A leader with an eye on posterity won’t have the appetite for the vanity of naming projects after himself. Because true immortality will be bestowed by history, not monuments that can be renamed. Tinubu needs to submit himself to some clear-eyed, sober reflection. This preoccupation with self-glorification and immortalisation is a telltale sign. 

There is now a Tinubu Barracks in Abuja. It’s a frenzy of self-immortalization. There is a Tinubu Airport in Minna. There is a Tinubu Polytechnic in Abuja. It was approved this week. There is a Tinubu Library at the National Assembly. The NASS wants to establish a Tinubu University of National Languages.  All these naming ceremonies have happened in less than two years. 

Some say it’s not Tinubu. But it’s sleazy. The president can’t watch his aides and subordinates outdo themselves in this sycophancy marathon. There is no virtue in it. Many say this idea of Oba of Nigeria matches Tinubu’s ego. It’s immoral for a leader to spend public funds to build a monument and allow his appointees to hang his name on it. Nigeria  is not a Banana  republic  

Tinubu’s men have defended the immorality. Their defence is that Tinubu didn’t start it. Buhari named a university after himself. Yet that comical defence is shamelessly bold. They are effectively saying that Tinubu, who came to renew hope, is building on the ignoble foundation of a few former leaders. That mischievous defence doesn’t bother to answer the question of propriety. With the rate at which Tinubu eternalisation project is going, after 8 years, his name could be on the river Niger 

Azikiwe built the Federal University in Nsukka. He named it after Nigeria. He only got an airport named after him long after his death. Awolowo built universities. He named none after himself. He only got a university named after him when he joined his ancestors. Obasanjo  presided over the affairs of the country twice. He didn’t name a Federal University or an airport after himself. Tinubu needs a special adviser on ethics. 

Our people say we can know the faces from the fart. A leader committed to such brazen self-aggrandisement cannot save himself from other associated temptations. If a leader can’t resist the urge to name projects after himself, if he lacks the discipline and decency to desist from childish self-immortalization, can he resist the urge to refrain from becoming synonymous with the state? Time will tell. 

There is this joke about Idi Amin. Amin appropriated all the titles in Uganda and named himself the conqueror of the British Empire. The joke was that he flirted with the idea of renaming Uganda. He felt Idi Republic would be a better name. After all, he was Uganda. But he was only stopped when he was told that since the people of Cyprus were called Cypriots, if Uganda became Idi, then Ugandans could easily become Idiots. The joke doesn’t quite capture all of Idia Amin’s vanity. 

At some point during Mobutu’s reign, his name was ubiquitous. The fawning by his aides had gone malignant. Worshipping Mobutu in public became synonymous with patriotism.  Before every News broadcast on TV, an image of Mobutu descending from the clouds would be aired to remind the people of his divine ancestry and mission. People were expected to stop all they were doing to clap. Mobutu was God sent. He was a messiah. He wasn’t a mere mortal. 

Tinubu has to draw the line now. His apparent delight in this self-glorification is ruinous. It’s a sign of moral laxity. It’s a sign of ongoing conflation of public and private political interests. It’s a sign of incipient and paralysing delusions of grandeur. It’s a thing the juvenile juntas in Niger or Mali should be doing. It will attract clowns to surround him. 

One of the most significant deficits of Tinubu’s government is its nonchalance to corruption. It doesn’t feel so dirty. Tribalism, nepotism, cronyism, etc, are all rife and permissible. Corruption is the abuse of power for private gain. In this government, a minister can revoke the title of a plot of land and give it to his inlaw. Nothing is scandalous.  When people complained that Tinubu was so brazenly concentrating power in the hands of the Yoruba, Tinubu heard the complaints and intensified the lopsidedness. Nigerians are resigning to that insensitivity; they no longer care. Their president is tone-deaf. When he chooses a course for personal or group advantage, he gives no damn about public sentiment or opinion. 

But the naming of barracks after living politicians is remarkably naive. Our military institutions must be protected from such flippancy. We must preserve the sacredness of certain institutions. We shouldn’t make them subjects of cheap politics. A barrack could be named after a president who lived, died, and left inspiring military feats. Abacha still has a barrack, too. So why is Tinubu enamoured with his name on a barrack if it puts him in a fairly despicable company? 

So, should we expect more projects to be named after Tinubu? The Lagos Calabar road would fit and perhaps complete that preposterousness. It’s the largest road project on the continent. It was awarded to a friend without due process. It could as well be named after the father of modern  Lagos. Two other prestigious projects would be the universities of Ibadan and Lagos. Since those who built them and those who came after them didn’t have the nerve, Tinubu could as well take them. Perhaps, when he reaches surfeit he will discover the folly of the adventure. 

Tinubu might say he won’t suffer the fate of Mobutu and Idi Amin. I agree with him. But he must remember Wike. When Wike was governor, he named a local government headquarters after himself. His statue was installed. Then, he installed his protege as his successor. It all seemed perfectly immortalised. But soon after, he fell out with his godson. A few months ago, his statue was knocked down, and his name was deleted from the monument. If Tinubu understands the ephemerality of power and the abiding dislike of the masses for terribly presumptuous leaders, why is he setting himself up for a future desecration? 

For the uninitiated, the alphabet BBL might draw a blank. Not so for aspiring and practising socialites in our big capital cities of Abuja, Lagos and Port Harcourt.

For the latter, BBL stands for Brazilian Butt Lift, a procedure that augments the look of your buttocks in addition to removing fat from other parts of your body and transferring it to the buttocks area for a more voluptuous appearance.

Plastic and cosmetic surgeries

Once upon a not-too-distant time, engaging in plastic surgery was almost taboo. There were few practitioners in the country anyway, and most were to be found in the teaching hospitals where they mainly performed corrective surgeries on patients with natural conditions such as cleft lips, club feet and mastectomy patients.

OBGYN Consultant and Surgeon, Dr Loretta Ogboro Okor tells Vanguard that patients of such procedures must exercise caution on many different levels, saying the side effects are not to be joked around with, as they are potentially fatal.

”You will remember that the Brazillians have all these festivals and they are very body image conscious, so they are very focused on all these cosmetic surgeries and BBL is one of such.

“ Before BBL people got butt implants, but BBL became better and more fashionable. In the immediate term there is the risk of bleeding whether we like it or not, because tissues are being cut and incisions are being made”.

