirants.

Implications

The alliance could pose a significant challenge to the ruling APC, especially if internal conflicts within the party persist. Also, the success of the alliance would depend on its ability to resonate with voters, addressing pressing national issues and offering a compelling alternative to the incumbent government.

The alliance might lead to a realignment of political forces, with potential defections from other parties and shifts in voter loyalty.

No threats

But those backing the President have dismissed the perceived threats posed by the potential coalition with the wave of hand.

Reacting to the visit of Atiku’s group to Buhari via his X handle, a presidential spokesperson, Daniel Bwala, said: “There is nothing these oppositions under the auspices of coalition for a wild goose chase cannot try to do to keep relevance.

“They went to meet @MBuhari and it was reported that he insisted the meeting be held in or on camera so that El Rufai would not go and say Buhari is joining SDP and PDP.

“Hard as they try, they are still struggling to convince Nigerians that they have any plan at all, needless alternative plan.”

‘Obidients’ disagree

Meanwhile, members of the Obidients movement, the campaign structure of the LP presidential candidate in the last election populated mostly by young Nigerians, said they would not be part of any alliance if Obi is not its flag bearer.

They maintained that any arrangements without Obi as the presidential candidate is dead on arrival, saying Atiku should support the former Anambra governor.

According to them, Atiku cannot be in the race when the South hasn’t completed its eight years.
So, it would be wise for him to step down for Obi.

One of those pushing this narrative is Samuel Ajayi, a self-professed Obidient.
According him, “If we’ve done Atiku/Obi and it didn’t work, why can’t we do Obi/Atiku? Don’t be emotional about this.

“The fact still remains that aside from the competence and character that Peter Obi has, he is still the most inspiring among all the candidates to unseat Tínubu.”Another proponent of this narrative is Jonathan Ajere, who said: “Atiku should do all he can to get Peter Obi on board. “But, he should either consider being Obi’s running mate or completely step aside and support Obi wholeheartedly. “This is because any attempt to field any northern candidate when the South has not completed its eight years is going to be counter-productive.

“It will be an express ride for Tinubu to a second term on a platter of gold.

”So, what Atiku and northern oligarchy need to do if they want Tinubu out of office in 2027 is to support a southern candidate and there is no candidate in South that has massive appeal and acceptability across Nigeria like Obi as of today.

“So, if Atiku listens to this voice of reason, the 2027 elections will be a walkover for the coalition. The coalition is what the APC guys dread so much. That’s why they are crying against it in pretence.”

As politicking for the 2027 general elections thickens, the success of the coalition would depend on various factors, including the ability to maintain internal cohesion, appeal to a broad voter base and effectively challenge the incumbent government.

If successful, it could significantly impact the outcome of the 2027 presidential election.

Some chieftains of the Peoples Democratic Party have faulted the endorsement of President Bola Tinubu by the Governor of Akwa Ibom State, Umo Eno, and the former governor of Ekiti State, Ayodele Fayose.

The PDP chieftains, including a former Deputy National Vice Chairman, Chief Bode George and Deputy National Youth Leader of the party, Timothy Osadolor, said Eno and Fayose’s position was capable of undermining the unity and future of the party.

Eno, a PDP governor, had during the official flag-off of the 65-kilometre, three-lane dual carriageway section of the highway project in Nsit-Antai Local Government Area of the state last week, declared support for Tinubu’s re-election.

“Let me end by assuring our people-loving President that we will stand by him. He deserves to complete his eight years in office. He cannot start this work and abandon it. Someone else may not finish it with the same passion. Me, I’m supporting Baba Bola Ahmed Tinubu for a second term,” he stated.

This was as Fayose ruled out the chances of the PDP in the 2027 election, saying, “It is better to allow Asiwaju (Tinubu) to complete his tenure because this is a southern slot. Everybody is fighting for their survival.”

Reacting, George expressed disappointment at Eno’s stance, describing it as dangerous.

“I don’t bother about whatever Fayose says or what he is doing, but I am very worried about the governor — a sitting governor of our party in Akwa Ibom,” he said.

The PDP chieftain warned that Eno’s decision could damage the party’s prospects ahead of the 2027 elections.

“I will advise him (Eno), as a leader of this party and as a father of this party, to take things easy. Taking that kind of decision without consultation with the national body of the party or with other stakeholders is undermining our party ahead of the 2027 election,” he said.

George added that the move was unprecedented in Akwa Ibom’s political history, urging the governor to reconsider his position.

“He should recant his comment in the interest of the history of this country, because what would he be remembered for? It has never happened in Akwa Ibom. It was a wrong decision,” said George.

Also, the Deputy National Youth Leader of the party, Timothy Osadolor, berated the duo, stating that they were not in a position to decide the direction the party will go in 2027.

