Latest News
The Minister of Works, Senator David Umahi, has said he is ready to undergo a probe over the controversy surrounding the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway project.
He said there was nothing to hide about the project, stating that due process was followed and the necessary approvals and documentation were obtained for the project to commence.
Recall that the House of Representatives on Thursday resolved to probe the N15 trillion project and said it would set up an ad hoc committee to investigate the project and submit a report within four weeks.
The House’s resolution followed the adoption of a motion of urgent public importance moved during plenary by Austin Achado, the member representing Gwer East/Gwer West Federal Constituency of Benue State.
In a chat with The Punch, the minister said he is ready to face the House of Representatives committee set up to probe the project. Umahi added that he planned to ensure the exercise was televised live for all Nigerians to see.
The former Governor of Ebonyi State also said that former Vice President Atiku Abubakar’s claim that the loan obtained to complete the project did not follow due process was untrue.
Umahi, however, added that the matter was before the National Assembly, noting that he would not want to comment on it.
He said, “I am ready to face the National Assembly to defend the project. I will not want to say anything now until I meet with the senators and House of Reps members. It will be live, so you will also hear it. It will be live so that Nigerians will see it.”
Naija News reports that the highway project, which is a 700-kilometre turnpike infrastructure, has attracted commendation and condemnation since the Bola Tinubu administration approved it in February.
The 10-lane coastal road was designed to connect Lagos to Cross River, passing through Ogun, Ondo, Delta, Bayelsa, Rivers, and Akwa Ibom states before culminating in Calabar, the Cross River State capital.
EFCC’s Naira Directive: Foreign Minister Writes Embassies To Charge Visa Fees In Local Currency
AFOLABI
Foreign Affairs Minister Yusuf Tuggar has written all the foreign missions in the country to comply with the directive of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to charge payment for visa and consular services in naira instead of dollar.
Tuggar has already met with a few envoys who sought more clarifications on the EFCC’s advisory.
It was learnt that the EFCC advisory against dollar-denominated service was necessitated in part after some embassies adopted N1,800-N1,900 exchange rates to a dollar.
An embassy was found to have set up an account unit where visa applicants were paying cash in dollar for services outside the conventional banking system.
Some embassies are understood to have started implementing the EFCC’s advisory on naira policy for consular services.
It was gathered that the EFCC has entered into an understanding with the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) for prompt remittance of the funds generated by the embassies to their home countries at official rate.
In an April 5, 2024 advisory to the Foreign Affairs Minister, the EFCC Executive Chairman, Mr. Ola Olukoyede, had asked government to stop foreign missions in Nigeria from charging visa and other consular services in foreign denominations.
He also advised all embassies to adopt Nigeria’s regulatory regime in fixing the exchange rate of the cost of their services.
He said the commission has observed the violation of Section 20(1) of the Central Bank of Nigeria Act, 2007 which makes currencies issued by the apex bank the only legal tender in Nigeria.
A top source told newwmen that the Minister of Foreign Affairs asked all foreign missions to implement the EFCC advisory.
The source said: “The Federal Government has adopted the advisory of the EFCC which is backed by the CBN Act. In line with this, the Minister, Amb. Yusuf Tuggar, has formally written all embassies to charge and accept payment for visa and consular services in naira.
“In fact, the Ambassador of one of the missions collecting dollars for consular services demanded an audience with the Minister of Foreign Affairs for clarifications on the new policy. Tuggar, who met with the affected envoy, said there is no going back on the naira policy.
“But the EFCC has also reached an understanding with the CBN for the prompt remittance of all consular fees collected at the official exchange rate to the embassies or countries. The Federal Government will not default in remitting funds.”
It was gathered that the EFCC issued the advisory following discovery that some embassies had adopted N1,800 to N1,900 exchange rates for applicants for visa and consular services.
“Some embassies went beyond official and parallel market rates in fixing exchange rate for consular services. They were charging as high as N1,800 to N1,900,” one source said.
“A foreign mission was even collecting dollars in cash from visa applicants. The practice was outside the banking system.
“From feedback, some of the embassies are already charging for consular services, including visa, in naira. We will not relent in ensuring full compliance by all missions.
“There is a desk monitoring compliance with the naira-for-visa policy. Any infraction will be reported to the Federal Government through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.”
The advisory, signed by the EFCC Executive Chairman, Mr. Ola Olukoyede, reads in part: “…I wish to notify you about the commission’s observation, with dismay, regarding the unhealthy practice by some foreign Missions to invoice consular services to Nigerians and other foreign nationals in the country in United States Dollar ($).
“This practice is an aberration and unlawful as it conflicts ‘with extant laws and financial regulations in Nigeria. Section 20(1) of the Central Bank of Nigeria Act, 2007 makes currencies issued by the apex bank the only legal tender in Nigeria.
“It states that ‘the currency notes issued by the Bank shall be the legal tender in Nigeria on their face value for the payment of any amount’.
“This presupposes that any transaction in currencies other than the naira anywhere in Nigeria contravenes the law and is therefore illegal.”
The commission added: “The refusal by some Missions to accept the Naira for consular service in Nigeria and also comply with foreign exchange regulatory regime in fixing the exchange of the cost of their services is not only illegal but represents an affront on the country’s sovereignty symbolised by the national currency. It undermines Nigeria’s monetary policy and aspiration for sustainable economic development.
“This trend can no longer be tolerated, especially in a volatile economic environment where the country’s macroeconomic policies are constantly under attack by all manner of state and non-state actors.
“In the light of the above, you may wish to convey the commission’s displeasure to all Missions in Nigeria and restate Nigeria’s desire for their operations not to conflict with extant laws and regulations in the country.
“Please accept, as always, the assurances of my highest consideration and respect.”
Attend to enquiries on money laundering, others within 24 hours, EFCC boss tasks bankers
The EFCC boss has also urged bankers to respond to the commission’s enquiries within 24 hours to aid its investigations.
“I don’t want to be charging banks alongside suspected criminals, because doing so can wreak havoc on the economy. It will even discourage investors from coming to the country,” Olukoyede said during a roundtable with compliance officers of banks in Ilorin, the Kwara State capital.