A high risk procedure

Ogboro Okoh advises BBL patients to patronise the right practitioners who will carry out proper investigations.

”Some of us bleed a lot more than others and in the Nigerian situation people don’t usually do check ups often so we don’t even know what is wrong with us. Some people even have Von Willebrand disease, where you bleed a lot.

“First few days after surgery are very painful and people are asked not to lie on their back. Imagine if someone already has gastro esophageal reflux disease or cardiac conditions and have to lie on their tummy for the first few weeks. The pain is real, swelling and bruising. Over time the skin may be discoloured”.

Lumps and bumps can appear on the intermediate run and of course, scarring and some form keloids. Blood vessels can become blocked and cause thrombosis, which can be fatal.

You can have fat embolism and that can go into the lungs. You can have fat necrosis. Blood vessels can clot and form a haematoma in the immediate postoperative period and blood will just be gathering there.
A serious skin infection can happen, called cellulitis.

These are the reasons ladies are made to wear compression garments immediately post op”.

Obeying gravity

Ogboro Okoh says infection is a big risk and recommends optimum hygiene before going in for the procedure.

“On the long run, what will your BBL be 10 years down the line or maybe when you are 60 or 70? The fat that is transferred will now start obeying gravity and maybe some fat has necrosed, so before you know, it is drooping on one side”.

Area targeted exercises

“They will tell you that the procedure is safe between the ages of 18 and 55, but I think a moderate lifestyle with proper exercise would help. Even just doing squats can make your bum come out.

I see some people using what they call BBL creams. Some of these creams have hormones. People have risks for certain hormone based cancers. The question is, is it really good for you? “

Targeted family size

The surgeon told Vanguard that BBL should be done when subscribers have completed their targeted family size, adding that moderation is key for best outcomes.

“Some surgeons will tell you it doesn’t matter but these people are looking for their money. You are going to expand during pregnancy, so you have to wait at least two years. You can’t get pregnant immediately.

BBL and fertility

“There is no clear cut link between BBL and fertility. However, there are certain infections that people have had which would make pregnancy a challenge”.

Weight loss pills, injections

A new class of weight loss medications have suddenly appeared in the horizon. Ozempic is the most favoured by Nigerian socialites, many of whom can now be seen sporting new, unusually slim body frames.

Though this class of drugs has been treated as prescription drugs in other countries and very much available in pharmacies, a false scarcity has been created in the socialite circles, with supplies sold only to the highest bidders. Sources claim a dose can go as high as 500,000 naira, as treatment, once proceeded, must be continued.

Though it can be a highly beneficial drug, Dr Ogboro Okoh warns of potentially harmful side effects.
“These groups of medications were used to manage type 2 diabetes. What was found as a side effect was weight loss. What the world is now trending and using it for is the side effect of these medications. The pharmacological names are Semaglutide with trade name Ozempic, then Tirzepatide, which is called Mounjaro.

“It will reduce your appetite and slow down the movement of the digestive tract and reduces the release of glucose from the liver. It is technically going to decrease your appetite. It also helps the pancreas to create more cells to make insulin”.

Adverse effects

Nausea, vomiting, constipation and jaundice are some adverse side effects of these drugs, according to Ogboro Okoh, who recommends full medical checkup before administering.
“It’s also been found that people who take these medications should not have a history of thyroid problems. In terms of weight loss it’s very effective”.

Fertility

”Anytime we lose weight, we improve our fertility- sperm count in men and ovulation and regularity of cycles in women. In fact in a situation like PCOS, once you lose weight you have treated that condition. We also know that when blood sugar levels improve, fertility increases. Ozempic actually works by decreasing inflammation in the body and when people are trying for babies we tell them to take vitamin E, an antioxidant.

However on the flip side, we still have concerns and research is still ongoing”.

Testosterone

“There has been talk that Ozempic can reduce testosterone in men and that can affect sperm count, but studies have not been concluded on this.

Results are showing that people who don’t want to get pregnant, once they start using Ozempic, they just start being super fertile. We now have Ozempic babies. Look at the side of the fence you are before you start taking these medications.

If you are taking birth control pills and you are taking Ozempic you might be setting yourself up for failure.

Again, she urges users to adjust their diet and lifestyle to get the best benefits, favouring diets rich in fiber to tackle constipation and arresting gastro paralysis and intestinal obstruction.
She also recommends physical activities for sustained weight loss, saying research is still evolving.

For celebs, visibility is currency

Part of being a celebrity is being seen. In the world of Nigerian celebrities, visibility is everything, particularly in this social media age. You must not only play the part and be seen to be playing the part, but you must also look the part. Competition is frenetic and new players are joining the queue every single day.

The recent wedding of afro pop crooner, popularly known as Davido with his long-term partner, Chioma saw video plays as high as one billion views on their official pages alone.

Black might be beautiful, but Nigerian celebs prefer a different kind of beauty, the type that shines even when there is no light.

From Bobrisky to Iyabo Ojo, there is hardly any successful female celeb whose skin tone has not significantly changed over the years. Even the men are not spared, particularly those of Southwestern stock in Yoruwood and indigenous pop music.

Bleaching or toning?

“There’s a big difference between bleaching and toning”, says Anthonia, a youth corper who recently completed her service. “Pimples, sun and things like that change the skin tone, especially poverty.

Many ladies don’t want to bleach but they don’t want different patches of colours on their skin, hence the use of creams”. With a dismissive laugh, she declined to reveal if her own skin tone is natural.
Asked if she is aware of the dangers of using skin colour changing creams, whether for bleaching or toning. Tonia says: “there’s nothing new in these things. The end justifies the means”.
Chemical peels have also become common cosmetic procedures.

Creams containing glycolic acid, salicylic acid, lactic acid or pyruvic acid are applied to the skin in the spa. These acids destroy the upper layer of the skin, called the epidermis and this is subsequently peeled off to reveal a fresher, smoother, lighter layer.

No NAFDAC numbers- NAFDAC

Many of these bleaching or toning creams are mixed by untrained individuals who obtain the ingredients from unregulated black markets in the Agege and Ojota areas of Lagos, according to informed sources.
Pharmacist Ebele Perpetua Anto, Deputy Director, cosmetics and medical devices, drug evaluation and research at NAFDAC, says even those sold on shelves do not all have NAFDAC numbers.

In a sensitization workshop on dangers of bleaching creams and regular controls, Anto revealed that skin bleaching has become an evolving health problem whose patrons believe they will achieve a higher level of relevance and acceptability.

