Admin

Admin

The quest for fame is a global pandemic. From time immemorial, man has craved recognition and social pre-eminence through various means – even if he has to be anti-social to attain social recognition. In this pursuit, the line between popularity and notoriety thins out. Most people would rather be notorious than be unknown. Every Tamuno, Dike and Hadi knows this fact.

I commend Nicola Formichetti’s words to the dark minds who foul up the virtual superhighway of social media in their quest for recognition: “The dark side of social media is that, within seconds, anything can be blown out of proportion and taken out of context. And it’s very difficult not to get swept up in it all.”

Tamuno, Dike & Hadi

Tamuno: Ah, Silifa has suddenly become an arrogant celebrity. Small girl of yesterday! Since her social media post about her stepfather went viral, she has suddenly become a superstar and is on demand everywhere…

Dike: I can give you a long list of her type in my neck of the woods. She must be the envy of other girls now, except that I wouldn’t go as far as she went just because I want to “trend”. Some people have more scandalous stories but they will never tell the world because the internet never forgets. You may become famous today but your grandchildren may be embarrassed by your disclosures several decades ahead.
Hadi: I insist that cultural red lines are sacrosanct. Despite the fact that social media tries to create an artificial “global culture”, we all know that there are western cultural fads that will never gain traction in Africa because culture is thicker than a fleeting craze. By the way, please refresh my memory on the Silifa story.

Tamuno: You mean scandal?
Hadi: Whatever!
Dike: She claimed that she snatched her stepfather from her mum and is today cohabiting with the man who is 39 years her senior. She told the story with lurid details and virtually disrobed her mother…
Hadi: Stop! Now I remember! The details are too offensive. Please, spare me!
Tamuno, Dike and Hadi are like most of the average people in the world who frown at extremes. Silifa, the subject of their gossip, is our local version of Christie, the American TikToker whose story went massively viral when she disclosed that she had married her stepdad. The story was so salacious that the video was viewed 22.3 million times on TikTok. It also attracted over 124,000 comments from viewers who also asked for more information.

Married Your Stepdad?
The world enjoys watching the dance of a mentally deranged person as long as she’s not a family member.
The woman who goes by the username @Christywho_ shared her video with the on-screen caption,

 

“Marrying my step dad was the best decision I’ve ever made.” The upload showed a man hugging a woman who had her legs wrapped around him as they kissed….
You would think that America was too far gone in debauchery to see anything wrong in what the woman claimed to have done, but the pushback was instant.

“Am I the only one wondering how your mom is doing?” asked one viewer whose comment was liked over 3,000 times.

“There’s seven billion people in the world, why?” asked another who received over 9,000 likes.
Many TikTok users stitched and duetted the video, appearing shocked by the story — one uploader’s silent reaction received over 103,000 views.

The video also made its way to Twitter where a user wrote, “Can someone unplug the internet please? I don’t want it anymore!”

The TikToker’s post had achieved as much notoriety as anyone could wish for, and she had become known by millions of people all over the world within a few days. But to what end? The negative reactions were so damning that she did a sequel to the video clip and changed her story.

Joke Turned Sour
Christie, the mother of two from Tampa, Florida, has now come out and revealed that the couple’s love story is not actually as controversial as she had portrayed it to be. She told the New York Post that she posted the clip as a “joke”.

In answer to some of the questions asked by commenters, she replied: “Was I groomed? No. Did my stepdad raise me? No. Was I a minor when I met him? No. Do me and my mom still talk? Yes. Did he have kids with my mom? No.”
Some critics had, inevitably, reacted with hate towards her children and her late brother. And that touched her deeply.

“The amount of death threats I received, wishing that my children were born without arms and legs and they were glad my brother had died, and they wanted to call child protective services on me.”
To another critic, she retorted, “This filter is insane. Plz leave my kids and ‘unalived’ brother out of this.”
She explained that her new husband isn’t even her stepdad – she simply made the comment because the couple have a 16-year age gap. She revealed that her husband was actually her older brother’s best friend, and after her brother died in a motorcycle crash, they bonded over the loss and fell in love.

“I didn’t expect the video to blow up as much as it did,” Christy admitted. “I wanted to show that people will believe anything that they read on the internet. I also wanted to prove that everyone will be upset and believe anything they see on the internet nowadays,” she elucidated.

“They were mad when I ‘married my stepdad,’ and they were mad when I posted my real story and found out that it wasn’t actually my stepdad. The internet feeds on the drama.”

Nigerian Desperadoes

It is that drama that will rubbish the legacies of many trending stars of today who will weave any kind of story to go viral. Politicians who have access to the public treasury indiscriminately buy hours of prime airtime on television stations to advertise their partisan poison. They also retain an army of internet warriors who terrorise their opponents and further spread their lies. They forget to ask themselves: Where are the liars of yesterday?

It is in this context that one must pity some Nigerian desperadoes who are like Nevada’s Christie. There is one who calls herself an investigative journalist but who, to all intents and purposes, is just a social climber and name dropper. She has tried so many tricks in the book but so far, no luck. People generally think she needs to see a shrink.

Then the attempt by a self-styled activist, critic and social media influencer, Martins Vincent Otse, alias VeryDarkman, to use a fib against the Falana family to climb to millions of social media endorsements and commentaries has blown up in his face. Tails between his legs, he’s now begging the Falanas for mercy.

