Admin

Admin

The Nigerian government has said that it was considering an adjustment to its N54.99trn 2025 national budget as part of measures to respond to potential shocks of the United States’ global trade tariff hike.

Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Wale Edun, gave the hint on Monday at a Corporate Governance Forum organised by the Ministry of Finance Incorporated (MOFI) in Abuja.

 

Edun also acknowledged that the adverse effect of the US tariff on Nigeria will be through oil price plunge. He claimed that the government was making efforts to ramp up crude oil production to curtail any price effect.

“We are also focusing on non-oil revenue mobilisation by FIRS and Customs.

“Budget adjustment and prioritisation where possible, and also innovative non-debt financing strategies,” Edun listed the possible counter measures at the event that was held at Transcorp Hilton in Abuja on Monday.

 

Recall that US President Donald Trump had last week announced general global tariffs on all imports into the country, including Nigeria.

Nigeria-US trade has been in surplus in the last three years (2022-2024). According to official data, Nigeria’s export to the US is between $5bn to $6bn annually.

“Consequently, the tariff effect on exports is negligible if we sustain our oil and minerals export volume,” Edun told the gathering.

However, he claimed that Nigeria was positioned to withstand global trade disruptions, including the new United States import tariffs, a position that triggered a murmured disagreement from the crowd present at the event.

He said the administration was determined to attract investment, not just through policy rhetoric but by demonstrating corporate readiness and governance in state-owned enterprises.

Edun stressed that Nigeria remained relatively insulated due to early reforms and a shift in economic strategy.

The minister said that the government was prioritising non-oil revenue mobilisation through the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) and Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) to mitigate potential revenue shortfalls.

Edun said Nigeria was already pivoting its economic model toward private sector-led growth, equity-based financing, and strategic asset optimisation.

According to Edun, while the government accounts for 10 per cent of the gross domestic product (GDP), the private sector contributes 90 per cent.

He credited President Bola Tinubu’s administration with stabilising key macroeconomic indicators and laying the groundwork for sustainable growth.

[Leadership]

A high court sitting in Jos, Plateau State, has adjourned the trial over the murder of Major-General Idris Alkali (rtd) to May 28 and 29, 2025, for the defendants to open their defence.

The adjournment followed the continued cross-examination of retired Major-General U. I. Mohammed on Wednesday. Before this, the prosecution had formally closed its case.

General Alkali, who was the former Chief of Administration at the Nigerian Army Headquarters, was declared missing just weeks after retiring from active service.

He had embarked on a journey from Abuja to Bauchi, passing through Plateau State, where he was last heard from during the trip. He was driving a black Toyota Corolla car.

At the time of his disappearance in 2018, General Mohammed (then a brigadier-general) was the Garrison Commander of the 3 Division and led the search-and-rescue mission for the missing officer.

His efforts led to the discovery of Alkali’s car in a deep mining pit in Du community and, later, his body in an abandoned well at Guchwet village in Shen district of Jos South LGA of Plateau State. During Monday’s proceedings, the defence counsel extensively cross-examined General Mohammed regarding inconsistencies and clarifications related to his previous statements and testimonies concerning Alkali’s death.

The questioning, which lasted for about two hours, focused on both his initial and subsequent accounts of the incident.

After the session, Justice Arum Ashom excused the witness and scheduled the next hearing.

Prosecuting counsel, Simon Mom, who represented the Plateau State Attorney General, did not object to the adjournment.

The judge subsequently adjourned the case to May 28 and 29 for the defence to begin presenting its case.

[DailyTrust]

Pascal Dozie, a renowned Nigerian entrepreneur and business leader has died. He was 86.

According to sources close to the deceased, Dozie died after a battle with old age-related illness.

Dozie, was a man of many parts, best known for founding Diamond Bank and serving as chairman of Pan-Atlantic University.

He was born on April 9, 1939, in Egbu, Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria. Dozie’s educational background includes a degree in Economics from the London School of Economics and a master’s in Administrative Science from City University in London.

 

Dozie also founded theAfrican Development Consulting Group, which worked with notable clients like Nestle and Pfizer. He served as MTN Group chairman but later resigned and was succeeded by Ernest Ndukwe.

Dozie received the prestigious National Award of the Order of the Niger (OON) for his contributions to Nigeria’s banking industry.

Dozie is survived by his wife Chinyere Dozie, and five children among other relatives.