Speaking with Sunday PUNCH, Osadolor said, “If there is a state that is 100 per cent PDP, that state is Akwa Ibom. Mr Eno is the governor of the state, but he is not in a position to decide the political direction of PDP members in the state. His endorsement of President Tinubu is personal to him and has nothing to do with our party.”

On Fayose, Osadolor said, “Nobody takes the former governor seriously anymore. He is at liberty to say whatever he likes because he owns his mouth, but the party is not bothered by the comments of Ayo Fayose.”

Commenting on the crisis rocking the party, a member of the House of Representatives, Wole Oke, decried the crisis rocking the PDP.

Oke described PDP as a party gasping for breath.

“The PDP is in big trouble, and it is gasping for breath,” he said.

He expressed worry that with less than two years to the next election cycle, the party was still swimming from one crisis to another, even as some of its chieftains were openly endorsing Tinubu for a second term in office.

[INTERVIEW]

Former National Secretary of the Congress for Progressive Change and now a chieftain of the New Nigeria People’s Party, Buba Galadima, speaks with Ismaeel Uthman on the fate of opposition parties ahead of the 2027 elections, the crisis rocking the Emir of Kano stool, and President Bola Tinubu’s handling of national affairs

In a recent interview, you said the APC is sending emissaries to compromise leaders of political parties, offering billions to them. Do you think the opposition will have its way in 2027 with this alleged inducement?

You should believe in the ability of God to do anything. Everything in an election can change a day before the election. One mistake by a frontrunner can make him the last. There is nothing impossible. We have seen a lot of things; we saw how Abacha died when he was about to become president, endorsed by all political parties. As strong as Obasanjo was, he wanted a third term but couldn’t get it. We saw how Goodluck Jonathan spent a lot of money for re-election but couldn’t get it. So, what is it that will surprise you in Nigeria?

What is your perception of the coalition of opposition being formed by Atiku, El-Rufai and others?

I don’t know why people call such an arrangement a coalition. These are just a few individuals who came together to form a group they want to propel into taking political power. And that is their undeniable right. Whether it will happen or not is left to God. It is Atiku who is bringing people from the PDP, while El-Rufai brought himself from the APC. As far as I’m concerned, these are the only people in the so-called coalition. The PDP governors have issued a statement that they are not going into any coalition with anybody, and the National Chairman of the SDP has also said the party is not merging with any political party. It is also on record that we (NNPP) were the first to reject such an arrangement. But we were called names by uninformed Nigerians; they said we were working for Tinubu because we said we were not joining any coalition of strange bedfellows.

We have gone through this before, and we know that it did not benefit Nigerians, and we are not prepared to test that path again. However, we are prepared to work with people of like minds, such that when we form a government, we know our direction because it will be based on principles and ideology. So, I don’t think people should lose sleep over this Atiku and El-Rufai coalition. I want to tell you that most political parties have their own internal problems, including the APC.

If the coalition won’t work, how would you advise opposition parties to go about the plan to unseat President Tinubu in 2027?

Most of the people in the opposition parties are not politicians. They are only interested in grabbing power and using it to enrich themselves and better the lives of their families. I don’t think they understand politics. If they did, they would know there is an area of convergence. Whether you agree with each other or not, at least we should pretend to be democrats. If we can do that, then we will take issues around the election process more seriously. Elections are the yardstick of democracy. There is no democracy without elections.

So, all of us can come together and fight for free, fair and transparent elections. And whoever wins, we will give him the chance to govern. But we are not doing that. Everybody wants to be president, so they form their own small kingdoms without principles. They do whatever they can and steal public funds. These are not opposition politicians; these are opportunists in politics.

If they are democrats, let us come together and fight for electoral reform that will guarantee one man, one vote. And once there is one man, one vote, even if your enemy wins an election, you will congratulate him, move forward, and wait for another chance. We should build confidence in the process and make sure that it is transparent.

How do you view the spread of political appointments and resource allocation in Nigeria under President Tinubu’s administration?

Right from Obasanjo’s time, I have kept on telling people that whoever wins an election should be allowed to pick a team that he thinks can help him govern the country fairly, bring about democratic dividends to Nigerians, build infrastructure, etc. I also told people 20 years ago that if Obasanjo left office and Nigerians found Iyabo Obasanjo, as the most appropriate person to be president, there would be nothing wrong with voting for her.

So, it doesn’t matter to me where anybody in office comes from. The most important thing is that he must deliver the dividends of democracy to the people. If there is no hyperinflation, goods are not priced beyond the reach of the ordinary person, and the cost of fuel is affordable so I can travel or take public transport; if there is good healthcare and there are good and affordable schools for my children — do I care if Trump is the President of Nigeria?

But because we are not democrats, when you say something correctly, some uninformed people will say you are supporting one person. The press should also stop using the words North and South, calling people Fulani, Yoruba, Edo, Igbo, Itsekiri, etc. We can’t build a nation when we keep reminding people of our differences. It doesn’t matter whether you are a Muslim, Christian, pagan, or atheist. The Constitution of Nigeria says any Nigerian — it didn’t specify religion or tribe — can be anything. Once people are promoting unity, Nigeria will be a better place.

