President Bola Tinubu on Monday in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia called for an end to Israeli aggression in Gaza, warning that
"the conflict in Palestine has persisted for far too long, inflicting immeasurable suffering."

Addressing the extraordinary Arab-Islamic Summit, convened to address the current situation in the Middle East, President Tinubu expressed deep concern on the humanitarian conditions in Gaza.

The one-day summit was a follow-up to the Riyadh summit last year, and was attended by Heads of State and Government of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and the League of Arab States.

Reiterating Nigeria's call for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, President Tinubu affirmed the country’s support for a two-state solution, where both Israeli and Palestinians can co-exist in security and dignity.

He noted that this solution remained a viable part to lasting peace in the region.

''The conflict in Palestine has persisted for far too long, inflicting immeasurable suffering on countless lives.

''As representatives of nations that value justice, dignity, and the sanctity of human life, we have a moral obligation to collectively bring about an immediate end to this conflict.

''It is not enough to issue empty condemnations. The world must work towards an end to Israeli aggression in Gaza, which has persisted for far too long.

"No political aim, no military strategy, and no security concern should come at the expense of so many innocent lives,'' he said.

The Nigerian leader called on parties in the conflict in the Middle East to respect the principles of proportionality and the basic rights of civilians, consistent with global legal and diplomatic frameworks.

''In a rules-based international order, States have the right of self-defence. But self defence must take proportionality into account, in line with global legal, diplomatic - and moral - frameworks.

''An entire civilian population, their dreams and futures, cannot be dismissed as collateral,'' he said.

Explaining Nigeria's principled and consistent stance on the two-state solution, President Tinubu noted that it stands as a beacon of hope, representing the rights of both Israelis and Palestinians to self-determination and peace.

''It is not just a diplomatic article of faith; it is a vision grounded in the principles of equality and mutual recognition.

''Achieving this vision requires a commitment to dialogue and respect for history. We all know this conflict did not begin on October 7 in 2023. It can only be resolved through principled compromise, based on appreciation of the proper context.

''This conflict, in the cradle of history, is so visceral that the ripples of division spread far and quickly. The corrosive impact of the images of endless violence, repeated on a billion smart phones around the world is huge. We need to find new pathways to peace, without delay,'' he said.

The Nigerian leader commended King Salman of Saudi Arabia and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman for convening the summit, describing it as a vital opportunity to renew diplomatic efforts and work toward a sustainable peace.

He assured that Nigeria given its own experiences would continue to support international efforts that advance peace and stability in the Middle East.

''Our own experiences, domestically and regionally, have taught us that identity politics are no substitute for respecting the nuances of diversity,'' he said.

According to President Tinubu ''the path to reconciliation may be fraught with challenges, but it is through honest conversation that we can foster understanding.

''The international community has the opportunity to bring to bear new thinking on this most relentless challenge.

''It is our duty to engage in this dialogue with sincerity and resolve, recognising the complexities that each side faces.''

President Tinubu called for the establishment of a secretariat to implement the resolutions of the Summit.

He urged the leaders to mandate a select Heads of Government to canvass support globally and oversee the implementation of the Summit resolutions, providing regular reports to a joint OIC and Arab League leadership until permanent peace is achieved in the Middle East.

In his opening remarks, Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman condemned Israeli actions in Gaza and Lebanon, including the targeting of civilians and the continued violation of the Al-Aqsa mosque.

He also condemned Israeli ban on the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) from delivering relief aid to Palestinians and the displacement of Lebanese people.

He emphasized the importance of preserving Lebanon's sovereignty and territorial integrity.

The Crown Prince highlighted Saudi Arabia's role in promoting Palestinian statehood based on the 1967 borders, mentioning international recognition and the establishment of a Global Coalition with the European Union and Norway.

He urged more states to join the Global Coalition.

Bayo Onanuga
Special Adviser to the President
(Information & Strategy)

Last week, President Bola Tinubu ordered the immediate termination of the treason charge against 119 protesters standing trial for treason arising from the August 1-8, 2024 protests against bad governance and hardship in the country. Consequently, the Attorney-general of the Federation, Mr. Lateef Fagbemi SAN applied for the withdrawal of the charges. Since there was no objection from the defence counsel, the case was struck out by Justice Obioma Egwatu. It is pertinent to review the attempted criminalization of peaceful protests in Nigeria by a governments that is completely intolerant of criticism in a democratic society.

Right of citizens to protest

The fundamental rights of Nigerian citizens to assemble and protest against unpopular policies of governments are guaranteed by Section 39 and 40 of the Constitution as well as Articles 9 and 10 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act, 2004. In the case of the Inspector General of Police v All Nigeria Peoples Party (2008) 22 WRN 65, the Court of Appeal declared police permit for rallies illegal and unconstitutional and directed the National Assembly to amend the Public Order Act to facilitate the enjoyment of the fundamental right to peaceful protests by aggrieved citizens.

While the National Assembly ignored the directive of the Court of Appeal, the police and other security forces intensified the infringement of the right of Nigerians to protest against governments and other public authorities. However, the right to protest by Nigerians was statutorily protected in the 2015 Amendment of the Electoral Act 2010. Furthermore, section 83(4) of the Police Establishment Act 2020 has imposed a duty on the Nigeria Police Force to provide adequate security for protesters during rallies, meetings and protests.

