
Admin
[OPINION] Obasa’s Impeachment: Why The Speaker Should Not Cry Over Spilt Milk - Isaac Asabor
Not a few people have been taken aback by the recent claim of Mr. Mudashiru Obasa, the immediate past Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly, that his impeachment and the election of Mrs. Mojisola Meranda as Speaker did not follow due process. Addressing a gathering of APC members, Obasa alleged the use of a fake mace, the invasion of the House by policemen to intimidate his loyalists, and a siege on his residence on the day of his removal. He described the actions as illegal and vowed to challenge his impeachment in court while maintaining that he remains the Speaker until due process is followed. His statements, coupled with his insistence on the procedural integrity of the Assembly and dismissal of financial misconduct allegations, have added a new twist to the unfolding political drama in Lagos State.
In politics, as in life, the only constant is change. For Mudashiru Obasa, the erstwhile Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly, this reality hit hard when he was impeached on January 13 over allegations of gross misconduct and abuse of office. While his insistence on remaining the Speaker until “the right thing is done” projects an air of defiance, it also raises important questions about accountability, leadership, and the delicate balance of power in governance.
Obasa’s fall from grace is neither unique nor unprecedented in Nigeria’s political history. However, the circumstances surrounding his impeachment, centered on accusations of financial impropriety, including an eyebrow-raising expenditure of ₦17 billion on a gate to the assembly complex, cast a long shadow on his tenure. Regardless of his claims of procedural impropriety, Obasa would do well to reflect on his leadership and why he should avoid crying over spilt milk.
Leadership is a privilege that comes with immense responsibilities, the most critical being accountability. A leader must be above reproach, not just in action but in perception. When allegations of corruption or abuse of office emerge, they erode public trust, regardless of their veracity. For Obasa, the optics of spending ₦17 billion on a gate, an expense that seems disproportionate by any metric, cannot be ignored. Whether or not the expenditure was justified, the perception of fiscal recklessness undermined his credibility.
In such situations, clinging to power, as Obasa appears to be doing, rarely serves to restore trust. Instead, it often deepens the public’s cynicism about the political class. By refusing to gracefully step aside, he risks being seen as prioritizing personal ambition over institutional integrity, a perception that could further tarnish his legacy.
The Lagos State House of Assembly, like any legislative body, is a vital institution in Nigeria’s democracy. It is tasked with lawmaking, oversight, and ensuring checks and balances in governance. However, when the Speaker of such an institution becomes the subject of corruption allegations, it weakens the institution’s credibility and effectiveness.
Obasa’s impeachment should be seen as an opportunity for the Assembly to restore its integrity. While the process of his removal may not have met his expectations, the collective decision of the lawmakers reflects their judgment on his ability to lead. His insistence on retaining the Speaker’s seat, even after being unanimously removed, risks turning the Assembly into a battleground for personal interests rather than a forum for public service.
Political leaders who fail to read the writing on the wall often find themselves on the wrong side of history. From Brazil’s Dilma Rousseff to South Africa’s Jacob Zuma, examples abound of leaders who clung to power amid scandals, only to face ignominious exits. Closer to home, Nigeria has witnessed similar dramas. Whether it was Patricia Etteh, the first female Speaker of Nigeria’s House of Representatives, who resigned amid allegations of financial misconduct, or some politicians who faced corruption charges but navigated the political minefield with strategic acumen, these cases underscore the importance of humility and strategy in the face of adversity.
In fact, Obasa’s insistence on staying put does little to endear him to the public or his colleagues. Instead, it risks painting him as a leader who is out of touch with the political realities around him.
Obasa’s statement that he is a Muslim who believes in fate is noteworthy. Faith can provide solace in challenging times, but it should not be a substitute for accountability. True faith requires introspection, humility, and a willingness to accept the consequences of one’s actions. Rather than attributing his predicament to fate, Obasa should take responsibility for the decisions and actions that led to his impeachment.