I can understand that some sections of the country, because they want to fight another section, are using all those primordial sentiments to garner support and run down the other part. But those times are gone. Nigerians are educated and informed enough to know what is good for them. If you use money to bribe people to vote for you, I will not blame you — I will blame those who took the money and voted for you. Because you can’t force people to vote for you. You also can’t write the figures if they don’t vote for you.

We must work hard to build an electoral empire that would be fair to everybody. We must force the judiciary to stop listening to people in authority — people holding transient powers — and to do justice. At every point in time, we must ensure that the security forces owe their allegiance to Nigeria, not to an individual holding public office at a particular time. This is what will make Nigeria a great country.

Why do you think both the ruling party and the opposition figures have turned former President Buhari’s home into a Mecca of sorts suddenly?

Those are useless people; they don’t know their left from right. Of what use is Buhari to anybody now? How can I go to Buhari — to say what? What did he do while in office? How can I go and seek relevance from Buhari? Is he relevant? He is not.

Do you mean the former president is not relevant in Nigerian politics?

Buhari is not relevant in Nigerian politics. He was defeated in 2019 by Atiku. Because they did not declare Atiku as the winner does not mean he didn’t win that election. When I see people going to Buhari, I just laugh. Who is Buhari? The man should just go and rest and wait for his death, and start doing astaghfirullah (seeking forgiveness from God) for dashing the hopes of the people of Nigeria.

You are one of the signatories to the formation of APC, and you campaigned for Buhari’s election in 2015. At what point did you see him as a bad person?

I was number four on the list of the people who signed the form for the creation of APC. But I later discovered that Buhari is the greatest fraud that has happened to Nigeria. He was fake. I realised quite early, but my mentor, Sule Hamma, always kept on advising me as a senior brother.

What exactly did he do wrong?

Buhari was the greatest fraud because he managed to conceal his true intentions for 15 years. No Nigerian could predict what he would do once he became president. We didn’t know his true colours. For years, Buhari preached that he was for the masses—the talakawas—without realising he was actually the saviour of the bourgeois. Isn’t that enough of a fraud?

What is your assessment of President Tinubu’s administration?

I don’t want to comment on that. Nigerians should comment on his administration. They should express how they feel about it. If they are okay with what is happening, so be it. The time to deal with him is when you are given the ballot paper. But despite all this, if people claim that you voted for them in an election and you know you didn’t vote for them, and you sat down, it means you have accepted the verdict of what they have done. If the politicians do anything that we don’t believe in, there are a lot of ways we can show our anger constitutionally. The only time you can hold any elected officer to account for his misdeeds is at the time of the election. Nigerians have never told you that they cannot cast their votes for whosoever they want. But those votes must be sacrosanct.

Some northern political leaders are embittered with President Tinubu’s administration. What do you think is responsible for the resentment?

You know some of us claim that we brought Buhari into politics. Everybody has got his own version of his contribution to bringing Buhari into politics. But there is one thing that is not disputable — nobody remained as steadfast and unwavering as some of us did with Buhari for 13 years. Despite all that, when he got into government, the likes of El-Rufai kicked us out of that government because they are sycophants. Despite calling Buhari several names, they kicked us out.

My daughter worked in the Villa for four good years without getting a salary. She was not paid for four years. Now, Tinubu, who is a Yoruba man from Lagos, came, and my daughters called him with my phone. They told him the country is hard, that they had finished school and there was no job. He gave one of them a job. This was misinterpreted to mean I am working for Tinubu. Nigeria doesn’t belong to Tinubu alone; it belongs to all of us, and my children have a stake, and they can take any job. It is not a political appointment. In comparison to Buhari, who is a better man? Is it Buhari, who denied my daughter four years of salaries, or Tinubu, with whom we have political differences? Who is my friend between them?

I have been called names because of this. But if there is any politician of integrity in this country; I’m not praising myself; you can’t count three people without putting my name there. I have resisted juicy appointments from the time of Obasanjo, Yar’Adua, and Jonathan governments. I am still living in a two-bedroom flat after 50 years of graduation, despite holding public offices. I am living with integrity and honour. Whoever holds a certain view, apart from good governance, is just a misfit. Of course, people can continue to have their differences — it is part of nature and part of our lives.

Is it true that Kwankwaso is joining APC?

I am an NNPP person, and a supporter of Rabiu Kwankwaso, and he has not told anybody that he is joining any party or coalition. However, we are talking to people of like minds across the country. By the time we come out with a formidable platform, Nigerians will know that the party to take over the government of the federation in 2027 has come.

You have many political associates who were members of the CPC in APC. Do you have any clue about the plan by the CPC bloc to dump the APC?