Breach of the right to protest against bad governance

In a brazen violation of the right of Nigerians to assemble and freely voice out their views on bad governance and rising cost of living in the country, the Federal Government and several state governments embarked on a campaign of calumny against the organisers of the August 2024 protests. When the vicious campaign did not achieve its dubious objective, the Federal Government threatened to deal ruthlessly with the organisers of the protest. Out of sheer desperation, the Lagos and Ogun states governments as well as the federal capital territory administration surreptitiously secured ex parte orders to stop the protest.

For having the temerity to participate in the protest, the police and the armed forces shot at many unarmed protesters. At the end of the protest, not less than 22 protesters were killed. Thus, the deliberate refusal of the police to provide adequate security for the protesters and the unwarranted killing of some of the protesters led to the violence that marred the peaceful protests in some states.

However, before the protest was called off, President Bola Tinubu said that the Federal Government had heard the protesters loud and clear and would enter into dialogue with the leaders. Notwithstanding the presidential declaration, the police turned round to commence the prosecution of the over 2,000 protesters that were arrested in several states.

Criminalization of protest

Even though charges were filed against a number of protesters in some state capitals, the Nigeria Police Force decided to arraign 130 protesters including 29 minors on 10 counts, including treason, incitement to mutiny by urging the military to remove President Bola Tinubu and other related charges before the Abuja judicial division of the Federal High Court. Notwithstanding that section 2(4) of the Terrorism Prevention Act 2022 states that a protest, demonstration or stoppage of work is not a terrorist act, the police sought and obtained an ex parte order to detain the suspects for 60 days for the purpose of investigating them for alleged involvement in terrorism.

Alhough the police had secured an order to detain the suspects for 60 days, they were held for 92 days before they were arraigned in the Federal High Court. Among the suspects were 29 children who were malnourished and dehydrated during their arraignment. Owing to hunger and exhaustion in the congested court room, four minor defendants collapsed and they were rushed to a hospital.

Illegal arraignment of children in the Federal High Court

In 2001, Nigeria ratified the United Nations Child’s Rights Convention and enacted the Child’s Rights Act in 2003. We have confirmed that the 36 states of the federation have adopted and enacted the legislation. Thus, under the Child’s Rights Law applicable in each State, child offenders under the age of 18 years cannot be charged in the Federal High Court or State High Court but in the Family Court.

The Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mr. Lateef Fagbemi SAN, was reported to have said that the minors were properly charged before the Federal High Court because the Constitution makes it clear that the Federal High Court has jurisdiction in matters related to treason and related offenses. With respect, the Federal High Court does not have exclusive jurisdiction to try treason and related offences.

Even if there was a reasonable suspicion that the minors committed treason they ought to have been arraigned in a Family Court pursuant to section 149 of the Child's Rights Act. But contrary to the Child's Rights Act applicable in the Federal Capital Territory, the minors were charged with treason at the Federal High Court after they had been detained in the midst of hardened criminal suspects in the anti robbery detention facility in Abuja. Even though they pleaded not guilty to the charge, the arraignment of the minors is illegal in every material particular.

Phoney evidence to prove treason charge

It is trite that under the Penal Code and Criminal Code, treason is committed by anyone who levies war against the state to intimidate the President or a State Governor or who conspires to levy war against the state. The charge of treason filed by the police did not allege that the suspects raised any war or conspired to levy war against the President and State Governors. The main offence allegedly committed by the suspects arrested is that they displayed the Russian flag during the protest. A tailor who was sewing the flag was arrested by the police.

The police Prosecutor ought to have known that it is not a criminal offence to waive a foreign flag in Nigeria. Hence, the flags of the United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany and other European countries are hoisted by the majority of hotels in Nigeria while churches hoist the flag of Israel based on the erroneous belief that it is a Christian country.

Seven Polish students were arrested for taking photographs during the protest. They were going to be charged with espionage to give the impression that the protests were instigated by foreign interest groups. The students have since been released when it was confirmed that they are taking part in an exchange programme at the Bayero University, Kano.

As if such embarrassment was not enough, Comrade Michael Adaramoye was charged with treason because he answers to the sobriquet “Lenin”. Comrades Elejo Opaluwa and Mosiu Abolaji were equally charged with treason for belonging to a socialist organisation that supported the protest. Povey was charged with treason because he sells socialist books in a bookshop at the Secretariat of the Nigerian Labour Congress.

In a total abuse of prosecutorial powers the police had wanted to prove the grave charge of treason evidence with two fire extinguishers, two prepaid meters, 76 Russian flags and the statements of the defendants. During the investigation the police claimed that it had evidence of
the billions of Naira with which a British national, Andrew Wynne (a.k.a. Andrew Povich) had funded the protest. Even though Mr. Whyne was declared wanted and charged for treason in absentia, the proof of evidence does not refer to the billions of Naira allegedly spent by him on the protest.