The evolution of social media has changed our lives for good. Social scientists are still trying to fathom the full extent of the influence of this phenomenon which has changed the way we relate with each other and shrunken distances and knowledge gaps in such an unprecedented way that it is nothing short of a socio-scientific revolution.

It can be a powerful instrument for good or social destruction depending on how it is deployed.

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is expected to reshuffle his cabinet soon and some portfolios may be reassigned and some ministers be relieved of their duties. According to the Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, ''When the reshuffle happens, it is expected to align with the President’s broader strategy to enhance governance and better communicate the administration’s successes.'' To achieve the desired results, the performance review of ministers should be holistic, as various factors affect performance, some of which may be beyond their control. The lag between policy announcements and implementation has contributed to the perceived poor performance of this administration.

The workload of the ministers should be reviewed to identify those who may be overwhelmed. No matter how capable a person is, being overloaded with tasks will lead to longer turnaround times and delays in policy implementation. Some ministerial portfolios may need to be split, or Ministers of State appointed in some Ministries where they do not exist. Some people think the Minister of Finance, who also doubles as the Coordinating Minister of the Economy, should have a Minister of State.

The problem of bureaucracy in Nigerian governance has always existed. Tasks that can be completed in two days in a private setting take much longer in government. The government should conduct a process review and streamline its operations for greater efficiency. This should be done without losing sight of the need for control and supervision. This will speed up policy formation and implementation thereby making the government more responsive. Beyond bureaucracy, another factor causing delays in policy implementation is the lack of, or delays in, funding. In such scenarios, there is little a minister can do.

One may ask if the roles, responsibilities, and deliverables with timelines expected of the ministers were clearly communicated to them. For example, just recently, Bayo Onanuga said, "The President has instructed ministers to actively communicate what their ministries are achieving. Some have been hesitant to engage with the media, but the President wants them to change that." While some ministers have been very vocal, though it may seem implied, it is possible that others did not know they were expected to be, given that the government has other means of promoting its successes.

There are factors beyond a minister's control that can affect their perceived performance, apart from funding. For instance, whilst not celebrating or defending the performance of the Minister of Agriculture, without addressing insecurity, which has led to incessant attacks on farmers, farmlands, and livestock, domestic food production will remain impaired. The Ministry of Solid Minerals is faced with a similar circumstance with many mining sites under the control by non-state actors.

As Mr President prepares to reshuffle his cabinet, it is imperative that issues like workload, funding, bureaucracy, communication of deliverables, and other factors beyond the control of ministers are properly addressed. Changing ministers or reassigning portfolios without dealing with all the issues impairing performance may not lead to significant improvement. Performance review is holistic and goes beyond just evaluating the individual responsible for certain tasks. Nigerians deserve a more responsive government.

Kenechukwu Aguolu   FCA,FCIA,PMP

If you have been following the story, before Dr. Segun Osoba’s lecture to the students of the University of Ife, now Obafemi Awolowo University (“Great Ife”), Ile-Ife,  on 1st February, 1974 in commemoration of the 3rd anniversary of the police killing of Kunle Adepeju, an undergraduate student of the University of Ibadan during a peaceful student protest, an ideological argument, as someone called it, took place between Osoba and Professor L. Beverley  Halstead. After the lecture, Halstead still would not let sleeping dogs lie but dragged the matter with Dr. Osoba. 
 
Titled “On Dr. Osoba’s drama”, he again said the following: “The 1st of February is an occasion of commemoration of the death of a student, Adekunle Adepeju, at Ibadan, killed by a police bullet during a demonstration in 1971. In Ife it was known that on this occasion there was to be a demonstration against the university authorities, the Vice-Chancellor in particular, over a wide series of issues. Dr. Osoba was scheduled to speak to the students on “Student Power” immediately prior to the march to the VC, bearing placards which had little relevance to the death of a student three years previously.
 
“This was an explosive situation charged with emotion that worried many people, including students. By good fortune, I met Dr. Osoba in the Staff Club where I was acting as chairman at the Geology conference dinner. One cannot but commend Dr. Osoba’s power of recall even though certain critical items seemed to have slipped his memory. I recall expressing my opinion that I felt it was inappropriate in such an explosive situation to be addressing students on the subject of student power; inappropriate to the extent of being irresponsible.
 
“I went so far as to suggest that if matters got out of hand, he would bear much of the responsibility for this. His reply was that if the mob got out of hand, it would have nothing to do with him - his conscience would be clear. I failed to understand his secretiveness over the text of his address - if it were so innocent why could it not be seen? I cannot understand Dr. Osoba’s motive in all this. He knew that people were worried about what might happen but he was not interested in allaying anyone’s fears; merely scoring a few cheap debating points: His first responsibility is to his conscience, as he said. In the meantime many people spent a worried night wondering what the morrow would bring.
 
“We knew that violence was intended; in retrospect, we know a serious crisis was averted and that Dr. Osoba merely paraded his conscience before the students. Thank you, Dr. Osoba”.
 
 Osoba, not one to take prisoners, responded in kind: “Dear Professor Halstead: Your letter of 13th February, 1974 is an unequalled achievement in self-exposure. Having denied on Thursday, 31st January, 1974 any responsibility to the students of this university beyond teaching them Biology,  you have now in this letter admitted, without apparently being aware of it, that the only other responsibility you owe them is to spy on them and, on the basis of this espionage work, ascribe all sorts of spurious motives to their actions and those of your colleagues on the academic staff who would not spy on students or treat them as congenitally irresponsible and destructive mass of people.
 