I learnt that the CPC group within the APC is divided into two: those who are opposed to Tinubu and those who are for him. I want to ask all of them in all honesty: is there any CPC man who has more CPC credentials and participated more in the formation and development of the party than Sule Yahaya Hamma and Buba Galadima? Is there any of them?

Today, are we in any of the equations? I also ask those who are not satisfied with what Tinubu is doing: why can’t they ask themselves, when they were in government under Buhari, what did they do for the CPC people they neglected? They should thank Tinubu for not running after them after holding public offices. Tinubu has given them a lot of concessions. Because if he likes, he can put any of them in jail. There is none of them he cannot put in jail if he wants. So, he did a gracious thing for them, and they should be grateful that they are free, walking on the streets of Nigeria. They should not carry their luck too far — I mean those who belong to the Buhari group.

Do you think the anti-Tinubu CPC bloc is on a wrong mission?

They will soon find out. I think they should thank Tinubu and not fight him.

Could you explain the politics behind the controversies on the Emir of Kano stool?

Everybody knows that all issues about chieftaincy matters end on the desk of the governor. The issue of the Emir of Kano will end on the desk of the governor. Even if the Supreme Court removes Sanusi, nobody will appoint an Emir for Kano from Abuja. That can only be done in Kano. So, why are they wasting their time? Why do they want to kill innocent people by instigating one brother against another, or an uncle against his nephew? All the instability in Kano is being cooked up in Abuja.

You recently warned President Tinubu that meddling in Kano’s political affairs and the emirate crisis could “destroy his presidency.” Could you elaborate on this?

When the grandfather of this Emir, Sanusi, was deposed in 1963, it was that issue, coupled with the wetie (political crisis) in 1964 in the Western Region, that led to the destruction of the civilian government of Abubakar Tafawa Balewa in January 1966.

President Tinubu has no business in deciding who becomes the Emir of Kano. But I also know that he participated in promoting Sanusi to be the Emir in the first place when Ado Bayero died.

What is your take on the withdrawn invitation letter sent to Emir Sanusi by the police?

Was there any reason for the police to invite the Emir in the first place? Why should they even call him? It is like charging Tinubu to court when a driver hits someone on the Lagos Mainland Bridge. What has Sanusi got to do with the killing on Eid-el-Fitr day? The man was riding on horseback one kilometre away when the problem happened. That’s why I said the instability is being fuelled by people in Abuja who have no political base, and who want to create one by force, by declaring a state of emergency in Kano.

There is a resurgent large scale of insecurity in the North. What do you think is responsible for this?

I think that some people are making a business out of it. The President should identify these kinds of people, because he knows who he gives money to — money that is not being utilised.

You’ve cautioned against the creation of state police, suggesting it could lead to national disintegration. What alternative security frameworks would you recommend to balance state autonomy with national unity?

The police and military postings are done by people as jobs for the boys. They should be jobs for the nation, because once you post people not because they are capable or qualified, but because they are close to you or you want them to make money, then you can’t get good results. That is exactly what is happening nowadays. All postings are political — for political gains or to make money for the boys.

The truth of the matter is that we are all Nigerians, and we should place the country above all else and work for the development and progress of this nation. We should avoid using tribal, religious, sectional, or other primordial sentiments to judge people.

[PUNCH]

The former National Secretary of the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ), Jola Ogunlusi, has passed away at the age of 91.

The veteran journalist died on Saturday morning after a brief illness.

In a statement issued by the family’s representative, Gbenga Aruleba, Ogunlusi’s passing was announced with deep sorrow but also with gratitude for his impactful and well-lived life.

The statement reads, “With profound sadness but utmost gratitude to God for a fulfilled and life well-spent, the Ogunlusi family announces the passing of our beloved Patriarch, Father, Grandfather, and Uncle, Mr. Jola Ogunlusi, who departed this life on Saturday, April 19, 2025, at 9:54 am, following a brief illness. He was aged 91.”

Known affectionately as “Papa Jola,” Ogunlusi’s legacy in journalism spans several decades. He began his career in the early 1970s and later became the National Secretary of the Nigeria Union of Journalists, where he became a beacon of dedication, fairness, and commitment to justice.

“Papa Jola indeed lived a fulfilled life, a life dedicated to the service of humanity and God. “From his active days as a journalist to his leadership role in the NUJ, Pa Ogunlusi was an epitome of dedication, loyalty, and singular commitment to equity, justice, and fairness,” the statement continued.

The Ogunlusi family highlighted the profound impact Jola Ogunlusi had on those around him, noting his sincerity, kindness, and generosity.

“In all his call to duty, our Daddy left an indelible mark on everyone about his sincerity and commitment. He was a kind, loving, and caring man, both to his family, extended family members, colleagues, acquaintances, and people, generally,” the family’s tribute stated.

