The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Enugu State Chapter, has said there would be no justification if Governor Peter Mbah joins the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).

PDP has, in recent times, lost some of its elected candidates to the ruling APC. Governor Sheriff Oborevwori and former Governor Ifeanyi Okowa, along with their structures, joined the APC recently.

Akwa Ibom State Governor Umo Eno, in an event last two weeks, drummed support for President Bola Tinubu’s second term. Reports have claimed that Governor Eno and Governor Mbah may also join the APC.

In an interview with Naija News on Sunday, Enugu PDP spokesman, Chief Uchenna Ubute, said defection would be of no benefit to Mbah.

While noting that personal reasons could influence defection, he said APC would not be of any benefit to the Governor.

“You said it is a rumour. As far as I know, political party is a platform. Maybe on personal reasons, somebody might decide to defect.

“The Governor is not defecting to any other political party. The Governor is the leader of PDP in the South East. Enugu is the only state standing for PDP in South East and Governor is the leader.

“What would Governor benefit from detecting to APC? The Governor of Enugu State, Peter Mbah, campaigned to the people of Enugu State.

“Peter Mbah is not only the leader of PDP in Enugu state he is leader of PDP in South East zone. What’s defection going to do for him? Is it defection that’s going to make people of Enugu vote for him? Or is it his good work that will make people of Enugu vote for him? Ubute said.

According to him, Enugu State has no opposition because the Governor has been performing.

“The government of Enugu state, led by Peter Mbah, is doing very well not only for the PDP but to other political parties. In Enugu State, we don’t have opposition now,” he stated.

PDP Is A Big Party, Has No Need For Coalition

Chief Ubute also faulted the call for a merger between PDP and other parties. He stressed that PDP has structures across the 36 states. He questioned how the merger would help the main opposition.

Enugu PDP spokesman further stated that Oborevwori, Okowa’s defection, and Eno’s statement did not void the stand of the PDP Governors Forum in Ibadan, Oyo State, on coalition.

“PDP has categorically made it clear that the party is not going to merge with any other political party.

“Governors are leaders of the party in their states. Governors that defected or made one or two comments, all those things are their personal issues and part of their fundamental rights. 

“But Governors Forum that brought together PDP governors , in that forum, we made a decision that we are not ready to merge with any political party. 

“If you recall, former Governor of Delta, Okowa, PDP vice presidential candidate, has been on EFCC, and as that supported somebody to be governor, the Governor (Oborevwori) may have defected to reduce attacks.

“PDP is big party. They have formidable structures in the 36 states of the federation. All those parties they’re merging with, what structure do they have, what benefit will they bring to the party. PDP is the biggest opposition in this country,” he stated.

Nigerians Should Decide Tinubu’s Fate In 2027

Ubute said Nigerians would have to decide if President Bola Tinubu should be re-elected for a second tenure.

He stressed that the role of the PDP as the main opposition party did not matter much. According to him, the Constitution empowered Nigerians to make a choice and not any institution.

“We are in democracy and we’re Nigerians. The Constitution has empowered Nigerians to make a choice on who governs them. People holding positions they have one voter’s card on the election day. 

“So Nigerians have to think before voting. If the federal government is doing well and what they’re doing is okay for them, then they should go and re-elect the president. They have the constitutional mandate to make that choice. The choice is on the people. Who to elect come 2027 is on the people, not on any institution. The people should make a choice, right choice,” he advised.

Senator Okey Ezea Lied

Naija News reported that Enugu North Senator, Okey Ezea, in a town hall meeting with the people of Uzo-Uwani, said Enugu PDP government, including Mbah, has no intention to protect the people of the area from insecurity caused by herdsmen.

According to Ezea, former Governor Ifeanyi Uguwanyi of the PDP also failed to address herdsmen attacks in his administration.

Reacting, Ubute said Ezea preferred to lie because of politics.

“It was the same Okey Ezea that said politics is do or die game. Okey Ezea is just an opposition Senator. Whether the government is doing well or not doing well he will continue to attack the government. Those things are unfounded. They’re lies. It’s his right to say these things,” he added.