77% of Nigerian women bleach — WHO

According to Anto, the demand for skin lightening products are on the increase, despite sensitization efforts. Due to the negativity attached to the word “bleaching”, she said new words have emerged such as toning, whitening, lightening, fading, exfoliating, peeling, brightening and so forth. The use of bleaching agents is also gaining popularity in baby and children products.

Citing a WHO 2018 study, Anto claims 77% of women in Nigeria regularly use skin lightening creams. The same study claims skin lightening is one of the fastest growing beauty industries worldwide, estimated to be worth $31.2 billion by 2024.

Risk of cancer

Encouraging cosmetic producers to register with NAFDAC, she enumerates the risk of cancer as one of the side effects of using bleaching agents.

Others are premature skin ageing, damage to the kidney, skin burns and skin infection.

“Elevated mercury levels in the hair, blood and urine can damage the nervous system and affect an unborn child. Various agents, including the natural ones, can cause allergic reactions “, she said as she called for the shunning of such products.

Tight fitting garments

For those who cannot afford the luxurious results of BBL and other cosmetic, invasive procedures, there are clever, figure enhancing undergarments to the rescue; but while some are just soft, lush and curve inducing, others are dangerously and viciously tight, putting the ribs, lungs and other body parts in danger.

Cause and effect

Dr Ogboro Okoh offers explanations and alternatives. “That being said, I don’t think it’s really a crime to want to change what is not very good about one’s body. Some lack proper self esteem and think when they do such, it would boost their esteem.

Women need to develop an internal level of self esteem and this can be got from the home growing up from the parents and those around them.

Life is not all about how they look but more about what they have between their ears.

Beauty, naturally…

Quincy Ayodele, a WHO certified naturopathic medical practitioner with decades of experience, has worked with hundreds of celebrities and helped them achieve their goals of slimmer physiques and better skins towards the goal of holistically healthier lifestyles.

In Quincy’s world, there are no diseases eradication, not to mention beauty goals, that cannot be reached by the use of herbs and plants that can be found within our own environment. This includes the attainment of a more voluptuous body frame.

With the World Health Organisation’s official recognition of naturopathic practitioners following their outstanding success in the handling of COVID 19 cases in their respective countries, Ayodele is convinced more Nigerians will begin to embrace their natural and more sustainable procedures, in their quest for beauty.

[Vanguard]

Adams Oshiomhole, chairman of the senate committee on interior, has alleged that retired military generals are behind the spate of illegal mining activities in the country.

According to Channels Television, the senator made the allegation on Friday during the budget presentation by Sampson Ekong, chairman of the senate committee on solid minerals development, to the senate committee on appropriation.

“The ongoing illegal mining across the country is being carried out by retired generals, and we know them. They use helicopters to cart away gold, making billions of dollars, while the country suffers,” Oshiomhole said.

“This issue has been left unchecked for too long. We have the data and surveys showing where these activities are happening. It’s time for the government to deploy joint task forces, just as it has done in tackling oil theft.”

Oshiomhole said he had written to former President Muhammadu Buhari about the situation during his stint as the national chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), detailing how illegal miners arm local groups and use sophisticated equipment to exploit resources.

The senator asked the federal government to take decisive action on the illegal mining crisis, advocating for robust measures similar to those deployed to combat illegal oil bunkering in the Niger Delta.

Last year, Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, minister of interior, launched the mining marshals to checkmate illegal mining of solid minerals across the country.

[TheCable]

The administration of President Donald Trump on Friday directed federal agencies to start terminating staffers working in positions related to diversity programs, after placing them on paid leave earlier this week.

The axing of jobs aimed at combating discrimination such as racism and sexism is the latest in a blitz of right-wing measures the 78-year-old Republican has put in place on his return to the White House.

“Each agency, department, or commission head shall take action to terminate, to the maximum extent allowed by law, all DEI, DEIA, and ‘environmental justice’ offices and positions within 60 days,” said a memo from the US Office of Personnel Management, referring to jobs aimed at boosting “diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility.”

Earlier this week Trump had ordered government agency heads to submit a written plan for reducing employees in DEI offices by close of business on Friday.

The reference to environmental justice appeared to be new, however.

The Environmental Protection Agency’s website defined it as “the just treatment and meaningful involvement of all people, regardless of income, race, color, national origin, Tribal affiliation, or disability, in agency decision-making and other Federal activities that affect human health and the environment.”

During last year’s presidential campaign, Trump vilified DEI policies in the federal government and corporate world, saying they discriminated against white people — men in particular.

He also demonized any recognition of gender diversity, attacking transgender people — notably transgender women in sports — and gender-affirming care for children.

Trump has already ended what he called “radical” affirmative action in awarding federal contracts, revoking an order crafted to combat racism that dates back to the civil rights era of the 1960s.

He has also promised to sweep away policies supporting transgender people, insisting that the United States will officially recognize only two genders.

His earlier orders also required federal department and agency bosses to ask “employees if they know of any efforts to disguise these (DEI) programs by using coded or imprecise language.”

[Opinion Nigeria]

In a world increasingly driven by superficial relationships and fleeting connections, the demonstration of genuine friendship by Samuel Eto’o, the renowned Cameroonian football legend, serves as a profound example worthy of emulation. His recent actions, which highlight loyalty, empathy, and a steadfast commitment to an old-time friend in need, resonate deeply with the biblical principle of love and faithfulness in relationships. Celebrities, given their influence and platform, have much to learn from such a powerful display of authentic friendship.

True friendship transcends material gain or fleeting pleasures. It is grounded in loyalty, sacrifice, and an unwavering commitment to stand by each other, especially in times of need. Samuel Eto’o’s actions embody these virtues, bringing to life the age-old saying, “A friend in need is a friend indeed.” His actions remind us that friendship is not just about shared good times but about walking with others through their darkest valleys.

The Bible places significant emphasis on the value of true friendship. Proverbs 17:17 states, “A friend loves at all times, and a brother is born for adversity.” Eto’o’s demonstration aligns perfectly with this scripture. In standing by his friend, Eto’o has shown that true friendship is not conditional; it does not waver in the face of adversity but remains steadfast, embodying the essence of God’s unconditional love.

In fact, the lives of celebrities are often marked by public scrutiny and the pressure to maintain a particular image. However, this should not detract from their ability to build and sustain meaningful relationships. Eto’o’s actions serve as a poignant reminder that fame and success should not overshadow the virtues of empathy and loyalty.

