The Katsina State Government and the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), led by the state chairman, reached an agreement late Friday on a ₦70,000 minimum wage consequential adjustment, averting a planned strike set for December 1.

The Secretary to the State Government, Abdullahi Garba Faskari, signed the agreement on behalf of the state government, accompanied by other officials, while the NLC chairman and union leaders signed on behalf of organized labour.

Implementation of the new ₦70,000 minimum wage is scheduled to begin in December 2024.

[TheNation]

For many years now, there have been call for political and economic restructuring of Nigeria. The rationale for this is to make Nigeria’s federalism to be more effective and efficient. It is also geared towards bridging marginalisation and discrimination gaps.

However, in order to streamline issues around the concept of restructuring, the All Progressives Congress in 2017 inaugurated Malam Nasri El-Rufai Committee on True Federalism. The Committee submitted its report in February 2018.

The All Progressives Congress committee on restructuring on Thursday, February 25, 2018 presented its report to the then National Chairman of the party, John Odigie-Oyegun, with the committee making several recommendations it said were based on opinions of Nigerians. Some of the key recommendations are resource control, making local government an affair of states, constitutional amendment to allow merger of states, state police, state court of appeal and independent candidacy. The committee, headed by former Governor of Kaduna State, Nasir El- Rufai, was set up in August 2017 to formulate the position of the party on true federalism. The committee initially had 10 members but this was later expanded to 23 members.

According to its mandate, the committee was to distill the true intent and definition of true federalism and to take a studied look on the report of the various national conferences, especially that of 2014; and come up with recommendations. Submitting the report at the party’s secretariat, Mr. El-Rufai said 8,014 people were engaged in the process of their research and that Nigerians indicated interest in 24 issues. Out of these, the committee made recommendation on 13 in its report, which has four volumes. It is very surprising that this incisive report by the ruling party hasn’t received much attention six years after its submission to the party leadership. One would have thought that APC Headquarters will forward the report to the president and National Assembly for necessary action. Unfortunately, this was not the case.

When President Bola Tinubu was inaugurated as the 16 th president last year, I had hoped that he would take the bull by the horn and deal with the issue of restructuring as urgent and important. That wasn’t to be as he continues to foot-drag on the salient issue. This was a man who was making a strident call for restructuring since his National Democratic Coalition better known as NADECO membership days. Perhaps his macroeconomic policies of removing fuel subsidy and floating the naira as well as his tax reform bills currently before the National Assembly is a surreptitious way of birthing economic restructuring. Assuming without conceding that this is the case, what is the president’s take on the germane issue of political restructuring?

The 10th National Assembly set the ball rolling for the sixth round of alteration to the 1999 Nigerian Constitution in February 2024. The House of Representatives Committee on Constitution Review issued a Call for Memoranda, enjoining Nigerians to submit memoranda or proposals for further amendments to the Constitution on a variety of thematic areas including the Nigeria Police and Nigerian security architecture, public revenue, fiscal federation and revenue allocation, judicial reforms, electoral reforms, traditional institutions, gender related issues, process of State creation, State access to mining, among others, as well as any other matter that will promote good governance and welfare of all persons in the country on the principles of freedom, equality and justice. Earlier, the President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio on February 14, constituted a 45-member Committee on Constitution Review chaired by the Deputy President of the Senate, Jibrin Barau. In the House of Representatives, the Speaker, Rt. Hon. Tajudeen Abbas, inaugurated the 43-member Committee on Constitution Review at an inaugural ceremony and citizens’ engagement organised by the Committee on February 26, 2024 in Abuja.

It came to me as a surprise that despite the setting up of the Constitutional Review Committee of the two chambers of National Assembly, members of the House of Representatives have been progressing in error by sponsoring Private Member Bills for constitution alterations when they should simply have submitted a memorandum on such issue to the Committee on Constitution Reform. I will cite three instances of such.

First, in February 2024, a bill for the establishment of state police passed the second reading in the House of Representatives. The bill, sponsored by the Deputy Speaker, Ben Kalu, and 14 others, aims to amend the 1999 Constitution by removing Police from the Exclusive Legislative List and adding it to the concurrent list. It seeks to transfer “Police” from the “Exclusive Legislative List” to the “Concurrent Legislative List,” effectively empowering states to have state-controlled policing. It proposes 16 alterations to the constitution and introduces a comprehensive framework to ensure cohesion, accountability, and uniform standards between the federal police and state police.

Second instance also happened in February this year when a group of 60 lawmakers initiated a move to end the current presidential system and revert to the parliamentary system previously used in Nigeria’s First Republic. The group, known as the Parliamentary Group, introduced a constitution alteration bill on the floor of the House of Representatives on Wednesday February 14, 2024, setting in motion what could be a transition to a parliamentary system by 2031. Three constitution alteration bills were presented by the Minority Leader, Kingsley Chinda (PDP, Rivers).

The third example is a Bill for an Act to alter the provisions of the Constitution to create a single term of six years for the office of president and state governors. The bill sponsored by Hon. Ikenga Ugochinyere sought to recognise the division of Nigeria into the six geopolitical zones, provide for the rotation of the office of president, state governor and chairmen of a local government councils among the inherent regions and zones. The bill also sought to make it possible for all elections in the country to be held on a single day. The bill was justifiably voted against last Thursday, November 21, 2024.

I am of the considered view that these three constitution alteration bills should not have been sponsored disparately as a private member bills but should have been submitted as a memoranda to the House of Representatives Committee on Constitution Review who should have liaised with the corresponding committee of the Senate led by Deputy President of the Senate to generate one long list of issues to be legislated on which can now be proposed to President Bola Tinubu to sponsor as Executive Bills after he must have made his input to the long list of issues for consideration. Otherwise, if they do not want to involve the president, they can draft the long list of issues into bills and have them sponsored as Private Member Bills. In fact, truth be told, there shouldn’t be two Constitution Review Committees in the National Assembly. It should have been joint committee.

The Constitution Review Committee should also plan to consult with the Conference of Speakers of State Houses of Assembly for their input before the legislative work will start in earnest on the exercise at the National Assembly. This because the rule book says on every of the constitution alteration bills, two-third of both chambers of National Assembly should vote to support the bills after which they will be sent to the 36 State Houses of Assembly for passage. It’s only the bill that get support of two-third of the State Houses of Assembly that will eventually be sent to the president for assent.