As Rivers State’s emergency rule enters the second month, KUNLE ODEREMI reports on the string of controversies and teasers trailing the activities of the interim tenure of Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (retd.), a former Chief of Naval Staff.

THIRTY-THREE days after, the proclamation a state of emergency in Rivers State is still generating heated debate, controversy and suspicion. The fit and whiff of anger spewed after the suspension of the governor, Siminalayi Fubara, and members of the State House of Assembly shows no sign of ebbing with the belligerent forces enmeshed in claims and counterclaims that culminated in the emergency rule.  Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (retd.), who was the Chief of Naval Staff from 2015 to 2021, was named as the sole administrator.

President Bola Tinubu, who had on October 31, 2024 intervened in the crisis by calling on the camps enmeshed in the crisis to sheathe their sword and embrace peace in the interest of the state.  The relationship between Minister of the Federal capital Territory (FCT), Mr Nyesom Wike and Governor Fubara, hitherto close allies, soon got soured over the appointment of key aides, including commissioners. The crisis led to moves by 24 members of the state House of Assembly loyal to Wike, to impeach Fubara. Prominent persons, including the late leader of the Ijaw Nation, Chief Edwin Clark had described the presidential intervention as not only unconstitutional but also not in the right direction. Clark, the convener of the Pan-Niger Delta Forum (PANDEF), said: “Mr president is the president of Nigeria and commander-in-chief of the armed forces of Nigeria and I am one of those giving him that support.”

However, Fubara claimed that the intervention of the president was political and not constitutional, affirming his commitment to the terms of the peace deal and mediation. His explanation followed warnings from various stakeholders that the governor should be more circumspect on the peace initiative. Shortly, the pro-Wike members of the House renewed the threat of impeachment against the governor. Fubara came up with a few things that had transpired that were not within the public space concerning the deal. He said: “Mr President invited all the parties to Abuja, and came out with a resolution that we should go and implement. That resolution, I am implementing it. It is not a constitutional implementation. It is a political solution to a problem.”

The second decisive intervention by President Tinubu was done on March 18, 2025 via a national broadcast in which he announced the declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers.  In the broadcast, the President said the Rivers crisis posed a stumbling block to “democratic governance, which we have all fought and worked for over the years.” He accused Fubara of having “for unjustifiable reasons, demolished the House of Assembly of the state as far back as 13th December 2023,” and had for 14 months after, not rebuilt same.” The President also said he made “personal interventions between the contending parties for a peaceful resolution of the crisis, but my efforts have been largely ignored by the parties to the crisis.” Tinubu recalled that on February 28, the Supreme Court delivered a judgment in respect of about eight consolidated appeals concerning the political crisis in Rivers and made some orders, among them, the immediate passing of an Appropriation Bill by the Rivers State House of Assembly which up till now has not been facilitated. He warned that, “The Administrator will not make any new laws. He will, however, be free to formulate regulations as may be found necessary to do his job, but such regulations will need to be considered and approved by the Federal Executive Council and promulgated by the President for the state.”

Justifying the action of the President following criticisms in certain quarters, the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) had emphasized the place of symphony among the three arms of government at all times. He said: “The government stands on the tripod: the Executive, the Legislature, and the Judiciary, and you (the governor) have made the functioning of government impossible. It is not enough for the Executive, to say, we are spending money, even the money you want to spend, the State Assembly must have appropriated it. These are some of the findings that the Supreme Court made. And at the end of the day, the Supreme Court said, or came to a decision, that the governor’s behaviour was like a despot, and that as the situation was, there was no government in Rivers. If there was no government in Rivers, what would we be looking for?”

Litigation

Governors elected on the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) are in the Supreme Court challenging the imposition of emergency rule in Rivers. The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has filed a suit against the proclamation of the state of emergency in Rivers. There are sundry suits initiated by either individuals or groups seeking to restore the democratic structures that were suspended by the order of the President imposing the state of emergency in Rivers.

Stumbling block

In the wake of the proclamation of the emergency rule, Fubara had accused the FCT minister of frustrating all efforts at peacefully resolving the crisis. In a press statement signed on his behalf by the sacked Commissioner for Information and Communications, Joseph Johnson, the suspended governor claimed that all steps taken to foster peace, unity and stability in the state were frustrated by Wike.  He said, “Since our dear Governor assumed office as your Governor, all his actions and decisions have been guided by his constitutional oath of office and a great sense of duty. Even in the face of the political impasse, he remained committed to constitutional order and the rule of law, putting the interest of our people above all else. This was why, immediately after Mr. President’s intervention to broker peace, we did not hesitate to implement the agreed terms in good faith, including welcoming back commissioners who had previously resigned on their own volition.  Furthermore, we moved swiftly to comply with the Supreme Court’s judgment immediately we received the certified true copy of the judgment to return the state to normalcy. These steps were taken not for personal gains but to foster peace, unity and stability in our dear State.” Fubara further alleged that members of the Rivers Assembly, led by the minister, made genuine peace and progress difficult.