“Unless I was maintaining a spy-ring among the students, how was I to know, as you and some others apparently claim to know by the evening of 31st January, 1974, that on the following day ‘there was to be a demonstration against the university authorities, the Vice-chancellor in particular, over a wide series of issues’? How was I to know in advance, like you, that after my address they were to ‘march to the V-C, bearing placards which had little relevance to the death of a student three years previously’?
 
“You claim in relation to my motives in addressing the students that ‘he (i . e. Osoba) knew that people were worried about what might happen but he was not interested in allaying anyone’s fears, merely scoring a few cheap debating points… In the meantime many people spent a worried night wondering what the morrow would bring’. The presumption, even crass dishonesty, of this kind of assertion is amazing in a man who, by his own admission, is committed only to his own professional career. If one were to dissipate one’s limited nervous and emotional resources in allaying self-induced fears reinforced by the testimony of spies, then, one would be likely to become ‘nuts’ like those being haunted by the hobgoblin of their own mind.
 
“Professsor Halstead and his crowd ‘knew that violence was intended; in retrospect (they) know a serious crisis was averted…’ Professor Halstead’s power of divination with respect to planning and averting violence are all-embracing: they are both predictive and retroactive! Even the British M15 and M16, the American C.I.A. and F.B.I. and the Soviet KGB may have one or two new tricks to learn from him and the other wizards of espionage and counter-espionage!
 
“In Professor Halstead’s near-divine wisdom, he knew that ‘Dr. Osoba merely paraded his conscience before the students’ but failed to tell us what his own stilled conscience - some amount of parading and airing of it, even before students - might help somewhat in reactivating and making it tick again.
 
“One can only hope that this university community is not paranoid to the point that it cannot isolate self-identified spies and thereby render them irrelevant to its main business of inculcating into our young men and women the habit of learning and the virtues of responsible citizenship in a hate-free, fear-free environment”
 
We still have in our universities today robust exchanges such as was witnessed between Osoba and Halstead. That, perhaps, is where the similarities end. In Osoba and Halstead’s own days, university senior teaching staff members belonged to the upper middle class and could afford the luxuries associated with that class. No more! A  preponderance of that class is today numbered among the struggling and the poor who cannot afford the basic necessities of decent living. And the free fall hasn’t ended yet! 
 
The university environment is no longer as conducive to teaching and learning as it used to be. Lecture theatres and office spaces are crammed beyond belief; hostel accommodation on campus takes only a fraction of students; and the condition of living there also beggars belief; the library and laboratories are archaic; lecturers are ill-motivated and the academic calendar for most public universities have been disrupted as a result of incessant strike action by university workers - teaching and non-teaching staff alike. 
 
Unlike in the days of the founding fathers of Nigeria, appropriate funding of education is no longer the priority of the ruling class. In summary, the universities today are a shadow of their original self; the quality of the education they dispense cannot but be similarly affected. As with other sectors of our national life, a Marshall Plan of sorts is needed to bail out the education sector from its doldrums that border on imminent collapse. But will they? NOW CONCLUDED.
 
FEEDBACK     
 
Re: Dangote's refinery and Nigerians' great expectations 
 
 Sir, good write-up as ever (but) you only appear to avoid hitting President Bola Ahmed Tinubu as hard as he deserves this time around! All the identified shortfalls start and end with ill-motivated and irresponsible leadership.  All PBAT seems to have as his reason for desiring and ascending unto the office (of president) was just to add the nomenclature and title of “President” to his name! Empty, purposeless and without focus! Like you pointed out in several of your earlier write-ups, speaking truth to power: (he is) a man that leaps before looking, and he acts before thinking! Making excuses for PBAT's non-performance is, in all sincerity, needless, sir!
 
Dangote acting capitalist/monopolist; Nigeria’s refineries not functional; NNPC turning supervisory against the objectives stated in the enabling Act that established it and its parasitic existence; Dangote refinery dashing the hopes of Nigerians; manning our porous borders to avoid subsidizing neighbouring countries and giving smugglers the advantage - all these and many more, without gainsaying, is accounted for by just a single person and single act: irresponsible leadership!
 
It is not about Dangote, NNPC, illegal supply/siphoning/diversion to neighbouring countries and the likes, but it is about the President’s (lack of) political will. Except we are saying it is you and me that should check all the evil and anti-citizen acts going on in the NNPC or we are the ones to address our porous borders when we have a President and Commander-in-Chief in place (who is) acting in trust for us as a nation!
 
What a gross shame that what a whole nation of over 200 million people could not achieve with all the resources at her beck and call has now been achieved by a single individual taking advantage of our irresponsible and ineffective leadership!
 
Do we need to remind PBAT to do something about our refineries! Is the task of building a new refinery, attainable by an individual, truly an uphill and herculean task for a whole nation? Was it not the resources of this nation that Dangote took advantage of to build his refinery? Should Tinubu merely watch as NNPC wrestles with Dangote to the peril of the citizens he claims to lead?
 
Can’t Tinubu have anyone to advise him that the current NNPC leadership has outlived its usefulness and should be disbanded? - Awodire Oyewole Ayo.
 