As he contemplates his next steps, Obasa should consider how his actions will affect his political career, the Assembly, and the broader democratic process. A protracted legal battle or an obstinate refusal to accept his removal could alienate his supporters and diminish his political relevance.
Moving forward in this context, there is no denying the fact that redemption could be obtained through service. This is as every political setback presents an opportunity for redemption. Obasa’s impeachment, while a significant blow, does not have to mark the end of his political career. Many politicians have used periods of adversity to reflect, rebuild, and reemerge stronger. However, this requires humility, a willingness to accept responsibility, and a commitment to public service.
Instead of clinging to power, Obasa should focus on clearing his name and rebuilding his reputation. This might involve cooperating fully with any investigations into the allegations against him and demonstrating transparency in his financial dealings. By doing so, he can begin to repair the damage to his public image and perhaps regain the trust of his constituents.
Without a doubt, Obasa’s predicament serves as a cautionary tale for other political leaders. Power is fleeting, and the actions taken while in office often determine the legacy one leaves behind. Leaders must prioritize the public good over personal gain and ensure that their actions stand up to scrutiny. They must also remember that no position is permanent, and the ultimate measure of a leader is how they respond to adversity.
In fact, Mudashiru Obasa’s fall from grace is a reminder that leadership is both a privilege and a responsibility. While he has the right to contest his impeachment through legal channels, he must also recognize the damage that prolonged resistance could do to his reputation and the institution he once led. Instead of crying over spilt milk, Obasa should focus on rebuilding his legacy through accountability, humility, and a renewed commitment to public service.
In the end, the true measure of a leader is not how long they hold power but how they use it, and how they respond when it is taken away. Obasa has a choice to make. Will he continue to fight a battle that may further erode his credibility, or will he seize this moment as an opportunity for redemption? Time, and his actions, will tell.
Divorcing Melinda, My Greatest Mistake – Bill Gates
Microsoft co-founder and philanthropist, Bill Gates, has described divorcing Melinda, 60, as one of his greatest mistakes in life.
Speaking in an interview with the Times of London, the 69-year-old American businessman admitted that although he might have other failures in his life, none could match calling off his 27-year-old union with Melinda, saying the divorce is “at the top of the list.”
“There are others but none that matter. The divorce thing was miserable for me and Melinda for at least two years.” he admitted.
Bill and Melinda married in 1994 and are blessed with three kids – Jennifer, 28; Rory, 25; and Phoebe, 22.
The couple, however, officially announced their separation in May 2021, indicating that they might have been separated for a year before officially announcing it to public.
Following the split, the pair have maintained a cordial relationship, although both are reportedly dating other people now.
“Melinda and I see each other – we have three kids and two grandchildren. So there are family events. The kids are doing well. They have good values.” Bill added.
[DailyTrust]
Resign from PDP now – Bala Mohammed tells Wike
Bauchi State Governor, Sen Bala Mohammed has asked the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Nyesom Wike to resign from the Peoples Democratic Party over alleged anti-party activities.
Bala Mohammed, who accused the FCT Minister of already serving the ruling party, All Progressives Congress’s interests, said it’s better for him to join the APC officially.
He labeled Wike’s attempts to tarnish his reputation as desperate and ineffective, stating that Nigerians can see through the minister’s alleged facade.
DAILY POST recalls that the Bauchi governor, on Thursday slammed Wike, calling him a “transactional politician” whose loyalty shifts with his personal ambitions.
Reacting, Wike in a statement by his media aide, Lere Olayinka, tackled Mohammed, accusing him of being a greedy politician.
Olayinka urged the governor to stop using the appointment of the minister by President Bola Tinubu as an excuse for his “lack of capacity to provide leadership as chairman of the party’s Governors’ Forum”.
But responding in a statement signed by his Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Mukhtar Gidado, Mohammed who doubles as Chairman of the PDP Governors’ Forum described Wike’s recent attack as reckless, deceptive, and reflective of declining political relevance.
He accused Wike of a pattern of betrayal, citing figures such as Senator John Azuta Mbata, Dr. Peter Odili, and Rt. Hon. Chibuike Amaechi as victims of Wike’s alleged treachery.
