Former Head of State, Gen. Yakubu Gowon (rtd), said he pleaded with late Gen. Sani Abacha not to execute former President Olusegun Obasanjo for an alleged coup plot in 1995. 

Gowon said this at the maiden edition of the Interdenominational Unity Christmas Carol and Praise Festival organised by the Plateau Government.

Recall that Obasanjo was arrested in 1995 by Abacha and convicted of being part of a planned coup to overthrow his government. 

Obasanjo, in spite of pleading innocent to the coup, was sentenced to death.

He spent three years in prison before he was released in 1998 following the death of Gen. Abacha on June 8 of that year.

‘I sent my wife to Abacha’

While Gowon was the Special Guest of Honour at the event, Obasanjo was the Guest of Honour.

“I wrote a letter to Abacha; I pleaded with him that God made him a leader to do good and not evil.

“I sent my wife with the letter in the middle of the night to Abacha in Abuja; I pleaded with him that such a thing should not happen.

“I’m glad that soon after that, things changed. And not only that Obasanjo left prison, he became our president in 1999.

“This is something that only prayers and sincerity can do. I’m happy that today myself and Obasanjo are here to celebrate the unity of Plateau,” he said.

Gowon also thanked the state government for organising the carol, adding that it would further unite the citizens of the state.

The former head of state said that the state had gone through a myriad of security challenges; hence, the carol provided a suitable avenue for the people to commune. 

He commended Governor Caleb Mutfwang for the various initiatives aimed at promoting peaceful coexistence among the people.

[Vanguard]

A federal high court in Lagos has dismissed a fundamental rights suit filed by crossdresser Bobrisky against the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the national assembly.

Bobrisky had filed the lawsuit seeking N200 million in damages from the EFCC for alleged “psychotic trauma” and N1 billion from the national assembly for purportedly violating his right to a fair hearing.

She also requested a court order to prevent the EFCC and the national assembly from “harassing, detaining, or declaring me wanted”.

However, on November 28, Alexander Owoeye, the judge who presided over the case, held that Bobrisky’s claims were unsubstantiated and lacked credible evidence.

Owoeye said the applicant failed to provide sufficient proof to support his allegations of rights violations.

Dele Oyewale, the EFCC spokesman, released a statement on Friday wherein he quoted the judge.

“Having evaluated the evidence placed before this Court by the Applicant, it is evident that the Applicant has failed to provide credible evidence to justify the award of the declaratory and injunctive reliefs sought by him,” Owoeye was quoted to have said.

“I hold that the claims of violation of fundamental rights against the 1st and 2nd Respondents were not made out of the affidavit evidence placed before this Court.

“The Applicant’s claims against the EFCC and National Assembly were found to lack merit, and are hereby dismissed. No damages were awarded.”

BACKGROUND

The crossdresser has been in the eye of the storm since activist VeryDarkMan shared a purported audio conversation wherein she claimed that she paid some EFCC officials N15 million to drop money laundering charges against her.

Bobrisky was released on August 5, after she was sentenced to six months in prison on April 12 for abusing the naira.

In the purported recording, the crossdresser also claimed that her “godfather”, alongside Haliru Nababa, controller-general of the Nigerian Correctional Service (NCoS), ensured she served the six-month sentence in a private apartment and not in prison.

The house of representatives joint committee on financial crimes and reformatory institutions resolved to probe the bribery allegation. It also invited VeryDarkMan, Bobrisky, Ola Olukoyode, EFCC chairman; and Nababa to appear before the committee.

The social media celebrity, who failed to appear before the committee, was arrested on October 21 at the Seme border for allegedly attempting to flee the country.

On November 1, the crossdresser was re-arrested by EFCC officials while attempting to leave Nigeria. A video shared on Instagram showed airport officials dragging her off the plane.

The commission also confirmed that she was rearrested to assist in investigating bribery allegations against the agency after which she finally travelled out of Nigeria on November 4.

[TheCable]

Aba Power Electric Ltd, Nigeria’s newest electricity distribution company, is working towards obtaining more natural gas supplies from its partners to increase electricity to nine of the 17 local government areas (LGAs) in Abia State it services as the Transmission Company of Nigeria (TCN) starts the regular services of the Alaoji-Aba 132kv line.

A statement this morning by Ugo Opiegbe, the managing director of Aba Power, explained that “a team of dedicated and competent TCN engineers and technicians is scheduled to service the line from December 1 to 7 to ensure regular and quality bulk power supply to the Aba Ringfenced Area managed by Aba Power, Nigeria’s 12^th distribution company (DisCo).