To aptly put it, celebrities should always endeavor to prioritize relationships over status.  Celebrities often navigate a world where relationships are transactional, driven by mutual benefit rather than genuine connection. Eto’o’s commitment to his friend underscores the importance of valuing relationships over societal status or public perception. Celebrities should take this to heart, nurturing friendships that are rooted in authenticity rather than convenience.

In a similar vein, celebrities should always be present for their old time friends in times of need. In fact, Ecclesiastes 4:9-10 teaches us, “Two are better than one because they have a good reward for their labor. For if they fall, one will lift up his companion. But woe to him who is alone when he falls, for he has no one to help him up.” Eto’o’s ability to step up and support his friend, even if it is that of a sense of belonging for now, during challenging times exemplifies this principle. Without a doubt, celebrities have the resources and influence to make a significant difference in the lives of those around them, especially their close friends and allies.

Also, celebrities should always endeavor to exude a sense of humility. In fact, in a culture that often glorifies self-promotion, Eto’o’s actions remind us of the value of humility. Not only that, Philippians 2:3 encourages believers to “Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit. Rather, in humility, value others above yourselves.” Celebrities should take a cue from Eto’o, using their platform to uplift and support others selflessly.

The Bible is replete with stories of true friendship that offer guidance and inspiration. Perhaps the most notable is the friendship between David and Jonathan. Despite the political and familial pressures that could have easily turned them against each other, Jonathan’s loyalty to David was unwavering. In 1 Samuel 18:3-4, we read, “And Jonathan made a covenant with David because he loved him as himself. Jonathan took off the robe he was wearing and gave it to David, along with his tunic, and even his sword, his bow, and his belt.” This act of selflessness mirrors Eto’o’s decision to prioritize his friend’s well-being over any potential personal inconvenience.

Similarly, the friendship between Ruth and Naomi in the Book of Ruth exemplifies commitment and loyalty. Ruth’s declaration, “Where you go, I will go, and where you stay, I will stay. Your people will be my people and your God my God” (Ruth 1:16), underscores the depth of her devotion. These examples offer a roadmap for celebrities to cultivate friendships that are enduring and rooted in mutual respect.

The actions of celebrities have far-reaching implications. Their decisions, whether positive or negative, influence millions of followers who look up to them as role models. By emulating Eto’o’s example, celebrities can inspire a culture of loyalty and compassion among their fans.

James 2:14-17 reminds us that faith without works is dead. Likewise, public declarations of friendship mean little if not accompanied by tangible actions. Eto’o’s support for his friend demonstrates that genuine friendship requires more than words; it demands action. Celebrities must recognize the power of their influence and use it to model behaviors that promote unity, love, and selflessness.

While true friendship often requires sacrifice, it also comes with its rewards. Proverbs 27:9 says, “The heartfelt counsel of a friend is as sweet as perfume and incense.” Beyond the immediate benefits of companionship and support, friendships rooted in authenticity bring long-lasting joy and fulfillment.

No doubt, Eto’o’s actions likely brought immense comfort to his friend, but they also serve as a testament to his character, earning him admiration and respect worldwide. For celebrities, this is a powerful lesson: acts of kindness and loyalty not only enrich the lives of others but also enhance one’s own legacy.

As public figures, celebrities have the privilege and responsibility of shaping societal values. By choosing to prioritize genuine relationships, they can set an example for their followers, fostering a culture that values loyalty, empathy, and love. Samuel Eto’o’s actions serve as a clarion call for celebrities to step up and be true friends, not just in word but in deed.

The Bible’s teachings on friendship are clear and timeless. As Proverbs 18:24 reminds us, “A man who has friends must himself be friendly, but there is a friend who sticks closer than a brother.” By following Eto’o’s example and adhering to these biblical principles, celebrities can build enduring relationships that withstand the test of time.

In fact, Samuel Eto’o’s recent demonstration of friendship is more than just an inspiring story; it is a call to action. It challenges celebrities to evaluate their relationships and strive for authenticity, loyalty, and selflessness. By doing so, they not only enrich their own lives but also set a powerful example for their fans and the wider society. Let Eto’o’s actions remind us all that true friendship is one of life’s greatest treasures, and let it inspire us to be friends who love at all times.

Ever since I started consciously monitoring the business of the government, I have always wondered why Nigeria’s yearly budgets unfailingly allocate astronomical amounts of money to buy the same items—cars, cutlery, furniture, etc.— that should last for years before needing replacement.

Yoruba cultural tours

Democracy in Ghana and America book

What happens to the items that are replaced every year? Who keeps them? And what necessitates the ritual of replacing items in perfect condition every year, especially for a country that says allocating money for subsidies to make life a little easier for people is too much of a burden?

I never wrote about this because I had assumed that there must be some arcane justification that I failed to grasp for this profligate annual budgetary ritual. 

Not wanting to be an ultracrepidarian (as people who comment authoritatively on subjects they have little or no knowledge of are called), I had chosen to simply wonder in silence— or perhaps ask people in government why they expend scarce resources to change items in excellent conditions, something everyday folks never do.

However, House of Representatives member Bello El-Rufai, who represents Kaduna North Federal Constituency and whose privileged position as the son of a former minister and governor should give him an insider perspective on why this practice happens, piqued my curiosity when he questioned it during a parliamentary debate in December last year.

He quipped that since his boyhood every year's budget has featured new computers, cars, utensils, and furniture even when these items don't expire in a year.

“We need to cut down on costs.,” he said. “The recurrent expenditure issue exists in every budget. Even as a young person like myself, I see that we budget for vehicles every year, utensils every year. To open more revenue streams or block loopholes, we need to scrutinise these ministries’ budgets. If they bought vehicles last year, they should hold off because vehicles do not expire.”

The speech went viral because it resonated with vast swaths of Nigerians who had been caught up in what we call a “spiral of silence” in communication theory, which occurs when people suppress their opinions about an issue because they (often incorrectly) assume that their opinions are in the minority and therefore unwelcome.

That someone who is deeply inserted into the inner sanctum of power by reason of both birth and positional privilege has articulated a thought that had been hibernating in the minds of millions of Nigerians was liberating. It reassured many people that their gnawing doubts about the moral propriety of Nigeria’s ritualized budgetary prodigality are not ill-informed or out of line.