Trivialisation of treason in Nigeria

It is often forgotten that after the military conquest of Nigeria, the British colonial regime imposed the Criminal Code and Penal Code on the southern and northern protectorates respectively. The offences of treason and treasonable felony were set out in both Codes. But the imperial regime never charged any of the "natives" with treason or treasonable felony for calling for an end to colonialism. Even when the Zikists called for a revolution in the course of a 1948 lecture they were only charged with sedition, tried, convicted and sentenced to three years imprisonment.

But the first civilian regime charged J.S. Tarka and his political lieutenants with treason. They were discharged and acquited. Chief Obafemi Awolowo and his political associates were charged with treasonable felony, convicted and sentenced to various terms of imprisonment. Since then, the country has witnessed a complete trivialisation of treason in the hands of civilian and military wings of the Nigerian ruling class.

The Ibrahim Babangida military junta went to the ridiculous extent of charging five of us with treasonable felony for calling for an end to military rule. Of course, the late Chief Gani Fawehinmi SAN and I, turned the case into the trial of General Babangida and his armed colleagues who had sacked the elected Shehu Shagari administration on December 31, 1983. The junta had no choice but to abandon the frivolous charge.

Babangida's comrade-in-arms, General Sani Abacha, made a complete mockery of the law by charging every imaginary enemy with treason. For declaring himself President on the basis of the June 12, 1993 presidential election won by him, Bashorun M.K.O Abiola was charged with treasonable felony. Shortly thereafter, General Abacha authorised that Senator Ahmed Bola Tinubu (now President and Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces) and 5 other Senators be charged with treasonable felony for demanding the validation of the results of the June 12, 1993 Presidential election. 4 journalists who exposed the 1995 phantom coup were charged with being "accessories after the fact of treason."

Ironically, President Bola Tinubu who had fled the country to escape the death penalty under a murderous dictator has allowed the police to charge protesters including minors with treason for challenging the untold economic hardship arising from the religious implementation of neoliberal economic policies dictated by the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. But for the abrupt termination of the treason charge because of the global condemnation of the trial of child protesters for treason, the regime would have prayed the Federal High Court to convict and sentence 130 Nigerians for exercising their fundamental rights to assemble peacefully and express themselves via the August 2024 protest.

Conclusion

From the foregoing, it is crystal clear that the Federal Government set out to use the case of the 130 protesters to discourage Nigerian people from protesting against the harsh living conditions. Since the plan has since boomeranged the Federal Government should be advised to appreciate that charging protesters with terrorism, treason, treasonable felony and allied offences will not cow Nigerians to submission.

Instead of exposing the country to avoidable shame by charging protesters with a crime punishable by death, the police should be directed to comply with the law by providing adequate security for protesters. That is the only means of ensuring that protests are conducted in a peaceful and civilised manner within the ambit of the law.

The Kano State Judicial Service Commission has relieved two Shariah Court Judges, Yusuf Kawu and Abdulmuminu Nuhu, of their duties for various offences bordering on misuse of office.

Naija News reports a magistrate, Nasir Ado, was also dismissed for alleged misconduct.

The decisions were taken at the 76th meeting of the Commission based on recommendations by the Judiciary Public Complaint Committee (JPCC).

The spokesperson of the Kano State Judiciary, Baba Jibo Ibrahim, who made the developments known in a statement, revealed that two court registrars, Salisu Nayola and Shamsu Abbas, were also ordered to proceed on compulsory retirements.

He said Magistrate Ado was found guilty of conducting a proceeding without record, and when asked, he falsified and tampered with the record to show that there was a record of the proceeding.

Also, Alkali Yusuf used his position to release a convict who was sentenced by another Alkali to 12 calendar months without option of fine in correctional centre.

According to him, “The Judiciary Public Complaint Committee (JPCC) investigated two petitions filed against Magistrate Nasir Ado, where the investigation revealed that the magistrate conducted a proceeding without record, and when asked, he falsified and tampered with the record to show that there was a record of the proceeding. The commission adopted the recommendation of the JPCC that Nasir Ado’s actions of falsifying and tampering with the court’s records constitute an act of gross misconduct, and accordingly, he is recalled from judicial duties.

“Following a complaint filed against Sharia court judge Yusuf Kawu by the Association of Fighting Criminals, it was confirmed that Alkali Yusuf Kawu used his judicial position to release a convict who was sentenced by another Alkali to 12 calendar months without option of fine in correctional centre. The commission found the actions of Alkali to be unlawful and his defence untenable; consequently, he is recalled from judicial functions indefinitely.

“The commission issued a warning to Magistrate Sanusi Usman Atana following two petitions against him, where he was found to have assumed the role of recovery of premises in a criminal trial and, in the second petition, granted bail to a suspect before the date slated for ruling without notifying the prosecution. Accordingly, the commission issued a strong warning to Sanusi Atana to desist from exceeding his jurisdictional limit and avoid circumventing the established principles of fair hearing in handling matters before him.

“The Judicial Service Commission (JSC) has directed the immediate compulsory retirement of Salisu Adamu Nayola, the Finance Registrar of Kiru Sharia Court, after an investigation by the Judiciary Public Complaints Committee (JPCC) following a petition on allegations of bribery. The JPCC received a petition alleging that Adamu Nayola was collecting money from families of deceased persons before processing their inheritance entitlements.