He added: “Our intention is to use the anti-corruption fight to bolster the economy. So, we must work together to save this country.”
Represented by acting Zonal Director, Ilorin Command Harry Erin, Pastor Olukoyede said: “We need to find a common ground to work together. You have a responsibility to fight corruption.”
The EFCC chair also expressed concerns over the use of fintech (private banking) by criminals to perpetuate crimes.
The anti-graft czar charged bankers to take the issue of “Know Your Customer” (KYC) and “Know Your Customer’s Business” (KYCB) seriously, as the two requirements would help to keep fraudulent customers on the radar.
Edison Ehie, Chief of Staff to Rivers Governor Siminalayi Fubara, has explained the reason behind the political crisis in the State.
According to Ehie, the issue in Rivers State started when a small group of political leaders wanted sole authority over the State’s resources.
He said this during a thanksgiving service on Saturday for the Supreme Court victory of the governor in Ahoada East Local Government Area of the state.
“The problem we have in the state is that 11 persons said they will control the resources of Rivers State. These 11 persons now called 20 others to allocate resources to themselves,” he said.
The jubilant thanksgiving, held at Western County High School Ahoada, began with a choir performance followed by a sermon, with the preacher admonishing Governor Fubara to remain dedicated to serving the people.
Ehie, spoke on behalf of Gov Fubara, warning the Governor should not be underestimated because of his age.
He said: “We are going to teach them a lesson of political arithmetic. What that small boy will do to you you’ll know that khaki no be leather.”
The depreciation of the naira continued over the weekend as the currency traded at N1,510 to a dollar at the parallel market and 1,466.31 at the official market.
The dollar-to-naira exchange rate increased by N40 between Thursday and Friday, having earlier closed at N1,426 to a dollar, according to the National Autonomous Foreign Exchange Market (NAFEM), the official exchange market.
Following a string of reforms and interventions by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), the naira had, in recent times, firmed up against the dollar, exchanging below N1,000.
The dollar exchanged at N1,450 Friday morning but closed the day with N1,510 at the black market.
A Bureau De Change operator who spoke to our correspondent yesterday said: “We have seen more demand in recent times, and this is what is causing the increase. I can tell you also that there is no enough dollar supply, and this is why the rate is increasing.”
Daily Trust on Sunday reports that the CBN had sustained dollar sales to registered BDC operators under the aegis of the Association of Bureau De Change Operators of Nigeria (ABCON).
It had on April 23, 2024 sold dollars at a discounted rate of N1,021 per dollar, the second time in the month and fourth time in 2024 as part of measures to stabilise the naira.
In February 2024, the CBN announced the sale of $20,000 to each BDC at the rate of N1,301/$. Subsequently, it reduced the allocation by 50 per cent and sold FX at the rate of N1,251/$1.
Other reforms by the CBN included substantially clearing foreign exchange backlog, including airlines’ trapped funds and taking action to stop speculation with the raids on unregistered BDC operators.
Despite the interventions, the crisis has persisted as the naira was rated the world’s worst-performing currency over the last month, according to a Bloomberg report.
BDCs say dollars not available, seek amnesty for hoarders
Speaking to Daily Trust on Sunday yesterday, the president of the ABCON, Aminu Gwadabe, said it was unfortunate that the gains of recent reforms and interventions by the CBN were being reversed.
He confirmed that the exchange rate was N1, 490 as at yesterday and blamed the depreciation on inadequate supply of the dollar.
He said: “The real issue is still the question of liquidity. The dollar is not available; and there is dollarisation of the financial system. People are really worried about the inflation rate that is hitting deep into the value of the naira. Some people say it is better to buy dollars now than to keep the naira.”
He called for amnesty for those hoarding foreign currencies in their homes to bring them out.
“There is a need for amnesty. A lot of people still have dollars in their houses. It is a crisis and stormy period. Sometimes we would not just remain at maximum compliance, voluntary compliance is key to effective regulations.
“Over regulation is toxic to effective compliance. People who keep dollars at home should be given amnesty, with less questioning to ensure liquidity,” he stated.
Gwadabe also asked the CBN to open up other channels of supply to BDC operators, especially the autonomous window against the direct supply by the apex bank.
He added: “I am happy the foreign reserve is going up, but it is unfortunate that the gains achieved have been reversed, although there was a kind of stemming of the volatility with some of the policies the CBN has taken. Recall that naysayers have predicted that it would have been around N3,000 to a dollar.”
Experts suggest solutions
The chief executive officer, Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise, Dr Muda Yusuf, attributed the naira crisis to supply and demand imbalance.
According to him, as long as the demand outweighs the supply, the crisis will remain.
Yusuf, a former director-general of the Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI) said: “The fundamental issue is still that of demand and supply. It is more of a supply issue. Also related to that is a confidence issue because if we are not able to supply consistently, it will affect confidence, and once confidence begins to weaken, speculative demand will kick in, and that will begin to pile pressure on the system.
“That’s why it is good to have a framework because exchange rate volatility is not good for any economy. We should not leave the currency to float completely. There should be a framework to stabilise it, even if it is at N1,500. Whatever it is, let’s have a framework to stabilise it.”
“We need to build the confidence that in the next three months, this thing is not likely to change much.”
He also said Nigeria must ramp up its oil production to take advantage of the current oil price.
An economist, Dr Oluseye Ajuwon, in an interview with our correspondent yesterday, said the CBN must trace the source of the foreign currency to track any illicit inflow.
He said: “It is purely a supply and demand issue. Once demand is more than supply, the price will continue to depreciate.
“The Central Bank should start doing what it needs to do by tracing money to know where it is coming from and where it is going.
“All the interventions of the CBN amount to just treating the issue at a surface level, it is not actually addressing the real issue.”
[DailyTrust]
President Bola Tinubu, through his Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Ajuri Ngelale, has told the Minister of Federal Capital Territory, FCT, Nyesom Wike and others that he will not take sides in the ongoing crisis rocking Rivers State.