My abridged response: I wish you get to a position where you will need to deal with diverse interests! It is not as easy as we see it from outside. Nigeria's problems are bigger than Tinubu. I wish and pray they will push him hard enough for him to abandon his conciliatory moves and put his foot down on all issues where he is bending over backward to please interest groups. I wish and pray also that they will frustrate him hard enough for him to give up on Nigeria and say, "to your tents, O Israel!"
 
 Take it from me: Nigeria's problems cannot be solved from Abuja or by anyone in Abuja. Put whoever you like there, they will only get wiser after they leave office. Ask Obasanjo. Ask Jonathan. Ask even Buhari! The forces holding Nigeria down will not allow the right things to be done. Presidents are no islands. Maybe they know or control up to 10% of what happens in their government. Patience told us Jonathan was caged by those around him. Aisha told us Buhari was a stranger in his own government. 
 
Why was MKO Abiola not allowed to rule? Maybe because he prematurely divulged the secrets of how he would govern: That he would act independently of the IMF and World Bank and that once he holds CBN with one hand and NNPC with another, Nigerians could go and sleep! Have these four (IMF, World Bank, NNPC and CBN) not remained our headache? 
 
In my view,  Tinubu’s error - if I can call it that - is that he chose to tread where angels fear to. He wants to solve Nigeria's problems. Either he is cocksure of himself or he underated the enormity and complexities of Nigeria's hydra-headed problems. Those benefiting from the system as it is will fight tooth-and-nail to maintain, even further consolidate and advance, their advantage. 
 
Now, after a year in the saddle, Tinubu should know better. He must begin to hold the bull by the horns and step on toes. To do that, he needs more of the courage he summoned on his first day in office when he announced that fuel subsidy is gone! 
 
Former Editor of PUNCH newspapers, Chairman of its Editorial Board and Deputy Editor-in-chief, BOLAWOLE was also the Managing Director/ Editor-in-chief of The WESTERNER newsmagazine. He writes the ON THE LORD'S DAY column in the Sunday TRIBUNE and TREASURES column in NEW TELEGRAPH newspaper on Wednesdays. He is also a public affairs analyst on radio and television.

Officials of the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission, RSIEC and voters ran for their lives when police officers stormed Elekahia Primary School in Port Harcourt City local government area, on Saturday.

About 21 Hilux patrol vans with heavily armed officers drove into the school which has 10 polling units.

Officials of the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSEIC) who had set up their stands were chased out of the Ward.

One of the policemen was heard saying, ‘”Come here, remove that vest. What are you doing here? Common move!”

The policemen, some of whom were masked, also asked the officials to remove their vest and hand it to them.

The operatives also shot teargas canister directly into the crowd of people who who were running for their lives.

A policeman fired another teargas at by-standers at the entrance of the Street and residents who came out to cast their votes ran helter-skelter.

Many of RSIEC officials, voters and residents of the community ran into Boms streets in Elekahia community in confused manner, thereby creating tension in the area, as the several police patrol vans sped out of the area with many election materials.

 

When contacted, spokesperson of the State Police Command, Grace Iringe-Koko, said she was not aware of the incident.

“I’m not aware. You are just telling me now, ” she said.

The Inspector-General of Police (IGP), Kayode Egbetokun, had ordered his men not to provide security during the election, citing a court order.

On the election eve, Governor Siminalayi Fubara had accused the IGP of taking orders from some politicians in Abuja.

He had also vowed to hold Egbetokun responsible if there is breakdown of law and order in the state.

However, the IGP denied the allegations in a statement issued by Force Public Relations Officer, Muyiwa Adejobi.

[DailyTrust]

 

 

 

The Body of Benchers is arguably the most prestigious organ of the legal profession.

It is, of course, not superior to our overarching professional body, the Nigerian Bar Association, NBA; after all, whereas all of us lawyers, both at the Bar and on the Bench, belong to the NBA, only a handful of us end up becoming Benchers.

Apart from the courts, themselves, from customary court to our most sacred temple of justice, The Supreme Court, there is no organ of our profession we respect, as lawyers, more than the Body of Benchers.

In light of his most embarrassing excesses, his decidedly unlawyerly demeanor, his shamefully ungentlemanly posturing and his obvious addiction to unnecessary controversy, the Honourable Minister for the Federal Capital Territory, FCT, and, former Governor of Rivers, Barrister Nyesom Wike, is the poster child and perfect specimen of precisely the sort of character that must not be a Bencher.

Nyesom Wike started out as an agbero, whom God, in His Infinite Mercy, Holy Magnanimity and Divine Providence, lifted up and took from the motorpark, made a local government Chairman, Secretary to The State Government, Minister of The Federal Republic, Governor for two consecutive terms, and, now once again a Minister but, unfortunately, decided to thank God for rescuing him from the motorpark by refusing to remove the motorpark from himself.

Indeed, you can force the horse to the river but not force it to drink from it, just as you might remove the agbero from the motor park, but the agbero might find it difficult to remove the motor park from himself.

I supported Wike’s nomination as Minister because he helped us win in Rivers State, but he has only succeeded in making himself an embarrassment to our government and a distraction to our President.

As to being a lawyer, the Body of Benchers must now declare Nyesom Wike as not a fit and proper person to be in their midst and sack him immediately from the most respected organ of our profession.

Onokpasa, a lawyer, was a member of the All Progressives Congress, APC, Presidential Campaign Council and the Tinubu Presidential Legal Team, TPLT, and writes from Abuja.