“Upon review, the JPCC found direct evidence of these actions, including Adamu Nayola’s admission to receiving bribes from multiple litigants. It was confirmed upon investigation that Salisu Nayola was in cohort with Alkali Abdulmuminu Nuhu, who was complacent in the acts of collecting bribes by the registrar. The commission adopted the recommendation of the JPCC, and Salisu Nayola, whose actions amounted to a gross violation of his duties as a judiciary staff, has been directed to proceed on compulsory retirement, while Alkali Abdulmuminu Nuhu is recalled from judicial duties for a period of two years to remain under the supervision of the Chief Registrar, Sharia Court of Appeal.

“The Judicial Service Commission (JSC) issued a strong warning to Alkali Abubakar Abdullahi of the Sharia Court, Takai, following an investigation by the Judiciary Public Complaints Committee (JPCC). The JPCC found Alkali Abdullahi to have presided over an estate distribution case located outside his jurisdiction in Sabo Garba Housing Estate, Kabuga, and Dorayi Kwanar Makabarta. The Commission endorsed the JPCC’s recommendation, warning the judge to strictly adhere to his territorial limits and avoid handling cases outside his designated jurisdiction.

“Following the investigation of the JPCC on the petition filed against Shuaibu Bello, a court messenger, who was found to have engaged in an act of corruption by collecting money in excess of the official amount charged for opening a file. The committee also found him to engage in conduct unbecoming of a judiciary staff by being rude and disrespectful to a court user and deceiving the petitioner into signing a letter of withdrawal of the petition. The commission endorsed the recommendation of the committee, issued a strong warning, and further suspended him for four months without pay.

“Sequel to an investigation conducted by the Judiciary Public Complaints Committee (JPCC) into a petition filed against Shamsu Abbas, a court registrar. The investigation revealed the registrar to have assumed an adjudicative role by releasing a suspect on bail without the case being officially assigned to any court, making an order for the suspect to make financial restitution related to the alleged crime, actions that are beyond his scope of duties as a court registrar. The committee found his actions to constitute a flagrant violation of the responsibilities of a court registrar. Considering the JPCC’s recommendations and after extensive deliberation, the Kano State Judicial Service Commission has directed the immediate compulsory retirement of the court registrar, Shamsu Abbas.

“The Judicial Service Commission remains dedicated to ensuring that all judicial personnel perform their duties within the boundaries of the law and with the utmost respect for judicial processes, and the commission will continue to apply the appropriate sanctions against any erring staff, particularly those saddled with judicial responsibilities, to safeguard the integrity and accountability of the judicial system and maintain public confidence,” Ibrahim said.

[NaijaNews]

SCRIPTURES say heaven and earth may pass away but not one jot of the word of God will go without fulfilling the purpose for which it was sent (Matthew 24:25). So also did the Preacher say there is nothing new under the sun (Ecclesiastes 1; 9). What is happening today has happened before and there is nothing new regarding the decision of the electorate in the United States to reject Kamala Harris while electing former President Donald Trump. That decision has biblical antecedents. Read the whole story in the Gospel according to St. Matthew chapter 27: despite the spirited efforts of Pilate to set Jesus Christ free, an innocent man wrongly accused by the Jews, the mob insisted that he be crucified but that Barabbas, whom the bible describes as “a notable prisoner”, a robber known as such to everyone, be set free. All attempts made by Pilate to let them see reason fell on deaf ears. In the end, Barabbas the thief was released while Jesus the innocent man was crucified. Does this sound familiar with the unhappy ending, to many, of the just-concluded United States election? What bricks and mortars did they not throw at Donald Trump, the eventual winner of the election! How many criminal convictions did he not suffer! I do not think there has been any American candidate so hunted, so rend apart as Trump; yet, he came out tops.

It looks like our own 2023 presidential election. Few people thought Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu would surmount the obstacles stacked on his way, first to the party primaries and then to the election proper. His entire life history and political career were turned inside out. What crime was he not accused of? Where did his detractors not contact to seek damaging evidence against him? Exactly, the same thing was suffered by Trump. I think on the weight of probability, the incriminating documents mounted against Trump made a child’s play of those that Tinubu had to contend with. What lessons do we learn from this? If we say a man with the weight of baggage that Tinubu was alleged to carry sailed through because we are a Third World country where democracy and civil education are yet to take firm roots and where corruption is rife, what do we say of the United States of America, the so-called bastion of democracy and civil rights movement? And my mind went back to those polemics during our Philosophy and Political Science classes at the then University of Ife (now Obafemi Awolowo University), Ile-Ife of the distinction/dichotomy between politics and morality, politics and religion, religion and morality, etc. Nicollo Machiavelli is very popular with his statement: the end justifies the means. Politics, as we say here, is a dirty game not suited for bishops and popes! And it is not only in politics that this holds true. Neither is it only political leaders that throw moral scruples to the dogs.