[NaijaNews]

A legislative lawyer, Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja, has asked the House of Representatives Ad-hoc Committee on Oversight of the State of Emergency in Rivers State to question the Sole Administrator, Ibok-Ete Ibas, over ‘unconstitutional’ steps he has been taking in executing the emergency rule proclamation in the state.

DAILY POST reports that Ibas, on 25th April 2025, honoured the invitation of the House committee but pleaded for more time to properly brief the lawmakers on the situation in Rivers.

The meeting was summoned in line with the House of Representatives resolve to take over legislative duties in Rivers, following the suspension of the State Assembly for the six months period of the emergency rule. The governor, Sim Fubara, and his deputy were also suspended for the duration of the state of emergency.

In an open letter addressed to Professor Jake Dan-Azumi, Head of Secretariat of the Reps Ad-hoc Committee on Rivers, Jaja, a legislative drafting expert, highlighted unconstitutional actions taken by Ibas in administering Rivers State, over which he said the lawmakers should demand answers from the sole administrator.

The letter dated 28th April 2025, it titled ‘Open Letter to Prof. Jake Dan-Azumi, Head of Secretariat of the Ad-hoc Committee of the HoR on Oversight of the State of Emergency in Rivers State – (Questions That The Sole Administrator Must Answer Regarding Dissolution of the Rivers State Judicial Service Commission, Appointment of LGA Sole Administrators and Exercise of Core Legislative Functions by the Sole Administrator)’.

Jaja, Director of the Centre for Legal, Parliamentary and Printing Consult (PTY) Limited (CLPPC), noted that the sole administrator of Rivers State, being a creation of a legislation of the National Assembly – namely the Proclamation State of Emergency (Rivers State) 2025 – is subject to the oversight of the National Assembly.

The letter added, “There are many issues that your Committee ought to provide clarification when you finally get the chance to hold the meeting with the Sole Administrator of Rivers. Let me point out some as follows:

“The Proclamation of a State of Emergency in Rivers State does not imply that the legislature and the will of the people was removed and replaced by a military styled dictatorship. It appears that the Sole Administrator of Rivers State and his legal advisers are of the opinion that the legislation that Proclaimed a State of Emergency in Rivers State gave him the powers to perform legislative functions.This wrong impression is far from the truth, Section 3 of the said legislation specifically stated that the only form of legislation to be enacted is Regulations, and Regulations are a form of subsidiary legislation that are made pursuant to a primary legislation (which in this case is the Proclamation of State of Emergency in Rivers State, 2025 as enacted by the National Assembly pursuant to Section 305 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999).

“Even the said Regulations which the Sole Administrator is authorised to enact are subject to the prior approval of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as specified under the Proclamation of State of Emergency in Rivers State, 2025.

“The judgment of the 28th February 2025 of the Supreme Court of Nigeria was specific in stating that it is never in the contemplation of the Nigerian Constitution that a military dictatorship (or in this instance, a Sole Administrator
of Rivers State) would replace and over-ride governance by the people through their representatives as constituted by a legislature. It is true that the said legislation suspended the entire members of the Rivers State House of Assembly, however, it did not suspend the representatives of the people of Rivers State at the National Assembly.

“Therefore, as representatives of the people of Rivers State, the Ad-hoc Committee on Oversight of Rivers State is humbly appealed to question whether there was any input of Rivers State people or their representatives regarding the Sole Administrator of Rivers State when he appointed 23 Local Government Area (LGAs) Sole Administrators for the 23 LGAs Councils of Rivers State and other actions involving appropriation of funds of the Rivers State government bearing in mind that by its judgment of July 2024, the Supreme Court of Nigeria has laid down a rule of law that it is illegal for LGAs in Nigeria tobe administered by non-elected officials and it is also illegal to allocate funds to any such LGAs that are administered by non-elected officials.”

The lawyer equally said the lawmakers should ask the sole administrator where he derived the power to unilaterally dissolve the Rivers State Judicial Service Commission and other similar statutory agencies such as the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC), without the approval of any legislature.

