
Admin
[OPINION] ‘How Can Nigeria Help Britain?’’ - Olusegun Adeniyi
For as long as I can remember, Nigeria’s October 1 independence anniversary has been an occasion for lamentations. It is a day in which our founding mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters, uncles, and aunties are featured in newspapers bemoaning the situation in our country – without anyone taking responsibility. But while the socio-economic situation remains dire, we have been spared a lot of that hypocrisy in recent years, perhaps because the generation born decades before independence has dwindled considerably. That said, it is not a bad idea to look back as we seek to leap forward.
The crisis of the moment is evident in virtually all sectors. From the debt overhang to the national currency whose value diminishes by the minute to the oil and gas sector where the bounty of nature abundantly available on our shores has been ceded to thieves. Security wise, Nigeria is in a state of anomie. Government—the only human invention meant to separate men from beasts—has lost the monopoly of violence to sundry criminal cartels. Whether on the road, at school or in the marketplace, death has become an unscheduled consequence of normal living for citizens. But I am not here to join the perpetual ‘wailing wailers.’ The foregoing catalogue of misdeeds is simply to remind us of some of the challenges that we still grapple with as a nation. But that’s not the thrust of this intervention.
Today, I want to rely on two archival materials currently doing the rounds among a select audience on WhatsApp as I reflect on the 64th independence of Nigeria and the road ahead. The first, from where I took the title of this column, is a 1947 newspaper advertisement in the United Kingdom. It begins with a quote credited to the Colonial Secretary, Mr Creech Jones, a few days earlier, on 21st August 1947: “I feel sure that Colonial peoples will want to understand the nature and the extent of the present economic difficulties facing us, and in particular how they affect Colonial territories and what the colonies can do in collaboration with us to win through to conditions of greater stability and prosperity.” Those words, according to the advert, “have direct bearing on the visit of the Goodwill Mission of the National Council of Nigeria and the Cameroons to this country.”
Members of the public were then invited to the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, 9th September 1947 at 7-30 p.m. in Houldsworth Hall, Deansgate. “Speakers will include Members of the Goodwill Mission of the National Council of Nigeria & Cameroons who will visit Manchester.” These visitors were listed as Dr Nnamdi Azikiwe, President N.C.N.C. Elected Member of Legislative Council Nigeria; Prince Adeleke Adedoyin, Secretary N.C.N.C., Elected Member of Legislative Council, Nigeria; Dr Ibiyinka Olorunimbe, Elected Member of Legislative Council, Nigeria; Mallam Buka Dipcharima, Former Member of Maiduguri Council, Nigeria; Chief Nyong Essian, Former President Ibibio Union, Nominated Member of Legislative Council, Nigeria; Mrs Funmilayo Ransome-Kuti, Educationist, President Abeokuta Women’s Union and Mr P.M. Kale, Educationist, President Cameroons Youth League. The forum was organised by the Pan-African Federation of Great Britain whose office was then located at number 58 Oxford Road, Manchester to see how Nigeria could help the United Kingdom to overcome its economic challenges at the period.
I am well aware that this was a colonial era with all its exploitation. So, one can argue that taking from us was not necessarily out of need by the United Kingdom but rather due to greed. But the fact also remains that Nigeria was in a relatively comfortable economic situation at the time, based on the productive capacity of our people. Though largely agrarian, since we are talking about a pre-oil period, the fundamentals of our economy were stable in the pre-independence days.
The second publication is a declassified 21 May 1975 American Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) document titled, ‘Lagos Emerging as a Modest Aid Donor’. It reads: “The Caribbean Development Bank has become the latest beneficiary of the modest aid effort that Nigeria has mounted in recent years to advance its claims to leadership in Africa and its international prestige. General (Yakubu) Gowon announced a $2.5 million loan to the bank upon his return from the recent Commonwealth heads of state conference in Jamaica and official visits to Barbados, the Bahamas, and Guyana.
“Since 1972, Nigeria has extended approximately $380 million in known loans and grants to individual governments and international financial institutions. Of this total, Nigeria has lent $240 million to the World Bank, and $120 million to the International Monetary Fund’s special oil facility that makes loans to countries to help cover their oil import requirements. The remaining $20 million has been distributed largely in Africa, particularly to the countries of West Africa and to regional organizations such as the Organization of African Unity and the African Development Bank.
“Nigeria, black Africa’s most populous country, is using the bulk of its oil wealth—oil earnings totalled $8.9 billion in 1974—to finance domestic development programs aimed at improving the lot of its own citizens whose per capita income averages less than $300 per year. The military government is determined not to let its aid activities become a drain on the treasury. In the future, General Gowon has said that Nigeria will emphasize loans to development banks rather than bilateral assistance. The Nigerians probably feel that development banks are in a better position to ensure that the loans will be used for the purposes given and that they will be repaid.”