“We have, therefore, been in talks with the NNPCL and Heirs Energies to increase gas supply to the 188-megawatt Geometric Power Plant in the Osisoma Industrial Layout in Aba to enable us to provide electricity to the people, businesses, and communities in the nine LGAs we cover, and they have pledged to do their best to give us increased gas”.

The NNPCL and Heirs Energies own Oil Mining Lease (OML) 17 in the Owaza community in Ukwa West LGA in Abia State as a joint venture, with Heirs Energies as the operator.

Geometric Power gets its gas from the 27-kilometre gas pipeline it built to the OML, according to Engineer Cliff Eneh, an electric power consultant in Lagos who used to work for both the Texas Power and Light company in the United States and the defunct National Electric Power of Nigeria (NEPA).

“Due to the insufficient gas supplies to the Geometric Power Plant”, Eneh told journalists today, “the electricity firm has been augmenting its own power generation with supplies from the Niger Delta Power Holding Company (NDPHC) which uses TCN’s 133kv and 330kv lines to make them available to the Geometric Power Plant.

“This is why Aba residents and businesses might be affected by the scheduled one-week maintenance work on the Line, though Geometric Power has taken proactive steps to either minimize the impact on the customers or reduce it to the barest minimum”.

While commending the cooperation between Geometric Power and the TCN as well as the NDPHC, Engr Eneh noted that the planned TCN shutdown would not have any impact on the Aba Ringfence if there were sufficient gas supplies to the 188MW plant.

People in the Aba Ringfence, recalled the engineer, did not experience outages when there was a series of nationwide outages in October and November 2024 because there was a significant gas supply improvement to the area during this period by the NNPCL and Heirs Energies.

“Not only would the plant have started to provide full and uninterrupted electricity to all the nine LGAs under its coverage since commissioning last February 26,” said the power expert, “it would have been exporting power to the national grid to increase power availability in other parts of Nigeria since it already has installed three turbines of 47MW each, with the fourth to be installed anytime the gas issue is resolved.

“The whole nation is waiting anxiously to see the NNPCL and Heirs Energies deliver on their promise to increase natural gas supply to the Geometric Power Plant which will, in turn, provide electricity to Aba Power Electricity Ltd.

The alumni association of Ajayi Crowther University, Oyo State, has donated a Sienna bus worth millions to its alma mater to ease the movement and activities of Principal officers in the institution.

The Association made the donation on Wednesday, during the 16th convocation ceremonies and Alumni Lecture that was held at the Folorunsho Alakija Law Faculty of the University.

The activities were lined up to celebrate the university’s academic achievements and the strides made in nurturing excellence among its students.

According to the President of the Alumni association, Mr. Busoye Ogunlade, they have been supporting the university with various donations.

The Alumni Executives also awarded some selected staff of the institution for their long-serving, dedication to the University.

Ogunlade recalled that the executives, under his leadership, purchased a set of computers for the Transcripts department, to ease collection of transcripts for old students, within and outside the country.

Mr. Ogunlade, who also chairs the Oyo State Road Maintenance Agency, OYSROMA, promised that the association would continue to make contributions to the development of the university.

He said the Alumni website, to be launched in December 2024, will avail old students, both at home and in the Diaspora, the opportunity to bond, towards achieving a greater goal as a body.

Ogunlade, while handing over the bus to the Vice-chancellor, said that the school authorities alone could not provide all the needs of the institution, urging all old students to endeavour to contribute to the development of their alma mater.

He noted that “to meet the increasing demand for quality education, the University urgently requires the support of its old students, to enhance the infrastructure on its campuses.”

Ogunlade prayed that the University keeps expanding in larger strides as well as every graduate of the School.

Responding, the Vice-Chancellor of Ajayi Crowther University, Professor Timothy Adebayo, expressed gratitude to the Ajayi Crowther University Alumni for its contribution to the university’s development. 

The vice-chancellor affirmed that the association has been a worthy partner in progress since he assumed office nearly a few years ago. 

He equally recalled that the association has made several donations towards the University.

In the vice-chancellor’s words “We are grateful to the university’s alumni for purchasing this bus. It is timely and we appreciate it.”

While explaining the numerous feats of the University in the last year, the VC said the institution has signed many pacts with various bodies and institutions which has aided academic developments, stability, accreditation, and expansion of frontiers.

The association delegation included other members of the executive, including the National Secretary, Yemisi Peters, among others.

E-signed: 

'Busoye Ogunlade,                                 'Yemisi Peters

National President,                                 Nat'l Secretary,

ACU Alumni.                                             ACU Alumni,

November 29, 2024.                               Nov. 29, 2024.