Controversies, posers

Rivers has been enmeshed in protests in the last couple of weeks. Women, the youth and other categories of interest groups loyal to either division of the imbroglio have been organising street protests for or against the interim administration or perceived forces behind the emergency rule. One of the posers that surround the interim administration in Rivers concerned when it summoned the suspended governor to the Government House over state matters. Though the authorities later disowned the summons, the report provoked many stakeholders and observers with insinuations that the authority was going out of their brief. The development also created public curiousity and aroused teasers whether the House of Representatives had reneged on its resolution that the activities of the sole administrator, especially on projects should be subject to the approval of the House. It was of the conditions given by the House before it approved the proclamation of the emergency rule in Rivers, whereas the President had said such power would be exercised by the Federal Executive Council (FEC). Ibas has taken other far-reaching decisions without recourse to the National Assembly. He made appointments into strategic positions, including singlehandedly picking sole administrators for the 23 local government areas of the state and approved the reconstitution of suspended boards of agencies, commissions, and parastatals, whereas, a Federal High Court in Port Harcourt had earlier restrained ibas from appointing sole administrators into the local council areas in the state.  The order was issued by the Justice, Adamu Turaki Muhammed in Suit No. FHC/PH/CS/46/2025 filed by Pilex Centre for Civic Education Initiative led by Courage Msirimovu against Ibas in his official capacity. Justice Muhammed said he found enough reason to grant the prayers and fixed April 14, 2025, for hearing.  The court added that the motion ex parte was filed on March 28, with the plaintiff seeking many reliefs, among which was an order of interim injunction restraining the respondent or his agents from appointing the sole administrator or whatever name called for the 23 LGAs. They also prayed for any other order deemed necessary in the circumstance.  Ibas equally appointed a new chairman and members of the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC) raising posers over his earlier statement on his mission as an arbiter in the Rivers quagmire. 

Ibas summons Fubara

The sole administrator, a few days ago, reportedly summoned Fubara and his deputy, Dr Ngozi Ordu, to appear before him at the Government House in Port Harcourt. He was quoted in a special statement issued and signed by the Secretary to the State Government, Professor Ibibia Lucky Worika that the summons was part of an official inquiry into appointments made during the Fubara administration over the past two years.  The full statement titled: Rivers Government Special Announcement, read: “The Sole Administrator, Vice Admiral (retd.) Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas, CFR, has formally summoned the suspended Governor of Rivers State, Sir Siminialayi Fubara, and his Deputy, Dr. Ngozi Ordu, to appear before him for an inquiry into the appointments made under their administration over the past two years. Sir Fubara is directed to present all relevant documents and records pertaining to appointments, including justifications and procedures followed during his tenure. The session will also serve as an opportunity for the suspended Governor to provide a clear and detailed explanation as to why he believes he should be reinstated to office. Both parties are expected to appear in person as follows: Date: Friday, 18th April, 2025; Time: 10:00am Prompt; Venue: Conference Room, Rivers State Government House, and Port Harcourt. Attendance is mandatory. This process forms part of the Sole Administrator’s ongoing efforts to restore transparency and accountability and lasting peace in the governance of Rivers State.”

Ibas’ article of faith

In his maiden address to the citizens of Rivers, the Sole Administrator, Vice Admiral Ibok-Ette Ibas, had warned that he would not condone lawlessness and any act of violence, declaring that further attacks on oil installations and other critical national assets by any group would not be tolerated. Ibas said his acceptance to his appointment was not hinged on personal ambition but a commitment to bring peace, stability and progress. More importantly, he promised to be neutral, stressing: “The political impasse nearly two years in Rivers State has paralysed governance, desecrated democratic institutions, threatened security and undermined the economic and social fabric of the state. It has deepened division among the people and cast a show of uncertainty over the future. These are realities we cannot afford to ignore.” Ibas said he was conscious of the task before him and would evoke confidence and trust in his assignment.  “As a son of the Niger Delta, I am one of you and I recognize the weight of this moment, the expectations of the people and the challenges that lie ahead. The uneasy calm that pervades the state is palpable and I feel the weight of families, young and old, businesses are uncertain what the future holds. My mandate is clear, to restore law and order, stabilise the polity and create the necessary conditions for the full restoration of democratic institutions and representation. This is not a task for one man alone,” he stated. He added, “I come as a servant of the state entrusted with the solemn duty of restoring peace and order so that Rivers State can move forward once again and reclaim its rightful place as the oil and gas capital of Nigeria and I dare say, Africa.”