Fifteen years after independence and five years after the end of a costly (in human and material terms) civil war, we can decipher from the second document that Nigeria was in a strong situation economically. It is indeed remarkable that we made $8.9 billion from oil sales in one year. Taken together, both the 1947 advert in which we were being asked to help the United Kingdom and the 1975 CIA document which reveals that less than 50 years ago we had enough to play ‘Father Christmas’ to the same World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) that we now go cap in hand to borrow from, tell a compelling story about Nigeria.
In his broadcast on Tuesday, President Bola Tinubu admitted being aware of the economic hardship faced by Nigerians due to the current reforms by his administration. Tempting as it may be to focus on what has been left undone and where our country has stumbled, the president argued, and quite correctly, Nigerians must never lose sight of how far we have come as a people. “While we celebrate the progress we have made as a people in the last sixty-four years, we must also recognise some of our missed opportunities and mistakes of the past,” Tinubu charged. “If we are to become one of the greatest nations on earth, as God has destined us to be, our mistakes must not be allowed to follow us into the future.”
I agree with the president that we cannot continue to bemoan the past or repeat the same mistakes and expect to develop as a country. But talk is cheap. Yes, we cannot continue to run government devoid of transparency and accountability and expect development. We cannot continue to accumulate debt, deluding ourselves that we can borrow our way into prosperity. We cannot continue to pretend that it is in our long-term interest to deny our young men and women opportunities for self-advancement in their own country – leaving them no choice but to flee Nigeria. We cannot substitute a regime of sharing ‘palliative’ and bags of rice (even if its an upgrade on ‘Agbado-nomics’) for a serious national economic plan. And while this may be an inconvenient issue to discuss in our country, we also cannot continue to breed a largely unproductive population that is growing at an exponential rate without consequences.
Going by the 2024 World Population Data Sheet released by the Population Reference Bureau (PRB) last week, Nigeria’s population is projected to post a 54 per cent increase by 2050. Meanwhile, Nigeria’s current estimated population of 232 million people is equivalent to 2.85 per cent of the total world population. The PRB provides global, regional, and country-specific data on population growth and decline, age structure, and fertility. Indicators project that Africa will account for 62 percent of global population growth. That Nigeria has a young population should be an advantage but sadly, it is not. We make no serious investment in education or health while out-of-school children in Nigeria are almost twice the entire population of some of the countries within the subregion.
In his book, ‘Reclaiming the Jewel of Africa: A blueprint for taking Nigeria and Africa from potential to prosperity’, published last year, former Finance Minister, Olusegun Aganga, highlighted three critical factors for sustainable growth on the continent, with a special focus on Nigeria. They are political, economic and social institutions. When these three properly align, they ultimately help to provide stability in the system and engender shared prosperity, according to Aganga, who draws relevant examples from countries that have leveraged on these three critical factors for the advancement of their people.
While interrogating why the whole of our country remains less than the sum of its parts, one of the issues addressed by Aganga is that of population. “We have a quantity advantage, and our demographic is the envy of the rest of the world”, Aganga wrote to buttress his point on the benefits of young population, if properly harnessed. “The average age in Nigeria is about 18.6 years. This compares to about 42.5 years in Europe and 38.4 in China.” But Aganga expressed concerns that every year “Nigeria adds 5.5 million people to its population, which is about the population of Congo, Namibia, Liberia, Mauritania and the Gambia, among others.” He then contrasted our population with that of the United Kingdom that was seeking our ‘help’ just about 77 years ago. At independence in 1960, the population of Nigeria was 45.2 million. That same year, the population of the UK was 52 million. Today, the UK is about 69.2 million. That means we are now more than three times the population of a country that was larger than us at independence with a fraction of their resources!
I concede the fact that Nigeria has come a long way and that at 64, there is much to celebrate. But there are also so many things that need to change, beginning with an uncontrolled population growth that is not backed with any infrastructural support. It should worry critical stakeholders that the only thing we are producing at a comparative advantage in Nigeria today are babies! Hence, the need for an enlightenment campaign on responsible procreation. Nigerians must begin to understand that only a moderate population growth that enables a high quality of life for citizens can guarantee a sustainable society.
[OPINION] Celebrating Iroko at 70 - Olukayode Ajulo
Happy 70th Birthday to the indomitable Dr. Olusegun Abdulrahman Mimiko, a true champion of the people! As one of his proud associates, my heart swells with joy as I reflect on the profound honor of serving alongside such an extraordinary leader. Dr. Mimiko’s unwavering commitment to the welfare of Nigerians has sparked a flame of inspiration that continues to illuminate our paths.