Ngelale said that anyone with the belief that President Tinubu would take their side in the political crisis would be disappointed.
The Special Adviser made the President’s position know during an interview on TVC, insisting that Tinubu won’t allow any attempt to frustrate the Rivers government.
“I believe that anyone who believes that by their actions, whether it’s from the Federal level, State level or the legislative branch in the State or the executive branch in the state, if they are banking on Mr. President to take sides on this matter, they’re mistaking and they’ll be disappointed,” he said.
“Mr. President will not do that. What he will do is to ensure that everybody has what they need in order to work.
“He will also ensure that any attempt to frustrate the operation of the Rivers State Government of conducting its affairs in a way that it would benefit the Rivers people, that’s obviously not going to be allowed by this President or anybody else.
“So, I think there’s a need for all stakeholders to understand that Mr President won’t take sides.”
[DailyPost]
President Bola Tinubu has asked the Central Bank of Nigeria to suspend the implementation of the controversial cybersecurity levy policy and ordered a review.
This followed the decision of the House of Representatives, which, last Thursday, asked the CBN to withdraw its circular directing all banks to commence charging a 0.5 per cent cybersecurity levy on all electronic transactions in the country.
The CBN on May 6, 2024, issued a circular mandating all banks, mobile money operators, and payment service providers to implement a new cybersecurity levy, following the provisions laid out in the Cybercrime (Prohibition, Prevention, etc) (Amendment) Act 2024.
According to the Act, a levy amounting to 0.5 per cent of the value of all electronic transactions will be collected and remitted to the National Cybersecurity Fund, overseen by the Office of the National Security Adviser.
Financial institutions are required to apply the levy at the point of electronic transfer origination.
The deducted amount is to be explicitly noted in customer accounts under the descriptor “Cybersecurity Levy” and remitted by the financial institution. All financial institutions are required to start implementing the levy within two weeks from the issuance of the circular.
By implication, the deduction of the levy by financial institutions should commence on May 20, 2024.
However, financial institutions are to make their remittances in bulk to the NCF account domiciled at the CBN by the fifth business day of every subsequent month.
The circular also stipulates a timeframe for financial institutions to reconfigure their systems to ensure complete and timely submission of remittance files to the Nigeria Interbank Settlement Systems Plc as follows: “Commercial, Merchant, Non-Interest, and Payment Service Banks – Within four weeks of the issuance of the Circular.
“All other Financial Institutions (Microfinance Banks, Primary Mortgage Banks, Development Financial Institutions) – Within eight weeks of the issuance of the Circular,” the circular noted.
The CBN has emphasised strict adherence to this mandate, warning that any financial institution that fails to comply with the provisions will face severe penalties. As outlined in the Act, non-compliant entities are subject to a minimum fine of two per cent of their annual turnover upon conviction.
The circular provides a list of transactions currently deemed eligible for exemption, to avoid multiple applications of the levy.
These are loan disbursements and repayments, salary payments, intra-account transfers within the same bank or between different banks for the same customer, and intra-bank transfers between customers of the same bank.
Exemptions include other financial institutions’ transfers to their correspondent banks, interbank placements, banks’ transfers to CBN and vice versa, inter-branch transfers within a bank, cheque clearing and settlements, letters of credit, and banks’ recapitalisation-related funding.
Others are bulk funds movement from collection accounts, savings, and deposits including transactions involving long-term investments such as treasury bills, bonds, and commercial papers, and government social welfare programmes transactions.
These may include pension payments, non-profit and charitable transactions including donations to registered non-profit organisations or charities, educational institutions transactions, including tuition payments and other transactions involving schools, universities, or other educational institutions, and transactions involving the bank’s internal accounts, inter-branch accounts, reserve accounts, nostro and vostro accounts, and escrow accounts.
The introduction of the new levy sparked varied reactions among stakeholders as it is expected to raise the cost of conducting business in Nigeria and could potentially hinder the growth of digital transaction adoption.
‘Stop levy now’
Members of the House of Representatives on Thursday asked the Central Bank of Nigeria to withdraw the circular directing financial institutions to commence implementation of the 0.5 per cent cybersecurity levy, describing it as “ambiguous”.
The development was in response to a motion on the urgent need to halt and modify the implementation of the cybersecurity levy, moved by Kingsley Chinda.
According to the House, the CBN is to withdraw the initial circular, and “issue a more understandable one”.
Chinda had drawn the attention of the House to multiple interpretations of the CBN directive against the specifications in the Cybersecurity Act.
The House then expressed worry, that the Act would be implemented in error if immediate steps were not taken, to address the concerns around the interpretation of the CBN directive and the Cybersecurity Act.
However, sources with knowledge of Tinubu’s position on the issue told Sunday PUNCH that the President was aware of the economic burden on Nigerians since his hardline economic reforms began last May, adding that he did not want to risk adding to the burden with more levies.
A senior presidency official who preferred not to be named told our correspondent, “The President is sensitive to what Nigerians feel. And he will not want to proceed with implementing a policy that adds to the burden of the people.
“So, he has asked the CBN to hold off on that policy and ordered a review. I would have said he ordered the CBN, but that is not appropriate because the CBN is autonomous. But he has asked the CBN to hold off on it and review things again.”
Another presidency official who preferred to remain anonymous as he was not authorised to speak on the issue said these discrepancies prompted the President to order a review.
“If you look at it, the law predates the Tinubu administration. It was enacted in 2015 and signed by Goodluck Jonathan. It is only being implemented now.
“You know he (Tinubu) was not around when that directive was being circulated. And he does not want to present his government as being insensitive. As it is now, the CBN has held off the instruction to banks to start charging people. So, the President is sensitive. His goal is not to just tax Nigerians like that. That is not his intention. So, he has ordered a review of that law.”
Tax reforms not to frustrate Nigerians — Shettima
Meanwhile, the Vice President, Kashim Shettima, on Saturday, said the tax reforms undertaken by the Bola Tinubu administration were not aimed to frustrate Nigerians but to sustain the country’s investment friendliness.