“Assuming the Sole Administrator of Rivers State is to argue that he derived the power pursuant to Section 3 of the Proclamation legislation, the said Proclamation legislation only empowers the Sole Administrator to enact Regulations which are a form of subsidiary legislation. And there is no way on earth that a subsidiary legislation can be enacted to nullify or amend the wordings of a primary legislation such as the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission Law, No 2 of 2018.

“There are many other questions that the Ad-hoc Committee on Oversight of theState of Emergency in Rivers State ought to ask the Sole Administrator such as where he received legislative approval for appointment of a Secretary to the Rivers State Government and other officials who are to receive appropriation from the funds of Rivers State whereas the constitution of Nigeria is clear that only funds appropriated and approved by the legislature can be expended,” the letter added.

Jaja stressed that the duty of the Ad-hoc Committee is essential to confirm that the Proclamation legislation has been complied with, to prevent autocratic conduct by the sole administrator.

[DailyPost]

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has congratulated Remo Stars Football Club on their historic victory in the 2024–2025 Nigerian Premier Football League (NPFL) season, describing the achievement as a proud moment for Ikenne, Ogun State, and Nigerian football as a whole.

In a statement issued on Monday by his Special Adviser on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, President Tinubu praised the club’s remarkable ascent to the pinnacle of Nigerian football just four years after gaining promotion to the elite league.

The President lauded the players, coaching crew, and management for their hard work, discipline, and unyielding spirit, emphasising that their journey to the title, after three previous close finishes, reflects resilience and perseverance at its finest.

“Your courage in the face of repeated challenges should serve as a powerful inspiration to clubs across Nigeria. Your success reinforces the values of tenacity, optimism, and dedication in the pursuit of excellence”, the President said.

President Tinubu also commended the vision and commitment of Remo Stars’ owner and chairman, Mr. Kunle Soname, whose investments in grassroots football, notably the construction of a state-of-the-art stadium in Ikenne, have provided a strong foundation for sporting development in Nigeria.

As newly crowned national champions, Remo Stars will represent Nigeria in the CAF Champions League.

The president urged the team to carry the same fighting spirit and focus to the continental stage, expressing confidence that they can bring further honours to the nation.

He also called on football fans across the country to rally behind Remo Stars as they embark on their continental campaign, noting that the team’s success is a source of pride for all Nigerians.

[TheNation]

Russian President Vladimir Putin has ordered a surprise three-day ceasefire from May 8-10, coinciding with Moscow’s World War II Victory Day commemorations, the Kremlin said Monday.

Moscow said it expected Kyiv to issue a similar order, and that it stood ready to respond to any violations of the possible halt in fighting.

Putin made a similar order to stop combat over Easter — a truce that both sides accused the other of violating hundreds of times but did lead to a temporary reduction in fighting.

“The Russian side is declaring a ceasefire during the 80th anniversary of Victory Day, from midnight on May 7-8 to midnight on May 10-11. All combat operations will be suspended during this period,” the Kremlin said in a statement.

“Russia believes that the Ukrainian side should follow this example. In the event of violations of the truce by the Ukrainian side, the Russian armed forces will give an adequate and effective response,” it added.

Putin last month rejected a US proposal for a full and unconditional 30-day ceasefire that had been accepted by Ukraine.

Kyiv and its European backers accused Putin of announcing the 30-hour Easter truce as a PR exercise and said he had little desire for peace.

Since launching its Ukraine offensive in February 2022, Russia has seized large parts of four Ukrainian regions and claimed them as its own, in addition to Crimea, which it annexed in 2014.

– ‘Tapping me along’ –

Putin’s order of a ceasefire comes at the beginning of what the United States indicated would be a crucial week for the chances of a ceasefire that could determine how long Washington keeps trying to broker a deal.

After a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at Pope Francis’s funeral on Saturday, Donald Trump questioned whether the Russian leader was serious about peace.