The US election demonstrated quite clearly what we know here: that every politics is local. The issues that determined the winner were local issues. Gone are the days when foreign affairs dominated the politics and elections of the US; now, stomach infrastructure, as we call it here, does! In the US, they call it the economy. Trump campaigned principally on the twin issues of the economy and immigration, both of which dovetailed into each other. The economy was deemed by most Americans to have performed better under the former president’s four-year rule than under Joe Biden/Kamala Harris. It is very instructive to note that the economic downturn that we complain bitterly about here in Nigeria is not limited to us alone. If you have people in the Diaspora, ask them; they will tell you they now spend three or four times more on goods and services than they did four years ago. Where people feel the impact of the government most is their pockets and pot of soup! Trump is deemed to have performed better here than Biden/Harris. Talks by the Democrats about protecting democracy sounds highfalutin to a hungry stomach. It is the living that protects democracy, not the dead.

When an economy begins to bite hard, the first scapegoats are immigrants and Trump made this drum beat louder than any excuse the Democrats could make about protecting fundamental rights. This is not limited to the US alone. It happens all over the place. We have recently seen such backlash against immigrants in Britain and France. Years back, we saw it rear its ugly head against Nigerians and east Africans in South Africa. This is not to forget that when we first had our own economic downturn in the early 1980s during the Shehu Shagari administration, an estimated over two million undocumented migrants were sent packing in what came to be (in)famously called “Ghana Must Go” perhaps because majority of the immigrants so sent packing were Ghanaians. This is a natural phenomenon which everyone involved in the “Japa” syndrome, be it locally and be it across borders, must take into consideration. If you abandon your own territory and run to another person’s, one day you will be asked to leave, regardless of the law and regardless of the number of years you have spent there or of the investments you might have made there. The Yoruba have a saying, to wit, ultimately, the houseboy will leave!

Many are already apprehensive that Trump will come down heavily on immigrants; he said repeatedly during the campaign that he will. He has also said so in his acceptance speech. He said, though, that only illegal immigrants have cause to fear but many people believe every immigrant has cause to worry. White Americans want to take “their” country back. They are alarmed at the rate immigrants are overwhelming their own White population. So, if nothing is done, they will become a minority in their own country and will have nowhere to go. They are both wrong and right! Wrong because they stole the country in the first place from its rightful and original owners and developed it with the sweat and labour of others, especially Africans shipped there as slaves. So, the descendants of those people have a stake in the US. We are also aware that the “Shitholes” that the immigrants are running away from have been made and kept so by the policies, wars and exploitation of successive United States governments. The reparation they have refused to pay to the continents they pillaged is what the peoples of those places are trying to take back in the form of “Japa”. A lesson for us here in Nigeria is that there is no “no man’s land” anywhere. If you pour your population there today, no matter how huge, the owners of the land will always remain the silent majority. The day they stir is the day they will show you the door. The votes of Blacks, Latinos, Jews and others were overwhelmed by those of silent White Americans who keyed into Trump’s battle cry of “Take our Country Back” and “Make America Great Again”!  Harris and the Democrats had no answer to Trump’s battle cry which resonated well with White Americans and those impoverished by Biden’s economic policies.

The war in Ukraine, into which Biden has poured billions of US dollars, must partly account for the Democrats’ failure. So is the war in Gaza. The Democrats’ effort to rally Arabs and Muslims failed spectacularly. It is believed that Trump has a better plan and bigger heart to stop the senseless wars and save the US the billions it is pouring into the war efforts in those two places. The Russia/Ukraine war especially has affected food chain supply across the globe. It is one reason why some food items like wheat and dairy products have become scarce and expensive in a place like Nigeria, for instance. Stomach infrastructure apart, what role did gender and ethnicity play in the results of the election? Trump must be accounted as a giant female-killer! He defeated Hilary Clinton to win his first slot as president and has now defeated another woman to make his come-back. Na only women you fit fight? Male chauvinism is still alive and well in the US while gender equality is still light years away. While they might not have been the dominant factors in the election, they, nonetheless, played a part. Racism is yet to be completely erased from the United States’ day-to-day existence. Combining both minuses – gender and race – did not do Harris any good. The fact that she carried the baggage of Biden – like Tinubu carries Buhari’s – made her case worse. Had Biden heeded calls for him to exit the race earlier and had the Democrats the opportunity to throw their net farther afield in search of a replacement, maybe the outcome of the race would have been different.

We have many lessons to learn from the US election: Stop wasting time on the opponent; sell yourself instead. In the last election here, the other presidential candidates focused all their attention and attack on Tinubu and had little or no time to sell themselves. They failed. In the US, the Democrats did similarly with Trump. They failed. Morality and politics may not be bedmates. Rather than focus undue attention on the baggage of a candidate, focus attention on issues that affect the populace. In Nigeria today, the biting economy is one such issue. Can anyone tell me what the opposition leaders have told us they will do differently if they get into office or if they were the ones there right now? I don’t know of any, other than their saying blandly that they would have acted differently from what Tinubu is doing? How? In what areas? Incessant power outages, weak currency, skyrocketing food and fuel prices are scourges that seem to defy solutions. What are the plans of the opposition and where do they differ from what the government is pursuing? Let them learn from Trump who left no one in doubt concerning what he would do. He clearly outlined his policies regardless of whose ox is gored. Not the kind of unserious politics that we play here with serious issues. You know Trump is coming for you; so, get ready for him. He did not have a word for everyone on everything simply to win an election.