The detention of investigative journalist Fisayo Soyombo by the Nigerian Army underscores a glaring disregard for constitutional governance and the roles of civilian law enforcement. It reflects a dangerous pattern of military overreach, and it is now incumbent on the leadership of the Nigerian armed forces, including Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) General Christopher Musa and newly appointed Chief of Army Staff Major General Olufemi Oluyede, to act decisively. Their leadership is critical to restoring the rule of law, protecting press freedom, and ensuring the military operates within its constitutional boundaries.

Lieutenant Colonel Danjuma John Danjuma, Acting Deputy Director of 6 Division Army Public Relations, claimed that Soyombo was “arrested at the scene” of an illegal oil bunkering site. Even if this is true, the Army’s actions following the arrest were not only unconstitutional but also deeply troubling. Soyombo is a civilian journalist, and Nigeria’s Constitution clearly mandates that the investigation and prosecution of civilians are the exclusive responsibility of the Nigeria Police Force (NPF). By detaining Soyombo for three days, seizing his gadgets, and keeping him incommunicado, the Army has grossly exceeded its authority, undermining both civilian institutions and democratic principles.

A Leadership Test for General Musa and Major General Oluyede

This case presents a critical leadership test for General Christopher Musa, the CDS, and Major General Olufemi Oluyede, the new Chief of Army Staff. The military under their watch has demonstrated an alarming disregard for the principles of democracy, and the world is watching how they respond. General Musa, as the highest-ranking military officer, must ensure that the armed forces respect the separation of powers and adhere strictly to their constitutional roles. Similarly, Major General Oluyede, who recently assumed office following the untimely death of Lt. General Taoreed Lagbaja, must demonstrate a clear commitment to upholding the rule of law and protecting civilian authority.

The continued detention of Soyombo is a stark violation of his rights and a direct affront to the Nigeria Police Force, which has been sidelined in this matter. The NPF, established under Section 214 of the Constitution, is the only body legally empowered to handle criminal investigations involving civilians. The Army’s actions not only undermine the police but also suggest a dangerous power struggle between the military and civilian institutions. This is a slippery slope that could lead to further erosion of democratic norms.

The Role of the Police and the Army’s Misstep

The Nigeria Police Force plays a central role in maintaining law and order, investigating crimes, and ensuring justice through due process. Its officers are trained to handle evidence, interrogate suspects, and follow legal protocols designed to protect human rights. By detaining Soyombo and confiscating his gadgets, the Army has not only overstepped its mandate but has also risked jeopardizing critical evidence. Any materials taken from Soyombo must be immediately preserved and transferred to the NPF to ensure transparency and accountability.

This blatant disregard for the NPF’s authority raises serious questions about the military’s intentions. Is this an isolated incident, or does it reflect a broader attempt by the military to assert dominance over civilian institutions? General Musa and Major General Oluyede must address these concerns head-on by ensuring that the Army’s actions align with its constitutional responsibilities and do not encroach on civilian governance.

Implications for Press Freedom and Democracy

The detention of Soyombo is more than an isolated case; it is a direct attack on press freedom and a warning to journalists across Nigeria. The military’s actions suggest that exposing corruption or systemic failures could lead to intimidation, detention, or worse. This is a dangerous precedent that undermines the principles of accountability and transparency essential to any democracy.

The Foundation for Investigative Journalism (FIJ) has made it clear: “Journalism is not a crime! #FreeFisayoNow.” The organization has also called for the immediate preservation of all evidence confiscated from Soyombo and its transfer to the police. The military’s continued custody of this evidence only deepens suspicions of tampering or suppression, further eroding public trust.

Calls for Immediate Action

If Soyombo remains in military custody at the time of this publication, it is imperative for the presidency, civil society organizations, and international human rights bodies to intervene. President Bola Tinubu must demand his immediate release, the transfer of all evidence to the police, and a full investigation into the military’s overreach. General Musa and Major General Oluyede must also take responsibility and ensure that such incidents do not recur under their leadership.

The Nigerian military must be reminded that its role is to support, not supplant, civilian authority. Detaining civilians, seizing evidence, and bypassing the police are actions that belong to authoritarian regimes, not democracies. General Musa, as CDS, must set a clear tone that the armed forces will respect constitutional boundaries and operate transparently.

A Defining Moment for Nigeria

This case is a critical test of Nigeria’s democracy and the leadership of its military. General Christopher Musa, the Chief of Defence Staff, and Major General Olufemi Oluyede, the Chief of Army Staff, have an opportunity to demonstrate that the Nigerian military can be a force for good—one that upholds the law and respects civilian institutions. Failing to act decisively will not only damage their reputations but also weaken Nigeria’s already fragile democratic foundations.