The Rivers State Police Command has confirmed that two separate explosions occurred in different parts of the state on Saturday.

It reported that the first explosion took place at the All Progressives Congress Secretariat along Aba Road, while the second struck the Obio/Akpor Local Government Secretariat, just outside Port Harcourt.

Grace Iringe-Koko, spokesperson for the State Police Command, stated in a press release that both explosions happened almost simultaneously.

Iringe-Koko further mentioned that police units responded swiftly, visiting the scenes and collecting samples for investigation.

 

Meanwhile, elections in the state have concluded in many areas, though they were disrupted in some locations by armed men dressed in police uniforms and others believed to be political thugs.

The statement read: “The Rivers State Police Command was alerted to two explosions that rocked the city of Port Harcourt on Saturday, 5 October 2024.

 

“The first explosion was reported at the APC Secretariat on Aba Road at approximately 3:00 AM. A security guard heard a loud bang, and upon investigation, observed three black Toyota Hilux vans speeding away from the scene. The explosion caused significant damage, destroying the gate, shattering the windows, and setting the security building on fire.

“The second explosion occurred at the Obio/Akpor Council Secretariat around 3:30 AM. Eyewitnesses reported seeing a black Toyota Hilux van and a white Toyota Sienna minivan drive past the secretariat. The occupants allegedly threw an object, suspected to be a stick of dynamite, which shattered the roof and damaged the generator house of the complex.

“In response to these incidents, the Explosive Ordnance Disposal and Anti-Bomb Squad were mobilised to both locations.

“An improvised explosive device was recovered at the APC Secretariat, and the team identified the use of incendiary materials in the arson of the security building.

The Anti-Bomb Squad collected samples from both scenes for forensic analysis, and investigations are ongoing to apprehend the perpetrators of these heinous acts. We urge the public to remain vigilant and report any suspicious activities to the authorities.

“We assure the residents of Port Harcourt that every possible measure is being taken to enhance security and ensure the safety of our community.”

[Punch]

Arsenal defeated Southampton 3-1 in a Premier League clash on Saturday, extending their unbeaten run this season.

Fresh from a commanding win over Paris Saint-Germain in the Champions League, Arsenal were expected to easily dispatch winless Southampton.

However, the Saints shocked the Emirates 10 minutes into the second half when Cameron Archer netted his first Premier League goal since his summer move from Aston Villa.

The lead only lasted three minutes before Kai Havertz scored in his seventh consecutive home game.
Gabriel Martinelli was introduced after an hour and made an impact within eight minutes, volleying home from Bukayo Saka’s cross.

After assisting Arsenal’s first two goals, Saka pounced on a loose ball to score the third himself.

Meanwhile, Rodri’s season-long absence due to a serious
knee injury is expected to be a major blow to Manchester City’s hopes of retaining the title for a fifth consecutive season.

However, it was his deputy, Mateo Kovacic, who scored twice to turn the game around for the champions at the Etihad, which ended 3-2.

Fulham, unbeaten since the opening night of the season at Manchester United, took the lead thanks to Andreas Pereira’s finish from a stunning backheel assist by Raul Jimenez.

 

Kovacic’s deflected effort quickly brought City level, and a cleaner strike less than two minutes into the second half made it 2-1.

Jeremy Doku then smashed a shot into the top corner from outside the box to give City a two-goal cushion, which they required.

Rodrigo Muniz gave Fulham hope on 88 minutes, but City held out for a 17th consecutive win against the Cottagers.

West Ham eased the pressure on new boss Julen Lopetegui by ending a run of three home defeats at the start of the new season.

Michail Antonio, Mohammed Kudus, Jarrod Bowen, and Lucas Paqueta were on target for the Hammers in a 4-1 win over Ipswich, who are still awaiting their first Premier League victory in 22 years.

There were six goals before half-time as Brentford defeated Wolves 5-3, leaving the visitors rooted to the foot of the table.

Leicester secured their first league win of the season with Facundo Buonanotte’s strike sealing a 1-0 victory over Bournemouth.

AFP

As the world celebrates the World Teachers’ Day 2024 today, October 5, the theme, “Valuing Teachers’ Voices: Towards a New Social Contract for Education,” resonates with a powerful message that has the potential to transform the educational landscape globally and, most importantly, within Nigeria. The theme highlights the pivotal role of teachers in shaping the future of education while advocating for a fresh commitment that recognizes their contributions, listens to their perspectives, and ultimately enhances their working conditions. However, while this theme is an important global call, there is an urgent need for the Federal Government of Nigeria and the 36 state governments to not only celebrate this theme but to actively domesticate it in every corner of the country.

Teachers are the bedrock of any society. Through them, the future is nurtured, knowledge is transmitted, and innovations are born. Yet, in Nigeria, these pillars of national development often bear the brunt of systemic neglect, poor remuneration, and hostile working environments. Despite the undeniable truth that no nation can rise above the quality of its education system, the Nigerian government has often treated education, and by extension teachers, with a disappointing level of disregard.

Many Nigerian teachers face chronic issues such as delayed salaries, inadequate teaching materials, dilapidated classrooms, and overcrowded spaces. These issues have become so normalized that it is now a crisis. If we are to live up to the global call of the 2024 World Teachers’ Day, we must engage the voices of teachers across the nation and listen to their demands for better pay, better facilities, and respect for the teaching profession.