[businessday.ng]

For centuries, the Kano Durbar has stood as a majestic symbol of northern Nigeria’s cultural pride—an annual celebration marked by regal horsemen, rhythmic drumming, and crowds of admirers drawn from across the globe but for the second consecutive year, that legacy has been paused.

Once again, silence replaced the thunder of hooves and the color of tradition, as the famed Sallah Durbar was cancelled due to security concerns. The decision, announced by the Kano state Police command just days before the festival, has triggered waves of disappointment among tourists, culture custodians, and tourism experts alike.

Tourists Left in the Cold

More than 160 tourists; many of whom had travelled thousands of miles—had arrived in Kano, eager to witness the historic spectacle. Instead, they were met with abrupt disappointment.

“I was terribly disappointed,” said Virgil Taylor, an African-American tourist from the United States.

“As a Black man living in America, it was empowering to come to Kano and witness a celebration of African royalty and heritage. I planned this trip for over a year. The cancellation crushed me,” Taylor said.

Taylor was not alone in his frustration. Among those affected was Lekan Okanlawon, a UK-based Nigerian who had come with a team of polo players and horse riders to attempt setting a Guinness World Record for the largest horse-riding procession.

“We had shipped our horses from the UK,” he lamented.

Speaking further, he said, “We were inspired by the global potential of the Durbar. UNESCO has already recognized it as part of its heritage program. But the sudden cancellation was a huge letdown.”

Economic Ripples Across the City

Beyond the cultural cost, the cancellation has affected the local economy. Traders, hoteliers, and artisans who usually benefit from the influx of guests during the Durbar reported heavy losses.

Yusuf Ibrahim Lajawa, a tourism expert based in Kano, explained the far-reaching impact, “Durbar season is one of the most profitable periods for small businesses. From food vendors to traditional crafts people, everyone benefits from the massive turnout. The suspension doesn’t only hurt culture—it hits livelihoods.”

Lajawa called on government and security stakeholders to find lasting solutions. “This isn’t just about a festival. It’s about heritage, tourism, and economic development. We urge those in power to take action and restore this glorious tradition in full force,” he said.

The Security Dilemma

Security authorities have defended their decision, citing intelligence reports and fears of a possible clash due to the presence of two rival emirs reportedly planning separate Durbar processions.

“We had to act in the interest of public safety, The potential for unrest was too high.” the police maintained.

In a bid to salvage the situation, the 16th Emir of Kano led a modest Eid motorcade. But the alternative procession lacked the grandeur, symbolism, and tourist appeal of the Durbar, leaving many observers underwhelmed.

Preserving a Priceless Legacy

Ahmad Yusuf, Executive Secretary of the Kano State History and Culture Bureau, expressed regret over the repeated cancellations, noting the loss of cultural and economic value.

“We acknowledge the concerns and the disappointment,” he said. “The Durbar is a cultural asset that deserves protection and promotion. Our hope is to work closely with stakeholders to ensure its safe return.”

Founded over five centuries ago, the Kano Durbar is more than a festival—it is a living narrative of tradition, royalty, and communal identity. For decades, it has attracted the admiration of scholars, tourists, and photographers from across the world.

But with back-to-back suspensions, tourism experts now worry that the city’s cultural brand could erode.

“This is not just Kano’s loss. It’s Nigeria’s loss,” said Okanlawon.

According to him, “No other country can showcase this level of royal equestrian culture. If properly managed, it can put Nigeria on the world tourism map.”

The UNESCO-recognized Durbar has over the years served as a magnet for culture enthusiasts from around the world. It is not just a celebration but a convergence of heritage, pride, and economic potential.

With back-to-back cancellations, experts warn that Kano risks losing its place as a premier cultural destination unless deliberate efforts are made to revive and secure the Durbar.

“This is a call to action. The Durbar is our crown jewel. It deserves to shine again,” Lajawa said.

[DailyPost]

 
 
 
 

A Nigerian court has adjourned a tax evasion case against Binance to April 30 to allow the local tax authority to respond to a request by the cryptocurrency exchange to annul an order for court documents to be served on it by email, a lawyer for Binance said on Monday.

The lawyer, Chukwuka Ikwuazom, asked the court to set aside the order because the tax authority did not obtain a leave from the court to serve court documents on Binance outside Nigeria. Binance does not have a physical office in Nigeria.