A Life of Service
Born on October 3, 1954, Dr. Mimiko has dedicated his life to the noble mission of serving others. From his early days as a passionate medical student at the esteemed Obafemi Awolowo University to his distinguished tenure as Governor of Ondo State, he has always placed the needs of the populace at the forefront. His steadfast dedication to healthcare, education, and infrastructure has transformed countless lives, proving that true leadership is rooted in compassion and selflessness.
A Visionary Leader
Throughout his governorship, Dr. Mimiko’s administration became a beacon of hope, prioritizing the needs of the people and earning him the cherished title of "Iroko." His groundbreaking initiatives, such as the Abiye program, have set a remarkable standard for healthcare reform across the nation. His visionary leadership has not only catalyzed economic growth but has also enhanced infrastructure and championed social justice, leaving an indelible mark on our society.
A Man of Principle
Dr. Mimiko’s unwavering commitment to democracy and good governance is truly commendable. He has stood firm in his beliefs, even when faced with adversity, showcasing an admirable resilience. His courage has inspired a new generation of leaders to follow in his esteemed footsteps, ensuring that his legacy of integrity and service endures.
Notable Achievements
Education Reforms: Initiatives like free shuttle buses and interventions at the tertiary level have significantly improved access to education for thousands of Nigerians.
Kaadi Igbe Ayo: The Ondo Residency Card Initiative has brought essential services directly to the doorsteps of citizens.
Urban Renewal: His ambitious vision for a modern Ondo State has transformed cities and towns into vibrant communities.
Agriculture: A strong emphasis on agriculture has empowered farmers and boosted food production across the region.
Judiciary Reforms: His relentless efforts have fortified the judiciary, ensuring justice is accessible to all.
A Lasting Legacy
As we gather to celebrate Dr. Mimiko’s 70th birthday, we honor his selfless service to the people of Ondo State and Nigeria as a whole. His legacy inspires us to strive for a brighter future, filled with hope and possibility.
“Leadership is not about titles, positions, or flowery words. It is about the impact we make in the lives of others.” Dr. Mimiko, your remarkable journey exemplifies this profound truth. Here’s to many more years of impactful service, joyous celebrations, and an unwavering spirit of making a difference!
Olukayode Ajulo, OON, SAN, PhD
Honorable Attorney General of Ondo State
Military Dismisses Seaman Detained For 6 Years
The military high command has announced the dismissal of a naval rating, Seaman Haruna Abbas, who was reportedly detained for about six years.
Haruna’s dismissal came on the heels of his wife, Hussaina Iliya, claim on a popular radio station in Abuja that her husband was detained unjustly by the military since 2018 over attempt to disarm him.
The military high command has announced the dismissal of a naval rating, Seaman Haruna Abbas, who was reportedly detained for about six years.
Haruna’s dismissal came on the heels of his wife, Hussaina Iliya, claim on a popular radio station in Abuja that her husband was detained unjustly by the military since 2018 over attempt to disarm him.
After Iliya’s claim went viral, the Chief of Defence Staff, Gen. Christopher Musa, and Minister of State for Defence, Bello Matawalle, ordered an investigation into the matter.
Giving an update about the matter during a press briefing at Defence Headquarters, Abuja, on Wednesday, the Director, Defence Information, Tukur Gusau, disclosed that Haruna had been dismissed from the military.
Gusau, a Brigadier-General, said Abbas was dismissed after the Chief of Naval Staff, Emmanuel Ogalla, ratified the judgement of the court martial instituted by the DHQ on September 19, 2024.
The senior military officer said that Abbas was arraigned before a court-martial on three charges bordering on disobedience to orders, resisting arrest and destruction of service property.
He noted that the offences were contrary to Sections 56 (1), 86 (1) and 66 (c) of the Armed Forces Act Act CAP A20 Laws of the Federation 2004, adding that upon his arraignment, he pleaded guilty to the allegations against him.
“Ex Seaman Abbas Haruna M5759 was arraigned before the GCM on 3 counts charge of Disobedience to Particular Orders, Resistance to Arrest and Offences in Relation to Public and Service Property contrary to Sections 56 (1), 86 (1) and 66 (c) of the Armed Forces Act (AFA) Act CAP A20 Laws of the Federation (LFN) 2004, respectively.
“At the trial, the GCM deliberated on the testimonies of the prosecution and Defence witnesses as well as the exhibits tendered by the prosecution surrounding the circumstances of the case.