 

The theme for this year’s World Teachers’ Day, “Valuing Teachers’ Voices: Towards a New Social Contract for Education,” offers Nigeria an opportunity to reshape its education system by starting with the very people who are the backbone of it, our teachers. But what does a new social contract mean in the Nigerian context?

In simple terms, it means an agreement between teachers, society, and the government that guarantees better working conditions, recognition of the role teachers play, and policies that are designed and implemented with teachers’ input. It means recognizing the expertise and insights teachers bring to educational reforms and creating policies that empower them, not stifle them.

For too long, Nigerian teachers have been left out of key decision-making processes that directly affect their work and the education of future generations. Federal and state governments have often made educational policies without fully consulting those on the frontlines of education, the teachers themselves. This approach has led to policies that are poorly implemented or outright rejected by the educational community because they do not take into consideration the realities on the ground. Domestication of this year’s theme requires a change in this practice.

 

A reformed educational system that values teachers’ voices will see teachers not just as implementers of educational policies but as active contributors to the design of those policies. Teachers understand better than anyone else the challenges students face, the gaps in the current curriculum, and the resources needed for effective learning. Therefore, the new social contract must involve the Federal Ministry of Education, State Education Ministries, and key educational bodies such as the Nigerian Union of Teachers (NUT) working hand-in-hand to ensure that teachers’ input is at the heart of any policy change.

This can be done through consultative forums through the establishments of platforms where teachers can regularly provide feedback on policies before they are implemented, ensuring that their voices are part of the decision-making process.

In a similar vein, through Teacher-Led Research Initiatives, teachers can be encouraged to conduct research on the challenges in the classroom and the Nigerian education system at large, using their findings to inform policy decisions.

 

Also, establishment of committees within the ministry to advocate for teachers’ welfare and ensure that their needs are prioritized in national and state budgets would go a long in addressing the challenges facing all teachers across Nigeria.

One of the ways the FG and state governments can demonstrate that they truly value teachers’ voices is by ensuring that teaching becomes an attractive profession for the best and brightest minds in Nigeria. This is not just about increasing salaries (although that is crucial), but also about offering incentives that recognize the professional standing of teachers.

In many countries, teaching is a respected and well-remunerated profession that competes with other career paths in terms of pay, prestige, and personal fulfillment. Nigeria must strive to reach this standard. The FG and state governments must review the Teachers’ Salary Structure (TSS) and ensure that teachers are adequately compensated for their invaluable contributions to society. More than this, the Teachers’ Registration Council of Nigeria (TRCN) must ensure that continuous professional development is linked with incentives for teachers who take up additional training, certifications, and responsibilities.

 

In fact, providing attractive housing schemes, health benefits, and pension packages can also make the profession more appealing. The recent 2020 approval of a special salary structure for teachers is a step in the right direction, but this must be fully implemented across all states to have a meaningful impact.

Rivers State, a critical economic hub in Nigeria, is often in the spotlight for its political and economic relevance. Known for its oil wealth, diverse culture, and bustling capital, Port Harcourt, the state holds immense potential to shape not just the Niger Delta region but also the broader national landscape. However, the political tension between the current Governor Siminalayi Fubara and his predecessor, Nyesom Wike, is casting a shadow over the state’s future. While both men play significant roles in Rivers’ political sphere, it is clear that Rivers State is far bigger than their individual ambitions. It is time for sanity to prevail in governance, for the people deserve leadership focused on their welfare rather than personal power struggles.

Nyesom Wike is a figure who commands attention, not only in Rivers State but across Nigeria. During his eight-year tenure as governor, he built a reputation for assertiveness, infrastructural development, and a no-nonsense approach to governance. Under his leadership, Port Harcourt witnessed several large-scale development projects, and Wike’s combative political style earned him a national profile as a staunch defender of his state’s interests.

His administration oversaw the construction of flyovers, bridges, hospitals, and schools. Wike’s personality and leadership style often led to political battles with the federal government, but his resilience endeared him to many in Rivers. Wike successfully turned Rivers into a strong political force within the national opposition party, the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), and expanded his influence beyond the state.

 

However, with every leader comes the inevitable challenge of legacy management. The question often arises: How will history remember Wike’s time in office? Will he be remembered for his contributions to infrastructural development or for political divisiveness? This question has only become more relevant with the growing friction between him and Governor Fubara, his former ally.

Governor Siminalayi Fubara, Wike’s successor, came to power with an endorsement from Wike, who was expected to continue wielding significant influence even after leaving office. As a former Accountant-General of Rivers State, Fubara’s technocratic background was seen as a stabilizing factor for the state’s finances, and his rise to the governorship was largely viewed as Wike’s attempt to maintain control of the state’s political machinery.

Yet, political successions are rarely as straightforward as they seem. Since assuming office, Fubara has sought to establish his own political identity, distancing himself from Wike’s overpowering influence. Fubara’s administration is still young, but the early signs indicate that he is keen on carving out his own path, which has inevitably led to clashes with his former mentor. Political observers note that Fubara’s decision to assert his authority is not only about personal ambition but also about the political survival that comes with stepping out of Wike’s shadow.

 

The ongoing power struggle between Wike and Fubara is not without consequences. Political distractions like these divert attention away from the real issues plaguing the state. From insecurity in the Niger Delta to unemployment and underdevelopment in rural areas, Rivers State faces numerous challenges that require urgent and focused governance. In a state that plays such a critical role in Nigeria’s oil economy, any prolonged political instability could have broader national repercussions.