The statement further criticized Wike’s tenure as a “use-and-dump” politician who contributed to internal crises within the PDP by orchestrating the downfall of successive party leaders, including Uche Secondus and Iyorchia Ayu.
“Let Nyesom Wike be reminded that while he lives in a delusional self-created universe of seeing splits and factions in the PDP the party is resolute and united apart from a few turncoats and quislings led by him who are desperately committed to weakening it for the benefit of the APC whose willing tool and favoured foot soldier he has become.
“Under Sen Bala Mohammed’s vibrant and visionary leadership the PDP Governors Forum and the party’s core organs including the BOT are working quietly and assiduously in cleaning the party of Wike’s treachery and perfidy.
“Such a path of perdition is not the portion of genuine PDP members who are working tirelessly to retire the APC in 2027- the very party, with its failed policies, that Wike has vowed to help win re-election in 2027.
“Wike’s antics cannot detract Bala Mohammed’s record. His outburst is the desperate cry of a man whose political relevance is fading.
“The time for noise making is over ; it is time for governance. Let Wike reflect on his conduct and do the honorable thing: RESIGN AND ALIGN FULLY WITH THE APC he so eagerly serves. Until then his words will remain as hollow as his loyalty,” the statement reads.
[Dailypost]
Abuja residents raise alarm over cracks in walls, compromised foundations
…seek Wike’s urgent intervention
Some residents of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja, have raised concerns over reported cases of noticeable cracks in walls, compromised foundations, and other structural damages that pose serious safety hazards to their homes.
Residents of Aso Garden Estate in Maitama (Nicon Junction) expressed fear since the commencement of construction works adjacent to their estate.
In a petition written by Dr. Nurain Abayomi Mumuni on behalf of the Chairman of the Estate, the residents highlighted significant and continuous heavy vibrations from the construction activities.
They stated that these vibrations have not only caused discomfort but have also raised serious concerns about the structural integrity of their properties.
The petition, addressed to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, laments that many residents have reported structural issues, including noticeable cracks in walls and compromised foundations, which could lead to severe safety risks.
In a statement made available to journalists on Sunday, Mumuni called on Wike to intervene urgently.
The letter, titled “Concern over ongoing construction works adjacent to Aso Garden Estate in Maitama (Nicon Junction) Abuja, FCT,” urged the minister to assess the construction’s impact on the estate and ensure that proper precautions and regulations are strictly adhered to.
“I hope this letter finds you well. I am writing on behalf of the residents of Aso Garden Estate to express our deep concern and anxiety regarding the ongoing construction activities taking place adjacent to our estate.
“Since the commencement of this construction works, we have observed significant and continuous heavy vibrations that have not only caused discomfort but have also raised serious concerns about the structural integrity of our properties. Many residents have reported noticeable cracks in walls, compromised foundations, and other structural damage that could lead to serious safety hazards.
“Unfortunately, this construction began without any prior notification or consultation with the residents of Aso Garden Estate. We believe that such important developments should involve the input and awareness of those who may be impacted directly. Our community has always valued cooperation and communication with authorities, and this lack of engagement is both concerning and disappointing.
“Given the gravity of the situation, we kindly request your immediate intervention to address our concerns. We urge you to assess the construction’s impact on our estate and to ensure that proper precautions and regulations are upheld to protect our homes and well-being. It would be greatly appreciated if a meeting could be arranged between the relevant authorities, the construction management, and the residents to discuss these issues in detail.
“Thank you for your attention to this pressing matter. We trust in your commitment to the well-being of all residents within the Federal Capital Territory and look forward to your prompt response”.
[TheNation]
Diana Ross arrives in Nigeria for Thisday Awards
Legendary music icon Diana Ross has arrived in Nigeria ahead of the prestigious Thisday Awards, scheduled to take place on Monday.
The globally celebrated singer was seen at the VIP lounge of the Murtala Muhammed International Airport, where she was warmly received by her entourage and fans eager to welcome her to the country.