“On the whole the order for the substituted service as granted by the court on February 11, 2025 on Binance who is … registered under the laws of Cayman Islands and resident in Cayman Islands is improper and should be set aside,” Ikwuazom said.

Nigeria has filed a lawsuit seeking to compel Binance to pay $79.5 billion for economic losses it says were caused by its operations in the country and $2 billion in back taxes, according to court documents.

 

Authorities blame Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, for Nigeria’s currency instability and detained two of its executives in 2024 after cryptocurrency websites emerged as platforms of choice for trading the local naira currency.

Binance, which is not registered in Nigeria, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. It has previously said it is working with Nigeria’s Federal Inland Revenue Service to resolve potential historic tax liabilities.

The inland revenue service alleges in documents seen by Reuters that Binance has a “significant economic presence” in Nigeria and is therefore liable for corporate income tax. It is seeking a court declaration that Binance pay income taxes for 2022 and 2023, plus a 10% annual penalty on unpaid amounts.

[TheNation]

The challenges facing the implementation of the Supreme Court judgment on local government autonomy have assumed a new dimension, with some state governors explicitly warning their council chairmen against opening an account with the Central Bank of Nigeria for the direct payment of their allocations from the Federation Account.

The latest development represents yet another significant hurdle, nearly nine months after the Supreme Court granted full autonomy to the 774 local governments across the country, paving the way for direct payment of federal allocations.

As part of the Federal Government’s commitment to the Supreme Court judgment, a panel was set up to ensure the implementation of LG autonomy.

In line with its recommendation, the panel directed the Central Bank of Nigeria to open accounts for the 774 LGs for direct payment of their allocation.

 

This process has, however, faced delays with the CBN and LGs trading accusations.

The immediate-past Account-General of the Federation, Oluwatoyin Madein and the Attorney-General and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, and other officials recently commenced talks on the modalities for the LGAs to open accounts with the CBN for direct allocation but are reportedly facing challenges identifying LGAs with democratically elected officials.

A Federation Account Allocation Committee Technical Sub-Committee meeting revealed that only Delta State LGAs had submitted their account details.

Amid the controversy,  fresh investigations by The PUNCH on Monday revealed that some governors have resorted to intimidation and coercion, pressuring their local government chairmen to refrain from opening the designated accounts for direct allocation payment.

Several local government chairmen who spoke with our correspondents on the condition of anonymity, out of fear of victimisation, said their respective governors have instructed them not to open accounts with the CBN for the direct receipt of their allocations.

One chairman revealed that a governor in the South-East region refused to accept 50 percent of the monthly allocations, which was part of the agreement intended to facilitate the opening of the accounts for direct payment.

“Our governor has threatened us (all the chairmen in the state) not to open accounts with the CBN for the direct payment of our allocation”, one of the chairmen of South-East states, who pleaded anonymity, told one of our correspondents.

“We even tried to beg him, seeking to strike a deal, such that if he allows us to open the account with the CBN and our allocations are paid directly, we will remit 50 per cent of the LG allocation to him monthly, but he disagreed. So, this is where we are for now,” the LG chair added.

Further investigations reveal that a significant number of governors are strongly opposed to the opening of CBN accounts, fearing it would sever their long-standing access to local government funds.

However, a negligible number of governors are said to be disposed to the idea of their LGAs opening the CBN accounts.

The PUNCH had reported how some governors met with President Bola Tinubu recently and said they preferred the LGs to open accounts with commercial banks instead of the CBN.

It is unclear if the President is positively disposed to the idea.

Meanwhile, another LG chair, who spoke to The PUNCH on the condition of anonymity, explained that the CBN’s stringent conditions might be one of the reasons the governors were not positively disposed to the idea, aside from the fact that it will cut off their access to  LG funds.

A chairman in one of the local government areas in South-West disclosed that the council chairmen in the state have not opened accounts with CBN due to the stringent conditions set by the apex bank.

The chairman said one of the stringent demands is the submission of a two-month statement of account from each local government area, which was not available.

“But as simple as that condition may look, all council areas here in our state can’t meet up. The situation is not peculiar to our state. If you check well, most states can’t meet up simply because their governors are the ones spending their allocation.

“They are only giving those in LGAs whatever they feel like giving them. That is the problem,” the LG boss said.

Other local governments have cited various reasons for the delay in opening CBN accounts. One council chairman in Benue State, who spoke to our correspondent on the condition of anonymity, alleged that certain parties are working together to hinder the process.