Rivers State is one of the country’s highest oil-producing regions, contributing billions of naira to the national treasury. Beyond oil, the state’s bustling ports and burgeoning industrial sector make it a key player in Nigeria’s economic future. However, these economic advantages can be easily undone by political instability. Business confidence, investment inflows, and development projects all suffer when political leaders focus on personal vendettas instead of creating an enabling environment for growth.

While Wike and Fubara lock horns in a battle for supremacy, the people of Rivers State are left to contend with everyday problems like poor infrastructure in rural areas, inadequate healthcare, and worsening insecurity. Political stability is the bedrock of effective governance, and if Wike and Fubara do not resolve their differences soon, the people who voted them into office may begin to lose faith in their leadership.

 

Another dimension to consider in this ongoing political drama is the issue of security in the Niger Delta. Over the years, Rivers State has had a history of militancy and unrest, largely fueled by the grievances of marginalized communities that feel left out of the state’s oil wealth. Although militancy has reduced in recent years, thanks to the amnesty programs and other peace initiatives, it remains a sensitive issue that can be reignited by political instability.

When politicians in leadership positions engage in open confrontations, it often sends a dangerous signal to disaffected groups. The lingering mistrust between the government and these groups could be exacerbated by a perception that the state’s leadership is distracted or disunited. The last thing Rivers State needs is for political instability to reignite old conflicts or lead to fresh waves of unrest.

For governance to be effective in Rivers State, Wike and Fubara must realize that leadership is not about personal egos. The people of Rivers did not vote for a personality contest; they voted for leaders who could deliver on their promises. Both men have their strengths and have contributed to the state’s development in different ways, but these strengths must be channeled toward a collective goal.

 

Fubara, in his role as governor, needs peace and stability to fulfill his electoral promises. And Wike, as a political heavyweight, has a duty to support the government for the greater good of Rivers State. As a leader who claims to have the people’s interests at heart, Wike should be more invested in ensuring that his legacy is not one of division and conflict but of continued progress and peace.

This is not the time for political king-making or behind-the-scenes maneuvering. It is the time for statesmanship. The future of Rivers State must not be held hostage to political egos.

Beyond Wike and Fubara, other political, traditional, and religious leaders in Rivers State must also play their part in ensuring that peace and stability are maintained. Political observers in Nigeria are well aware of how traditional rulers and civil society can mediate disputes between political leaders. In times like these, their roles become even more crucial.

 

Traditional rulers, with their moral authority, can serve as mediators to broker peace between the two warring camps. Civil society organizations, particularly those advocating for good governance and social justice, must rise to the occasion by holding both leaders accountable for their actions and decisions. Religious leaders, too, have a critical voice in calling for unity and reminding political leaders of their responsibilities to the people.

Rivers State is not just a political playground; it is home to millions of Nigerians whose lives depend on effective governance. It is a critical economic asset to Nigeria, and its stability should be a top priority for anyone in leadership. The ongoing tensions between Wike and Fubara must be resolved through dialogue, humility, and a shared commitment to the state’s future. Political sanity must prevail because Rivers is bigger than the ambitions of any single individual.

If Wike and Fubara truly care about Rivers State, they must put aside their differences and work for the common good. In the end, history will not judge them by the political battles they fought, but by the impact they had on the lives of the people they were elected to serve.

 

 

In Nigeria’s vibrant Christian landscape, few topics have generated as much debate and controversy as tithing. This contentious subject has divided churches, sparked online debates, and challenged long-held beliefs within Christian circles. The controversy around tithing was initially stirred by Pastor Abel Damina, a prominent Nigerian preacher known for his bold and often controversial theological positions. Damina publicly challenged the traditional stance on tithing, arguing that it is not a New Testament requirement for Christians, a position that shocked many and created waves across the Christian community.

Against this backdrop of heated debate, Pastor Enoch Adejare Adeboye, the General Overseer of the Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG), made a statement that further fueled conversations, but in a way that demonstrated his wisdom and humility. Adeboye recently declared that not paying tithes would not prevent anyone from making heaven. His admission was both startling and reassuring to many, coming from a leader whose ministry has long emphasized the importance of tithing. This declaration did more than address a doctrinal issue as it showed the world that Adeboye is a man whose faith transcends financial matters, and whose ultimate focus is on the grace of God, and not on material contributions.

In making this statement, Adeboye not only redefined his stance on a hot-button issue but also performed what many consider one of the most profound acts of evangelism in contemporary Christianity. His humility, as demonstrated in his handling of the issue, sets him apart from many other leaders in Christendom who often hold onto doctrinal positions with a sense of pride and unwavering authority. Unlike these leaders, Adeboye’s admittance underscores his deep-rooted humility, marking him as a true servant of God, committed to the growth of his flock and the truth of the gospel.

 

At the heart of Adeboye’s recent pronouncement lies a profound display of humility, a characteristic that has defined his ministry for decades. Many leaders within religious circles hold tightly to dogmatic beliefs and doctrines, often refusing to shift their positions even when new revelations or interpretations of scripture arise. But Adeboye’s willingness to address a topic as sensitive as tithing, which has been a cornerstone of Christian financial giving, and admit that it is not a salvation issue, points to the depth of his character.