I thought the speech would ignite a soul-searching national conversation about Nigeria’s wasteful budgeting practices. However, it seems it didn’t. If it did, I must have missed it.

But let’s face it. There are not many regular people on the face of this earth who change their cars, computers, utensils, etc. every year. Even wealthy people use these items for a few years before changing them.

Why does a country whose governments routinely proclaim that they are too poor to be able to afford subsidizing the energy consumption of its struggling population spend stratospheric amounts of money to replenish one-year-old items for people in government every single year?

Each time I write about the immorality of visiting avoidable anguish on the Nigerian population through the withdrawal subsidies, the standard retort I get from neoliberal apologists who care more about the happiness of the “markets” than they do about the health and vitality of the people is, “where do you want the government to get the money to pay for subsidies?”

Well, how about from the same place where it gets the funds to change year-old items every year for government officials at the cost of billions of naira?

Just because Bello El-Rufai raised this issue and his fellow politicians didn’t shoot him down, at least to my knowledge, I got curious and researched what happens in other countries.

 It turns out most wealthy nations of the world (who, by the way, extend various kinds of subsidies to their vulnerable populations) don’t replace cars, computers, and utensils every year as a matter of course.  

In the United States, the official vehicles of the president and the vice president are not replaced every year. In fact, “The Beast,” as the presidential limousines of U.S. presidents have been called since 2001, “have largely been on eight-year cycles for the past 30 years,” according to Autoweek.com.

The most recent model of the presidential limousine was introduced in 2018. It replaced the previous version, which debuted in 2009 during President Barack Obama's administration. So, President Donald Trump doesn’t have a brand new car.

Although the official vehicles for the president and the vice president have an eight-year replacement cycle, they undergo periodic upgrades to incorporate the latest security features, including communications, armor, and defensive capabilities. That’s more economical than buying brand new cars every year just for the sake of it.

Members of the U.S. Congress (that is, members of the House of Representatives and the Senate) don’t have funds specifically allocated to them for the purchase of official or personal cars. They only receive allowances and benefits that may cover travel-related expenses.

Most members of Congress don’t buy cars. They instead opt to lease cars using their congressional office budget called “Representational Allowance” for House members and “Senate office funds” for Senators), and lease terms typically range from 2 to 4 years. That means they may switch vehicles periodically based on lease expiration.

Only high-ranking Congressional officials (such as the Speaker and the Senate Majority Leader) or those facing security threats use government-provided vehicles for official duties.

I also found that the replacement cycle for vehicles used by U.S. government agencies ranges from 3 to 5 years.

The guidelines established by the General Services Administration (GSA), which manages the federal fleet, say sedans and light-duty vehicles should be changed every 3 to 5 years or after or after they rack up 60,000 to 75,000 miles, whichever comes first.

Vans and trucks are changed every  5 to 7 years or 100,000 to 150,000 miles, whichever comes first.

Law enforcement and emergency vehicles are replaced every 3 to 6 years or after recording between 50,000 to 80,000 miles, with replacements based on performance, reliability, and safety concerns.

What happens to government vehicles that get replaced? According to the General Services Administration (GSA), most government vehicles, once they reach the end of their service life, are sold to the public through GSA Auctions, which is the federal government's online auction platform.

Auctions are open to individuals, businesses, and local governments. But the vehicles can also be transferred to other government agencies or donated through programs like the Federal Surplus Personal Property Donation Program, which provides assets to eligible non-profits, educational institutions, and local governments.

Similarly, the replacement frequency of official vehicles for the UK Prime Minister and cabinet members is not yearly, as it is in Nigeria.

 Although change of cars for UK government officials is not governed by a fixed schedule as it is in the U.S., the Government Car Service (GCS), an executive agency of the Department for Transport, manages the fleet of vehicles assigned to cabinet ministers and other officials and determines when they need to be changed.

In sum, most wealthy nations of the world don’t allocate funds every year for the replacement of non-perishable items used by government officials. It’s a wasteful practice that should have no place in a struggling country like Nigeria. The funds allocated for the yearly needless replacement of cars, computers, utensils, etc. should instead be invested in programs and policies that bring relief to the people.

I hope Bello El-Rufai will move beyond rhetoric and galvanize support for legislation that will enshrine a 5-year replacement cycle for items that are currently replaced every year in Nigerian budgets. He would write his name in gold if he did that. 

Anambra State Governor, Charles Soludo, is not one to shy away from tough decisions, especially when the stakes are high. His recent crackdown on fetish practices and misuse of supernatural powers has drawn parallels to the biblical King Hilkiah, who rediscovered the Book of the Law and led Judah in sweeping reforms to restore moral and spiritual order. By introducing Clause 18 of the Anambra State Homeland Security Law, 2025, Soludo has declared war on practices that many believe are deeply embedded in the cultural fabric of the Igbo people. But does this bold move mark him as a modern reformer, or is it a misstep in navigating the complexities of tradition and governance?

For the sake of clarity, clause 18 of the Anambra State Homeland Security Law, 2025 is a comprehensive legislative effort targeting harmful and fraudulent activities involving supernatural powers.

First and foremost, the law stipulates that using charms or supernatural powers for crime or wealth are criminal acts.  This is as it clarifies that individuals employing charms or promoting wealth through supernatural means, popularly known as practices like “Okeite” or “Eze Nwanyi”, now face up to six years in prison, a ₦20 million fine, or both.

Concerning sacrifices and charms in public spaces, the law says public spaces are no longer dumping grounds for sacrificial items or charms, and specifies that offenders caught leaving such items on roads, rivers, or other communal areas face the same penalties.

In a similar vein, false claims of supernatural powers, such as fraudulent claims of supernatural abilities, particularly those aimed at deceiving or defrauding others, will lead to prosecution with severe penalties.

Also, on the aspect of proving supernatural claims, the law says those suspected of misleading others with claims of supernatural powers must provide proof of their abilities during investigations.

Also in a similar view, from the perspective of the Attorney General’s Review, the law states that before prosecutions can proceed, police findings must be reviewed by the Attorney General of Anambra State for legal advice.

Without a doubt, the rationale behind this law, according to the state government, is to safeguard public morals, ensure community safety, and promote lawful means of livelihood.