He said, “Chairmen across the country are aware that state governors are trying to frustrate the financial autonomy of local government areas. What they are pushing for is for council chairmen to open their accounts in commercial banks where they can easily have access to control the councils’ money.

“They know that the moment the money is paid to CBN, it will go directly to us, and they will not have access to it. So, that is the reason the governors are frustrating the move.”

However, the Nigerian Union of Local Government Employees in Nasarawa State has said it is fully compliant with the directive to open accounts and is prepared to receive funds from the Federal Government.

The NULGE Chairman in the state, Adamu  Sharhabilu, who disclosed this to our correspondent in Lafia on Monday, revealed that the state government and the House of Assembly have been working in collaboration with local government workers to ensure that local government autonomy is fully realized in the state, showing a unified effort to support the implementation of the Supreme Court’s ruling.

He noted, however, that despite the cooperation at the state level, the local government councils have yet to begin receiving their allocations directly from the Federal Government

The NULGE chair said, “As I speak with you, all the LG accounts had been opened because we thought that the Federal Government will send our money there, but up till this moment, no LG in Nasarawa State has received allocation directly from the FG.

“For now, there are no obvious plans by the Nasarawa State government to short-change the local government workers or frustrate the LG Autonomy implementation in the state. From our own observation, the governor has been working towards ensuring that local government workers get what is due to them and also enjoy all the benefits of the LG autonomy.

“The monthly allocations are usually sent to the Joint Accounts under the State Ministry for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs. No local government has received funds from the Federation Account.’’

 

However, another local government chairman in the state, speaking anonymously, attributed the delay to the government’s failure to follow through on its promises.

The official stated, “What we are facing now is the fault of the Federal Government because the federal allocation committee is supposed to send the money straight to the local governments, not the joint account. We have so many accounts to receive the money, but they refused to send the money to the local government coffers.”

He, therefore, urged the Federal Government to align itself with the Supreme Court’s judgment and allow for the full implementation of the LG autonomy by ensuring that the funds are paid directly to the LGAs.

 Findings showed that many state chairmen are unaware of the current stage of policy implementation.

The Chairman of the Nigeria Union of Local Government Employees, Kwara State chapter, Seun Oyinlade, hinted that no council has opened an account with the CBN.

Speaking on the phone on Monday, Oyinlade said, “We are not aware that any of the 16 local government councils in the state have opened an account with the CBN. We do not know if the local government councils in the state operate an account with the Central Bank of Nigeria.”

He said he could not confirm if the state governor was similarly opposed to the direct payment of allocation to the councils.

“Though we heard it as a rumour that governors are trying to frustrate the implementation of the local government autonomy, we are yet to verify the claim. We will confirm if the local government councils have accounts with the CBN when allocation from the Federation Account is paid to them,” he said.

A local government worker in Damaturu, Yobe State, revealed that March salaries were paid through the Ministry for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs, rather than directly from the local governments’  accounts.

He said, “This is a setback in the implementation of the Supreme Court’s ruling aimed at granting more autonomy to local governments.”

“Even the new minimum wage implementation, local government staff members are yet to benefit from it. The state civil servants have benefited from the new minimum wage approved by the Federal Government. This development has brought some relief to state employees.”

In Zamfara, local government chairmen confirmed that they have yet to open accounts with the CBN.

The state’s ALGON chairman, Alhaji Samaila Moriki, who also serves as the chairman of Zurmi Local Government Area, told The PUNCH that they were still awaiting further instructions before proceeding with the opening of accounts.

He said, “We have yet to open accounts with the CBN because we are waiting for further directives and instructions. Everything is done through due process, and we are waiting for the directives from above. So, that is why we have yet to open accounts with the CBN. We will do that later when things become normal.”

He, however, declined to make further comments on the directives and instructions they were waiting for.

Furthermore, the 44 local government councils in Kano State have yet to open an account with the CBN.

The chairman of Garko LGA,  Saminu Garko, confirmed this, stating,  “None of the 44 local government councils in the state has opened accounts with the Central Bank of Nigeria. But we heard that the apex bank has opened an account for all local governments, and what remains is to regularise the accounts.

“Moreso, the Central Bank of Nigeria has not invited any of the local government chairmen in the state for the regularisation of the accounts, let alone verification of signatories.