“It is important to note that the ex-rating pleaded guilty to all the charges during the trial. The GCM therefore, considered the nature of the offence committed by the ex rating, his plea of guilty and plea in mitigation of punishment as well as the legal advice of the Judge Advocate in arriving at its verdict,” he said.
Gusau said after the trial, the court found Abbas guilty and dismissed him with effect from February 7, 2023, adding that Abbas was subsequently placed on open arrest pending the ratification of the judgment.
He said, “Accordingly, after proceedings, the GCM found Ex Seaman Abbas Haruna M5759 guilty on all counts. Based on this, he was sentenced to a Reduction in Rate from Seaman to Ordinary Seaman on Count One and Dismissal with Ignominy on Counts 2 and 3 with effect from 7 February 2023.
“Thereafter, the ex-rating was placed on open arrest at the arrival hall in Mogadishu Cantonment, Abuja, pending confirmation of the sentences by the Chief of the Naval Staff.
“The Record of Proceedings of the trial was forwarded to DHQ on 27 June 2023 and subsequently transmitted to Naval Headquarters on 8 August 2023. The sentences of the GCM were thereafter confirmed by the CNS with effect from September 19, 2024.”
Gusau dismissed claims that Abbas was tried despite having mental health issues.
He said, “On the issue of mental well-being, we have a clip here that shows medical personnel coming to testify that he has conducted checks and he is fit to stand trial. And again, we have medical certificates from Federal Medical Center, where they certify that he is fit to stand trial.
“He has been going in and out of hospital, but all the hospitals he attended show that he is mentally fit to stand trial. In fact, because of his, you know, in and out of hospital, that’s why the first court-martial was dissolved, to give him enough time so that he can go and seek medical attention.
“But all reports came back saying he is physically and mentally ready to stand trial”, adding that Abba’s Commander did nothing wrong to disarm him.
He stated, “You can disarm that person. Once you give a weapon to somebody and you don’t trust him any longer, you don’t allow him until he’s perpetrated an offence or even killed people before you now, you know, collect the weapon.
“The weapon belongs to the states. It belongs to the Armed Forces of Nigeria. You go to the armoury, you sign it, and at every point, until your commander feels he doesn’t trust you with that weapon, he can retrieve it from you. And if you refuse, he can disarm you.”
Narrating how Abbas’ ordeal started, Gusau said the dismissed rating continually interrupted his commander while addressing them on the parade ground.
He added that Abbas disobeyed all orders given to him by his commander, which included him to report to the guard room.
Gusau said, “Let me at this point intimate to you that the case involving Ex-Seaman Abbas M5759 started when he was found misbehaving during a parade.
“Specifically, the ex-rating was part of the parade during a coordinating conference of the Commanding Officer when he was addressing troops of Exercise AYAM AKPATUMA preparing for the operation.
“While the CO was addressing the troops, the ex-rating continually interrupted the address, which warranted the CO to direct him to report to the guard room. However, the rating refused to obey the order.
“Thus, the CO directed his arrest, but the ex-rating resisted and expended 16 rounds of 7.62mm ammunition belonging to the NN with the aim of preventing other soldiers from taking him into custody.
“Consequently, the investigation was conducted, and the ex-rating was recommended to be tried by court-martial. The ex-rating was eventually tried by a GCM from December 20, 2022 – February 7, 2023.
“Notably, the trial of Ex Seaman Abbas Haruna M5759 by GCM was based on the authority that as serving personnel, he was subject to both military and civil laws.”
[DailyTrust]
Major shakeup in police as PSC moves four CPs to state command
The Police Service Commission (PSC) on Wednesday, October 2, approved the postings of four Commissioners of Police to head State Commands in the country.
CP Abaniwonda Olufemi recently moved to Rivers State Command and has been returned as Commissioner of Police Delta State Command.
CP Peter Ukachi Opara has finally been deployed to Cross Rivers State Command.
According to a statement issued by the head of press and public relations, Ikechukwu Ani, he was earlier appointed the Commissioner of Police, Federal Capital Territory, FCT Command, moved to Delta State but has now been posted to head the Cross Rivers State Command.
Ani said: “CP Mustapha Mohammed Bala from Katsina State has been posted to Rivers State, while Gyogon Augustine Grimah from Nasarawa State has been posted to Kaduna State Command”.
The approval for the postings, he said, has been conveyed to the Inspector-General of Police for implementation in a letter signed by Commission Chairman, DIG Hashimu Argungu.
[TheNation]
[OPINION] How not to hike electricity tariff - Lekan Sote
In April 2024, Musiliu Oseni, Vice Chairman of the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission, announced that “the commission has approved a rate review of 225 naira per kilowatt hour, from a minimum of 68 naira per kilowatt hour… for just 15 % of the customer population in the Nigerian electricity supply industry.”