The Thisday Awards celebrates resilience and excellence, honouring individuals and institutions dedicated to rebuilding Nigeria and strengthening its democracy.
Among the key categories are the ‘Titans of the Year’ award, which recognises visionary men and women whose courage and leadership have left a lasting impact on the nation.
President Bola Tinubu has been named ‘Man of the Year’ for his significant influence on major events that shaped 2024, while Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala has clinched the ‘Woman of the Year’ award for her remarkable contributions in Nigeria and globally.
Diana Ross’s presence adds star power to an event already set to highlight some of Nigeria’s most pivotal achievements and outstanding individuals.
[Vanguard]
SERAP sues FG, NCC over 50% telecom tariff hike
The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project has filed a lawsuit against the administration of President Bola Tinubu and the Nigerian Communications Commission over what it described as the “arbitrary, unconstitutional, unlawful, unfair, and unreasonable” 50% increase in telecom tariffs.
The NCC recently approved the tariff hike, which raised the cost of a one-minute call from N11 to N16.5, the price of 1GB of data from N287.5 to N431.25, and SMS charges from N4 to N6.
The hike has sparked widespread criticism, with SERAP leading legal opposition to the decision.
In the suit filed at the Federal High Court, Abuja (Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/111/2025), SERAP contends that the tariff hike infringes on citizens’ rights to freedom of expression and access to information as enshrined in the Nigerian Constitution and international treaties.
A statement issued on Sunday by SERAP titled, “SERAP wants court to stop Tinubu govt, telcos from implementing 50% telecom tariff hike,” disclosed this.
“The unilateral decision by the NCC to approve a 50% hike in telecom tariffs is arbitrary, unconstitutional, and unfair,.
“This action contravenes both the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act of 2018 and international human rights standards.
“It also reflects a failure to consult key stakeholders, such as the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission,” said SERAP’s lawyer, Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, SAN.
SERAP argued that the decision disregards the principle of legality, which requires fairness, reasonableness, and adherence to due process in the exercise of statutory powers.
“The NCC’s action undermines citizens’ right to seek, receive, and impart information through communication media without discrimination,” the lawsuit read.
The increase comes amidst Nigeria’s economic challenges, with a recent report by the National Bureau of Statistics revealing that 133 million Nigerians are multidimensionally poor.
The report highlights worsening living conditions, with over half of the population relying on wood, dung, or charcoal for cooking.
SERAP stated, “This tariff hike is happening at a time when Nigerians are grappling with a cost-of-living crisis. Many are struggling to afford basic necessities, let alone higher communication costs.
“The move adds to existing burdens, including fuel subsidy removal, rising electricity tariffs, and soaring food prices.”
In its prayers, SERAP is seeking a court declaration that the tariff hike violates constitutional provisions and international human rights treaties, as well as an injunction to halt the implementation of the hike.
The organisation is also asking the court to nullify the NCC’s decision, describing it as “extortive, unreasonable, and a breach of due process.”
SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, emphasised the broader implications of the tariff hike.
The statement further noted, “Access to communication is not a luxury; it is a fundamental right.
“The government and the NCC have a duty to ensure that telecommunication services remain affordable, especially for the millions of Nigerians living in poverty.”
No date has been set for the hearing of the case, which could have significant ramifications for telecom regulation in Nigeria, the statement noted.
Meanwhile, subscriber groups issued an ultimatum to the Nigerian Communications Commission, demanding the reversal of the 50 per cent tariff hike to 10 per cent by Wednesday, January 29, 2025. https://www.google.com/amp/s/punchng.com/tariff-hike-telecoms-subscribers-issue-ultimatum-for-reversal-oppose-nlc-threat/
‘My dream nose,’ Comedian Zicsaloma undergoes nose surgery in Turkey
Nigerian comedian and skit maker Zicsaloma has taken to social media to announce undergoing a successful nose surgery in Istanbul.
The comic star expressed excitement and joy, sharing his journey with followers.