There is no gainsaying that the support of the president, the governors and the Speakers of the State Houses of Assembly are needed by the National Assembly for any successful alteration to be made. Personally speaking, I am in support of State Police, having all elections held in one day, and power rotation for purpose of political inclusion even though it may not necessarily deliver good governance. I am however against change of government from presidential to parliamentary system. Parliamentary system may be cost saving in terms of elections and governance; however, it breeds political instability. It does not necessarily stop corruption and is not a panacea for good governance.

The fanfare that greeted the resumption of activities at the Port Harcourt Refining Company on Tuesday may have melted away leaving the hope and expectations of many Nigerians hanging.

A visit by Saturday PUNCH to the refinery on Friday revealed that there was no activity on site, as some workers met by our correspondent claimed that the refinery was undergoing calibration which might last till next week.

The Port Harcourt Refinery has faced numerous delays and missed deadlines to resume operations.

However, the Group Chief Executive Officer of the Nigeria National Petroleum Company Limited, Melee Kyari, inaugurated the new plant at the Area 5 terminal of the refinery on Tuesday. It was claimed that 200 petrol trucks were loading daily from the plant.

However, the announcement was met with skepticism as reports circulated that the trucks were loaded with old products in the storage tanks.

Upon visiting the Port Harcourt Refinery Area 5, our correspondent observed no signs of activity.

An official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, revealed that the loaded trucks contained “dead stock”.

He said, “Before the refinery was shut down between 2015/2016, we had dead stock left in the tank, including some Premium Motor Spirit (petrol) DPK  (kerosene), and Automated Gas Oil (diesel).

“So, these products were in large quantities in stores in those tanks. During the rehabilitation of the Port Harcourt Refinery, Old Area 5, those products were evacuated from the tanks for storage.”

However, he noted that the large quantity of refined petrol was “off-spec,” requiring separation from water to obtain the main product in preferred colours.

“But for DPK, it is in large quantity but they have not pushed it from the tank where it was kept after refined ready for commercial purposes.

“So, the product that was loaded was dead stock, that is the old product that was in the system. So, after these dead stocks, they will have to clean the tank, remove all the debris before pumping the new project into that tank, and redye it,” the source said.

The worker highlighted that refineries worldwide should operate electronically, not manually.

“But what they are trying to do at the Port Harcourt Refinery is manual, which cannot match the new digital pumps. Most of the pumps used for the event were refurbished,” he added.

He explained that during Kyari’s visit on Tuesday, seven trucks were prepared for loading, but only five were filled with petrol.

The Chairman of the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria, Taken Ikpaki, while speaking to journalists during the inauguration of the facility on Tuesday, had expressed optimism.

He stated that more trucks were expected to come into the facility to load products in the coming days.

But rather than more trucks coming into the refinery, the number of trucks has dwindled.

Around 1.30pm when our correspondent visited, he observed that most workers and drivers appeared idle as no machinery was operational.

Nine trucks were seen parked, but the loading bay, numbered from one to 18, was empty and deserted, with some workers lying down.

When asked about the lack of loading activity, a worker in overalls said, “They are de-watering, removing the water under the PMS. Maybe there will be loading after that, but we don’t know what time today.”

Another worker at the loading bay mentioned that ongoing calibration was the reason for the delay.

“They are calibrating the meters,” he said tersely.

Findings by Saturday PUNCH showed that the PMS left in the storage might not be enough to fill five trucks.

A source indicated that calibration would continue until Monday, with the loading of DPK (kerosene) and AGO (diesel) expected to start by then.

Speaking to our correspondent, a resident of Alode in Eleme Local Government Area of Rivers State, who simply identified himself as Osaro, said, “After that ceremony with Mele Kyari where they said the refinery had started operation and loading was taking place, what happened afterwards? They continued loading on air, that is on the pages of newspapers and social media.”

When contacted for his reaction on the lack of activities on Friday, the National Public Relations Officer of the Petroleum Product Retail Outlet Owners Association of Nigeria, Dr Joseph Obelle, said it was as a result of ongoing calibration.

Obelle, the PETROAN spokesman, said, “They are calibrating the loading pumps. They will be done today.”

Meanwhile, it was gathered that the Senate Committee on Petroleum visited the refinery on Thursday on a facility tour. The outcome of the visit had yet to be made public.

Calls and text messages to the spokesperson for the NNPC, Olufemi Soneye, were not replied as of the time of filing this report.

But the NNPC had in a statement denied claims by an Alesa community leader, Timothy Mgbere, that the Port Harcourt refinery was not producing fuel.

Soneye accused Mgbere of crass ignorance of how a refinery runs.

He said, “The old and new Port Harcourt refineries have since been integrated with one single terminal for product load-out. They share common utilities like power and storage tanks. This means that storage tanks and loading gantry which he claimed belongs to the new Port-Harcourt Refinery can also receive products from the Old Port Harcourt Refinery.”

He called on the public to disregard claims borne out of “sheer mischief and blatant display of ignorance.”

[Punch]

“There are three kinds of lies: Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics.” — Mark Twain (1835-1910). Please note that Mark Twain himself attributed it to former British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli (1804-1881)

LAST Monday, the National Bureau of Statistics, NBS, released a report on the National Gross Domestic Product for Q1 2024, that is, the first three months of this year. On its website, NBS gave the following overview: Nigeria’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) grew by 2.98% (year-on-year) in real terms in the first quarter of 2024. This growth rate is higher than the 2.31% recorded in the first quarter of 2023 and lower than the fourth quarter of 2023 growth of 3.46%. The performance of the GDP in the first quarter of 2024 was driven mainly by the Services sector, which recorded a growth of 4.32% and contributed 58.04% to the aggregate GDP.

The agriculture sector grew by 0.18%, from the growth of -0.90% recorded in the first quarter of 2023. The growth of the industry sector was 2.19%, an improvement from 0.31% recorded in the first quarter of 2023. In terms of share of the GDP, the services sector contributed more to the aggregate GDP in the first quarter of 2024 compared to the corresponding quarter of 2023. 

The high points of the NBS report, which elicited reactions indicated GDP growth for third quarter of 2024 as 3.46 per cent and Unemployment rate for the same quarter as 5.0 per cent. 

Naturally, a population of people looking for anything to brighten their otherwise gloomy experience, which persisted for the eight years of the Buhari administration, but worsened since May 29, 2023 should heave a sigh of relief that things are getting on the mend. But not so fast, as many stakeholders opted to take the report with a pinch of salt, and in fact began to query the veracity of the report.