And, in what now seems to be a setting up for a dunk on the heads of the 1.5 million electricity consumers—which a recent report claims to be 2 million―on Band A tariff plan, Adebayo Adelabu, Minister of Power, assured everyone that the 2024 Budget had provision for N1.8 trillion electricity subsidy.
While delivering this coy body slam to electricity consumers, Adelabu also sneaked in a hint that the tariff may still be reviewed upward before the end of the year, because the Electricity Act provides for review of the electricity tariff two times every year.
And, he tried to justify the need to further raise the tariff in 2024, by enumerating the reasons, which include the rising exchange rate, increasing price of gas, and high cost of maintenance of electricity generation, transmission, and distribution infrastructure.
It couldn’t have been anything else, it seemed. But he should have also added inappropriate policy choices—of several generations of governments before the current one―and partial sale and commercialisation of electricity generation and electricity distribution companies by the government of President Goodluck Jonathan to crony capitalists, and the retention of the national grid in the hands of bureaucrats.
One major problem is that those who bought the facilities lack the managerial, financial, and technical capabilities to run the companies, even though they regard their more-or-less sinecure equity in those companies as compensation for their less-than-patriotic service to the country.
To borrow and rework a phrase from Bashorun MKO Abiola, the presumed winner of the June 12, 1993, presidential election that was cruelly annulled by the regime of military President Ibrahim Babangida, “Nigerians held the horns of the cow for the crony capitalists to milk!”
Some observers feel that the minister is probably insisting on raising the tariff because he feels that many consumers rack up high electricity bills. After all, they are usually careless by switching on electrical appliances, like air-conditioners, that they may not necessarily have to use all the time.
Someone asked if the minister takes his own counsel in his office where the electricity bill is paid by the Federal Government, or in his home which may likely be an official quarter.
The minister, who admitted to having given the unsolicited advice to electricity consumers to cultivate what he described as the “culture of managing energy consumption,” has, however, apologised to those who may have been offended by his unsolicited counsel.
NERC has finally come up with the sledgehammer announcement that the government is feeling the weight of about N181.1 billion monthly subsidy bill, and, as a result, electricity tariff would have to be hiked for in Band A, who were promised 20 hours of electricity every day.
And that would, of course, further harm the finances and well-being of these already impoverished consumers who are reeling under the weight of subsidy removal and the floating of the Naira, even though NERC had unilaterally placed them in Band A tariff plan without asking them if they were game for the tariff plan.
What the consumers really need is not the minister’s counsel, but appropriate policies to mitigate their gradually depleting standard of living on top of irregular electricity supply. That is why he was appointed as minister of power. As they say on the streets of Lagos, “The minister should shake a leg!”
Apart from the boast by the minister of power that more than 40 per cent of Nigerians currently receive 20 hours of electricity per day, it is actually too little and insignificant. 100 per cent of Nigerians should be able to get 24 hours supply of electricity every day.
The minister sounded like he expected those Nigerians that he forcibly conscripted into the Band A tariff plan should be grateful for even the irregular electricity supply that they get, a reminder of a former minister of communications who said telephone is not for everybody.
By the way, the minister should stop that nauseating claim that the (less than modest) achievement of the electricity sector is inspired by the Renewed Hope agenda of President Bola Tinubu, a man who has not claimed omnipotence or invincibility.
The current template of the electricity industry can only guarantee shortages and consequent inefficiency that causes the accountant minister to think that inordinately holding down Nigerians for milking by the Gencos, the Transmission Company of Nigeria, and the Discos, is the silver bullet to sorting out the problems of the sector.
One should add, for the umpteenth time, that GenCos, DisCos, and electricity grids that currently operate in silos, should be integrated under one management in each of the markets that have already been demarcated for them.
What this means is that the transmission lines within the Ikeja market, for instance, should be ceded to Ikeja Electric, which will merge with the GenCo which currently uploads electricity to its market. All three components of electricity supply should be under one roof in each market.
If the Minister is not too sure of the expediency of this model being suggested, he could seek clarification from experts, amongst which should be Professor Barth Nnaji, who is possibly Nigeria’s most illustrious minister of power.
The gentleman is a thoroughbred professional who understands the technical demands and the dynamics of the ecosystem of the electricity system. When he was minister of power, electricity supply was very regular.
This matter should be treated expeditiously like that of the man who appeared in a dream to entreat Apostle Paul to “Come over to Macedonia and help us!” Like Paul, Prof Nnaji would likely come to help Nigeria overcome the electricity sector debacle.