The VP, represented by his Special Adviser on General Duties Dr Aliyu Umar, spoke at the close-out retreat of the Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee held at the Transcorp Hilton, Abuja. Shettima’s Spokesperson, Mr Stanley Nkwocha, revealed this in a statement titled, ‘Our tax reforms initiated for overall benefits of Nigerians – VP Shettima’.
He argued that contrary to speculations in some quarters, “we are not here to frustrate any sector of our economy but to create an administrative system that ensures the benefits of a thriving tax system for all our citizens”.
Levy suspension welcome development – PDP
Reacting to the decision of the President, the Peoples Democratic Party’s National Publicity Secretary, Debo Ologunagba, welcomed the suspension of the cybersecurity levy policy implementation, noting that the policy should not have been introduced at all.
He said, “It was an anti-people decision from the beginning. It was an insensitive decision from the beginning. It was an ambush on the people who had already been frustrated by the multiple layers of taxes from the beginning. So, it was a very cruel introduction because you do not need to tax us to have cybersecurity.
“You do not need to tax the villagers or the people in the rural areas for cybersecurity. People who do not even have light. They don’t even have access to an internet connection. Well, if that is a show that the president is listening, then that is good. Then, he must now continue to listen more and begin to look at where the problem started and that is the issue of removal of subsidy without any cushioning of its effect. What will happen is that the president should go back further so that Nigerians can breathe by ensuring a policy that will reduce the hardship of the sudden removal of the subsidy.”
Also, reacting to the development, the Chief Executive Officer, Centre for Promotion of Private Enterprises, Dr Muda Yusuf, said the President’s decision shows he is a democrat, adding that the CBN should ensure that the reviewing process of the policy is very inclusive.
“The President’s decision is in line with the clamour by the people. There had been a lot of outcry about it and the fact that the president has responded shows that he is a democrat. It shows he is a listening leader. So we must commend him for listening to the voices of the people. It is a welcome development.
“The government should now look at the policy. I am sure it is not going to be only the CBN. Even the legislators should also look at it because they passed the law. But the key thing is that the policy needs to be reviewed. And the apex bank should take the review beyond the government level. It must consult the stakeholders and the organised private sectors. That is what will make the review very inclusive.”
Also speaking to Sunday PUNCH, the Director of Centre for Anti-corruption and Open Leadership, Debo Adeniran, said while President Tinubu should be commended for the decision, the Federal Government should consider a total cancellation of the policy instead of a temporary suspension.
He said, “This is the right step in the right direction. It further accentuates the fact that President Tinubu listens to the voice of the people. And maybe it is because he used to be an activist. He knows that the voice of the people is the voice of God.
“But then, the suspension of the policy is not enough. It should result in the total cancellation of the policy. All the taxes, rates, and levies that are being imposed on the people should be streamlined so that if we want to pay personal income taxes, we should know that that is what we are paying. It is not that the government will take off personal income taxes and we should now pay for every service that we should enjoy from the government. And the increase in micro-economic products like petroleum and others should be made cheaper and affordable for all Nigerians,” he stated.
Also, a professor of Economics at Olabisi Onabanjo University, Sheriffdeen Tella, cautioned the Federal Government against creating additional hardship for Nigerians. He said while the policy was not a bad idea, the timing was inappropriate.
He said, “There is nothing wrong with the levy but it was at the wrong time. The government should stop creating problems for itself. People are battling inflation and all sorts of inefficiency and you are imposing a tax on them. The president has done well by reversing it. It is not the right time to impose additional burdens on Nigerians. I commend the President for having the courage to do the right thing.”
SERAP threatens lawsuit
Meanwhile, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project threatened to file a lawsuit if the Federal Government did not withdraw the levy within 48 hours. The group stated that the levy “patently violates the provisions of the Nigerian constitution 1999 (as amended) and the country’s international human rights obligations and commitments”.
Labour rejects levy
However, the Nigeria Labour Congress stated that the cybersecurity levy and several other levies and taxes already imposed on the citizens had deepened the financial burden on the populace currently grappling with economic challenges.
A statement signed by the NLC President, Joe Ajaero, demanded the reversal of the directive by CBN, adding that the Federal Government should prioritise policies that alleviate the financial burdens of Nigerians. NLC said the move, which was ostensibly aimed at bolstering cybersecurity measures, could exacerbate the financial strain already faced by the populace.
•Says the beheading of one Alhaji sparked killings
•‘How sponsors of attack tried to eliminate me in prison custody
•Pleads for legal help to appeal the death sentence
•Miyetti Allah disowns latest mayhem
Eight years after the massacre of April 25, 2016, that left no less than 40 persons dead in Nimbo in the Uzo-Uwani local government area of Enugu State, the only person who was convicted for the mass murder, Mohamed Zurai, has confessed to his participation in the crime.
But he said he was complicit to the crime to the extent of video recording the killings and not killing anyone.
Zurai, a herdsman, told Sunday Vanguard that the Nimbo massacre was carried out because one Alhaji was beheaded by assailants in the Enugu community.
He spoke to our correspondent during an undercover operation in Enugu Correctional Center where he is waiting for the hangman’s noose.
Justice Anthony Onovo of the Nsukka Division of Enugu State High Court had, on May 17, 2023, pronounced the death sentence on him.
The murderer was among five suspects arraigned on May 9, 2017 for the mass murder in Nimbo on April 25, 2016.
They were charged with murder contrary to Section 274 (1) of the Criminal Code Cap 30 Vol II of the Revised Laws of Enugu State of Nigeria 2004.
Zurai was the prime suspect whose cell phone was found to have recorded the Nimbo killings.
Delivering judgment on the matter on May 17, 2023, Justice Onovo said, “In all, the only person who has been shown to have participated in the killing at Nimbo community on 25/4/2016 is the 1st defendant, Mohammed Zurai.
“He is hereby convicted as charged. The 2nd defendant (Alhaji Ciroma Musa) and the 3rd defendant (Sale Adanmu) not having been found guilty are hereby discharged and acquitted.”
According to him, many went for the operation but he used his phone to do a video recording of the killings in his image also appeared in the video as a selfie.