Given the backdrop of the foregoing views, it is not a misnomer to opine that Governor Soludo’s bold move evokes the story of King Hilkiah, who, upon rediscovering the Book of the Law, sparked a wave of reforms that saw Judah return to the worship of Yahweh. Much like Hilkiah, Soludo is on a mission to sanitize the land of practices he views as detrimental to the moral and economic progress of Anambra State.

However, while Hilkiah’s reforms were rooted in religious revival, Soludo’s actions are framed as a quest for social and economic transformation. By outlawing activities that promote fraudulent wealth accumulation and harm public safety, Soludo aims to dismantle systems of exploitation and fear that have taken root over decades.

Without a doubt, the misuse of supernatural powers has far-reaching consequences in Anambra. Practices like oath-taking in shrines, charms used for personal gain, and public displays of sacrifices are not just symbolic; they often perpetuate fear, control, and manipulation. These practices have crept into business dealings, community leadership, and even politics, undermining trust and ethical standards.

By targeting these activities, Soludo seeks to restore a sense of order and accountability. His message is clear: success and wealth must come from honest work, not dubious rituals or fraudulent practices.

Despite its merits, the law has not been universally welcomed. Critics argue that Soludo’s approach is an affront to Igbo culture, where traditional practices hold deep spiritual and communal significance. They see the law as an attempt to erase aspects of the Igbo identity in favor of Westernized values.

Yet, a critical distinction must be made between cultural preservation and harmful traditions. While culture is worth preserving, practices that exploit or harm individuals have no place in a progressive society. Soludo’s crackdown is not an attack on Igbo culture but a necessary step toward refining it for the modern era.

To fully address the issues driving the misuse of supernatural powers, the government must go beyond enforcement. Many turn to these practices out of desperation, poverty, and a lack of access to legitimate opportunities. Soludo’s administration must pair this legislative crackdown with initiatives that promote economic empowerment, education, and awareness.

For instance, creating vocational programs, supporting small businesses, and investing in education could reduce the allure of fraudulent rituals. When people see tangible pathways to success, the dependency on dubious practices will naturally wane.

In fact, Governor Soludo’s decision to criminalize these activities is as bold as it is contentious. The inclusion of provisions requiring individuals to prove their supernatural abilities is particularly intriguing. While it serves as a deterrent to fraudsters, it also raises questions about how such claims will be evaluated and the potential for misuse of this clause.

Moreover, the penalties, six years in prison and a ₦20 million fine, are severe. They send a strong message but may also alienate segments of the population who view these practices as integral to their identity. Balancing reform with cultural sensitivity will be key to the success of this initiative.

Labeling Soludo as a modern-day King Hilkiah is both apt and contentious. Like Hilkiah, he has taken a stand against entrenched practices, risking backlash from those who benefit from the status quo. However, skeptics question whether his focus on supernatural practices addresses the root causes of Anambra’s challenges, such as unemployment, insecurity, and infrastructure decay.

For Soludo to truly embody the spirit of Hilkiah, his reforms must extend beyond punitive measures to fostering a culture of integrity, trust, and opportunity. Reforming hearts and minds is a gradual process that requires dialogue, education, and economic transformation.

Governor Charles Soludo’s crusade against the misuse of supernatural powers is a bold and necessary step toward creating a more ethical and prosperous Anambra State. By tackling practices that perpetuate fear, fraud, and exploitation, he is positioning himself as a reformer with a vision for progress.

As Anambra State navigates this transformative period, one question lingers: Will Soludo’s crusade be remembered as the spark that ignited a moral and economic renaissance, or will it be seen as an ambitious overreach? Time, as always, will be the ultimate judge.

In any democratic society, the rule of law is the cornerstone of justice and governance, ensuring that no one, regardless of their status or influence, is above the law. However, the recent meeting between former Governor Yahaya Bello—who, after evading justice for several months, has now surrendered to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and is currently facing charges for fraud and money laundering—and Minister Nyesom Wike reveals a concerning intersection of political power and the legal process. While the meeting itself may not be illegal, the optics of a high-ranking government official engaging with someone in the midst of an ongoing, high-profile legal case sends a troubling message. This interaction undermines the integrity of the EFCC, the Attorney General’s office, and the judiciary, all of which are working diligently to hold Bello accountable. Such actions raise the dangerous implication that political influence can be used to bypass legal accountability, casting doubt on the Tinubu administration’s commitment to a transparent, impartial process in Bello’s prosecution and, more broadly, undermining the nation’s fight against corruption.

The psychological impact of such a high-profile encounter cannot be underestimated. The very image of these figures—politicians with significant sway—publicly shaking hands and smiling, suggests to the public and to the international community that the law might be flexible when it comes to influential figures. This is particularly alarming in Abuja, the seat of the federal government, where justice should be the strongest. In such a context, the legal proceedings against Bello, involving N100 billion and N80 billion in fraud and money laundering, should be seen as an urgent matter. But instead, this image raises the unsettling question: Is the rule of law compromised by political connections?

The EFCC’s Authority at Stake: Political Influence Undermining Law Enforcement

The EFCC’s role in investigating and prosecuting corruption is one of the cornerstones of the Tinubu administration’s commitment to the fight against graft. However, the recent meeting between Wike and Bello puts the EFCC’s authority in jeopardy. By publicly engaging with a man actively under investigation for major financial crimes, Wike, a key figure in the government, is inadvertently sending a message to the EFCC that its work can be undermined by political ties.

This move diminishes the credibility of the EFCC. The agency, which has pursued high-profile figures like Bello, relies on public confidence in its impartiality. When a senior government official, who is supposed to represent the will of the state, is seen engaging with a person under prosecution, it gives the impression that political power overrides legal processes. Such behavior can create a dangerous precedent, where individuals feel that they can evade legal consequences if they hold enough political influence.

Judiciary Integrity in Jeopardy: The Dangerous Undermining of Legal Independence

The judiciary must remain impartial and independent, free from political interference. Yet, this meeting raises grave concerns about the judicial independence in Nigeria. With two active federal cases against Bello, the judiciary should operate without any perception of political influence. But when a high-ranking official engages with a person facing legal prosecution, the very foundation of the rule of law is threatened.

This event is a psychological blow to the credibility of the judiciary. If political figures like Wike can support someone under investigation, how can Nigerians trust that judges and justices will make their decisions based solely on law and evidence, free from external pressures? The public perception of judicial impartiality is crucial to the country’s democratic framework. This encounter threatens to erode the public’s trust in the fairness of the legal system, leading to the belief that the law can be influenced by political maneuvering, rather than upholding justice for all.