Nigerians must demand accountability—not just for Fisayo Soyombo but for the preservation of the principles that underpin a functioning democracy. This is a defining moment for the country, and the actions of its leaders will determine whether Nigeria continues to progress as a constitutional democracy or slides further into authoritarianism. Journalism is not a crime, and no institution, no matter how powerful, is above the law. It is imperative for the Nigerian military to act within its constitutional mandate and restore public confidence in its commitment to justice and democracy.

If, at the time of this publication, Soyombo remains in military custody, the world must take notice. The global press, international human rights organizations, national civil societies, and even the Nigeria Police Force (NPF) itself must collectively raise their voices and call for action. President Bola Tinubu must be confronted with the urgency of this matter, as must General Musa and Major General Oluyede. The continued silence of journalists, civil institutions, or the police in the face of such undemocratic practices would embolden further violations and undermine the freedoms of every Nigerian citizen.

The press, as the fourth estate of democracy, cannot afford to be silent. Civil society groups, both national and international, must demand the immediate release of Soyombo and the transfer of any evidence or confiscated materials to the NPF for proper handling. This is not just about one journalist; it is about safeguarding the core tenets of democracy. The Nigerian military must be reminded of its duty to protect the nation, not to suppress its voices. Failing to do so would represent a betrayal of the democratic values Nigerians have fought to uphold.

The Nigerian military urgently needs to establish and implement comprehensive training programs focused on civilian-military relations, emphasizing the distinct constitutional roles of the military and the police in a democracy. These programs should provide clear guidance on the military’s mandate to protect national security and address external threats, while highlighting the Nigeria Police Force’s exclusive jurisdiction over internal security, crime investigations, and civilian law enforcement. It must be stressed that the military’s involvement in civilian matters should only occur under strict constitutional guidelines and with full deference to civilian authority.

To ensure these training programs are effective, they must be led by a qualified constitutional law expert with a deep understanding of democratic governance and the separation of powers. This expert would provide critical insights into the legal boundaries of military operations and the importance of respecting human rights, transparency, and accountability. Such training should also underscore the need for cooperation between the military and civilian institutions to foster mutual respect and adherence to the rule of law.

This initiative offers a critical opportunity for military leaders, including General Christopher Musa and Lieutenant General Olufemi Oluyede, to reinforce the military’s role as a protector of democracy rather than an institution that oversteps its bounds. Implementing this training is essential not only to prevent incidents like the unlawful detention of journalist Fisayo Soyombo but also to rebuild public trust in the military as a vital and accountable part of Nigeria’s democratic framework. Without such proactive measures, the military risks perpetuating constitutional violations that could erode Nigeria’s democratic progress and damage its national and international credibility.

In the world of music, certain acts become more than just performers; they evolve into cultural icons. P-Square, the Nigerian twin brothers Peter and Paul Okoye, is one such act. For over a decade, they dominated the African music scene with electrifying performances, chart-topping hits, and a chemistry that seemed unbreakable.

Recently, a French band’s soulful performance of a P-Square classic has reignited nostalgia and stirred a poignant question: How far could P-Square have gone if they had stayed united? Their story, marked by monumental success and a heartbreaking split, remains a bittersweet chapter in the history of Afrobeat.

Before delving into what could have been, it is essential to acknowledge what P-Square achieved. Emerging in the early 2000s, the duo quickly rose to prominence, blending Afrobeat, pop, and R&B with seamless choreography that became their signature. They gave us hits like “Do Me,” “No One Like You,” “Chop My Money,” and “Personally.”

Their music transcended borders, resonating across Africa and the diaspora. P-Square was not just a duo; they were ambassadors of African music, paving the way for today’s global Afrobeat stars. Their sold-out concerts, numerous awards, and timeless tracks cemented their place in the hearts of millions.

The recent performance by a French band of one of P-Square’s iconic songs is a testament to the enduring appeal of their music.  In fact, the French band surprised guests at a state dinner in Paris by performing P-Square’s hit song “Testimony (Taste the Money)” in honor of President Bola Tinubu. This visit aims to strengthen bilateral ties and foster closer diplomatic and economic relations between Nigeria and France.

Despite their split in 2017, their artistry continues to inspire and connect people worldwide. The band’s rendition not only showcases the global influence of Afrobeat but also highlights the timelessness of P-Square’s craft.

This global recognition raises a compelling question: If P-Square had remained united, how much further could they have gone? With Afrobeat now a dominant force on the global stage, led by the likes of Burna Boy, Wizkid, and Davido, it is easy to imagine P-Square sharing in this global spotlight.

The question still remains, “What could have been had P-Square stayed together?  The possibilities were endless. They could have headlined global festivals: Events like Coachella, Glastonbury, and Afro Nation would have been natural stages for the duo to showcase their electrifying performances.