It is not fair for the electricity tariff to be raised by about 330 per cent, from N68 to N225 per kilowatt hour, for Band A tariff plan customers in April and to now start hinting at another hike in less than six months, even if the law provides that tariffs can be reviewed two times in one year.
If the government goes ahead with this wicked intention, it may well be the final straw that would break the camel’s back. It will further impoverish the disappearing Nigerian middle class that is barely coping with 34 per cent inflation and they may be easily persuaded to join the lumpen plebeian proletariat as they embark on street protests.
This won’t bode well for a government that came into office with roughly one-third of the votes of less than one-fourth of the electorate. That should not be the testimony of a government that is committed to Section 14 of the Constitution which sets the security and welfare of the citizens as the primary responsibility of the government.
The minister of power needs to understand that inappropriate and ineffectual government policies are the major causes of the inability of the electricity sector to deliver regular electricity to Nigerian citizens at an affordable tariff rate. No other reason.
Court rules on stopping Ado-Bayero’s palace renovation October 10
A Kano State High Court on Wednesday set October 10, 2024, for its ruling on an application seeking to prevent the 15th Emir of Kano, Aminu Ado-Bayero, from renovating the Nassarawa mini palace, located on State Road, Kano.
The applicants in the case—the Kano State Government, the Attorney General of Kano, and the Kano Emirate Council—filed the motion through their counsel, Rilwanu Umar, SAN, on September 12, 2024.
The suit aims to restrain Ado-Bayero, who is the sole respondent, from making any modifications to the mini palace.
During the hearing, counsel for the applicants, Habib Akilu, informed the court that the defendant was not represented, stating that the substantive suit was ready for hearing.
He then proceeded to move the interlocutory application, asking the court to prevent the former Emir from altering or reconstructing the palace.
Presiding over the case, Justice Abdu-Aboki, ordered that all legal processes be pasted on the court’s notice board.
It should be recalled that on September 13, 2024, the court issued an interim injunction restraining Ado-Bayero, his agents, or anyone acting on his behalf from demolishing, renovating, repairing, or reconstructing the Nassarawa mini palace, pending the hearing of the main suit.
The court also directed all parties involved to maintain the current state of the palace’s structural and architectural design until the case was fully resolved.
[OPINION] Tinubu’s health reforms: The outcomes - Fredrick Nwabufo
[STATE HOUSE PRESS RELEASE] President Tinubu Goes On Annual Leave
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu will depart Abuja today for the United Kingdom to begin a two-week vacation, part of his yearly leave.
He will use the two weeks as a working vacation and a retreat to reflect on his administration's economic reforms.
He will return to the country after the leave expires.
Bayo Onanuga
Special Adviser to the President
(Information & Strategy)
FCCPC and NBC announce different stances on Pay-Per-View for GOtv, DStv
The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) and the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC) have informed the Federal High Court Abuja about their respective positions on Pay-Per-View subscription requests against Multichoice Nigeria products, GOtv and DStv.
Multichoice Nigeria Limited had asked the court in suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/563/2024 to refuse a plaintiff application seeking to compel it to meter its GOtv and DStv decoders to read customers’ subscriptions only per view or during viewing.
FCCPC and NBC were drawn into the fresh legal dispute by Maduabuchi O. Idam Esq, who sought an order compelling the FCCPC, NBC, and the Attorney General of the Federation to direct every TV network provider in Nigeria to regulate or meter their subscriptions to read per view or during viewing and to roll over unused subscriptions after the expiration of the subscription duration.
Customer/Multichoice Contention
In the suit, the claimant also seeks an order compelling Multichoice to roll over unused subscriptions upon expiration for Idam and other Nigerian customers, allowing them to maximize their investment in its products.
In this latest suit, Idam alleges that GOtv subscriptions, for instance, are not metered and do not account for viewing time; instead, customers are disconnected from service upon the expiration of their subscription, regardless of usage.
Idam states that apart from the alleged arbitrary price hikes that took effect in May 2024, Multichoice does not allow customers to roll over unused subscriptions, preventing them from fully utilizing their purchased services, citing this development as oppressive.
Multichoice denies the allegations of customer oppression, drawing the court’s attention to prior clarifications from Multichoice and other pay-TV operators during meetings with the NBC regarding the feasibility of the Pay-As-You-Go (PAYG) model, stating that it is not commercially or technically viable in satellite broadcasting due to current technological limitations.
“PAYG has been investigated several times by the National Assembly. In the 8th Assembly, the House Committee on Information, National Orientation, Ethics, and Values, led by Hon. Olusegun Odebunmi, found that allegations of exorbitant Pay-TV subscription charges against Multichoice and the GOtv license holder were unsubstantiated and that the PAYG model is not technically or commercially feasible in the broadcast industry,” Multichoice stated.