An interesting reaction came from one of the political organisations in the country. Really, politicians generally do not make statements about the economy here, preferring to wheel and deal behind the scenes to cut their unfair share of the proverbial national cake. So, it was quite interesting that the Conference of United Political Parties, CUPP, opted to react to the NBS report. Its National Secretary, Chief Peter Ameh, said in a statement in Abuja, that: “The NBS recently announced that the country’s GDP grew by 3.46 per cent in the third quarter of 2024. At first glance, this may seem like a positive development, but the reality on the ground tells a different story.

“The widespread hunger, starvation, unemployment, inflation, and crumbling infrastructure paint a picture of a nation in distress. It is alarming to see the stark contrast between the reported GDP growth and the harsh economic realities faced by Nigerians.” That’s Take One.

Take 2: The umbrella body of employers in the country, the Nigeria Employers Consultative Association, NECA, was equally not enamoured of the report, and in fact advised NBS to be more inclusive when it comes to national survey participation and involve more private sector players. NECA’s D-G, Adewale Smatt-Oyerinde said: “Typically, economic growth is expected to drive job creation. However, despite a 3.42 per cent GDP growth, unemployment has paradoxically risen to 5.0 per cent, rather than declining as anticipated. The operating environment is still fraught with innumerable challenges, ranging from regulatory, tax, infrastructure gap, including high energy cost, inflation, declined sales revenue, insecurity and negative effect of capital flight, “japa syndrome” and many more.

The two commentaries cited above are enough to call to question the integrity of the NBS Report. It is also interesting that this is one NBS Report that the Presidency decided to celebrate. A presidential spokesman, Mr Sunday Dare, in a statement made available to newsmen said that: “The 3.46 per cent growth indicates Nigeria is recovering from the reforms’ unintended effects.  

“President Tinubu said his administration has not and will never forget his promise of a $1 trillion economy by 2030. He assured that once the economy is rebased by early 2025 to capture its dynamism and record significant changes that have occurred in different sectors, the country will be on its way to shared prosperity.”

The statement explained that the latest GDP growth in the third quarter was driven by key sectors such as Agriculture, Transport, Education, Health, Real Estate, Finance and Insurance, ICT, Trade, and Manufacturing. 

“This performance once again shows that the reforms embarked upon by the Tinubu administration to reposition the economy and ensure better fiscal management are beginning to yield fruits,” Dare’s statement said.

That the Presidency is celebrating the GDP growth figures indicates that the tune being played by the piper is coming from his paymaster. It is a shame that amidst the privations Nigerians are going through, we still can refuse to tell ourselves the truth. How did the  Agriculture, Transport, Education, Health, Real Estate, Finance and Insurance, ICT, Trade, and Manufacturing sectors grow the GDP? It is now more important to query the metrics used by NBS in generating its report. 

How did the Transport sector help GDP growth with the current price of petrol and diesel? With hospitals nearly empty of healthcare professionals as a result of the Japa syndrome, and the high cost of medicaments because of the exchange rate, it is difficult to see how the Health sector could have grown. Same applies to Education, ICT, and Trade, all of which have been buffeted relentlessly by the exchange rate.

As for the NBS, if it has decided to bow to political pressure in the discharge of its duties, then we have incubated and hatched a gigantic problem. When the economy is rebased next year, NBS should not expect us to believe what it tells us. Besides, data, reliable data in the modern world, is life, and a key tool used in making investment decisions. When the data is no longer reliable, the investors have no template to work with and may not come. Real, unintended trouble is here. I advise NBS to go back to reality when next it releases its report, not because we like to read bad things about our country, but just that we know exactly where the shoe is pinching at all times. TGIF.

Almighty God, I bring the   PDP before thee. That party has disgraced God and man. Its cup is full. However, my merciful Lord, I plead that the PDP is spared the fates of Jonah and Judas. Though   Presidents Obasanjo and Jonathan, whom it gave everything, have forsaken it, I believe the party is not irredeemable.  

Our ancestors said we should preserve even tattered baskets because we would need them when we offer sacrifices to the gods, but I haven’t come so that this moribund   PDP becomes a useful rag. God, you eat sacrifices with fire; what you cannot do doesn’t exist. You can salvage the PDP.  

Lord, my eyes are dry. I have shed all my tears. The house Ekwueme, Ciroma and other noblemen built was a house of promise. A house filled with many talents and some orisirisi. But Nnam, that fabled party, has now become a whorehouse. The prodigal son knew when to return home. Though jealous neighbours   said he only returned when he had nothing left to waste. But the PDP,   more profligate than the biblical man of squander, appears willing to become enslaved rather than return to its senses. That is precisely why I’m at your feet, Onyekereuwa.

Before evil came to our land, a responsible adult didn’t stay home and watch a goat go into labour tethered. But the PDP is sleepwalking towards 2027 in handcuffs of servitude. And men of good conscience in Nigeria are playing ludo, watching the PDP become the shoe-shiner of the APC, unperturbed by the country’s imminent slide into a one-party state. Good Lord, is that good? Some of us are screaming ourselves hoarse because though a word is often   enough for the wise, with repeated instructions, the hard at hearing would hear. But this PDP isn’t just stone deaf; it has the disturbing traits of an Ogbanje. A few years ago, the PDP was begging the country for forgiveness. And we all thought the demons were ready to   depart. Now, the PDP is muttering again, gathering empty cans, and dancing to music only it can hear. Olisabinigwe, is the PDP cursed?  

Father, you see my heart. My kindness is not the benevolence of a man who blows sand off his neighbour’s vagina. My motives can’t be likened to   Nyesom Wike’s penchant for building mansions for judges. You know I never liked the PDP and no longer dance to attract money or praise. But this country needs a strong, virile, self-respecting and electable opposition party. Not a  Kabukabu  driven by pimps that live on booze. Not a perpetually overheating  Akankita  running around as the Opposition.  

Allknowing God, what happened to the PDP? The PDP has forgotten that even a hungry in-law must maintain some social distancing of dignity. If he frequents too much, he may be sent to fetch firewood. At the rate the chairman of the PDP party is going, won’t he be asked to wash toilets in Aso Rock for the ruling party for some bags of rice? Our ancestors said, “If a   proverb has to be interpreted for a child, then the dowry paid on his mother’s head is wasted.” Father, this Damagum is dancing like a child. Doesn’t he know we all know the hidden drummer supplying him the awantilo rhythm from the bush?