In terms of collaboration with International stars, imagine P-Square alongside Beyoncé, Drake, or Justin Bieber, blending their Afrobeat sound with global pop and R&B.

There is no denying the fact that if they had been together that they could have now expanded Afrobeat’s reach. As pioneers, they were uniquely positioned to lead the Afrobeat movement into uncharted territories, further amplifying its global impact.

In fact, they could have by now gone far in creating more iconic hits. It will be recalled in this imaginary context that when they were together that their synergy was unmatched.  Therefore, the world could have witnessed a continued evolution of their sound, pushing creative boundaries.

Without a doubt, P-Square’s split was a significant loss, not just for the brothers but for the music industry and their fans. As individuals, Mr. P and Rudeboy have released commendable solo projects, but the magic of P-Square lies in their unity. The breakup robbed fans of the duo’s unique chemistry and limited the full realization of their global potential.

Their story also serves as a reminder of the fragility of success when personal differences overshadow shared goals. The music industry is replete with tales of groups that faltered due to internal conflicts. P-Square’s split is a cautionary tale about the cost of disunity.

A P-Square reunion would not just be a moment of nostalgia; it would be a powerful statement about the strength of reconciliation. It would:

However, it is germane to opine that reigniting their legacy is non-negotiable.  This is as it would allow them to pick up where they left off, creating new music and moments that resonate across generations.

Without a doubt, their story could serve as a lesson in forgiveness and collaboration, inspiring others to mend broken relationships.

In a similar vein, with Afrobeat’s global dominance, a P-Square reunion would add another layer of richness to the genre’s ongoing narrative.

In fact, looking at the role of fans and the Industry, it is germane to opine that fans remain central to P-Square’s story. Their unwavering loyalty has kept the duo’s music alive, even in their absence. The viral French band performance is a reflection of this enduring love. Fans around the world continue to hope for a reunion, cherishing the possibility of seeing the brothers share a stage once again.

The music industry, too, stands to gain from a P-Square reunion. With Afrobeat’s rise, the return of one of its greatest acts would further solidify the genre’s influence on the global stage.

At this juncture, it is not a misnomer to ask “What is it that the future holds for them?” The answer to the foregoing question cannot be farfetched, as evidences abound to show that while they have built successful solo careers, the reality is that P-Square’s magic lies in their partnership. Their reunion would not just be about reviving past glory; it would be about creating a new chapter, one that honors their legacy while embracing new opportunities.

As the French band’s performance reminds us of P-Square’s brilliance, it also challenges the brothers to reflect on what they can achieve together. The world has not forgotten them, and the stage is set for a grand comeback.

Imagining how far P-Square could have gone is both inspiring and bittersweet. Their story is a testament to their immense talent and a reminder of the power of unity. As the world continues to celebrate their music, the hope for a reunion burns bright.

P-Square has already left an indelible mark on the music world. But the potential for more remains. Together, they can once again capture the hearts of millions and show the world the true power of Afrobeat.

The French band’s tribute was more than a performance, it was a call to action. Now, it is up to Peter and Paul to answer it. The question is: “Will they rise to the occasion?” For the sake of their legacy, their fans, and the music industry, we can only hope the answer is yes.

In the bustling chaos of Lagos, amidst the honks of danfo buses and the haggling of market traders, the soulful strains of “EGWU” pierced through the air from a roadside jukebox at Ketu. Mohbad’s voice, layered with Chike’s hauntingly beautiful melodies, carried a bittersweet resonance. The song, released posthumously as a tribute by Chike, has taken the music world by storm. With over 70 million views on YouTube and 48 million streams on Spotify, “EGWU” has become Chike’s biggest hit, cementing Mohbad’s legacy. Yet, the tragedy lies in its timing, Mohbad is no longer here to witness the profound impact of his artistry.

At the bus stop, a young lady, perhaps in her early 20s, wagged her head to the rhythm of the song before voicing the question on many Nigerians’ minds: “So, nobody knows who kill this boy?” It was less a question and more a cry of anguish, a reflection of the collective frustration of a nation seeking justice.

Born Ilerioluwa Oladimeji Aloba, Mohbad was a rising star in the Nigerian music industry, known for his unique fusion of street hop and Afrobeat. He was not just another singer; he was a voice for the streets, a poet for the voiceless, and a symbol of resilience in the face of adversity. His songs resonated deeply with young Nigerians, addressing themes of struggle, betrayal, and survival in a society often unforgiving to its underprivileged youth.

Mohbad’s sudden death on September 12, 2023, sent shockwaves across Nigeria and beyond. He was just 27. The circumstances surrounding his passing remain shrouded in mystery, fueling widespread speculation and outrage. Was it a health issue, foul play, or something far more sinister? Rumors swirled, but answers remained elusive, leaving fans and loved ones grappling with an aching void.