Trump’s second coming will be action-packed on the foreign scene as well. To repair the United States’ damaged economy, he must cut costs on the foreign scene. Europe will not have it easy with him as they will be required to cough out more for their own security. China must sit up as Trump will fight to re-establish America’s hegemony. He will most likely also call the bluff of Israel’s Netanyahu. Ukraine should be imagining what hit it right now: Negotiate with Russia to end the senseless war or carry the can on your own. For African countries, you know what he thinks of you: Trump’s America has no time – and no milk – for whining babies!

Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) has given state governments an ultimatum of December 1, to implement the new minimum wage.

The NLC made this known on Sunday in a communique signed by its President, Mr Joe Ajaero at the end of its National Executive Council (NEC) meeting, held in Port Harcourt, Rivers.

Ajaero, who expressed dissatisfaction over the delay by some states to implement the new wage, said workers in affected states were finding it difficult to sustain themselves given the worsening state of the economy.

“The NEC notes with deep frustration the persistent delay and outright refusal by some state governments to implement the 2024 National Minimum Wage Act.

“This betrayal by certain governors and government officials across the country flies in the face of both legality and morality, as workers continue to be denied their rightful wages amidst rising economic hardship.

“It is a blatant disregard for the law and the lives of millions of Nigerian workers, who are being exploited by the very leaders sworn to protect them.

“The NEC therefore resolved to set up a National Minimum Wage Implementation Committee that will commence a nationwide assessment, mobilisation and campaign to educate citizens on the need to resist this assault on their dignity and rights.

“Furthermore, the NLC shall initiate a series of industrial actions in all non-compliant states and shall not relent until the minimum wage is fully implemented across Nigeria.

“To this end, all state Councils where the National Minimum Wage has not been fully implemented by the last day of Nov., 2024 have been directed to proceed on strike beginning from December 1,” he said.

[NIGERIAN TRIBUNE ]

The recent public apology tendered by Stephen Abuwatseya, an Abuja-based Bolt driver, to Hon. Alex Ikwechegh, the House of Representatives member who allegedly assaulted him, has sparked outrage across social media. Many Nigerians, particularly those who rallied behind the driver, felt betrayed and disappointed. They were quick to express their dismay, with some accusing Abuwatseya of being an ingrate who compromised justice for financial gain. But beyond the fury and resentment that followed this unexpected turn of events, it is essential to pause and reflect on the significance of Abuwatseya’s decision to apologize.

The saga began when Abuwatseya alleged that he was slapped by Hon. Ikwechegh, causing public outrage after social activist Martin Vincent Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan (VDM), brought the issue to light. VDM, along with human rights lawyer DejiAdeyanju, took up the fight for justice. The outcry led to an investigation by the House of Representatives, which summoned Ikwechegh to account for his actions. The lawmaker later tendered a public apology, expressing regret and acknowledging his misconduct.

However, the narrative took an unexpected twist when VDM shared a video revealing that Abuwatseya had apologized to Ikwechegh. According to VDM, an agreement had been reached wherein Ikwechegh’s camp compensated Abuwatseya with ₦5 million and a new car, terms that Abuwatseya allegedly accepted without informing his advocates. This abrupt apology triggered backlash, with social media users labeling the driver as ungrateful and opportunistic.

While it is easy to join the chorus of condemnation against Abuwatseya, it is crucial to consider the context and motivations behind his actions. In an environment where survival is often a day-to-day struggle, many individuals are driven by the need to secure their immediate wellbeing. The reality of poverty in Nigeria cannot be underestimated; it influences decisions that may appear perplexing or even disappointing to those on the outside looking in.

Abuwatseya’s decision to apologize may not necessarily be a sign of betrayal but rather an effort to find closure and move forward. He might have realized that in the grand scheme of things, holding onto bitterness would only perpetuate the cycle of resentment. His willingness to reconcile with Ikwechegh, despite the past incident, demonstrates a rare but necessary quality, letting go for the sake of peace.

We live in an era where social media amplifies conflicts, often making it harder to forgive and forget. In the heat of public outrage, the human element of forgiveness is frequently overlooked. Abuwatseya’s apology, though surprising, might be his way of seeking peace, not only with his assailant but also within himself.

While VDM, Adeyanju, and countless Nigerians poured their energy into seeking justice for Abuwatseya, the driver ultimately chose a different path. It is easy to judge from afar, but the reality is that forgiveness and reconciliation are deeply personal choices. In a world that is becoming increasingly polarized, Abuwatseya’s gesture reminds us that sometimes, stepping back and making peace, even with those who have wronged us, can be a more rewarding outcome.

The harsh reactions from social media users reflect a larger issue, our tendency to judge quickly and harshly without understanding the full picture. Yes, Abuwatseya’s actions may seem disappointing, especially to those who advocated for him. However, rather than demonizing him, it is more constructive to recognize the complexities of his situation.