He disclosed that sponsors of the killings wanted to eliminate him while in prison custody, alleging that some persons were offered N300,000 to kill him so that he would not live to tell the story of what happened but that the request was turned down.
The murderer, who said there were over 20 that carried out the operation, however, denied killing anybody at Nimbo but said he was behind his colleagues and that his only job was to record the killings.
Zurai wondered why only he was convicted while his friends who were arraigned with him also participated in the operation but were freed.
He, therefore, pleaded for the telephone number of this reporter so that he could communicate with him afterwards since he agreed to help him get a lawyer who could appeal his death sentence.
Zuari looked 30 years old and fair in complexion.
MACBAN disowns fresh attack
Meanwhile, Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association of Nigeria, MACBAN, has dissociated itself from the suspected herdsmen’s attack on the Nimbo community around the anniversary of the 2016 incident.
The latest attack came on Sunday, April 28 2024 and killed four members of the community.
The attack, which occurred at Ugwuijoro community where villagers had gathered to mourn the dead, also left many injured.
Reports had it that a member of the community was also shot dead at the nearby Opanda community, three days before the Nimbo incident.
The people of Uzo-Uwani LGA allege that there are many herdsmen camps around Ugboda, Adani and Opanda in the council area because of the thick forests there.
Governor Peter Mbah described the attack as unacceptable, vowing that the government would track down and bring the attackers to book.
Mbah footed the medical bills of the wounded people and awarded scholarships and jobs to bereaved family members while the Nimbo community asked the state government to strengthen their neighbourhood watch group.
MACBAN, dissociating itself from the attack, accused native security operatives of killing their members in the South-East.
National Deputy Director General of the group, Gidado Siddiki, who made the allegation, said their members and livestock had been targeted while he exonerated herdsmen of any wrongdoing in the zone, blaming kidnappings and other crimes committed in the bush and farmland in the zone on criminals.
Sidikki lamented that their markets had been indiscriminately destroyed under the guise of rooting out criminality, with no evidence of wrongdoing found on them, stating that even in the remote areas where they graze cattle, they face increasing threats from criminals without a response from the government or local leadership.
He appealed to the state governments in the South-East and leaders of host communities to recognize them as strategic stakeholders and refrain from “unfounded” attribution of wrongdoing to every herdsman out there.
[Vanguard]
The Army Headquarters has announced investigation into a viral footage showing soldiers protesting at the 8 Division Garrison detention facility in Sokoto.
The footage, circulating on social media, depicts personnel held in custody expressing grievances.
In a statement signed Saturday by Onyema Nwachukwu, Major General Director Army Public Relations, the Army regretted the incident adding that it would not condone the soldiers’ behaviour, which constitutes mutiny and misconduct.
According to the report, the Chief of Army Staff has ordered a probe to determine if the incident is isolated or widespread in similar facilities.
“Undoubtedly, the Sokoto barracks detention facility incident is quite unfortunate and an embarrassment to the sound administration efforts of the Chief of Army Staff (COAS), to say the least, and in line with his leadership style, the COAS has instituted an appropriate investigation into the incident to determine whether it is an isolated or widespread situation in similar detention facilities.
“While the service regrets and has gleaned some lessons from the incident, it will however not condone the manner the inmates expressed their purported grievance. Mutiny and conduct prejudicial to service order are grievous misconducts, and this very incident epitomises such.
“As such, as Army, on the one side, goes ahead to implement the COAS directive to look into the state of all NA detention facilities, as detainees’ lives also matter, the Service shall not shy away from appropriately sanctioning the soldiers involved in the unruly behaviour in its Sokoto detention facility for failing to exhaust all available options to channel their complaints to the appropriate authorities and if it was discovered they did and nothing was done, necessary administrative actions will be taken against anyone found to have failed to discharge his/her duties effectively.
“While the Service is mindful of its subjective oversight engagements by statutory bodies, it remains primarily a responsible, self-regulating professional body. As such, the Service remains committed to ensuring that everyone, even those found guilty of aiding terrorists, kidnappers, and bandits, and are awaiting confirmation of their sentencing, as it has been discovered in the Sokoto case is accorded a relatively decent life until their judgment is confirmed and executed. This commitment underscores the NA’s dedication to upholding professional standards and maintaining a just and fair system.
“The NA appreciates all Nigerians for their concern and support as well as pledge to remain focused on its drive to defeating security challenges facing the nation in conjunction with sister services and other security agencies,” the statement added.
…urges Tinubu to call Wike to order
The former National Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Prince Uche Secondus, has said the Rivers State Governor Similaye Fubura, was being haunded by his political opponents for daring to prevent the looting of the state.
He explained that the political crisis in the state was orchestrated by those who demand unfettered access to the finances of the state a demand the governor has refused to accept.
Secondus who spoke in Abuja, on Saturday, also accused the immediate past Governor of the state and now Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, of being the brain behind Fubura’s political troubles.
He explained that Wike’s conduct, utterances and unrelenting fued with the governor, has cast the state in bad light.
Secondus said, “Wike has been Governor for eight years and is now Minister of the FCT. As Minister, what, has he (Wike) attracted in terms of Federal projects to our dear State since he assumed office? Perhaps misery, grief, and anguish. As Governor he had supervised the exit of investors from the state due to his draconian policies.
“He had on an occasion mentioned that he is capable of causing crisis and he is not far from the truth, as he is causing an unfathomable crisis in Rivers State.
“Mrs Patience Jonathan and I worked for his emergence as governor, have we ever breathed down his neck? Instead what we get is disrespect and insults.
“ I can attest to Dr. Odili’s performance as Governor being the State PDP chairman then. I hasten to say without any fear of contradiction that he is the best governor of Rivers State in this dispensation.
“Wike claims that our revered Dr. Odili made him but in his characteristic manner, he publicly ridiculed the Odili’s without any justification. He owes them an unreserved apology and he should do so publicly.
“These media attacks against the political leaders of Rivers State are unwarranted and diversionary.