The young lady’s question strikes at the heart of a systemic issue in Nigeria: the culture of silence and impunity. When public figures or ordinary citizens meet untimely deaths under questionable circumstances, the wheels of justice often grind to a halt. From Dele Giwa to Bola Ige, history is littered with unresolved cases that have faded into obscurity, drowned out by the relentless tide of new tragedies.

In Mohbad’s case, the public outcry was immediate and loud. Social media erupted with hashtags like #JusticeForMohbad, and candlelight vigils were held across the country. Yet, as weeks turned into months, the initial fervor waned. The authorities promised investigations, but no tangible progress was made. The question lingers: “Why does justice feel so out of reach in Nigeria?”

Mohbad’s strained relationship with his former record label, Marlian Music, and its head, Naira Marley, has been a focal point of public speculation. The two had a highly publicized fallout, with Mohbad accusing the label of exploitation and harassment. In a now-viral video, he tearfully recounted alleged threats to his life. His fans believe these warnings were ignored or dismissed, and his eventual death has cast a shadow over those he once called colleagues.

While it is important not to jump to conclusions without evidence, it is equally vital to question why such allegations were not thoroughly investigated while Mohbad was alive. Could timely intervention have prevented his death? And why does it seem that those with power and influence in Nigeria are often shielded from accountability?

“EGWU” stands as both a tribute and a reminder. The song’s soaring popularity underscores Mohbad’s enduring influence and the depth of his talent. However, its success is a heartbreaking reminder of what was lost, a life cut short, a career unfulfilled.

The young lady at Ketu may have voiced her question rhetorically, but it demands a response. Nigerians deserve to know the truth about Mohbad’s death, not just for his sake but for what it represents. Justice for Mohbad would symbolize a step towards dismantling the impunity that has long plagued the country. It would send a message that no one, no matter how powerful, is above the law.

To ensure justice for Mohbad, Nigeria’s law enforcement agencies must rise to the occasion. Investigations must be transparent, thorough, and devoid of external interference. The media, civil society, and concerned citizens must continue to apply pressure, ensuring that the case does not slip into the abyss of forgotten tragedies.

Moreover, the entertainment industry itself must take a hard look in the mirror. The exploitation and mistreatment of young artists are rampant, with record labels often prioritizing profit over the well-being of their signees. A regulatory framework to protect artists’ rights and well-being is long overdue.

As “EGWU” continues to dominate airwaves and playlists, it serves as a poignant reminder of Mohbad’s talent and humanity. Fans can honor his memory not just by keeping his music alive but by demanding systemic change, both within the entertainment industry and in society at large.

Mohbad’s death should not be in vain. It should galvanize a movement towards accountability, justice, and a safer, fairer environment for all Nigerians. The question, “So, nobody knows who kill this boy?” should ignite a collective resolve to ensure that such tragedies become a thing of the past.

In the words of Mohbad himself: “I’ve been through so many things, but I still stand.” His voice, though silenced, continues to inspire resilience. Let that resilience guide the pursuit of justice, for Mohbad and for every Nigerian who dreams of a better tomorrow.

Stakeholders in Nigeria’s university community have expressed divergent views on the federal government’s cancellation of foreign training for the country’s scholars.

While some applauded the measure, others described it as retrogressive and parochial.

At the opening of a three-day conference organised by the British Council in Abuja on Tuesday, November 26, 2024, the minister of Education, Dr Tunji Alausa, said university lecturers would henceforth be trained in Nigeria.

He said the federal government would be spending substantial money on building a simulation lab, as well as developing the universities to save costs.

Alausa said, “We have just decided to cancel foreign training for scholars. The amount of money we are spending to train one scholar abroad could use it to train 20 people here. We will be training everybody here.

“We will unleash capacity in our universities. We are going to be spending more money now on research, innovation, and also on welfare, both on our academics and non-academics.”

Two days later, the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund) also announced the suspension of the foreign component of the TETFund Scholarship for Academic Staff (TSAS) Intervention, effective January 1, 2025.

It said suspension was in response to the excessive cost of training in foreign institutions, as well as the high rate of abscondment among foreign scholars.

In separate reactions to the decision, the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU), students, and other stakeholders urged the government to redirect the savings from the ban into upgrading local universities.

They also called for increased investment in the domestic higher education sector to enhance the quality of education and reduce reliance on studying abroad.

The coordinator of ASUU, Abuja Zone, Dr Salahu Mohammed Lawal, advocated for the reinvestment of saved funds into Nigerian education to improve infrastructure and access.

He said foreign training cuts could benefit local education if the funds are properly directed.