In our pursuit of justice, we must not lose sight of empathy. Social activism is vital for holding public figures accountable, but it is also essential to respect the choices of those we claim to be helping. After all, no one but Abuwatseya knows the pressures he faced or the factors that led him to accept the compensation and issue an apology.

At the heart of this incident lies a powerful message: the need for forgiveness, understanding, and reconciliation in our society. While Hon. Ikwechegh’s initial actions were wrong and should not be condoned, his apology showed a willingness to admit fault. Likewise, Abuwatseya’s decision to reconcile is a step toward healing a fractured relationship.

Rather than fixating on the perceived betrayal, Nigerians can learn from this episode. The world is already filled with conflict and division; perhaps what we need more of is the courage to forgive, to accept apologies, and to seek common ground.

Let us not forget that the ability to forgive and move on is a virtue that strengthens the social fabric. Abuwatseya’s apology may have shocked many, but it also highlights an essential truth, we all make mistakes, and sometimes, the best course of action is to let go, extend a hand of peace, and move forward.

As Nigerians, we can choose to dwell on our differences, or we can rise above them to build a more harmonious society. The road to unity is paved with understanding and forgiveness, values that both parties in this unfortunate incident have shown, even if in ways we might not fully agree with.

In the end, making peace, however it comes about, should be seen as a victory for all.

In Nigeria’s political landscape, there is no name more associated with a mix of determination, audacity, and sometimes controversy than that of Nyesom Wike. His tenure as the Governor of Rivers State is remembered for his bulldog-like tenacity in implementing his policies, no matter whose ox was gored. Now, in his current role as the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja, he seems to have carried that same energy into the heart of Nigeria’s capital. But while his strong-willed approach to governance has earned him a reputation as a no-nonsense leader, it is crucial to remind him that there is a line between firmness and overzealousness.

Recently, Wike’s decision to demolish the Ruga settlement along Airport Road in Lugbe, Abuja, sparked outrage among residents and activists. Leading the protests, Deji Adeyanju condemned the government’s actions, accusing the FCT task force of heavy-handedness that left thousands homeless and businesses ruined. Despite the cries of the displaced residents, Wike remained resolute, insisting that no amount of protest or blackmail would halt his drive to sanitize the city.

While there is merit in enforcing regulations and addressing security concerns, it is vital to recognize the human cost of such actions. As Wike bulldozes through his ministerial mandate with uncompromising zeal, it would serve him well to remember that power is transient. The seat he occupies today is not forever, and there is a higher power above him who watches over all. There is always a tomorrow, and history has a way of humbling even the mightiest of men.

Wike’s declaration that no protest will stop the demolition exercise reflects a man who is determined to get things done. But as laudable as his intentions might be, there is a danger when a public office holder begins to perceive dissent as an affront to their authority. Governance should never be about showing who is in control or flexing political muscles to prove a point.

By declaring, “No amount of protests would stop demolition,” Wike risks coming off as someone who is disconnected from the realities of those whose lives are affected by his policies. Demolishing settlements and rendering thousands homeless in the blink of an eye is not the mark of a compassionate leader. Even if these structures were illegal, there is a humane approach to implementing urban planning without causing mass suffering.

Wike must remember that these are the same citizens who once hailed him as a hero in Rivers State for his infrastructural strides and tough stance on security. However, in his current role, he is dealing with a diverse and sensitive demographic in Abuja. This city is not just another state capital; it is the heart of Nigeria, home to people from all walks of life, many of whom have struggled for years to eke out a living. Displacing them overnight without adequate resettlement plans is akin to kicking a man who is already down.

Nyesom Wike is not the first Nigerian politician to wield power with a heavy hand, and he certainly won’t be the last. Yet, history is filled with lessons that those in power often forget. The corridors of power are littered with the echoes of past leaders who thought they were invincible until the tides turned.

As Wike bulldozes through policies with the same energy he displayed as Rivers State Governor, he should recall that even his own past battles had their limits. During his time in Rivers, he faced several political challenges, including tussles with the federal government, which nearly cost him his position. If there is one lesson to be learned from that era, it is that power is fleeting. The applauses of today can quickly turn into the jeers of tomorrow.

No matter how strong his grip on Abuja may seem right now, Wike would do well to tread carefully. His overbearing style, if unchecked, could backfire. The people whose homes he demolishes today may not forget his actions when the tables turn. Nigeria’s political history has shown that the pendulum of power swings unpredictably. One moment, a leader is untouchable, and the next, they are at the mercy of those they once scorned.

In the words of the Holy Scriptures, “The Most High is sovereign over the kingdoms of men and gives them to anyone He wishes” (Daniel 4:17). This is a reminder that all power is ultimately derived from a higher source. Wike must remember that his current position is not an entitlement but a privilege given to him by the President, who was elected by the people. And above all, there is a divine authority that supersedes human power.

The minister’s overzealous approach to governance, especially in a sensitive city like Abuja, may win him applauses from those who crave order. However, it is God who ultimately controls the destinies of men. As a public servant, humility should be his watchword. It is important for Wike to understand that true power does not lie in the ability to demolish homes and displace thousands but in the wisdom to balance enforcement with compassion.