‘’We just read in the newspapers that the bank is inviting local government chairmen for the verification exercise.”

He noted that since the Local governments have not opened the accounts with the bank, there was no way the chairmen could be invited for the verification of signatories.

But the ALGON in Jigawa State denied that the governor threatened local government chairmen against opening accounts with the CBN.

The ALGON state chairman, Prof. Abdulrahman Salim, assured that the account opening process is ongoing. “Everything is okay, and our local government areas are still visiting the CBN state headquarters to complete the necessary procedures,” he explained.

 Salim added that “All 774 local government councils, including the 27 in Jigawa State, are expected to open dedicated accounts with the CBN for direct disbursement of funds from the Federation Account as we were directed.

 “Jigawa State’s 27 local government areas are taking steps to open CBN accounts, which will enable them to receive direct allocations and manage their finances independently.”

“The CBN has been instrumental in facilitating local government autonomy by providing a platform for local governments to open accounts and receive direct allocations,” he stressed further.

“The delay in opening CBN accounts has been attributed to administrative bottlenecks, including the failure of the apex bank to fix a date for the biometric data capturing to complete the process.”

He claimed that nearly all the necessary steps had been completed, with only biometric capturing remaining for some local governments, adding that “the chairmen are currently waiting for the CBN to schedule a date for them to revisit the office for biometric data capturing.”

The NULGE leadership in Jigawa State could not be reached to confirm Salim’s claims.

However, a NULGE official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, quipped, “It will not come to us as a surprise if governors really don’t want the local government autonomy, they can change the process entirely.”

•Beijing calls US tariffs intimidation

•EU offers zero-for-zero tariff

•Global market continues to plunge

United States of America President, Donald Trump, has threatened to impose additional 50 per cent tariff on Beijing if it does not withdraw its 34 per cent retaliatory tariffs on Washington.

China, the second largest economy in the world, had reacted swiftly to the import tax announced by Trump last week, slamming Washington with 34 per cent tariff even as the rest of the countries continued to weigh their next move, opting either to negotiate or put their retaliatory tariffs forward. 

If the extra 50 per cent tax is implemented, that would bring the total import tax on China to 104 percent, roughly doubling the cost for companies bringing their goods from China to US in less than a month.

In a similar move, President Trump had threatened to hit alcohol from Europe with a 200 percent tax and also place a 50 percent tariff on Canada’s steel and aluminium “if they team up to work against American’s interest”.

However, both sides reached a kind of concessions  and the hikes never materialised. 

As the clash between both countries (US and China) rages on, Beijing has described Trump’s “reciprocal tariffs” as intimidation, stressing that threats and pressure are not the right way to deal with China.

The Spokesperson for Chinese Foreign Ministry,  Lin Jian, speaking during a press conference stated that the tariffs are typical unilateralism and protectionism and economic bullying, adding that U.S. tariffs in the name of reciprocity only served its interest at the expense of other countries.

Jian, therefore, urged countries to jointly oppose all forms of unilateralism and protectionism and safeguard the international system and the multilateral trading system, according to the United Nations and World Trade Organisation values, respectively.

“The abuse of tariffs by the United States is tantamount to depriving countries, especially those in the Global South, of their right to development,” said, citing a widening gap between the rich and poor in each country and less developed countries suffering a greater impact.

“All countries should uphold consultation, joint construction and sharing, and genuine multilateralism”, he said.

Meanwhile, the European Commission, said it has offered a zero-for-zero tariff deal to the US to avert a trade war with Trump as the EU ministers agreed to prioritise negotiations, while striking back with targeted countermeasures next week.

The 27-nation bloc faces 25 percent import tariffs on steel and aluminium and cars and broader tariffs of 20 percent from Wednesday, April 9, for almost all other goods under Trump’s policy to hit countries Trump believes impose high barriers on U.S. imports.

Ministers overseeing trade in the bloc met in Luxembourg yesterday to debate the EU’s response and discuss relations with China where many agreed that the priority was to launch negotiations to remove Trump’s tariffs, rather than fight them.

This is even the stock markets around the US, Europe and Asia have continued to plunge on the back of the tariff war. In US, major markets continued to slump with the Dow Jones falling by 4.4 percent at mid-day, the S&P 500 lost 4.7 percent while the Nasdaq fell by five percent.

In Hong Kong, the Hang Seng Index closed down 13.22 percent, marking a 28-year low for the exchange.