Lord, those who say goats are chewing palm fronds on the head of the PDP are not wrong. The PDP is in a pitiful state. It appears happy playing monkey-post for Obio Akpor. Permit me, lord, to repeat this. Shouldn’t a man with head lice see the barber? Why does the PDP think scratching will solve it? Father, is it true that the PDP is now harvesting what it had sown when its governors converted ecological funds to party funds? Is the wages of its sin death? Or shall grace abound?  

Some PDP chieftains have been rationalising their apparent cowardice. One said the PDP deserved pity because wasps have perched on its scrotum. Because those who have taken PDP hostage dine and wine judicial brother Jeros. They have built a fearsome reputation as tricky judicial pickpockets. But wasn’t the PDP inviting lizards by bringing in ant-infested firewood, sabotaging internal party democracy, and embracing money worship? And shouldn’t a man who has collected wasps with his head be left to suffer the agony of the stings? In any case, Achebe told us in the   Arrow of God that when the people of Aninta became fed up with their deity, they took matters into their own hands. They took him to a border town and abandoned him there. Our ancestors said, “If a man says yes, his god will say yes.”   All these notwithstanding, Ancient of days, let this Lazarus come forth.

The PDP has become too timid. It is neither the Labour nor Accord party. The PDP should have the seen-it-all versatility of a mature prostitute. Excuse my language, heavenly father. A   real prostitute can’t be frightened by the size of any penis. The PDP is not a novice. Why isn’t it bold and adventurous? Our ancestors said, “A woman desperately seeking a child doesn’t sleep with clothes on.” The PDP must show some desperation. No one can tell of witchcraft better than the woman who has just lost her son to a witch. Perhaps the PDP must sit down with Obaseki and understand the contours of the treacherous task ahead. After exorcising the moles that have hijacked the party and finding a sharp arrowhead, the PDP has to grow feral fangs. They are going against Tinubu, Ganduje, Akpabio, Hope Uzodimma, Wike, and Matawalle.   Politically, these people are not flesh and blood. The PDP will need to conjure the whirlwind. Father, that’s where you come in. Lord, remember that the PDP stood for national unity, unlike these folks trying to establish a Yoruba PLC. Be merciful unto it. You can take the PDP by force and set it free the same way you freed the children of Israel from Pharoah.  

If I linger, it might seem as if I have seen a wife to marry in the PDP. I have no sympathy for the PDP. My sympathy is for Nigeria, my own dear native land, which is drifting towards a one-party state.   Sometimes, I pity myself. Our ancestor said, “The anus regrets not being informed about the waywardness of his neighbour and her numerous visitors. If properly informed, he would have settled in a different neighbourhood.” Had I known Nigeria would come to this sorry pass, wouldn’t   I have checked out with the   Andrews in those early days? See how Tinubu’s destructive reformation of the naira has ambushed the young and the old. If one had checked out, would this incestuous relationship between the two main parties that have raped the country be this heart-rending?   The fleeing youths can smell it. But I’m stuck here with a president who awards multi-trillion naira contracts to his friends without due process while feeding the nation with lullabies of reformation instead of food and security. Yet, the main opposition party is twerking for him.   

The PDP needs to be led by a conscientious person who can inspire the youth and create a magnetic vision. There are many leaves in the forest, but if the soup needs ukazi, then it needs ukazi. But the PDP has this bad habit. When it sees political journeymen blowing their trumpets, it becomes enchanted and bestows on them the title of omeokachie. I won’t call names, Lord. Lord, rescue the PDP from naivety and frivolity.

Father, I   hope you have heard me. If Tinubu refuses electoral reforms, 2027 might be an exercise in watery futility. Father, what should the opposition do? Our fathers said, “When a woman chooses to make only watery soups, her husband must learn to dent his foo-foo   balls before dipping   into the soup so that he can   come out with something.” Rather than legitimising a sham by participating without comprehensive electoral reforms, I think the opposition must sit at home. It’s called civil disobedience. Not the Made-in-Finland variety, though. But dear lord, if a reformed PDP opts for a boycott rather than participate in a Bulaba choreography, will things not fall apart? Father, watch this county.  

Lord, I haven’t said the PDP shouldn’t accept a genuine defeat. Accusing a child who brings home more firewood than his peers of fetching them from the evil forest is common and consolatory, but it’s not good sportsmanship. Yet without a thoroughgoing electoral reforms, isn’t 2027 dead on arrival? We know that if the vulture is absent   at the sacrifice, then the land of the spirits is troubled. We can tell   the nature of the faces from the character of the heralding fart. Things can be foretold. Father, if you do not watch over a city, in vain are the night watchmen awake. Father, watch this country.  

Lord, I have emptied my mouth. Faith without works is dead. The PDP must not give its ticket to a political contractor.   Father, when the PDP starts to wrestle against these principalities and power, please, lend it a helping hand. If it has sold its soul, discard it and raise another national party. Our national history supports the biblical notion that your way is not ours. Arise, O Lord, and disappoint all 2027 designs and shenanigans of the wicked. Let the enemies of Your people in all parties be scattered.   AMEN.

•We may not be able to pay salaries if bills are passed
•Says some southwest, southeast states may also have problems

Governor Babagana Umara Zulum of Borno State has rejected the tax reform bills, sponsored by President Bola Tinubu’s administration, saying the bills will destroy the north.

The bills which seek to prioritize the location of consumption as the basis for sharing Value Added Tax, have faced stiff opposition, especially from the north, with stakeholders calling for its withdrawal.

Northern governors, traditional rulers, and Northern Elders Forum have rejected the proposed bills, saying they were not in the interest of the nation. However, despite protests and rejections of the pieces of the legislation, the Senate passed the bills for second reading on Thursday despite rowdiness at plenary.

Speaking on the development in an interview with BBC Hausa service, the governor expressed displeasure over how the bills enjoyed speedy and smooth passage to the current phase when other bills had spent several years to scale through.

He said, “We condemn these bills transmitted to the National Assembly. They will drag the north backward, and not only the north, South East, South West and some states in the South West such as Oyo, Osun, Ekiti, Ondo, will have problem with these bills.

“It is not opposition. This, based on our understanding, is something that will destroy the north in its entirety. Therefore, we call on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and others to review this decision. He secured 60% of his votes in the north. He should not listen to those telling him that northerners are not supporting him.

If our interest is served, that is all. What we need now is the withdrawal of the tax bills.
“Why all the rush! There’s a petroleum bill that was presented but it took almost 20 years before it was finally passed. But this one was transmitted and now receiving legislative attention within a week. What we are saying is that, let it be treated carefully and with caution so that even after our exit, our children would reap the benefits.