Tomorrow is unpredictable, and the political tides can shift in an instant. One day, Wike will no longer be Minister of the FCT. How will he be remembered? As a leader who brought positive change with compassion or as one who left behind a trail of tears and destruction? The choice is his to make, but he must remember that every action taken today is a seed sown for the future.

Good governance is about more than just enforcing rules and regulations; it is about empathy, compassion, and the willingness to listen. The residents of Ruga settlement are human beings with families, livelihoods, and dreams. They are not just statistics in an urban planning agenda. Yes, some settlements may be illegal, but there are humane ways to address these issues that do not involve rendering people homeless overnight.

Wike’s critics are not necessarily against his efforts to improve Abuja, but they are questioning his approach. The minister could take a page from his own playbook in Rivers State, where he combined firmness with dialogue. By meeting the affected residents halfway and providing alternative housing solutions, he can show that he is not just a bulldozer but a leader who genuinely cares about the welfare of the people.

As Wike continues his ministerial duties, it is important for him to remember that leadership is not a sprint but a marathon. The people who suffer today due to his policies may be the same ones whose support he will need tomorrow. A leader who lacks empathy and resorts to heavy-handedness may achieve short-term success, but history has shown that such a strategy often leads to long-term regrets.

Wike must be guided. He should recognize that there is a higher power above him, and one day, he will have to account for how he used the authority given to him. The Nigerian people are watching, and history will judge him not by how many buildings he demolishes but by how many lives he touches positively.

In fact, Wike should not let the euphoria of his newfound ministerial powers becloud his judgment. Let him be reminded that there is a God above, and tomorrow will come. Power is transient, and those who forget this often pay a steep price. Let him rule with compassion, remembering that what goes around comes around.

Nigerian investigative journalist, Fisayo Soyombo, has raised the alarm over an alleged plan to smuggle over 130,000kg of rice into Nigeria from the Benin Republic.

Soyombo, known for his in-depth investigative work, made the disclosure on his X platform (formerly Twitter) on Sunday.

Soyombo specifically accused some officers of the Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) of colluding with smugglers to facilitate the illegal importation of rice on Sunday night. He named Adeyemi Habeeb Abdulganiy, a prominent figure in the smuggling world, as the mastermind behind the smuggling. Abdulganiy, also known as Abuga, is reportedly orchestrating the transportation of the rice in over 2,000 cars, each carrying at least 65 bags of rice.

“Good evening, @CustomsNG. I am aware that your officers have colluded with smugglers to move well over 130,000kg of rice from Benin Republic into Nigeria tonight, Sunday, November 11, 2024,” Soyombo wrote.

He further detailed the smuggling routes, warning that the convoy of vehicles would enter Nigeria through various points, including Sango, Ifo, and the Oju-Ore-Ota route. Some of the cars were expected to drive against traffic at the toll gate near Sango, posing a risk to road users.

“Road users in Sango can expect traffic congestion early tomorrow morning unless this post prompts an about-face from the actors,” Soyombo warned.

He also alleged that soldiers from the 192 Battalion in Owode would be patrolling during the operation to prevent any resistance.

In a sharp rebuke to the Nigeria Customs Service, Soyombo suggested that the public would be skeptical of any future claims of seizures made by the authorities.

“@CustomsNG, just so you know, the people are watching; they will be hysterically laughing at you when you announce ‘seizure of one million bags of rice and 25 cartons of guns’ later this week,” he concluded.

The revelation has attracted public attention, with many awaiting a response from the Nigeria Customs Service and other security agencies regarding the alleged smuggling operation.

[Leadership]

Barring any unforeseen circumstance, the late Chief of Army Staff (COAS), Lt. General Taoreed Lagbaja, would be buried in Abuja on Friday.

His immediate elder brother, Moshood Lagbaja, disclosed this in Osogbo, Osun State during a condolence visit by St Charles Grammar School Osogbo Old Boys Association (SCOBA).

He said the military could not release his remains to the family, but assured them he would be given a befitting burial in Abuja on Friday.

The delegation presented a condolence letter signed by Global President of the association, Tade Adekunle and and General Secretary, Leye Odetoyinbo, to the family.

Speaking on behalf of SCOBA during the condolence visit, the leader of the delegation, who is also the 1st Vice President, Engineer Adesina Salami, described late Lagbaja as an exceptional individual, a proud Charlean, and a distinguished military leader who served the nation with unwavering dedication.

Salami said, “We mourn the loss of an exceptional individual, a proud Charlean, and a distinguished military leader who served our nation with unwavering dedication. Lt. Gen. Lagbaja’s remarkable life, selfless service, and enduring legacy inspire us.

“He made an inspiring and unforgettable impact on the Charlean Family Worldwide during his glorious lifetime.

“May the comforting presence of Almighty God surround you during this difficult time. May His peace, love, and strength sustain you as you navigate the darkness of grief.

“We pray that the cherished memories of Lt. Gen. Lagbaja’s love, wisdom, and accomplishments bring solace to your hearts and may his exemplary life continue to inspire generations to come.”

[DailyTrust]