The Media’s Dilemma: Fueling Public Speculation and Erosion of Trust

For the media, which plays a vital role in upholding the principles of accountability and transparency, this meeting presents a significant dilemma. The press is now faced with the challenge of how to frame this interaction. Is it merely a political meeting, or does it represent something deeper—an indication that political power is indeed undermining the justice system?

The psychological impact of the media’s coverage will be felt across the nation. If the media downplays the significance of this encounter, it risks eroding public trust in the system. If it highlights the implications of the meeting—questioning the integrity of the legal process—it could trigger a national conversation about whether those in power can manipulate the system for personal or political gain. The media’s responsibility to reflect the public’s concerns while holding those in power accountable could mean the difference between strengthening or weakening public faith in the government’s commitment to justice.

Nigeria’s Public Trust at Stake: Undermining Accountability for the Ordinary Citizen

For the average Nigerian citizen, this meeting may feel like a betrayal. For those who have long felt marginalized or disenfranchised by systemic corruption, the image of a high-ranking official engaging with someone currently facing serious legal charges is a psychological blow to their faith in the legal system. It reinforces the belief that the powerful are shielded from accountability, further deepening the sense of powerlessness among ordinary Nigerians. This interaction suggests that the law is not applied equally—that those with the right political connections can sidestep justice with impunity. For many, this reinforces the painful perception that, while the average citizen faces harsh legal consequences, influential individuals can navigate the system unscathed.

This erodes trust in the government’s anti-corruption efforts and fosters a culture of impunity. It sends the message that, if you hold the right connections or position, you are above the law. This message could lead to widespread cynicism about the effectiveness of the country’s legal and political systems. The government’s promise of accountability and transparency risks becoming hollow, as Nigerians may no longer believe that the powerful will be held accountable for their actions.

A Dangerous Global Perception: Sending the Wrong Message to the World

On the global stage, this meeting raises serious questions about Nigeria’s commitment to democracy, the rule of law, and the fight against corruption. International organizations, investors, and diplomatic partners who have been watching Nigeria’s anti-corruption efforts with cautious optimism may now question whether the country is truly dedicated to building a transparent and fair system. The international community will be looking at this interaction and wondering whether political connections in Nigeria allow individuals to bypass the legal system.

Nigeria’s global reputation is at stake. If political figures are seen publicly sidestepping the law, it could harm the country’s image, potentially leading to reduced foreign investments and strained relationships with international bodies. Global confidence in Nigeria’s legal and governance frameworks will erode, and the message sent is that political influence can often triumph over justice.

Wike’s Message to Tinubu: A Subtle Display of Power and Influence

Perhaps the most alarming implication of this meeting is the message it sends to President Tinubu. Yahaya Bello, the former Governor of Kogi State, and his successor, Usman Ododo, visited Nyesom Wike, the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), at his Abuja residence. The three politicians, who belong to different parties, were captured in photos smiling and exchanging pleasantries. Is this Wike signaling that he is beyond reproach, that his political power makes him immune to the consequences of his actions? The image of Wike, a senior government minister, publicly aligning with a figure facing two active federal court cases suggests a sense of untouchability. It raises the uncomfortable question of whether Wike feels that his position allows him to bypass the legal system, openly defying the principles of accountability and justice without fear of reprisal. This meeting sends a dangerous message that political influence can shield individuals from legal consequences, undermining the credibility of the administration’s anti-corruption efforts.

Is Wike sending a subtle message of defiance, signaling that his position allows him to defy the administration’s efforts at upholding the law? By publicly associating with someone facing serious criminal charges, Wike could be indicating that he is protected by political power and that his actions, even when they may undermine the government’s core anti-corruption agenda, will have little to no consequences. This sends a powerful psychological signal to both the public and to President Tinubu, implying that Wike believes he can operate outside the boundaries of the law with no consequences. This is a dangerous precedent for any government to allow, as it creates a culture where political power trumps the rule of law.

Wike’s Familiarity with Inviting Key Judicial Figures: A Dangerous Precedent

It is clear that Wike is no stranger to inviting heads of the judiciary and other influential figures to various ceremonies, such as inaugurations or project unveilings. While this is a common diplomatic practice in many countries, it becomes deeply concerning when it involves individuals with ongoing legal matters or when the person inviting these key figures is actively undermining the judicial process. In the case of Yahaya Bello, the fact that Wike continues to engage with him during such a critical time in his legal proceedings is highly troubling. Wike should not be able to extend invitations to the likes of the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), the President of the Court of Appeal, heads of immigration and law enforcement, or the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), especially after the image of a senior minister under Tinubu being seen with someone recently declared a “wanted” person and currently in court.

This raises a disturbing question: Is Wike subtly implying that he holds influence over the judiciary and law enforcement? For the sake of integrity, such actions should not be tolerated. Wike’s continued interactions with individuals facing prosecution—especially in such an overt manner—create a scenario where high-ranking officials may feel compelled to accommodate him out of fear of political fallout or personal influence. The fact that he can invite and engage these figures so freely, without any public repercussions, highlights the dangerous precedent this sets for Nigeria’s legal and political systems. It is imperative to recognize the far-reaching implications of such behavior and ensure that no one, regardless of their position, can bypass justice through political influence.

Wike Must Publicly Acknowledge His Mistake and Be Rebuffed for Honor’s Sake

I think this is really poor judgment on the part of Minister Wike. While politicians are certainly entitled to maintain relationships across party lines, this particular interaction—at a time when Bello is actively being prosecuted—shows a lack of regard for the gravity of the situation and the integrity of the Tinubu administration’s fight against corruption. Wike should publicly declare that he made a mistake by engaging with Bello in this manner and offer an apology to the Nigerian people for undermining the government’s efforts at accountability. This should be a humbling moment for him to acknowledge that his actions were misguided, especially given the serious legal implications of the case at hand.

For the sake of honor and restoring faith in the political system, Wike needs to be rebuked for his actions. The public perception of impartiality, justice, and fairness in the legal system is crucial to the success of the administration’s anti-corruption agenda. By making this public acknowledgment, Wike would help in reaffirming the Tinubu administration’s commitment to integrity and could begin to repair some of the damage done to the credibility of the fight against corruption. In this crucial moment, the Tinubu administration must demonstrate the resolve to address this breach and act decisively to reaffirm that justice will not be compromised, no matter the political standing of the individuals involved.