In a video posted on his page, Zicsaloma documented every step of the process, from the initial consultation to post-operative care.
He extended heartfelt gratitude to the medical team and gave special recognition to the surgeon who performed the procedure.
Sharing his thoughts on the outcome, the comedian remarked that his new nose had surpassed his expectations.
Zicsaloma’s decision to undergo surgery at the facility was influenced by his online research, where he discovered the hospital’s profile and was impressed by its expertise.
Upon arrival, the hospital staff provided a warm welcome, ensuring a smooth and stress-free experience.
Although he admitted to feeling nervous beforehand, Zicsaloma was relieved and delighted with the success of the operation.
The comedian also shared updates about his recovery process, posting photos and videos of his healing face.
He revealed that the plasters on his nose would be removed after six days, noting the temporary discomfort but emphasising his excitement about his new look.
[OPINION] A Writer, Societal Values And Burden Of History - Richard Odusanya
[OPINION] Limits of the American King - Chidi Amuta
Barely one week into his refurbished presidential tenure, America’s Donald Trump seems poised to set new precedents in the model of the Presidency as the pinnacle of America’s democracy. An elected president of a republic is strutting and pronouncing like an emperor. Ordinarily, an American king would be a freak oddity. But here comes Donald Trump, an emperor in business suit.
From a bumbling and bigoted first term, the newly minted Donald Trump seems to be a refurbished version of his original version. A combination of sickening egotism and perennial television consciousness has now become an urgent desire to be historical. He has relentlessly branded his return to the White House as the ‘greatest political come back’ in modern history. He has spent the week touting his America as the dream nation, the “ golden age of America”, forgetting that the triumphs he is already claiming are indeed the achievements of his immediate past predecessor whose record he has been so viciously shredding.
Right from his inauguration, he has unleashed a slew of wild changes in both the presidency as an institution and indeed the place of the United States as a nation. Against the backdrop of his landslide electoral victory, he stepped onto the podium of presidential power with an air of absolutism which is unlikely to help the presidency as an institution governed by the constraints of constitutionalism. Trump has an addiction to saluting and dressing himself in superlatives. In his mind, he is the greatest thing that has ever happened to the American presidency.
Nonetheless, his predecessor’s lack luster style and business as usual Washington manners created a backdrop of anxious expectation and excitement about the return of the more dramatic Trump. Unlike his first inauguration which was greeted by a divided nation, this time around there was a veneer of unity of purpose and reconciliation in the Capitol Rotunda where the inauguration took place. A cross section of his predecessors and the Washington political elite conferred a certain air of unity on the event. Moreover, Trump was surrounded by some of the richest business elite especially the leaders of the tech industry.
Right from the inauguration ground, Mr. Trump launched what he himself called a sane revolution. His dream of the new America is one in which the nation reassumes a supremacist position among nations. It is a new America that looks out first for itself and relates to the rest of the world from a nationalist almost isolationist perspective. It is: “America First” in real practical terms once again. In relation to the rest of the world, Trump’s America is a somewhat isolationist, ultra nationalistic nation.
Trump has boasted that he would slam all manner of prohibitive tariffs on nations as close and strategic as Canada, Mexico and China. Under his new hostile foreign policy posture, he has renamed the Gulf of Mexico into the Gulf of America, He is looking to forcefully snatch Greenland from Denmark and to retake the Panama Canal from Panama. The king can literally see no obstacles to his absolutism. The king is the state and this one state is the king of all nations!
He has since magisterially pronounced to the World Economic Forum in Davos that nations and companies who want to do business with the US must be ready to move their manufacturing operations to the US or face the penalty of hostile imperial tariffs. He would increase the mandatory contribution of NATO nations for their joint defense fund from 2% to 5%. Europe has heard him but is keeping silent for now.