“How we see it is, if these bills scale through, we will not be able to even pay salaries. And if we paid, it won’t be sustainable the following year.”

Asked whether the bills would further exacerbate hunger and poverty in the north, Zulum answered in the affirmative, adding, “Including security. But they’re saying otherwise. We are against it, Lagos is against it; that it will drag it backwards. If this is the situation, then why won’t they rescind it? Our National Assembly members and even some from the Southern region are not in support of these bills.”
The governor, however, clarified that his objection of the bills was not a pointer of any opposition against the government, maintaining that it was only a call to reverse the decision.

“This is our stand and doesn’t mean that we are against the government. We supported and voted for him (President Tinubu). But these bills will not mean good for us.”

Asked to comment on whether the lawmakers would pass the bills when lobbied and given kickbacks, Zulum said, “There are rumours around but we are not certain. But you know we are in Nigeria! What I am saying is that let us all be patriotic. We have children, grandchildren and relatives who are in villages, therefore, we should be careful not to endorse anything that would impede the progress of the north and other regions. We are appealing to the President to listen to us and address our concerns.”

[Vanguard]

Your Chief of Staff, Hon. Femi Gbajabiamila was my colleague during my time in the House. He knows me well and can confirm to you that I’m not given to frivolities. I write to you as a concerned Nigerian citizen praying for your success in tackling our country’s myriad problems. I have followed your journey closely – from your days as a democracy advocate with NADECO, through your involuntary exile to the UK; your return to Nigeria and subsequent emergence as Governor of Lagos State, and now, by the Grace of God, the President and Commander-in- Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. I am glad to have witnessed your leadership style and do believe that you possess both the capacity and the will to transform our beloved country if you so desire.

“O God of all creation; Grant this our one request; Help us to build a nation; Where no man is oppressed, and so with peace and plenty Nigeria may be blessed.”

This final stanza of our reintroduced national anthem aligns with the sentiments of many Nigerians, who, despite facing numerous challenges, remain resilient and optimistic about the future. Your administration’s decision to reinstate the original anthem at the beginning of your tenure in office appeared to signal some hope for good governance and nation-building.

You recognised that after more than sixty years of independence from colonialism, Nigeria is still far from nationhood and remains a country of diverse peoples in search of shared goals. Your implied vision of nation building resonated deeply with Nigerians, particularly those of us from the Niger Delta and other minority groups who continually face systemic marginalisation. If this prayer is indeed your vision for our country – then there is hope for light at the end of the tunnel!

Effective nation-building, however, demands strong and accountable leaders who demonstrate commitment not only through their reforms and actions, but by their body language as well. Please remember Mr. President as you embark on building a nation “not to speak is to speak, not to act is to act”

Having been born before the country’s independence from the colonial masters, I have had the privilege of living in a Nigeria that was once a land flowing with milk and honey, led by people with a conscience.

Between 1954 and 1964, Eastern Nigeria boasted the fastest-growing economy in the world. Up until 1980 the Naira exchanged for approximately $1.50 in international markets. Over the years, I have also witnessed the gradual and painful decline of our economy and core values. Political office is now perceived as an opportunity for personal gain rather than as a responsibility to serve the public. Those entrusted with overseeing public assets often brazenly convert them for personal enrichment, seemingly without repercussions.

Political power has become an instrument wielded, without remorse, for the benefit of office holders and their cronies. Public officials ignore the concerns of the people, confident of their immunity from consequences. I’m sure you will agree that this troubling trend, if allowed to continue, risks normalising unethical behavior among future leaders with dire and predictable implications for our grandchildren and great grandchildren.

Eighteen months after it has become your turn, I am hopeful that you will begin to address some of our major concerns moving forward. Recent nationwide protests underscored the fact that bad governance is viewed as our greatest obstacle to sustainable development.  The protests also presented an ongoing opportunity for you to change our narrative and inspire a renaissance of values and morality. A simple gesture such as committing to a zero-tolerance policy toward bad behavior can catalyze significant change, and many Nigerians stand ready to support any leader who embraces this ideal.

With the removal of fuel subsidies, you have already demonstrated the resolve to make the tough but inevitable decisions.  You have also for the most part surrounded yourself with people who hopefully share your vision for Nigeria. However, the growing perception of a dysfunctional judiciary, more interested in pursuing everything but true justice, raises alarms and could pose an insurmountable obstacle to your wonderful vision of nation-building.

 A Chatham House survey conducted in 2022, revealed that an astounding 61 percent of respondents anticipate bribery in court judgments. Many judgments, particularly in cases involving elections and political figures, appear to defy both logic and justice, fueling suspicions that they are influenced by external pressures rather than being grounded in the law. This erosion of public trust undermines the foundations that must be laid for us to even begin to dream of a functional society.

In such a society, the judiciary serves as a beacon of hope for ordinary citizens, ensuring justice and fairness. Its role in fostering accountability, promoting good governance, and advancing social progress cannot be overstated. If any meaningful progress is to be achieved toward this dream, it is essential for your administration – and indeed all Nigerians – to hold the judiciary to the highest standards of integrity ensuring it embodies the ideals of our national anthem. It must not be allowed to become a tool for anyone. “Justice must not only be done; it must be seen to be done.”

The hope for our nation lies in our collective ability to demand accountability and uphold the rule of law. As Desmond Tutu famously noted, “If you are silent in the face of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.” In an ocean of chaos and confusion, it is imperative that the judiciary remains an island of sanity, stability and clarity.  This, unfortunately, appears very far from being the current reality.

 Of great concern also is the ongoing divestments of oil and gas assets by multinational companies in the Niger Delta. I hope that these activities are being conducted in a manner that ensures proper representation of the local inhabitants who will bear the consequences of the devastation left behind once the oil is exhausted and the companies have departed.

Additionally, the recent dissolution of a Niger Delta Ministry that was established with a clear mandate is also very troubling. I am uncertain how the newly formed Ministry of Regional Development will encompass this mandate and whether it can deliver on it more effectively.

I will withhold further comments until there is greater clarity on these developments. It might be quite revealing, however, if a searchlight was to be beamed on the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) but I will save that discussion for another time.

In closing, I share the hope of all patriotic Nigerians.

 “When justice is done, it brings joy to the righteous and terror to evildoers.” (Proverbs 21:15)

 Long live Federal Republic of Nigeria!