NASS summons Ibas, set for inquiry

Amid the rising public concern, the House of Representatives summoned  Ibas, the Sole Administrator for a detailed interaction aimed at uncovering the true state of governance in the crisis-hit region. The invitation was confirmed in a statement issued by the House spokesman, Honourable  Akin Rotimi Jr and it followed the inauguration of an Ad-Hoc Committee on Rivers State Oversight by the House, which pledged to ensure that the emergency governance measures currently in place serve the best interests of the state’s residents.

President Bola Tinubu had earlier declared a state of emergency in Rivers State, leading to the suspension of Governor Siminalayi Fubara, Deputy Governor Ngozi Odu, the State House of Assembly, and other elected officials. Speaking in a national broadcast, Tinubu noted: “I have made personal interventions between the contending parties for a peaceful resolution of the crisis, but my efforts have been largely ignored by the parties involved.”

Following Tinubu’s proclamation, both the Senate and the House of Representatives ratified the emergency rule in March 2025, invoking constitutional authority granted under the amended 1999 Constitution. A joint committee of both legislative chambers was subsequently established to oversee the state’s affairs during the emergency period.  The chairman of the Committee and House Leader, Professor Julius Ihonvbere, stated that the interaction is to determine the state of affairs in Rivers under Ibas’ watch since he assumed office. The lawmaker promised that the oversight would ensure the House remained properly briefed in order to uphold transparency in the committee’s work.

Some observers have also raised concern over what they perceived as the individual and collective role of other top federal Government top functionaries over the seemingly intractable Rivers imbroglio. What they described as their comments and body language has elicited concerns about the stance of such officials. There have been claims and counterclaims about the role of the top hierarchy of the Nigeria Police Force, the Judiciary, the presidency and the national Assembly on what played out that led to the emergency rule in Rivers. The trouble in the state was exacerbated after the Supreme Court judgment that recognised the 24 pro-Wike members of the Rivers Assembly, as authentic, ordered Fubara to represent the 2025 state budget to the House.

The controversy trailing the state of affairs in Rivers in the last 33 days has also led to the sudden exit of a Chief Magistrate in the state, Ejike George. He resigned from the Rivers State Judiciary on the ground that he was not trained to take directives from a military administration. “I am simply saying that I cannot take instructions from a military administrator. I cannot,” he said. George faulted the president’s decision, saying that there was no crisis in Rivers State to have warranted the suspension of Fubara and others as well as the introduction of military-style rule. “It is not fair to the people of Rivers State,” he insisted. A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Femi Falana, argued that Ibas had gone outside his brief and should be removed by the Federal Government as Rivers sole administrator. He hinged his demand on the official Federal Government Gazette, which spelt out the duty of Ibas, which stated that, “The Sole Administrator shall operate on the basis of such Regulations that may, from time to time, be issued by me,” as proclaimed by President Tinubu. Falana said: “By treating the orders of President Bola Tinubu with contempt, the Sole Administrator has compounded the illegality of his appointment. The Sole Administrator ought to be removed without any further delay. However, a presidential aide, Tunde Rahman,  faulted critics over the proclamation of the emergency rule in Rivers. The  Senior Special Assistant to President Tinubu on Media, Publicity & Special Duties stated: “Those criticising the declaration of emergency rule in Rivers on the grounds that President Tinubu, while in opposition, strongly condemned the emergency declaration by former President Jonathan in Adamawa, Borno and Yobe states conveniently forgot to mention Tinubu’s opposition to former Edo State Governor Godwin Obaseki who muscled the state assembly and particularly refused to inaugurate the 14 lawmakers who were duly elected by their constituents till the end of his tenure. Tinubu called out Obaseki, labeling him a despot who emasculated the legislature, which is pivotal to the functioning of democracy, the same way he has condemned Governor Fubara.” He noted that the National Assembly, particularly the House of Representatives, has “added democratic components to the emergency proclamation by announcing regular oversight on the work of the administrator and the National Assembly performing the law-making functions of the Rivers State Assembly as provided for in the constitution.”

On a final note, a principal factor in the Rivers crisis and current FCT minister, Wike noted that his wish was that Fubara was allowed to be removed from office by the legislative arm of government, rather than his being suspended under the emergency rule. Some other stakeholders are raising such teasers as if the actions of the sole administrator do not really amount to stoking the fire or playing the Ostrich. Time will tell!

The family of renowned Nigerian gospel singer, Bolaji Olarewaju, popularly known as “Big Bolaji” or “Big B,” has confirmed the passing of their beloved son, father, brother, and singer.
Naija News reports that Big Bolaji passed away on Saturday, April 19, 2025, after a brief illness.

The news of his death comes shortly after the singer celebrated his 50th birthday in November 2024, marking a milestone in his career and life. His death has sent shockwaves through the gospel music community, leaving fans and colleagues heartbroken.

A statement about his passing was released by his family and shared publicly by his colleague, fellow gospel artist, Beejaysaxb, on social media.