In Taiwan, a 9.7 percent drop at close resulted in a record low for Taipei’s TAIEX index

In Europe, the UK’s FTSE 100 index fell to its lowest level in a year, dropping by nearly six percent, while Germany’s Dax plunged almost 10 percent at the start of trading yesterday.

This comes as the UK Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, said tariffs, which are a tax on imports, are a “huge challenge.”

Trump’s officials have continued to be dismissive the impact of the tariff war on the global economy and stock markets.

Peter Navarro,Trump’s trade adviser, said that the administration has been seeing a “beautiful situation” with the stock market and prices since the tariffs were introduced and advised businesses not to panic about what they are seeing on the stock market.

According to him, “any discussion of recession seems silly.”

[Vanguard]

Prince Harry will push ahead with a court challenge in London on Tuesday as the self-exiled royal fights a decision to downgrade his personal security when he visits Britain.

Following Harry’s dramatic split with the royal family in 2020 and subsequent move to North America, the British government said he would no longer be given the “same degree” of publicly funded protection when in the UK.

But the 40-year-old prince took legal action against the interior ministry and, after his initial case was rejected last year, he is now set to bring a challenge before London’s Court of Appeal.

Harry and his American wife Meghan are no longer classified as working royals following their acrimonious departure from the UK in 2020, which has left them largely estranged from the family.

They have started a new life in California, but King Charles III’s younger son has said security concerns have hampered his ability to visit home, and he has only rarely returned to the UK for short visits.

– ‘The UK is my home’ –

“The UK is my home. The UK is central to the heritage of my children,” he said in a written statement read out by his lawyers at a 2023 hearing.

“That cannot happen if it’s not possible to keep them safe. I cannot put my wife in danger like that and, given my experiences in life, I am reluctant to unnecessarily put myself in harm’s way too.”

Harry’s mother Princess Diana was killed in a high-speed car crash in Paris in 1997 as she tried to escape paparazzi photographers.

Last week, the Court of Appeal said parts of the hearing, which is set to take place on Tuesday and Wednesday, would be held in private due to security concerns.

It was not clear whether Harry would be attending in person. The hearing comes on the same day as his wife’s new podcast “Confessions of a Female Founder” is due to be launched.

– ‘Singled out’ –

The prince’s legal battle centres on a February 2020 decision to downgrade Harry’s security, made by the UK’s interior ministry and a committee that deals with the protection of royals and public figures.

Britain’s High Court was previously told the decision followed a change in Harry’s status after he stopped being a working member of the royal family.

The High Court ruled in February 2024 against Harry’s case, saying the government had acted lawfully.

The prince’s initial bid to appeal was refused in April 2024 and he was ordered to pay about £1,000,000 (1.17 million euros) in legal costs, according to The Times newspaper. However, the following month, a judge said Harry could in fact challenge the decision at the Court of Appeal.

Harry’s lawyers told the High Court he was “singled out” and treated “less favourably” in the committee’s decision, claiming that alleged flaws made the downgrade “unlawful and unfair”.

The government argued the committee was entitled to conclude Harry’s protection should be “bespoke” and considered on a “case-by-case” basis.

The dispute comes as Harry, who has taken several legal suits against British UK tabloid dailies, is embroiled in a separate row over a charity he co-founded in southern Africa.

A bitter boardroom battle has seen the prince resign as patron of the Sentebale charity, while its chair Sophie Chandauka has accused him of “bullying” and being involved in a “cover up”.

Harry has in turn hit out at what he called “blatant lies”, and the UK-based charity watchdog has launched an investigation.

AFP

 

 

It was during the latter part of the 1960s – around 1968 or 1969. There was no mobile phone, no social media. There was the ubiquitous radio that provided news daily. In certain households television was also available.

Despite the absence of social media, people were well-informed about events and people. For example, we were aware that there was a young commissioner in the government of Western State under Governor Adeyinka Adebayo. The young man was known simply as Olunloyo. 

He was said to be a talented mathematician. As commissioner for education, he would visit secondary schools and assess their operations. He would reprimand school principals and teachers who were underperforming. He would give instructions on what should be done to improve the school. He would leave as quickly as he appeared. Sometimes, they said, he would drive his vehicle himself to events.