Long live the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria!

With Senate Clearance yesterday, Lt Gen Oluyede has become the substantive Chief of Army Staff (COAS). He is, by all accounts, a thoroughbred professional soldier with no political flavorings. Confident in a very unobtrusive sort of way, sober, focused, methodical and not given to undue ceremonies and fripperies, the new COAS was once described by a peer of his to my hearing, years back, as someone who does not get involved in anything that is unnecessary. He is completely beholden to his professional calling and ocupies himself with it.

He is now heading an army that is overstretched and taking on what should ordinarily not be its business – such as deradicalization programmes and much more.  The soldiers we see on the road all over the country today have no business being there. The longer they are out there, performing policing duties and without strict professional military drills and supervision, the more “demobilized” they would be; from the standpoint of military discipline, grooming and readiness for combat.

The implication of the foregoing is that the new COAS is walking into an environment that is roundly beset with many asymmetrical security challenges that are partly contrived and partly avoidable. Imagine what the nation would have been like today if we had consistently enjoyed effective and responsible civilian leadership over the decay. The bulk of what our men in uniform are facing today simply won’t be there.

The more we look at some of the security problems facing many states of the federation today, the more we feel constrained to say that they are traceable to the antics of an out-of-touch leadership elite. The notion of leadership elite meant here goes beyond the purely political. It cuts across the political, business, traditional and religious leaders. They all seem to be working together, but apparently without intending it, to create an environment with unprecedented records of grinding poverty and unemployment.

The twin facts of poverty and unemployment have poured unto the national political and sociocultural landscape a massive population of unemployed, underemployed and also “unemployable” people. Many in the latter category are not unemployable by choice, no! They are unemployable either because they hold certificates they cannot defend, are morally so damaged that they cannot be trusted with responsibility or they simply have no skills and must be “retooled’ for them to be useful either to themselves or to the wider society.

Just think of the collapse of the educational system, particularly the dearth of vocational education for those who are not interested in pursuing an academic life and career. One of the questions we may wish to ask here today is this: “Would we be where we are today, in terms of national security challenges, if there had been serious and well thought out National Planning that is guided by strategic National Development Plans?

We have had, and still do have, “Episodic and Regime self-flagellation Plans and Programmes”. With these have come the reprehensible personalization of national resources by those charged with managing the resources on behalf of the people. Ethnic chauvinism and religious bigotry are easily recruited as major drivers of all the wrong things that are fueling insecurity in the country. And it would seem that the right lessons are still not being learnt

We see this every day and everywhere.  We have also had more than enough retreats, and summits, wherein we have wasted much of our time and national resources talking about the causes of insecurity, as if we do not know where it is all coming from. Conveners of the summits, conferences and retreats will always go out of their way to quote various authorities on the subject and then tell us about the effects of insecurity on the economy or the welfare of the people.

Well, we are the people. We know the effects. We cannot safely walk the streets without fear of one misfortune or the other. So, we know. So does the military and sundry security agencies. Yet, the business of talking takes over from the business of problem solving and some people even brag that they have been talking.

That’s why the Sultan of Sokoto said, at one such event about two years ago, that we had had enough of conferences and retreats on national security. Part of what could be inferred from the Sultan’s statement was that the Nigerian public is yet to fully apprise itself of the need for a holistic understanding of national security, as well as the specific roles assigned in principle and in fact to the military, particularly the Nigerian army, and the citizenry.

We can all see that, today, the Nigerian Army is the public scapegoat in all matters of national security, simply because it is the most visible symbol of the state wherever you look. That is why Oluyede needs, and must work with, a comprehensive facts-based overview of all dimensions of the current asymmetrical security challenges facing the Nigerian Army and as an Institution of State.

Banditry and insurgency are not inventions from outer space. Every bandit or insurgent has a local address. Intelligence about such an address can only mostly come from a cooperative civilian population.

That is why holistic perspective on the imperatives of a “whole of society approach to national security” demands of everyone a sense of responsibility towards those professionally charged with protecting the nation and the rest of us. We need informed linkages between political decisions and actions, the reflexes of the various strata of the elite and other less obtrusive stakeholders, in order to really address the security challenges in different parts of the country.

The people must fully appreciate the issues at the core of our national security challenges. This includes a clear understanding of the roles and responsibilities of the key actors, as well as the dysfunctionalities that would inevitably arise whenever there is lack of synergy in the national security activity chain.

Intelligence gathering at community and other levels rests more on the willingness of the communities concerned to cooperate and collaborate, than it does on the military and security professionals deployed to various localities. Some of the challenges with tracing the whereabouts, and hideouts, of bandits and insurgents lies in the fact that this role of intelligence support from various localities is being observed in the breach.

Once this role is observed in the breach, with some communities and community leaders even nurturing, and facilitating, the very security threat the army is trying to deal with, the problems will only fester and get worse. As it stands today, the Nigerian Army is the public face of the war against banditry and insecurity. It has also become the people’s “Whipping Boy” for everything wrong with the safety of lives and property in Nigeria today.

We need to think seriously about some overlooked aspects of the security challenges facing the nation. They include the wrong attitudes of the civil populace towards the military and security agencies, conspiracy with embedded targets in communities, refusal to support security operations with local intelligence, the targeting of military personnel for hostile civilian attention, deliberate misrepresentation of the activities and achievements of the Nigerian Army through fake news, misinformation and disinformation, among others.

The new COAS is coming on board at a time that the nation desperately needs simple and implementable solutions, around the deeper motions of personal, community and environmental security that we have since abandoned. He is also coming on board to sustain the gains made by his predecessor, to ensure that the wrong idea that it is purely the job of the military, and the security agencies, to secure us, is summarily retired.

The civilian populace is not meant to just sit down and do nothing but watch the military “doing their job of securing us”. Communities which do not report the presence of strangers, suspicious characters, or even suspicious activities, to Institutions of State that exist to protect them only further endanger themselves and complicate our national security challenges.  

Undermining the nation’s efforts at improving security comes in the form of Attitudinal, or Orientational Asymmetry. It is a distortion, and disruption, of the right attitude every citizen should adopt in his response to the nation’s security personnel and problems. It is also one of the greatest asymmetrical security challenges facing Nigeria today.

Unless we approach national security issues with a proper sense of history, we might end up mistaking hysteria for substance. The citizen’s duty in the national security ecosystem must be reaffirmed, for everyone to identify with, understand and carry out his role in the national security ecosystem.