“For the records you should account for the three hundred million dollars($300m) you collected from the NNPC for the Ogoni Oil well and the cash refund made by the Saipem oil and gas company and subsequently account for your eight-year tenure of over N4Trillion realized, mismanaged and squandered. Rather than trying to cover your inadequacies through media attacks.”
These attacks, he stressed, might dovetail into a national crisis if not properly checked.
While appealing to President Bola Tinubu to reign in the FCT minister, Secondus added, “I call on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, to prevail on the FCT Minister, Nyesom Wike to stop overheating the Rivers State political atmosphere and allow Fubara to work. Whatever Wike thinks he is It must be stressed that Rivers people made him.”
....as Dean of Agric Urges Pursuit of Excellence
The Vice Chancellor of the University of Calabar, Prof. Florence Banku Obi has stated that the University is open to collaborations with the William Anam's Farm.
The Vice-Chancellor stated this when representatives of the late William Awak Anam's family paid her a courtesy visit recently.
Represented by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Research, Linkages and Collaborations, Prof. Peter C. Okafor, the Vice Chancellor while interfacing with the Anams at the University's Council Chambers said that the institution was ready to collaborate with them in areas of mutual benefits.
Prof. Obi while extending Management's condolences over the demise of their father, celebrated the faculty for making the effort to reach out.
She said collaborating with the faculty in real-time will not only improve their knowledge but also make them more active in agriculture.
The University Administrator apologized for not including the family's award in the last convocation Brochure, promising that the award will be included in the next convocation which is going to be the 50th and a milestone convocation.
She appreciated the family for the award stating that it will no doubt motivate others to be focused, especially the practical year students.
In a related development, the Dean of, the Faculty of Agriculture, Prof. Susan Ohen has urged students of the Faculty of Agriculture to continue to pursue excellence in all their academic endeavours.
The Dean stated that the William Anam Award which was initially planned to be presented at the just concluded 36th Convocation, was hindered due to unforeseen circumstances. Speaking during the formal presentation of the Late William Anam's maiden award for the Best Practical Year Student of the 2020/2021 graduating class held at the Faculty of Agriculture Post- Graduate Hall, Prof. Ohen said that Mr. Anam, an alumnus of the faculty, was very passionate about agriculture.
The Dean used the occasion to commend the wife and family of the Late alumnus for making his desire come true by sustaining the initiative of conferring an award on the best practical student in the faculty.
This is even as she admonished the award recipient to see it as a motivation to do more academically.
In a presentation titled; "Striving for Excellence in Academics", Prof. Ausaji A. Ayuk said to strive is to struggle, push or fight vigorously, and to make great efforts to achieve or obtain something, while excellence is the quality of being outstanding or extremely good, and academic is relating to education.
The one-time Dean of Agric thus, challenged the students to see beyond where they presently are and make sure they achieve their desired goals.
The wife of the Late William Anam thanked the University and the Faculty of Agriculture for allowing her family to confer the maiden William Awak Anam Award for the Best Practical Student.
Mrs. Maryanne William Anam stated that her late husband, the initiator of the award who unfortunately passed on in 2023 at the age of 58 was a passionate alumnus of the Faculty of Agriculture, a successful farmer with an uncanny zeal for nurturing and seeing other people grow.
To this end, she pledged on behalf of the WILLIAM ANAM FARMS that the William Awak Anam award will be sustained as an annual event for deserving students as a way of motivating them.
The high point of the event was the presentation of the award which has a cash backing of a hundred thousand naira, to the Best Graduating Student in Practicals for the 2020/2021 session by the VC'S representative, DVC, Research, Linkages and Collaborations, Prof. Peter C. Okafor to the award recipient Mr. Emmanuel John Amadi.
Public Relations Unit
University of Calabar
More...
Air travel can be a thrilling experience, filled with excitement and anticipation as you embark on a new adventure or reunite with loved ones. However, the thrill of flying can quickly turn into a nightmare if you find yourself detained at the airport. Whether you are a seasoned traveler or embarking on your first flight, it’s essential to know what can land you in hot water with airport authorities. From seemingly innocuous mistakes to serious offenses, there are several things that can get you detained at the airport, causing frustration, delay, and even legal consequences.
In today’s security-conscious world, airports have strict rules and regulations in place to ensure the safety of all passengers and staff. While these measures are necessary, they can also lead to unintentional violations. As a traveler, it is important to be aware of the dos and don’ts of air travel to avoid any unnecessary delays or complications on your journey. By knowing what to avoid, you can ensure a smooth and stress-free travel experience, and make the most of your time in the air.
Here are 8 of such things that can get you detained at the airport
Prohibited items
When packing for your next trip, it is essential to know what items are allowed in your luggage. While it isobvious that illegal substances are a no-go, many travelers are unaware of the other prohibited items that can land them in trouble. For instance, India prohibits books and maps that incorrectly displays their external boundaries, while Japan prioritizes public safety and morals by prohibiting books, drawings and carvings . Dubai, on the other hand, has strict rules around food and wildlife products. To avoid any issues, always check the customs websites of your destination country and familiarize yourself with their specific rules and regulations.
Invalid or damaged travel documents
Airline and country-specific regulations govern travel document requirements, ensuring hassle-free boarding. These documents must not be expired and often need to remain valid for a certain period beyond the travel date. This precaution ensures flexibility in case of flight delays, enabling travelers to board alternative return flights. Before heading to the airport, meticulously review passport and visa validity guidelines. For instance, countries like Thailand, Nepal, and Turkey mandate six months of passport validity upon entry, while most European Union nations require three months, and New Zealand stipulates one month beyond the intended departure date.
Additionally, ensure the visibility and clarity of your photo and bio data. Any damage, such as rips, tears, or water damage, could result in travel disruptions until replacement documents are obtained. It is important to note that travel documents extend beyond passports; some countries necessitate supplementary documents, such as prior travel history, parental consent for minors, vaccination records, or proof of accommodation during the stay.
Prescriptions and medications
When traveling with medications, it is important to research the regulations of your destination country. While some medicines may be allowed with a doctor’s note, others are strictly prohibited. The International Narcotics Control Board provides some guidance, but it is essential to verify the specific rules for each country on your travel route, including transit countries.