The rumours and stories were many. We were young and happy to know that there was someone at the top who was acting differently from the usual politicians who went around in obvious luxury. The politicians would be accompanied by lorry loads of supporters. The politicians would dance and make lengthy speeches. Once their visits ended and they left, all their promises would disappear with them. Increasingly, the military officers who had replaced the politicians at the time were looking and acting in the traditional mode of political leaders.

 

Although he was in the military government, Olunloyo was said to be different. He was radical. He was impatient with the politics, convoy of vehicles, supporters, the dancing and speeches. Well, this was the image that many in my generation had of Olunloyo in the 1960s.

Almost 15 years later, I was face-to-face with Dr. Victor Omololu Olunloyo one early morning at his home at Oke Ado, Ibadan. 

“Which media organisation are you from?” he asked.

 

“Me, sir?”

“Yes. You.”

“I am from NAN – News Agency of Nigeria.”

“You don’t have to spell out NAN to me. You think that I don’t know NAN? Ori e o daa. (silly person).” And he laughed. “I like your appearance…smart…tie and nice shirt.”

 

“Thank you, sir.” I felt good. NAN journalists were required to maintain a smart and formal appearance, conduct themselves in a professional manner, and never accept any form of renumerations or kickbacks from any news source, organization or person. 

Olunloyo was the gubernatorial candidate of the National Party of Nigeria (NPN) for Oyo State. I was assigned to cover his and the party’s campaign that was to commence at the time.

The political landscape in 1983 was particularly dynamic. Olunloyo was aiming to unseat the popular incumbent Governor, Bola Ige, known for is eloquence, and a close-ally of Chief Obafemi Awolowo, the leader of the Unity Party of Nigeria, the leading opposition party. 

At that time the NPN was led by President Shehu Shagari who held power over federal institutions and security forces which they deployed effectively for the campaign. Conversely, Ige and UPN had a robust party structure in Oyo State, and a long tradition of ruling the state. The state media was effective and highly capable, and firmly under the control of the UPN.

 

Almost every day, Olunloyo embarked on political campaigns, accompanied with a retinue of vehicles carrying NPN leaders, notably Chief Adisa Akinloye, Chief Richard Akinjide, Chief Lamidi Adedibu, and party cadres. They would travel to towns, villages and small settlements in Oyo State to canvass for votes, visit local leaders and make promises. The reporter’s duty was to file news stories, write feature articles and generally reflect back to the public what happened in the various places.

Olunloyo loved to tell stories. When he was not on the road or campaigning, it was a delight to listen to him. Especially when his party leaders were not in the room, he would lambast every party, including his own. He often recounted tales of corrupt politicians, and how Nigerians were being deprived of their rights, particularly rights to economic development. 

 

One day, we, the media representatives, were gathered as usual in the spacious living area of Olunloyo’s residence. He was telling us stories about how people wanted the NPN in power. How NPN, his party, would triumph in Oyo, Iwo, Iseyin etc. and how Ibadan people would vote himself as their son. A fellow reporter had his notebook out and was scribbling away, capturing the revealing assertions and claims of Olunloyo.  

Suddenly, without any prior indication, Olunloyo got up from his chair and seized the reporter’s notebook. He tore it to pieces while saying: “Oniko kuko. O ti le ko ikokuko ju. O ri e o da. (You write all kinds of nonsense. You write too much nonsense. Silly.)”

 

The he sat down and continued his story as if nothing had happened. The reporter continued to cover the NPN campaign throughout the period with no further incident. Olunloyo did not stop either to provide journalists with information about everything that interested him, including his calculations of how Nigeria could have a democratic government in the long run.

On another day, I arrived early at Olunloyo’s house, ahead of my colleagues. It was not unusual. He had just finished breakfast and he offered me tea.

 

“No, sir. I have already had breakfast.”

“You NAN people… always proper,” he joked.

“Thank you, sir.”

Then he asked me if I thought that he would be the next governor of Oyo State. I was already familiar with Olunloyo. He did not appreciate pretext or flattery. I gave it to him straight, and told him what I heard around town and my own perspective. 

“I do not see yet how you will win this election, sir,” I concluded

“Really?” he queried further.

“This is how I see it,” I held on to my position.

He gazed at me longer than he normally did, and then he said: “Bunmi, listen carefully. There has never been a free and fair election in Nigeria. Go and check the records, go through history. Do the analysis of campaigns, voting, returns and everything involved. This election will not be different.”

I nodded respectfully. I did not quite understand what he meant at the time. In some of our previous conversations, Olunloyo would say things that left me puzzled anyways.