Lawal charged the government to channel the savings into upgrading university infrastructure and increasing access to higher education for more Nigerians.

He said, “The news came with mixed feelings. First, it is good for Nigerian education if the expected money can be plunged into the university system to upgrade facilities. The issue of world-class education and research opportunities is nothing more than the commitment of resources to the sector. Thus, the saved money can be used for that.

“Second, the saved money can be used for more candidates within Nigeria to access higher education and research opportunities.”

On her part, Prof Maryam Abdu of the Kaduna State University said the suspension was caused by the deteriorating exchange rate, which has made it uneconomical for the government to continue with foreign training.

“The rate of US$1 to N1,780 or thereabouts is extremely expensive. Revenues in Nigeria, especially foreign exchange, are not forthcoming nor encouraging enough to continue to finance such programmes.

“The biggest challenge is that Nigerian institutions don’t have the capacity and infrastructure to absorb all the students. There are some courses that are not offered in Nigerian universities, which would further compound the problem,” she asserted.

Prof Abdu, however, urged the government to reconsider the issue and make scholarships available for some courses.

Similarly, the president of the National Association of University Students (NAUS), Comrade Peter Oche Josiah, said the action could limit access to specialised programmes and global exposure, affecting students’ career prospects and aspirations.

To address this, he said the government should focus on improving local universities by increasing funding, building infrastructure, and fostering international partnerships.

“While local institutions face challenges, with the right investments, they could provide quality education and research opportunities.

“This policy could initially reduce Nigeria’s attractiveness to international students unless significant reforms are made to elevate local education standards. Ultimately, the success of this policy depends on the government’s commitment to transforming local universities into world-class institutions.”

He also proposed a range of solutions or alternatives to the government, including strengthening domestic educational institutions, collaboration with international institutions, scholarships and grants for online learning, support for private sector involvement, improvement of research and development (R&D) in Nigeria, public awareness campaigns, and fostering innovation in education delivery.

A lawyer and public affairs analyst, Barr Carl Umegboro, knocked the policy, saying it was weak and weird.

“It’s more or less throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Whilst I concede there has been gross abuse of the policy, however, it is not sufficient to vote against it in entirety.”

According to him, all that is needed is to fight the abuse only by tightening the policy with checks and balances particularly by tying their participation to visible tasks and projects that must be completed after the main study time abroad. Irrefutably, going out there affords the scholars opportunity to interact with the global audience and space, and by doing so, they are able to measure our growth levels so we are not left behind all the time.

“This seclusive thinking is what has kept Nigeria trailing on every side of development. We measure our currency against foreign currencies, yet we want to cocoon the intellectual property by subjecting it to local standards.

“In science for instance, there are some kinds of knowledge that could only be acquired properly through hands-on experience obtainable from specific locations. Not until you go there, you may never know more than what you knew.

“The experiences scholars get during those programmes like the practical hands-on experience that broaden their scope of knowledge are enormous and very important. And those added knowledge usually come through those foreign programmes. And again, travelling, they say, is the best form of learning. Suffice it to say that shutting the door entirely on account of abuses is unacceptable,” Umegboro stated.

Similarly, some parents and students have expressed reservation over the new policy of the government.

They contended that knowledge is not stagnant as training goes beyond acquiring knowledge without practical knowledge that may not be available locally.

A medical student at the Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Azeez Abidemi, said new medical grounds were being broken worldwide and wondered how their lecturers could benefit from such research if they are limited to Nigeria.

Also, a parent, Mr Olayiwola Atanda, said technology was advancing on a daily basis and the need to go outside the box for lecturers to acquire knowledge cannot be over-emphasised.

The speakers asked the government to rethink the measure especially when it was spending so much on overseas trips for officials on trivial issues.

When President Bola Ahmed Tinubu set up the Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reform Committee (PFPTRC) in July 2023, it was greeted by general ovation as it appeared to many that the age-long grumbling around the country’s tax regime was receiving the attention it deserved.

Speaking at the inauguration of the committee, the president said: “We cannot continue to tax poverty when we are supposed to promote prosperity.”

A few days ago, several groups mounted campaigns, endorsing Seyi Tinubu, the son of President Bola Tinubu to become the next governor of Lagos State.

DAILY POST reports that it started with the Coalition of Nigerian Youth Leaders, CONYL, which in a statement in Owerri, Imo State, endorsed the President’s son for the Lagos governorship seat in 2027.

According to the Coalition, Seyi Tinubu had on several occasions proven through his philanthropic gestures that he is a man who is selfless in all senses of the word.

“When there was flooding in Borno State, Mr Seyi and his team were there to sympathize and show support to those Nigerians whose property, homes and means of livelihood were destroyed by the flood.