Some medications, like Sudafed, are considered controlled substances that are banned in certain countries, like Mexico. Violating these laws can have severe consequences. To ensure a smooth journey, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends checking with the embassies of each country to confirm that your medications are permitted. If you are taking restricted medications, especially life-sustaining, psychiatric, or psychotropic drugs, consult your doctor about alternative options or equivalent substitutions available in your destination country. This will help you avoid any potential issues and ensure your health and safety while traveling.
Large sums of cash or undeclared items
When traveling, especially in countries like the US, it is important to notify authorities if you are carrying large sums of money or valuables exceeding a certain threshold, typically around $10,000. This could include items like jewelry, expensive clothing, or electronics. In places like South Africa and Canada, completing declaration forms before your trip can help avoid potential fines and delays at the airport.
Flammable and explosive materials
Traveling with flammable or explosive items can lead to flight disruptions. Fireworks, including small sparklers, are strictly prohibited on airplanes due to safety concerns. Even friction during the flight can trigger their ignition, posing a risk to passengers and crew. In the US, violating these rules can result in civil penalties of up to $75,000 per offense, with potential criminal charges for those importing them for sale. What ever your reason for travelling, it is essential to refrain from carrying any items intended for ignition.
Unreported plants, pets or exotic animals
Transporting living organisms across borders, including plants, pets, and animals, is subject to strict regulations. The US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) advises travelers to check the Don’t Pack a Pest website for plant-related declarations. The US Fish and Wildlife Service provides guidance on avoiding prohibited live animals and products. Regulations vary by airline and country; for instance, Jamaica restricts certain dog breeds. Transporting exotic animals may require specialized pet transporters to ensure compliance with vaccination and quarantine measures. Check with your airline and embassy for the latest guidelines.
Unsettled legal matters
Legal matters left unresolved can disrupt your travel plans, as airport authorities worldwide have access to databases containing information on individuals with criminal records or outstanding warrants.For instance, individuals with unpaid fines attempting to enter or leave New Zealand may face interception by police at the airport, according to the Ministry of Justice website. Similarly, in the US, those owing over $2,500 in child support are ineligible for a US passport.
Ensure compliance with the law before embarking on air travel. If you have pending civil or criminal issues, consult legal counsel to confirm travel eligibility. Prioritize resolving any warrants or fines before your flight, and carry documentation of resolution to prevent potential airport complications.
Traveling while intoxicated or under the influence of drugs
If ground or cabin crew suspect you have had too much to drink and pose a risk to yourself and others, it could lead to delays. Keep in mind that alcohol consumption is prohibited in certain countries. Being under the influence or carrying alcohol in luggage can lead to detention or imprisonment.
[BusinessDay]
The Trade Union Congress (TUC) has berated opposition lawmakers in the National Assembly over its perceived silence on the controversial cybersecurity levy.
Naija News reports that on May 6, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) directed banks and other financial institutions to implement a 0.5 per cent cybersecurity levy on electronic transfers.
Many Nigerians and groups have expressed their dissatisfaction, highlighting that banking transactions are becoming increasingly costly due to numerous charges.
Speaking on the the situation during an appearance on Channels Television’s Politics Today, the TUC President, Festus Usifo, questioned the silence of the opposition lawmakers in the National Assembly.
He lamented that the lawmakers have refused to take a stance on the situation.
Usifo accused the ruling party, the All Progressives Congress (APC), of making life more difficult for the Nigerian people.
He said, “Where are the opposition parties in the National Assembly? Where are the PDP, Labour Party, and NNPP members?”
“Even if the ruling party today wants to suffocate Nigerians and the opposition, you hear nothing from them. It is really that bad. This kind of attitude where we don’t see bills like this in the newspapers that there is going to be public hearings, and we don’t hear any advertisement on major television channels that there is going to be a public hearing. What are they doing with the budget of the National Assembly?”
According to him, the organised labour was not carried along by the lawmakers in the passage of the Cybercrime (Prohibition, Prevention, etc) (Amendment) Act 2024.
[NaijaNews]
Emergency healthcare in Nigeria faces critical challenges due to inadequate infrastructure, limited ambulance availability, and a missing emergency fund of N26.3 billion, impacting frontline hospitals’ ability to provide essential care.
LEADERSHIP checks reveal that a N26.3 billion fund for medical emergency care cannot be tapped by most frontline hospitals confronted with patients who need it the most.
The fund, the equivalent of five percent of the Basic Health Care Provision Fund (BHCPF), is missing in action years after the National Health Act established it to cover essential medical services during emergencies.
Between 2020 and 2024, N526.9 billion was approved for the BHCPF, five per cent of which is over N26.3 billion.
This is as the cost of treating emergency cases in Nigeria has accrued to N200 billion in the past 10 years, even as the Nigerian private medical practitioners have called on the government to release the 2.5 per cent of the Basic Health Care Provision Fund (BHCPF) for emergency medical treatment.
Emergency incidents, no doubt, present a huge medical burden on the healthcare system in Nigeria. According to a 2019 Emergency Response Africa (ERA) survey, three out of four Nigerians had experienced at least one medical emergency in the last five years, with over a quarter of Nigerians having more than four emergencies.
Medical conditions (acute and chronic) and road traffic accidents contributed significantly to the number of emergencies. For instance, a total number of road traffic crashes in Q4 2022 was 3,617, indicating an increase of 6.01 per cent from the previous quarter which recorded 3,412 and a 6.16 per cent rise from 3,407 in Q4 2021, the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) disclosed.
Statista report revealed that over 11,800 road traffic accidents were reported in Nigeria between October and December of 2021; of those, approximately 10,200 were injuries and about 1,700 were registered deaths.
A study titled: “Mortality patterns in the accident and emergency department of an urban hospital in Nigeria”, averred that some of the deaths occurred within six hours of arrival at the emergency department of a major urban hospital in Nigeria.