Big Bolaji, known for his powerful vocals and inspirational songs, was a household name in the Nigerian gospel music scene. His music touched the lives of many

See the statement below:

The governor of Abia State, Alex Otti has welcomed politicians from opposition parties into the Abia State chapter of the Labour Party.

The defectors including the lawmaker representing Isuikwuato state constituency at the Abia State House of Assembly, Lucky Johnson and his predecessor, Chukwudi Ogele said their decision to join the Labour Party stems from the numerous achievements of Governor Otti across the state.

The defectors were welcomed by Otti at the Isuikwuato High School, Otamkpa.

Speaking during the defection, Otti commended the decampees for their truthfulness and ability to align towards the light.

The governor assured that the state would be witnessing unprecedented developments in the coming months.

He also commended the people of Abia for their continuous support towards the success of his administration.

He said, “As part of the rehabilitation of Abia State University, I have approved that an independent power plant project be set up at Abia State University.

“The independent power plant project would generate not less than 10 megawatts of electricity.

“So, the idea is that not just Abia State University will be served, but Uturu town would also have power from the initiative,” Otti said.

Aspiring Nigerian teachers looking to relocate to the United Kingdom, UK now have a clearer path to securing Qualified Teacher Status (QTS), especially in high-demand STEM and modern foreign language subjects.

The UK’s Department for Education has outlined key requirements for international applicants, highlighting qualifications, documentation, and subject-specific expectations that must be met to teach in secondary schools across England.

Key Requirements

Valid International Passport

Applicants must possess a valid, non-expired international passport. No other forms of identification will be accepted. 

Educational Qualifications

Teachers must hold a teaching qualification equivalent to a UK Level 6 or higher. If this teaching qualification is not a bachelor’s degree, a separate bachelor’s degree is also required.

Certificates and Transcripts

For every qualification listed, applicants must submit both a certificate and a transcript (or diploma supplement), indicating the scope of practical teaching covered during training.

Nigeria-Specific Restrictions

Certain Nigerian teaching qualifications are not recognized in the UK. These include:

• Nigeria Certificate in Education (NCE)
• Teachers Certificate Grade II
• Associate Certificate in Education (pre-1990)

Accepted Teaching Subjects

Eligibility is limited to applicants trained in teaching students in specific subjects:

• Maths, Science (Biology, Chemistry, Physics), Computer Science
• French, German, Italian, Japanese, Latin, Mandarin, Russian, Spanish
  Related fields like Agricultural Science or Economics are not accepted unless at least 50% of the bachelor’s degree or 25% of teacher training was focused on an approved subject.

English Language Proficiency

Candidates must demonstrate English proficiency through:

• A degree taught in English
• An approved English language test, such as IELTS for UKVI

Letter of Professional Standing

Upon acceptance of the QTS application, candidates must contact Nigeria’s Teachers Registration Council (TRCN) to submit the following directly to the UK Department for Education:

• Letter of Professional Standing
• TRCN certificate and license
• Valid ID

References from Teaching Experience

Applicants must submit references from schools where they have:

• Taught post-qualification
• Taught without supervision
• Delivered and assessed lessons for a minimum of four students
• Worked within institutions offering mandatory education

How to apply

STEP 1: Apply for Qualified Teacher Status (QTS)

Visit the official UK government site: Apply for QTS in England
Steps:

• Create an account
• Fill in your qualifications and teaching experience
• Upload your documents
• Submit your application

Note: You don’t need to send your Letter of Professional Standing (LoPS) at this stage.

STEP 2: Await Initial Review

After submission, the UK Department for Education (DfE) will review your application. If it passes the initial assessment, you’ll receive instructions to request a Letter of Professional Standing from Nigeria’s Teachers Registration Council (TRCN).

STEP 3: Request Your LoPS from TRCN

When asked by the UK authorities:

• Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
• Include:
  • Your QTS application reference number
  • TRCN certificate and license
  • Valid ID (passport or national ID)

TRCN will send your LoPS directly to the UK DfE.

STEP 6: Get Your QTS Decision

Once your documents are verified and accepted, the DfE will issue your Qualified Teacher Status (QTS) — an official requirement to teach in most schools in England.

After Gaining QTS: Securing a Teaching Job and Relocating

STEP 7: Search for Sponsored Teaching Jobs

Visit:

• Teaching Vacancies UK

Tip: Filter for roles that explicitly mention “Visa sponsorship available.”

STEP 8: Obtain a Job Offer & Certificate of Sponsorship (CoS)

Once you’re hired, your school will provide a Certificate of Sponsorship (CoS) — a requirement for your visa application.

STEP 9: Apply for the UK Skilled Worker Visa

With your job offer and CoS:

• Pay visa application fees
• Pay Immigration Health Surcharge (IHS)
• Submit your biometric data

STEP 10: Prepare for Your Relocation

Plan your move:

• Book your flight and arrange accommodation
• Budget for settling-in costs
• Learn about the UK school system and cultural expectations