What FCCPC Is Saying
In FCCPC’s counter affidavit dated August 16, 2024, and exclusively seen by Nairametrics, Mr. Adedeji Bankole, an officer in the Department of Legal Services of the Commission, countered the claimant’s submission, maintaining that most of the allegations regarding its Pay-Per-View request are incorrect.
Bankole stressed that the FCCPC’s mandate focuses on promoting competition and protecting consumers, but it does not directly regulate how businesses should be run.
He stated that while the FCCPC sets guidelines and enforces laws related to competition and consumer protection, it does not dictate how businesses should be operated or managed.
“The FCCPC is not in any position to direct or compel Multichoice to regulate or meter their subscriptions to read per view or during viewing and to roll over unused subscriptions after the expiration of the subscription duration,” he stated.
He added that the FCCPC has investigated Multichoice several times before and that other subscribers/consumers have taken Multichoice to court in the past over increases in tariffs, and several of those cases are now on appeal.
NBC’s Position
Still on the matter, Odoeme N.V., representing the NBC, submitted to the court that it received a complaint from the plaintiff dated September 20, 2023, addressed to the Chief Executive Officer of Multichoice TV.
In response to the complaint, it set up a committee to investigate the matter concerning requests for Pay-Per-View, among others.
He stated that Multichoice, through their letters dated October 30, 2023, and April 23, 2024, informed the NBC of their intention to increase the subscription fee.
He continued that the NBC, in its letters dated November 7, 2023, and April 30, 2024, urged and directed Multichoice to suspend the increase while inviting the pay-TV provider for a meeting for further discussion.
“But Multichoice did not honor the invitation. The NBC, on September 28, 2023, wrote to Multichoice to respond to the plaintiff’s complaint, but Multichoice did not respond or make any representation,” he added.
He explained that before the committee established to investigate the plaintiff’s complaint against Multichoice concluded its assignment, the Federal High Court Abuja delivered a judgment declaring that the NBC, not being either the Nigerian Police or the court, does not have the power to investigate or sanction.
The NBC said it is bound by the judgment of the court and cannot presently attend to any complaint against Multichoice for now.
“This judgment forestalled the implementation of the (NBC)committee’s findings. Owing to the said judgment, the NBC could not take any action in sanctioning or giving directives to Multichoice regarding the plaintiff’s complaint,” the NBC stated in its submission, seen by Nairametrics.
Nairametrics has gathered that the court has scheduled December 5, 2024, for a hearing on this legal dispute.
What You Should Know
Nairametrics reports that Multichoice has faced accusations of exploiting Nigerian customers.
Over the years, the Pay-TV provider has been scrutinized by lawmakers and consumer protection tribunals over its pricing practices.
The hearing follows the Nigerian Competition and Consumer Protection Tribunal’s decision on July 12, 2024, granting a request from lawyer Festus Onifade to withdraw his case against Multichoice Nigeria concerning a price hike of GOtv and DStv subscriptions.
Initially, the tribunal fined Multichoice 150 million naira and mandated a one-month free subscription for violating interim orders, but Multichoice appealed and filed for a stay of proceedings.
The tribunal rescheduled the case to November, but Onifade chose to withdraw the suit, which the tribunal approved without awarding costs.
Multichoice announced new price adjustments for DStv and GOtv packages on Wednesday, April 24, 2024. An email to subscribers stated, “On Wednesday, May 1, 2024, we will adjust our prices across all our packages on DStv and GOtv. We understand the impact this change may have on you—our valued customer—but the rise in the cost of business operations has led us to make this difficult decision. It remains our mission to provide the best entertainment and viewing experience to you, and we are committed to continuing to deliver high-quality content and unparalleled service.”
[Nairametrics]
[OPINION] Bridging The Trust Deficit In Nigerian Politics: A Call For Leaders To Keep Their Promises - Isaac Asabor
As Nigeria marked another independence anniversary, the familiar chorus of political promises filled the airwaves. Leaders spoke of their commitment to improving the lives of the people, promoting development, and tackling the myriad challenges facing the country. However, a growing number of citizens responded with skepticism. For many Nigerians, these promises are echoes of the past, repeated over and over but rarely fulfilled. This persistent pattern of unkept promises has deepened the trust deficit between the governed and those who govern, and has thus become a troubling trend that threatens the stability and progress of Nigeria’s political landscape.
Trust, the bedrock of any functioning democracy, is in short supply in Nigeria. It is not that politicians lack vision or eloquence; rather, it is the consistency with which their promises have gone unfulfilled that has eroded public confidence. In almost every election cycle, Nigerians are treated to grand manifestos and ambitious plans for transformation. Yet, after the election dust settles, these promises are too often forgotten, leaving citizens disillusioned.