To reverse this trend, the former president of Nigeria, Muhammadu Buhari launched the BHCPF appropriated by the National Assembly for the first time in the 2018 budget since the National Health Act (NHAct) was enacted in 2014.
In accordance with the NHAct 2014, the BHCPF is derived from an annual grant from the federal government of Nigeria of not less than one percent of the Consolidated Revenue Fund (CRF); grants by international donor partners and funds from any other source, inclusive of the private sector.
The NHAct sets out the important drivers to guide disbursement of the BHCPF. These “Payment Gateways” are in three-fold and the Act states that 50 per cent (one half) of the Fund shall be disbursed through the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) and deployed towards the provision of the Basic Minimum Package Health Scheme (BMPHS) in eligible primary or secondary health care facilities.
Forty-five per cent of the Fund is meant to be disbursed through the National Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA) and deployed to strengthening Primary Healthcare Centres (PHCs) in eligible PHC facilities for the provision of essential drugs, vaccines and consumables; provision and maintenance of facilities, equipment and transport; and development of human resources: 2.5 per cent shall be disbursed through a committee appointed by the National Council on Health (NCH) and deployed towards emergency medical treatment and 2.5 per cent goes to the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC).
Current contributions into the basket fund of the BHCPF includes N88,993,570,146.91of which N59,203,966,455.42 has been disbursed to states as at June 2022, (with balance of N30,120,321,166.18), according to document obtained by LEADERSHIP Weekend.
National president, Association of Nigerian Private Medical Practitioners (ANPMP) Dr. Kayode Adesola told LEADERSHIP Weekend that section 20(1) of the NHAct (2014) provides that “a health care provider, health worker or health establishment shall not refuse a person emergency medical treatment for any reason.
“Since 2014, we, the private medical practitioners, have been treating emergency cases, as stipulated by the law, without being paid a dime. From our calculation, the cost of treating emergency cases across the over 11,000 private health facilities in Nigeria, has surpassed N200 billion from 2014 till date,” Adesola revealed.
Speaking on the efforts to recoup their money, the national president said, “We know that 2.5 per cent of the BHCPF is meant for emergency medical treatment. We have confronted the National Assembly appealing to them to investigate where the money is. Private hospitals across Nigeria are receiving emergency cases, without being paid. Anybody can be a victim of any form of emergency.”
If government refuses to pay the money, Adesola posited that they will not continue this charity care forever, as they set up their clinics to make money, adding that it does not make sense if government decided to enforce the penalty for not adhering to section 20(1) of the NHAct (2014).
He called on Nigerians to appeal to the government to release the fund. “We need the senate to help us look for that money. Any of us can be a victim,” Adesola affirmed.
Country director, PharmAccess Nigeria, Njide Ndili, told LEADERSHIP Weekend at the sideline of the 2024 Medic West Africa Conference, that a lot of Nigerians are being turned away, adding that, “When you get to the hospital, in an emergency, you may be turned away. The first thing they will ask you is who is going to pay. The private hospitals don’t want to admit that, that is why they are turning people away, because they provide services and at the end of the day, nobody pays for the treatment. We need to find the 2.5 per cent of the PHCPF. Government needs to provide that fund for private hospitals to be able to fully enforce the NHAct 2024.”
The medical director, Head of Emergency Care, R-Jolad Hospital, Dr. Abiola Fasina Ayoola, explained that most of the public health engagements are focused on malaria, HIV and achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC). However, there is need to flesh out these engagements/discussions in terms of incorporating emergency, critical and operative care, she said, adding that, “We don’t give attention to acute emergency care, yet, trauma and emergency affect almost all Nigerians, surpassing malaria, TB and HIV combined.
“For instance, road accident kills more Nigerians than anything. R-Jolad is right on the highway and we are getting young victims all the time. We are spending like N7 million in a month, with zero chance of recouping these funds. While we try to treat as many survivors that come to the hospital, we should not forget that we established the hospital to make money. We can’t give charity care 100 per cent all the time. We cannot continue this charity care for ever, without some sort of financing mechanism. To achieve equity in emergency care services, we must tackle the issue of healthcare financing. Someone has to foot the emergency bill,” she asserted.
The deputy chairman of the Senate Committee on Health, Sen. Samaila Kaila, affirmed that the health system in Nigeria is not working and as such, one should not expect a component of the system to work.
Speaking on the emergency fund, Kaila said that National Council on Health approved a committee in the ministry of health, headed by a director to administer the fund.
On the need to formulate a law to improve emergency funding, Kaila stated that there are only two medical personnel in the Senate Committee on Health, adding that it is not easy to convince the rest of the committee members when it comes to critical matters like this. He therefore called on Nigerians to take the issue of politics seriously. “If we really want to change the way we are doing things, we have to get the right people to man critical positions,” he stated.
The chief medical director of the University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Emem Bassey, further affirmed that the 2.5 per cent for emergency treatment is with the Ministry of Health. “Sadly, the money is what is being used for the national emergency medical service and ambulance system. That is where your 2.5 per cent is. So, I am afraid it may not be given to private medical practitioners, unless they fight for it,” he stated.
[Leadership]
The member representing Aguata Federal Constituency of Anambra State, Rep. Dominic Okafor, has threatened to take legal action over a media report that he collected a bribe of $140 million from Binance.
He stated this while addressing journalists at the House of Representatives on Friday.
He said the publication was an attempt to smear his name and integrity after moving a motion to probe the escape of a Binance executive, Nadeem Anjarwalla, from the custody of Nigerian security.
He said: “Shortly after I moved that motion, which was well received and a lot of people were calling to commend me, I started getting calls from my friends all over the world saying I collected bribes from this very company. I got worried and wrote a letter to Premium Times, the media company that originated the story.”
“I wrote a letter to them which I copied the Speaker, Deputy Speaker, Clerk, Inspector General of Police, EFCC and DSS. I asked them to retrieve the information within 24 hours, if not I will take legal action against them.”
It would be recalled that bribery allegations were levelled against members of a ‘federal government’s committee’ by an executive of Binance, an online cryptocurrency trading platform.
[DailyTrust]