On his first day in office, Mr. Trump has pulled the US out of the Paris Climate Accord and the World Health Organization. He has also claimed credit for the tenuous ceasefire accord between Israel and Hamas over Gaza. On his much-trumpeted bluster to end the Russia-Ukraine war in a day after assuming office, he has merely scorched the snake of Russia’s authoritarian and ambitious Putin. It seems that he has just reminded Messrs Xi Jiping and Vladimir Putin that they are both at the helm of an authoritarian counter weight to the West. He is likely to hit a brick wall of resistance to his absolutist posturing if he fails to embrace diplomacy and tact over the Ukraine war. Russia and China will be only too happy to puncture his balloon of bluster.
Taken together, the utterances and actions of the comeback Trump clearly indicate a clear imperial absolutist slant which will put democracy to test and also place the new global order under a severe stress test.
Inside America itself, his stiff position against illegal immigration has already kicked off with raids on illegal immigrants in major cities. Combat troops and immigration goons are scouring major cities in places like churches, hotels, hospitals and schools in search of undocumented immigrants. His executive order banning automatic citizen rights for children born in the United States has already been blocked by a judge as a violation of the constitution. The possibility that more court actions will challenge a number of his imperial executive orders that infringe on citizens rights is clear and present. The judiciary is more likely to temper Trump’s bravado and absolutist pretensions in due course.
Either in terms of his domestic or foreign policy activism, everything about the new Donald Trump rings of power absolutism and even naked imperialism. He is proceeding as though the electoral mandate that returned him to the White House is a blank cheque to carry on in office as he alone deems fit. That would be putting his new mandate to too much test and pushing the chances of his elevated office to the limits.
American democracy is the result of an outright revolt and rejection of royalty and absolutism. Everything in the American constitution is a rejection of an imperial order. In real practical terms then, the powers which American democracy confer on a president are every inch subject to the limits placed by the US constitution and the institutional guardrails of American democracy: the judiciary, the media, the popular pressure of civil society etc.
Even when a president’s party has an overwhelming majority in Congress as Trump indeed now virtually does, the responsibility of Congress to curtail and limit the absolutism of the president often transcends partisan frontiers. That is what has prevented the United States from degenerating into an absolute monarchy in the last over 200 years.
The institutions of American democracy may sometimes be tortured and mangled by changing political exigencies but they remain in place as checks and balances against those who may be tempted to usurp the advantages of electoral political advantage to disfigure the liberal democratic essence of America’s ultimate republican order.
Even though it is still quite early in the day of his rowdy return, Trump seems poised to push the American presidency in illiberal directions. He may want to arm twist his partisan majority to derive advantages that may force those opposed to his imperial views and tendencies. Yet the constitutionally guaranteed freedom of Americans to freely disagree with their president and his party cannot be casually eroded. We cannot expect what obtains in illiberal states like Russia, Turkey, Rwanda or Hungary to happen in the United States.
Perhaps the strongest guardrail against the rise of presidential absolutism in today’s America is the sanctity of the constitution and the power of the Supreme Court to uphold the constitution against the absolutist ambitions of an individual president no matter how popular he may be. Mr. Trump’s personal idiosyncrasies may tempt him towards absolutist and authoritarian flirtations but the powers of the constitution, the Supreme Court and Congress remain as perennial barriers to extremes of power absolutism.
On the international plane, the global order in the post Second
World war era is a complex of interconnected international relations held together by a network of alliances, alignments and interests. No nation, no matter how strong its military and economic power, can pursue its interests in random violation of the interests of other nations. Therefore, when Mr. Trump adopts a rhetoric that appears to threaten other nations in the international community, he risks alienating America’s allies. Worse still, the powers of any one nation cannot block the ability of other nations to enter into and pursue fresh alliances in order to protect and advance their own national interests.
In the post Cold War era, the world has rapidly shifted from a unipolar world to one in which the polarity of international power is now scattered among centres of power both old and new. Broadly, we are now looking at a new world order in which the triumphant Western bloc is being actively counter balanced by a new authoritarian centre of power led by China and Russia with nations like North Korea, Iran, Hungary and Turkey in fellowship. In addition, other minor coalitions and blocs have risen as we see with the birth BRICS nations. Therefore, the possibility of Individual national leaders emerging as absolutism leaders has been reduced to nearly nil. More impossible is the prospect of absolutist nations to lord it over other nations. Over time, Mr. Trump will come to a realization of the naked reality of the new world order and the limits it poses to absolute unilateral power.