This cycle of broken trust is not a recent phenomenon. Over successive political dispensations, leaders from different parties and regions have made lofty pledges during their campaigns, only to fall short when entrusted with power. The failure to meet these expectations is not just a matter of incompetence or corruption; it speaks to a deeper problem, an erosion of accountability.
During Nigeria’s just-celebrated Independence Day, speeches from political leaders were expectedly filled with rhetoric about hope and progress. However, these speeches were largely dismissed by many Nigerians. A palpable sense of fatigue hangs over the nation, as citizens no longer take political promises at face value. Many listened not out of expectation but out of routine, knowing that the same pledges have been made in the past with little to show for it.
This mistrust has reached a critical level. In a society where faith in the political class is so low, governance becomes an uphill task. Without trust, even the most well-intentioned policies are viewed with suspicion. This cynicism leads to apathy among the electorate, manifesting in low voter turnout, diminished civic engagement, and a general detachment from the political process. Worse still, it fosters an environment where populist rhetoric, rather than substantive leadership, thrives.
The absence of trust between Nigerian political leaders and the people is not just a moral issue; it is a practical one. When citizens no longer believe in the ability or willingness of their leaders to keep their promises, the entire democratic process is undermined. Governance becomes a one-sided affair where politicians operate without accountability, knowing that public trust is already broken.
Moreover, the trust deficit hampers long-term national development. Policy implementation requires public cooperation, and when leaders have lost credibility, mobilizing the public for national initiatives becomes exceedingly difficult. Consider the economic reforms proposed in recent years. While some of these policies may have had merit, the public’s response was tepid because they were seen as just another set of unkept promises.
For Nigeria’s political landscape to evolve and for governance to improve, it is imperative that political leaders start living by their promises. The credibility of a leader is built on consistency between words and actions. When promises are made during campaigns, they should not be empty rhetoric designed solely to win votes. Instead, they must be realistic goals that the politician intends to pursue diligently once in office.
One way to ensure that leaders are held accountable is to establish clear benchmarks for their promises. Citizens must demand specific timelines and measurable outcomes from their leaders. If a politician pledges to improve infrastructure, reduce poverty, or tackle corruption, there should be a structured plan in place, with regular updates to the public on progress.
Furthermore, political leaders must be transparent about the challenges they face in implementing their promises. Governance is complex, and unforeseen obstacles often arise. Rather than abandoning promises or making excuses, leaders should engage with the public, explaining the difficulties and offering revised plans. This transparency fosters trust, as it shows that the leader is still committed to the original goals, even if the path to achieving them has changed.
While much of the responsibility lies with political leaders, institutions and civil society also have a critical role to play in restoring trust in Nigerian politics. The media, for instance, should hold leaders accountable for their promises, conducting follow-up reports on pledges made during elections. Civil society organizations must continue to advocate for good governance and transparency, acting as watchdogs to ensure that political leaders do not veer off track once they assume office.
Additionally, institutions like the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) should implement reforms that allow for better tracking of campaign promises. One innovative approach could be the establishment of a public database that records all campaign promises made by elected officials. This database could then be used by voters, civil society, and the media to monitor progress and hold leaders accountable.
Nigeria’s development hinges on the restoration of trust between political leaders and the people. No nation can progress when the majority of its citizens feel disconnected from their leaders and skeptical of their intentions. Political trust fosters social cohesion, encourages investment in national initiatives, and ensures that the public actively participates in the democratic process.
If Nigerian political leaders wish to see their country thrive, they must prioritize rebuilding this trust. This means not only delivering on their promises but also communicating openly and honestly with the people they serve. It means showing empathy for the struggles of everyday Nigerians and demonstrating a genuine commitment to improving their lives.
The trust deficit in Nigerian politics is not insurmountable, but it requires intentional effort from both leaders and citizens to overcome. Political leaders must commit to a new era of transparency, accountability, and integrity. When promises are made, they must be backed by realistic plans and the political will to follow through.
Likewise, citizens must remain engaged, demanding more from their leaders and refusing to settle for empty promises. Nigeria’s political development depends on leaders who are not only good speakers but also good stewards of the public trust. As we look to the future, the challenge is clear: political leaders must live by their promises if they hope to regain the trust of the people and build a more prosperous, united Nigeria.
In fact, restoring trust in Nigerian politics is essential to our country’s growth and stability. Leaders must live by their promises to be trusted, and we, as the people, must hold them accountable. Only by bridging this trust gap can Nigeria move forward on a path of sustained development and good governance.