The new COAS is familiar with retreats, conferences and summits. He does not need to organize another one now, since these often offer mostly descriptive, and sometimes purely “lamentational”, submissions. Their detailed descriptions of the problems and the generalized recommendations without any clear implementation strategies are all too familiar.

The solutions to our current national security problems do not lie in the declaration of a State of emergency on national security, either. No verbal declaration of a state of emergency can make uncooperative communities to suddenly become cooperative. To urge anyone to declare a state of emergency will not dramatically raise the morale of officers and soldiers who are overstretched. Neither will it remove the fact that the job of our men in uniform is further complicated by the missteps of a civilian ruling elite that has created a massive pool of impoverished, unemployed, underemployed and unemployable youths with the wrong social skills.

The ongoing civil/military relations efforts should be ramped up, because the military needs the independent perspectives that would arise from such engagement. Ditto for the new programs for middle level officers and soldiers. It will all help improve the quality of soldiering, as well as public understanding of the roles, and achievements, of the Nigerian Army in the ongoing efforts to protect and secure the Nigerian State.

For this to happen, we need an overarching perspective that is focused on a “whole of society approach”. This is a critical success factor that we should focus on and press for, as Lt Gen Oluyede comes on board.

Pacts include diverse financial, technical assistance programmes worth over €300m 

•President upbeat Nigeria’s economic reform’ll impact Africa positively 

•Macron optimistic Tinubu will transform Nigeria’s economy like he did as Lagos Gov

President Bola Tinubu and his French counterpart, Emmanuel Macron have signed two agreements that will ensure a partnership on the development of critical infrastructure and the long-term sustenance of agriculture and food security.

The partnership agreements, according to a statement by the Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, were signed at an economic forum attended by businessmen, captains of industry, governors, and some top government officials of both countries at the Palais des Elysée in Paris, France, during President Tinubu’s state visit.

Nigeria’s Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Mr. Wale Edun, and Mr. Armand signed the Letter of Intent.

According to the document: “The two countries affirmed their commitment to work together on investment and development of critical infrastructure, healthcare transportation, agricultural value chain, renewable energy, and human capital development, through diverse financial and technical assistance programmes, of over Euros 300m spread across all geopolitical zones in the country.

“The two countries committed to forge a strategic relationship in project implementation and enhance mutual trade and cross border services by removing fiscal barriers while protecting labour rights.” 

Minister of Finance, Edun, and Chief Executive Officer of the French Development Agency (AFD), Mr. Remi Rioux, signed another Letter of Intent to support the Renewed Hope Agenda reforms designed to stimulate and strengthen the economy.

“The Declaration”, the document stated, “ set out the enduring relationship between the AFD and the FRN, and the AFD’s continuing commitment to support the socio-economic growth of Nigeria through financing sustainable projects in urban infrastructure development, transportation network, housing infrastructure, human capital development through improved education specifically in STEM, agriculture, food security and healthcare.

“The AFD reaffirmed its commitment to long-term support of the Renewed Hope Agenda of Mr. President on energy access and transition, sustainable agriculture and food security by financing the improvement of agro-logistic hubs. Importantly, the AFD committed to supporting the real sector by providing capital from MSME in high-impact sectors.

“The Federal Republic of Nigeria also affirmed its support for the projects financed by the AFD and committed to ensure that the implementation of the projects are expedited efficiently.”

The two Presidents had earlier in Paris, the French capital witnessed the signing of the agreement by the United Bank for Africa (UBA) Group Chairman Tony Elumelu and  Mr. Antoine Armand, the French Minister of Economy, Finance and Industry for the bank to commence operations in Paris.

Zenith Bank also inaugurated its services in the country during the visit.

Meanwhile, Tinubu once more assured Nigerians that the ongoing reforms in Nigeria would improve Africa’s economic prospects.

Speaking Thursday night at the State Dinner organised by the French government for him at Palais des Elysée in Paris, the President said: “Regarding Nigeria’s economy, as you have said, we have embarked on a very strong reform, and there is no looking back. It is in the interest of the entire continent that we don’t continue in the past. We must brace up for the future with commitment and optimism. And with the courage of our founding fathers.

“President Macron, all your efforts about Africa, I promise you shall not be in vain,” he stated.

President Tinubu while noting that the future remained bright for better relations with France emphasised that he was glad to be leading Nigeria during the trying times of the nation.

His words: “It is a good time for all of us. I cannot be prouder than I am to be President of Nigeria at this challenging time. I have people who are very clearly inspired, who are determined to change the course of Africa by changing the rot of the past, blending a future that our children and grandchildren can hold, and be open, and be proud.”

The President also lauded the amicable relations with French President Emmanuel Macron, appreciating his interest in Africa.

He also expressed confidence that Macron’s goodwill would foster stronger bilateral ties, benefiting the entire continent.

The Nigerian leader encouraged both Nigerian and French citizens to uphold the cordial relationship shared by their nations.

First Lady, Senator Oluremi Tinubu accompanied the President to the dinner, along with top Nigerian government officials, businessmen, and the Director-General of the World Trade Organisation, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala.

“It is a great honour for me to be here. And it’s been a great day because you have arranged a great reception.

“Appreciating that you have a good knowledge of Nigeria is not enough. Your warmth, your commitment, and your foresight in Africa are remarkable.

“You stirred my excitement and caught my attention as a leader. Thank you.

“France went through a lot to put freedom, democracy and commitment together. Your effort is very inspiring for us to work together. We have no choice but to build a continent that connects, resonates for its people, and cares about the people and development,” President Tinubu said.

He thanked the French leader and his wife, Brigitte, for the State Visit and the three-day reception.

“In addition to the economic prospects and what you mean to Europe, to America and the African continent, there is a good prospect that you will not forget who we are. You open your doors for investment for our friends and brothers here. I could see Aliko Dangote, Aig Imoukhuede, and Tony Elumelu here. You have memories of your friends in Nigeria.  You asked for Mike Adenuga earlier today. Thank you,” he added.

In his remarks, President Macron acknowledged Nigeria’s leadership in Africa, recognising its role as a ‘big brother’ to the continent.

He praised Nigerians for their resilience and intellect, mentioning Nobel Laureate Prof. Wole Soyinka and musician Femi Kuti as global figures.

“Nigeria is a formidable country with talented young people. Many Nigerians are exceptional in their chosen careers.

“You conquered military rule and took your liberty. President Tinubu transformed the economy in Lagos, and now you are on a mission to transform the country,” he stressed.