Tinubu’s Crucial Moment: Restoring the Integrity of the Legal System

President Tinubu now faces a critical moment in his presidency. The actions of Minister Wike have placed a tremendous strain on the credibility of the Nigerian government’s anti-corruption agenda. The EFCC, the judiciary, and law enforcement agencies are all now confronted with the perception that political power can nullify the legal process. If this situation is allowed to continue unchecked, the government risks undermining the trust of both the Nigerian people and the international community in its commitment to justice and transparency.

Tinubu must act decisively. The rule of law must be restored to its rightful place as the cornerstone of Nigeria’s democracy. No one, regardless of political position, should be allowed to undermine or subvert the legal process. President Tinubu must demonstrate that political influence cannot shield individuals from the consequences of their actions. This is an opportunity for the administration to reaffirm that the law applies equally to all, and that no political figure, no matter how influential, is above it.

This is a moment for decisive leadership—to show that the fight against corruption is more than just a slogan, and that justice will not be compromised by political expediency. It is time for President Tinubu to stand firm in defense of the rule of law, ensuring that Nigeria remains a country where justice is applied fairly, without exception.

Section 31 of the 1979 Constitution provided that every individual was entitled to respect for the dignity of his person, and accordingly no person shall be subject to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment. Article 5 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act Cap A9 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004 provides that “all forms of exploitation and degradation of man, particularly slavery, slave trade, torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment and treatment shall be prohibited”

 In utter breach of the above provisions of the Constitution and the African Charter, the police and other security forces usually  subject lowly placed Nigerian citizens to torture in detention facilities, markets and other places. In Mogaji V. Board of Customs & Excise (1982) 3 NCLR 552,  the armed agents of the defendant invaded and raided markets in Lagos and seized contraband goods. In the process, some of the traders were brutalized. 

The victims sued the defendant for damages in the Lagos high court. Adefarasin CJ held that it was a violation of the constitutional prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment to organize a raid with the use of guns, horse-whips and tear gas in a market in the course of a purported search of contraband goods & to injure custodians of such goods. The judge opined that “Those in authority in customs and excise matters ought to intensify methods for apprehending offenders at the point of entry of goods into the country as it becomes more difficult to do so afterwards.”

Notwithstanding that section 34 of the 1999 Constitution equally guarantees the fundamental right of every citizen from torture, inhuman or degrading treatment, the police and other security agencies continued to subject poor citizens to horrendous torture. In 2007, the Government of Nigeria was indicted in the report of the then United Nations Rapporteur on Torture, Mr. Manfred Nowak. In his detailed report, Mr. Nowak, “ Police shoot prisoners, beat them and hung them from the ceiling for long periods… detainees in Nigerian police cells were frequently tortured to extract confessions

The Rapporteur also found that torture is an intrinsic part of how law enforcement services operate within the country. In particular, he confirmed that the  police engaged in “ flogging with whips, beatings with batons and machetes,  shooting suspects in the foot, threatening suspects with death and shooting them with power cartridges. . . as well as “suspension from the ceiling or metal rods in various positions and being denied food, water and medical treatment.”

Following such international embarrassment and indictment by local human rights bodies, Nigeria ratified the Anti Torture Convention of the United Nations in 2007 and the Optional Protocol in  n 2017, the National Assembly domesticated  and enacted the Anti Torture Act in 2017. Specifically, the Anti-torture Act 2017 has criminalised torture, cruel, inhuman and provided protection for victims and witnesses of torture.

Section 1 of the Act has imposes an obligation on government to ensure that the rights of all persons, including suspects, detainees and prisoners to freedom from torture are respected at all times and that no person under investigation or held in custody is subjected to any form of physical, mental or psychological torture.

Section 2 titled ‘Acts of Torture’ defines what amounts to torture thus:

In order to stop the practice of torturing lowly placed suspects to make confessional statements during the investigation of criminal offences, sections 15 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015, the taking of the statement shall be in writing and may be recorded electronically on a compact disc or some other audio virtual means. Section 17 thereof further provides that  the statement may be taken in the presence of a legal practitioner or his choice, or where he has no legal practitioner of his choice, in the presence of an officer of the Legal Aid Council of Nigeria or an officer of a civil society organization or a Justice of the peace.

Even though the Administration of Criminal Justice Act became effective in May 2015, confessional statements are still obtained by force in the absence of lawyers, leading to trial within trial during the prosecution of criminal cases. However,  in Federal Republic of Nigeria.v. Akaeze [2024] 12 NWLR (Pt. 1951) 1 the Supreme Court held that it is mandatory for law enforcement agencies in Nigeria under sections 15(4) and 17(1) & (2) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015 (“ACJA“) to record electronically confessional statement of suspect during criminal investigation in an audio-visual format.  See also Friday Charles v. The State of Lagos (2023) 13 NWLR (Pt. 1901) 213.

It is public knowledge that, in spite of the clear provisions of the Constitution and other local and international human rights instruments,  the fundamental right of children, indigent citizens and criminal suspects to freedom from torture, cruel and degrading treatment is routinely violated in all states of the Federation and the Federal Capital Territory.

A few weeks ago, Mr. Dele Farotimi, a lawyer standing trial for criminal libel,  was subjected to the restraint of handcuffs in one of the court sessions.

Following the condemnation of the action of the prison management by lawyers and the media, Mr. Farotimi’s handcuffs were hurriedly discarded.

While I argued that Mr. Farotimi ought not to have been handcuffed as he was not proved to have exhibited any form of violence, I accused the lawyers who attacked the prison management of hypocrisy.I pointed out that “on a daily basis, lowly placed criminal suspects are handcuffed to and from the several High Courts and Magistrate Courts in all the states of the Federation and the Federal Capital Territory. As if that is not enough, such suspects are regularly leg chained like slaves in sugar plantations in the Americas during the slave trade.

The dehumanisation of poor suspects is considered normal by the elite in our stratified society. For instance, a couple of months ago, a police command paraded a suspect before the electronic and print media for stealing five tubers of yam valued at less than N10,000 to feed himself and his family members. At about the same time, a public officer accused of stealing over N100 billion was neither handcuffed nor paraded before the media.”

Hence, it  has become necessary for the National Human Rights Commission, the Nigerian Bar Association and the human rights community to mobilise Nigerians to expose and report private individuals and public officers whenever they contravene the provisions of the Anti Torture Act 2017.