In a world where religious leaders are often criticized for prioritizing financial contributions over the spiritual welfare of their congregants, Adeboye’s admission that tithing is not essential for entry into heaven was a revelation. He did not just stop at making a factual statement, but his openness signified a deep understanding that the essence of Christianity is not found in rigid adherence to rituals or financial commitments but in the transformative power of grace.

His words reflect the essence of biblical Christianity, where grace, not financial giving, serves as the pathway to salvation. As it is written in Ephesians 2:8-9: “For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast.” Pastor Adeboye, through his message, reminded believers that making heaven is a matter of personal relationship with God, rooted in faith and grace, not the weight of one’s tithe.

 

Adeboye’s life is a powerful testament to humility. Over the decades, he has maintained a relatively low profile despite presiding over one of the largest Christian denominations in the world. The RCCG has branches in virtually every corner of the globe, yet Adeboye continues to live modestly, focusing on his mission of preaching the gospel and winning souls. In a time when many pastors and spiritual leaders enjoy lavish lifestyles and display their wealth, Adeboye’s personal discipline and modesty are deeply refreshing.

Born on March 2, 1942, in Ifewara, Osun State, Nigeria, Adeboye grew up in humble beginnings. He was not born into wealth or privilege but worked diligently to rise to the position he holds today. Before becoming a pastor, Adeboye was an academic, holding degrees in mathematics and teaching at various institutions. His calling into ministry was a dramatic shift, and he became the General Overseer of RCCG in 1981 following the passing of the church’s founder, Reverend Josiah OlufemiAkindayomi.

Under Adeboye’s leadership, RCCG grew from a small, local church into a global Christian powerhouse with millions of members worldwide. Despite the church’s immense growth and the influence he wields, Adeboye remains a leader of remarkable restraint and humility, choosing to focus on the simplicity of the gospel message and the well-being of his flock rather than on the accumulation of wealth or status.

 

It is in this context that his recent statement about tithing comes as both a reflection of his character and a moment of clarity for many who have struggled with the teaching of tithing as a salvation requirement.

Tithing has long been a controversial issue within Christian communities. Some churches teach it as a mandatory practice, emphasizing that giving 10% of one’s income is necessary to receive blessings or even secure a place in heaven. Others view it as a matter of personal conviction, not a compulsory act.

For decades, Adeboye has been a strong advocate for tithing, often emphasizing its biblical importance and encouraging believers to participate in the practice. His stance has attracted both criticism and support. Critics accuse pastors who emphasize tithing of exploiting their congregants for financial gain, while supporters argue that tithing is an essential biblical principle that promotes generosity and financial stewardship within the Christian community.

 

In his latest clarification, Adeboye struck a balanced tone. While still encouraging believers to tithe, he clarified that one’s entry into heaven is not dependent on paying tithes. This was a significant statement, as it reframes the narrative around tithing, emphasizing that it is an act of worship rather than a transactional obligation. It shows that Adeboye is more concerned with spiritual growth and righteousness than with financial contributions, a stance that reflects his commitment to biblical truth over material gain.

But what makes Adeboye’s handling of the matter stand out even more is the humility with which he addressed it. Unlike some leaders who might double down on their previous teachings to save face, Adeboye took the higher road by focusing on biblical truth rather than ego. His willingness to apologize and admit that tithing is not a salvation issue demonstrated a humility that many other proud pastors often shy away from. By doing so, Adeboye performed the most powerful act of evangelism, showing the world that true leadership in Christ is about serving and guiding with humility.

In making this statement, Adeboye demonstrated that salvation is not about legalistic adherence to religious rules but about living in the grace of God. Christianity is fundamentally a faith of grace, and Pastor Adeboye’s words bring this home clearly. In Romans 10:9-10, the apostle Paul writes: “If you declare with your mouth, ‘Jesus is Lord,’ and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you profess your faith and are saved.”

 

Adeboye’s words serve as a reminder that while tithing is important for the growth of the church and can unlock blessings, it is not a prerequisite for salvation. The focus should always be on faith in Christ, not on financial contributions. His teachings underscore that no human work, be it tithing or any other religious act, can earn a place in heaven. Heaven is secured through the grace of God, accessed by faith.

In a world that often leans toward works-based righteousness, Adeboye’s recent statement cuts through the noise. He reminds us that Christianity is not about trying to earn God’s love or secure salvation through human efforts but about embracing the gift of grace offered through Jesus Christ.

Regardless of where you stand on the issue of tithing or your opinion of Adeboye as a spiritual leader, his legacy as a man of God cannot be disputed. His ministry has positively impacted millions, bringing the gospel message to people across the globe. His humility, dedication, and willingness to speak the truth, even when it challenges the status quo, are qualities that set him apart in a world where spiritual leadership is often synonymous with power and privilege.

 

Without a doubt, Pastor Enoch Adeboye’s recent remarks on tithing are a testament to his commitment to biblical principles and his understanding of the balance between grace and the law. By reinforcing the message that heaven is accessed through faith and not financial giving, Adeboye has demonstrated that his ministry is rooted in love for God’s people and a desire for their spiritual growth.

In an age where many spiritual leaders are accused of greed, Adeboye stands out as a man of integrity and grace, reminding the world that humility and faith are at the core of the Christian journey. With his apology and humble admission, Adeboye has not only affirmed his place as a true man of God but also performed what may be the most powerful and effectual act of evangelism in contemporary Christendom. Like him or hate him, Adeboye has proven once again that he is truly a man of God.