Macron noted that French investors have long been active in Nigeria, particularly in oil, gas, construction, and food security.

[Thisday]

THIS week, as I refueled my car, I couldn’t help but be struck by the sharp contrast between petrol prices here in Metro Atlanta and in Nigeria.

In Metro Atlanta, fuel prices hover at $2.70 per gallon, which is equivalent to around 67 cents per liter.  (Four liters make up a gallon.) Translating this into naira reveals a stark discrepancy. At the current exchange rate of 1,647 naira to the dollar, a gallon of petrol in Atlanta equates to approximately 5,200 naira or 1,102 naira per liter. That’s astonishingly cheaper than Nigeria’s prevailing rate of around 1,300 naira per liter.

This disparity grows even more troubling in light of the wildly differential minimum wage standards between Nigeria and the United States. In the United States, the federal minimum wage is $7.25 per hour, which amounts to roughly $1,200 a month. Converted into naira, this comes to nearly 1,974,000 (one million, nine hundred and seventy-four thousand) naira.

Note that almost no one earns the minimum wage. Even the lowest remunerated workers here earn above the minimum wage. For example, my 16-year-old daughter who works at an entertainment restaurant chain on weekends earns $13 an hour.

Meanwhile, the federal minimum wage in Nigeria is a piddling 70,000 naira, or around $42.55. In other words, Nigerians with a minimum wage of 70,000 per month pay a higher rate at the pump than Atlantans with a minimum wage of 1.9 million naira per month.

When one presents these figures, defenders of past and present Nigerian regimes— and clueless, stonyhearted neoliberal evangelists— often argue that it’s fruitless to compare Nigeria with the United States, the world’s largest economy.

Yet, it’s worth noting that the U.S. does not indulge in the luxuries afforded to Nigeria’s ruling political elites. For instance, while American presidents pay for their own meals, including the meals of their guests, Nigeria allocates billions for the upkeep of its first families.

Such contrasts illustrate not merely economic differences but also the broader question of public accountability and fiscal priorities.

In much of the developed world, government subsidies for fuel are deemed vital, particularly where public transport systems are not robust. In the U.S., for example, state governments sometimes provide targeted subsidies to cushion residents from high fuel prices.

The lower fuel prices in America are facilitated by state subsidies aimed at counterbalancing a lack of comprehensive public transit options, as is the case in Western Europe.

For instance, the governor of Georgia, Governor Brian Kemp, recently decided to suspend fuel taxes in Georgia following Hurricane Helene, which temporarily reduced petrol prices to around $2.50 per gallon. This is typical all over the United States.

The Center for Investigative Reporting found that the true cost of petrol in the United States is $15 per gallon, that is, $3.75 per liter. Converted into naira, that would amount to 24,648.90 naira per gallon or 6,162.23 naira per liter. But the average pump price of petrol in the United States is $3.16 per gallon.

(Gas prices can vary greatly within each state, with Texas having the lowest price of $2.669 per gallon and California the highest price at $4.68 per gallon. Note that California’s minimum wage is almost twice the federal minimum wage at $16.00 an hour.)

Americans don’t pay the actual cost of petrol because their state governments spend billions to subsidize their petrol consumption. According to the IMF, which has demonized fuel subsidies in the developing world, compelled governments to remove subsidies, and recruited scorn-worthy traitors to brainwash poor people into accepting that subsidies are bad for them, the United States spent $757 billion in fossil fuel subsidies in 2022 alone.

Globally, the IMF said, “subsidies surged to a record $7 trillion [in 2022] as governments supported consumers and businesses during the global spike in energy prices caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the economic recovery from the pandemic.” That represents 7 percent of global GDP.

U.S. state governments spent a significant sum on fuel subsidies, largely as part of measures to alleviate the impact of elevated energy costs. These measures included gas tax holidays, direct consumer grants, and discounts, aiming to shield residents from the global surge in fuel prices following supply disruptions caused by international events like the Ukraine crisis.

These interventions illustrate the fiscal lengths governments are willing to go to stabilize fuel costs for their citizens amid economic challenges.

Countries as diverse as Egypt and Indonesia have similarly leveraged fuel subsidies to maintain price stability, alleviate poverty, and stimulate their economies. These examples illuminate a fundamental principle that subsidies, when properly managed, can serve as powerful tools to bridge income disparities and invigorate economic growth.

But not Nigeria. Nigerians face relentless economic strain despite residing in an oil-producing nation. It’s a country where, somehow, people have been persuaded by a sophisticated mob of well-compensated spin doctors that exorbitant fuel prices are an unavoidable reality to which they must resign themselves.

For a resource-rich nation, which is also among the poorest globally, this is a bitter, disconcerting irony.

Those who denounce subsidies as inefficacious or detrimental often betray a limited understanding of their societal role, or worse, they may advocate for policies that consolidate wealth at the top.

In societies grappling with inequality, subsidies can mean the difference between bare survival and a modest but dignified life for millions.

To disparage such measures, particularly in a nation with profound economic inequalities, is to endorse a vision of society that is untenably divided—and to invite criticism that should rightly be directed not only toward them but, if you’ll pardon the expression, toward the legacy of those who espouse such values.

It is a grave irony, and a deeply unjust one, that the people of Nigeria — a nation abundantly blessed with oil wealth — must endure petrol prices that surpass those of Atlanta, a city in one of the world’s richest nations. This, while the average Nigerian subsists on a minimum wage of approximately $45 a month, a pittance that could scarcely fill a tank, let alone sustain a family.

The removal of petrol subsidies is not merely an economic policy; it is a sentence handed down to the already struggling, forcing countless Nigerians to choose between transportation, sustenance, and survival. The ripple effects are evident in unchecked inflation spirals, faltering businesses, and tragic loss of lives in the wake of avoidable hardship.

To govern is to protect, to prioritize the well-being of the many over the convenience of the few. To abandon subsidies under the guise of fiscal responsibility while the vulnerable teeter on the edge of despair is neither responsible nor just. It is, instead, an abdication of moral duty.

President Tinubu should restore the subsidies, not as a concession, but as an obligation to the people he is obligated to serve. To do so is not to admit defeat but to affirm humanity, to wield governance as a tool of compassion rather than austerity.

After all, what use is a nation’s wealth if it is not deployed in the service of its citizens? Let Nigeria’s oil be a blessing once more, not a bitter reminder of inequalities entrenched and lives disregarded.