Beyond the limitations of power and politics at the individual national level and even among nations, a new determinant of power has emerged. Technology has emerged in recent times as a major determinant of national power and precedence. Information technology was until very lately the major determinant of gradations of power among nations. Even that has now been superseded by the graduation into Artificial Intelligence –AI. The race among great nations is going to be a race to lead the AI race in the next few years. It is perhaps beneficial that Mr. Trump has gathered the world’s most powerful technology oligarchs into a future AI conglomerate. Whether his rowdy personal ego will allow him to maintain the harmony among the tech oligarchs to work harmoniously for America’s global superiority is going to be the determinant of the road ahead. It can only be hoped that Mr. Trump does not mistake his transient enabling political advantage for a blank cheque to absolutism. He must not allow this political moment to blind him to the contradictory nature of power absolutism in a fast changing world. Economic reality and diplomatic compulsion are likely to work together to tame Trump’s present idealism and absolutism illusions.
[OPINION] Who is more important than a teacher? - Tonnie Iredia
The countries that are recognized today as developed in world affairs have all attributed their transformation to the role of advanced technology. On the other hand, 3rd world countries that have either remained stagnant or developing at minimal pace are those who are yet to take advantage of technology thus affirming that technology has become the redeeming feature of humanity.
Earlier, the popular agent of development was the teacher whose role has been to teach and train people, serving permanently as a veritable guide towards the assimilation of knowledge especially by the youth. Teachers have indeed remained the unique agents of societal development because they still have to teach people how to operate and manage new devices that technology continues to give birth to.
It is therefore obvious that no one can be more important than teachers. Yet, in developing societies such as Nigeria, the role of teachers is poorly appreciated. They are not only lowly placed among occupations; their remuneration has remained scandalously inadequate. In Nigeria, the appreciation of teachers is temperamental. On some occasions, which are few and far apart, we applaud and reward our teachers but more often than not, it is as if teachers do not exist in our scheme of governance. Last week, Ogun State Governor, Dapo Abiodun suddenly celebrated a teacher, Kayode Adewale for his excellence. Abiodun announced a N5 million cash reward and a bungalow for Adewale, a mathematics teacher at Imagbon/Imaka Comprehensive High School, Imagbon, Ogun State.
We commend Governor Abiodun for the award not because the recognition is extraordinary. Instead, our praise is informed by the fact that other states do no such thing for any teacher. The few who do, like Lagos state, have only a-once-a-year Education Merit Award for some teachers. In addition, it is obvious that Ogun State was internationally pressured to honour Adewale because he was recently shortlisted among the 50 finalists for the prestigious $1 million Global Teacher Prize which Varkey Foundation presents annually in collaboration with UNESCO and GEMS Education. The prize recognizes educators who have made extraordinary contributions to transforming lives and communities through education. Indeed, Adewale’s feat is not a fluke as he had won the Best Teacher Award in Ogun State in 2020.
Truly, teacher Adewale’s humility and unwavering dedication to uplifting his community through education are commendable. This is more obvious when it is realized that if any outstanding teacher had decided to abandon teaching for politics, he would have since become a billionaire. All he would have needed to do was just to get a godfather to help him rig election into the federal legislature which automatically gives him N14million monthly salary and a foreign made SUV car valued at N160 million among other benefits. In all fairness, teacher Adewale and his contemporaries have no business teaching because across the board, our governments believe that the only Nigerians that matter are politicians.