At the end of voting in that election, Olunloyo was victorious and assumed office as governor of Oyo State. He served from October 1983 to December 1983 when General Muhammadu Buhari took over Nigeria in a military coup. 

When Olunloyo was declared governor, I was no longer in Ibadan to ask him the question – what made his calculations work as he had predicted?

May his lively, brilliant and vibrant soul rest in peace.

Makinwa is the CEO of AUNIQUEI Communication for Leadership.

Cyprian Edward-Ekpo, the director-general of the Institute of Law Research and Development of the United Nations (ILAWDUN), US, has asked President Bola Tinubu to reverse the state of emergency imposed in Rivers.

The professor of international environmental law warned that the emergency rule in the south-south state is a threat to Nigeria’s democracy and international reputation.

BACKGROUND

On March 18, President Bola Tinubu declared a state of emergency in Rivers, citing the protracted political crisis and vandalisation of oil facilities.

The president suspended Siminalayi Fubara, Ngozi Odu, his deputy, and all house of assembly members for six months.

Tinubu also appointed Ibok-Ete Ibas, a retired vice-admiral, as the sole administrator for Rivers state.

On March 20, the senate and the house of representatives controversially ratified Tinubu’s request for the emergency rule.

On March 26, Ibas suspended all political officeholders in the state.

‘A DEMOCRATIC CRISIS’

In a letter dated March 28, addressed to President Bola Tinubu, Edward-Ekpo said he initially planned to present his concerns to the supreme court but reconsidered, citing alleged growing scepticism over the judiciary’s independence.

“It has become a widely held global perception that Nigeria’s judicial system suffers a crisis of confidence. Many have lost faith in the court’s integrity, moral standing, and intellectual credibility,” the letter reads.

Edward-Ekpo said Tinubu’s action could have lasting consequences for his legacy as a pro-democracy advocate.

“Mr President, just a few days ago, a reputable individual was denied the opportunity to rent an office space in Washington, DC, simply because he was Nigerian—on the premise that Nigerians cannot be trusted,” he added.

“Similarly, a business partner withdrew from a tripartite investment contract solely because a Nigerian company was involved, citing concerns over the dispute resolution clause, which designated Nigeria as the jurisdictional venue.

“These are not isolated incidents. Nigerians frequently face visa denials, cancellations, and unwarranted suspicion in the global market.

“Beyond concerns about fraud—often driven by economic desperation and weak social security systems—Nigeria’s greatest reputational burden is its judiciary.

“Mr President, there is a seemingly straightforward yet profoundly consequential issue—one with the potential to tarnish a leader’s legacy irreversibly.

“For decades—even as far back as the 1990s when I was just a child, my ears glued to my parents’ radio, my eyes fixed on the television and newspaper headlines—you were known as a staunch pro-democracy advocate and a defender of the rule of law.

“However, the handling of the Rivers State crisis has shattered that image, erasing the memory of your once-principled political stance.

“It has cast doubt on the democratic values you once embodied, leaving many to question whether the ideals you championed were ever truly a part of your leadership philosophy.”

The professor said President Tinubu does not have the “legal authority” to suspend an elected governor.

“It is clear that your advisers—whether out of mischief or ignorance—have misled you, tarnishing your reputation and bringing Nigeria into disrepute on the global stage. 

“I have engaged with many individuals, including senior lawyers in Nigeria, and I have consistently maintained that you, Mr President, are not to blame for this situation. The responsibility squarely falls on the attorney-general of the federation, Lateef Fagbemi, SAN.”

He said as the chief law officer, it is Fagbemi’s duty to “provide sound legal guidance” and ensure that Tinubu’s decisions align with the provisions of the constitution.

“Unfortunately, in this instance, he has failed in that duty. It is particularly disheartening that a legal mind of his calibre—widely regarded as one of Nigeria’s finest—has handled this matter so poorly,” he said.

“Cases like this, along with the persistent global perception of Nigerians as fraudsters, contribute to constant visa denials, cancellations, and a broader distrust of our nation by the international community.”

He also criticised the national assembly for ratifying the emergency rule without a constituted two-thirds majority.

“What arcane magic did the national assembly conjure a two-thirds majority? he asked.

Edward-Ekpo urged Tinubu to “immediately” revoke the emergency rule and restore Funara to his position as governor.

[TheCable]