“He gave a lot of gift items, food, home utensils, drugs and money to the affected persons during that period when the sad event took place,” the coalition said.

Also, the Lagos branch of the Middle Belt Youths joined the call in a press conference, with the Deputy National Publicity Secretary of the Middle Belt Forum, Dr Stanley Augustine Kavwam, as well as the group’s National Youth Leader, Capt. Brent Kane, urging Seyi to step up in 2027, describing him as the leader Lagos needs.

In the same vein, a socio-political organisation, Friends of Seyi Tinubu, FOST, endorsed Seyi Tinubu for the 2027 contest.

Describing him as a visionary leader with a rare blend of intellect, empathy, and strategic acumen, the group said Seyi Tinubu is the quintessential choice to drive Lagos state into a future defined by prosperity and innovation.

A statement by its president, Comr. Adejorin Tai Manuel, said Seyi Tinubu’s philanthropic contributions, leadership acumen, and commitment to societal progress is evidence of his readiness to serve as governor.

The development has been drawing reactions from different stakeholders.

First to quickly react was a prominent member of the ruling All Progressives Congress, APC, Joe Igbokwe, who voiced his opposition in a Facebook post, describing the endorsements as a ploy to undermine President Tinubu.

“Who are these faceless people pushing Seyi Tinubu for Lagos governor? This is a needless distraction. To pull PBAT down is their target. Ruling Lagos is not the job of boys,” Igbokwe wrote.

Similarly, a youth group under the aegis of the Coalition of Lagos Indigenous Youths rejected the endorsement, saying there was no vacancy for a non-indigene to occupy the Alausa Government House.

“Our attention has been drawn to the recent endorsement of Seyi Tinubu for Lagos governor by a group known as Coalition of Nigerian Youth Leaders, CONYL, and the group is described as the umbrella body of all the youth groups drawn across the six geopolitical zones in Nigeria.

“The said Coalition sat in Owerri, Imo State and publicly issued the statement of endorsement.

“While we know Mr Seyi Tinubu has his democratic rights as a Nigerian, we condemn the ill-fated endorsement and describe it as anti-democracy and a deliberate move by some faceless individuals to deny indigenes of Lagos State the right to govern themselves in 2027.

“It is no longer news that since 1999, no true blood indigene of Lagos State has taken over the mantle of leadership in the State (except one), the marginalization which underscores the essence of democracy and an outright denial of the indigenes of Lagos State the right to govern themselves.

“We know as a fact that there will soon be vacancy in Osun State where Mr Seyi Tinubu can best exercise his democratic rights unhindered.

“And if the people of Owerri in Imo are also interested in benefiting from the experience Mr Seyi Tinubu has acquired in recent times, they can push him to succeed Governor Uzodinma.

“As for us there is no vacancy for non-indigenes in Lagos State in 2027. The marginalization is too much and the marginalization has led to the underdevelopment in the state,” the group said.

On its part, the Lagos State chapter of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, said that citizens would resist any attempts to impose Seyi Tinubu, son of President Bola Tinubu, as the next governor of the state.

The state PDP spokesperson, Hakeem Amode, while rejecting the idea, said, “Lagos will not serve him.”

Amode asked whether governorship should become an inheritance, suggesting that it was inappropriate for a son to inherit such a role from his father.

He stressed that if the Tinubu camp were to resort to tactics similar to those used in Ondo and Edo states in the past, it would be met with resistance.

“Governorship is not a gift,” he stated.

Speaking to DAILY POST, a human rights activist, Deji Adeyanju, described the endorsement as laughable, adding that it was a clear indication that the people of Lagos State were taken for granted.

He queried if Nigeria, particularly Lagos State, was practising a monarchical system of government, where a father would pass the baton of leadership to his son in a democratic society filled with eligible and competent citizens.

According to him, such a thing happens because there is no election, adding that what takes place in disguise of election is ‘selection.’

While noting that everyone has the right to contest for election, Adeyanju called on the political actors of Lagos State to rise.

“It is a laughable endorsement because they have underrated Lagos people. If they rate them, such calls would not even be arising.

“Is Lagos a monarchy state, where the Tinubu’s family is supreme? Is it that power is the birthright of the Tinubu’s family?

“Is there something that people don’t know that should be known about them? Because I just don’t understand and can’t explain it.

“It makes no sense that they underrated Lagos people. And it’s because elections don’t take place there, it’s just selection. And because strong political office holders are never held accountable by the people, that’s why things go the way they go.

“Nigeria is practising federalism and not monarchy where political powers are being inherited from the father to the son.

“It therefore behoves on the political actors of Lagos State to stand up and do what is right for the state,” he stated.

[DailyPost]