The undue prioritization of politics is no doubt the single most irrational policy that has continued to adversely affect Nigeria’s growth and development. To be appointed into any other field of endeavour in Nigeria, an applicant must meet some high academic qualifications and rigorous standard recruitment process. After that, the new appointee is graded at the level of a pupil operative and required to serve for many years before consequential advancement to each new grade. In politics on the other hand, all that is needed is to be able to read and write after which a lawmaker is elevated to inexplicable remuneration while political appointees such as Ministers etc are recruited through prescriptive criteria and cleared through a system of bow and go. The official scheme which approves such bogus pampering of politicians has remained unascertainable.
What appears to legitimize the inequitable placement of Nigerians in different offices and posts that are serviced through tax payers’ money is simply because the Nigerian civic society has remained docile and dormant over the years. The same situation does not happen in virile societies where literacy is deliberately improved upon by relevant authorities. Some few years ago, it was argued that the reason senators are rated higher than Ministers is because it is they who clear nominees to become Ministers. By that reasoning, should anyone be placed higher that his teacher? If not, what suddenly changed the old order in which the teacher was seen as a role model in virtually every community?
Today’s role model in a typical Nigerian community is the politician who suddenly becomes wealthy within a few months of holding a public office. He is hardly as trained as a teacher. Sometimes, he becomes a state governor whose poor academic background is known to his old school mates. There was the interesting story of one governor who once organized a show your certificate policy for teachers. His old school mates told those who cared to hear that the particular governor himself had no certificate because he was a drop out from their school. The influence and wealth of the governor is however enough to discourage other citizens from serving as teachers or farmers. The impression that teaching cannot uplift anyone therefore sticks pushing many people to politics.
Unfortunately, it is not only that no one seems to remember teachers for what they used to be known for, the new stigma of the average teacher these days is the trend of negatives like exam malpractices sexual harassments and extortion of students through compulsory purchase of handouts. When shall the Nigerian society talk about diligent teachers who in spite of poor pay and inadequate materials, is never involved in the listed malpractices? Is it not unfair to allow only students to applaud their dedicated and committed teachers? Here, we commend some students of the Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU) projected in the media to have showered one of their lecturers, Dr. Olagunju, with gifts as a token of appreciation for his exceptional dedication.
The fact that the authorities of that University are yet to respond to the gesture of the joyous students as they would have done if only one of them had accused Olagunju of any malpractice is instructive. Could it be that University authorities in Nigeria have inadvertently contributed to the lowering image of the academic community? Of course, they have. Each time I take a look at today’s Nigerian university system; I am unable to imagine how anybody could have been able to convince Professor Adeoye Lambo my adorable Vice Chancellor of Nigeria’s Premier University of Ibadan to step out and announce a transparently flawed election result. It shows that the much talked about leadership decay has like cancer spread to even unimaginable parts of the body.
To what extent can teachers alone be held accountable for falling standards of education? Teachers are not spirits but human beings. Like other citizens, some teachers pay the fictitious band ‘A’ electricity bills and all other spurious charges by privileged private entrepreneurs that government indulges. It is almost impossible to dissuade teachers from certain sharp practices in their schools or from engaging in other businesses at the expense of teaching to make ends meet. Without good welfare packages it is a waste of time to mouth patriotism and expect it to successfully spur teachers to high performances in the discharge of their duties.
On its part, the government at both federal and state levels has greatly supported the undermining of the university system by refusing to properly fund our tertiary institutions. They have also over the years consistently refused to honour agreements which they voluntarily signed with academic and professional unions. Besides, they have also deliberately polluted the sanity of the ivory towers by flooding governing councils with politicians whose only interest in meetings is the award of contracts. The unending controversies which the appointment of Vice Chancellors generate in recent times portrays the divisive trait of politicians who always abort standard rules and processes to arrive at a predetermined end.
Interestingly, it is still the duty of teachers to begin to design strategies for restoring the values of their profession. One way of doing so is to strengthen work ethics as well as to become more politically conscious without being partisan. There is no better time than now for more emphasis on educating students to recognize the futility of voting for popular politicians who are neither well educated nor have a track record. University leaders should themselves become less materialistic and sycophantic while playing down the award of honorary degrees to political leaders that neither prioritize education nor are teacher friendly.