“There was no reason for Putin to be shooting missiles into civilian areas, cities and towns, over the last few days. It makes me think that maybe he doesn’t want to stop the war, he’s just tapping me along,” Trump had said on Truth Social.

Russian missiles have killed dozens of civilians over the last month in large-scale strikes on Zelensky’s home city of Kryvyi Rig, the northeastern city of Sumy, and the capital Kyiv.

Russia had earlier on Monday said it was ready to negotiate directly with Ukraine, but that recognition of its claims over five Ukrainian regions including Crimea were “imperative” to resolving the conflict.

Ukraine has denounced the annexations as an illegal land grab and says it will never recognise them, while European officials have warned that accepting Moscow’s demands set a dangerous precedent that could lead to future Russian aggression.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said in an interview with Brazilian newspaper O Globo published Monday that “we remain open to negotiations.”

“But the ball is not in our court. So far, Kyiv has not demonstrated its ability to negotiate,” he said, adding Moscow’s position on the conflict was “well-known”.

“International recognition of Russia’s ownership of Crimea, Sevastopol, the Donetsk People’s Republic, the Lugansk People’s Republic, the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions is imperative,” he said, using the Kremlin’s names for the Ukrainian regions.

Zelensky said last Friday that Ukraine would “not legally recognise any temporarily occupied territories”, and has previously called the demilitarisation demand “incomprehensible”.

– Kursk retaken –

Trump, who boasted before his inauguration he could halt Russia’s assault on Ukraine within “24 hours”, launched a diplomatic offensive to stop the fighting after taking office in January.

But the White House has voiced frustration with both sides, as the conflict that has devastated swathes of eastern Ukraine and killed tens of thousands of people drags on.

Russia and Ukraine have not held direct talks on the fighting since the start of Moscow’s offensive in 2022.

Early Monday, a Russian attack on a Ukrainian village near the frontline city of Pokrovsk killed a married couple and another local resident, regional prosecutors said.

Meanwhile, Russia over the weekend announced it had taken full control of its Kursk region with the help of North Korean troops, more than eight months after Kyiv launched a cross-border ground assault.

Putin thanked North Korean leader Kim Jong Un on Monday for help with the operation, which has denied Kyiv a key bargaining chip in future talks with Moscow.

The Russian army said Monday it had taken control of the village of Kamianka in the northeastern Kharkiv region, in its latest battlefield advance.

AFP

Justice Nwosu-Iheme of a FCT High Court Wuse Zone 2 in Abuja on Monday sentenced the husband of late gospel singer, Osinachi, Peter Nwachukwu, to death by hanging.

Nwachukwu was found guilty of culpable homicide resulting in the death of the deceased ( his wife) on April 8, 2022.

The judge held that the prosecution had proven the burden of proof placed on it by the law and subsequently found the defendant guilty.

Nwachukwu was arraigned on June 3, 2022 by the Office of Attorney-General of the Federation (OAGF), on behalf of the Federal Government, on a 23-count charge .

The charge was on culpable homicide punishable with death, criminal intimidation, cruelty to children, criminal intimidation of children, spousal battery, among others.

In the course of trial, the prosecution called 17 witnesses, including two children of the late Osinachi, who testified as fourth prosecution and fifth prosecution witnesses, PW4 and PW5 respectively.

The prosecution also tendered 25 documents as exhibits before the court.

The defendant testified for the defence and further called four other witnesses and tendered four exhibits in his defence.

Shortly before sentencing, the defendant, counsel , Reginald Nwali, in his allocutus pleaded with the court to be lenient in its judgment.

Similarly, the prosecution counsel, Mrs Aderonke Imala, urged the court to give force to the law as stipulated.

Justice Nwosu-Iheme subsequently sentenced Nwachukwu to death by hanging on Count 1, while he was sentenced to two years imprisonment each on Counts 2, 3, 8,9, 12, 13, and 18.

The court sentenced the defendant to six months imprisonment on Count 10, three years imrisonment in Count 11, while he was fined the sum of N500,000 and N200,000 respectively on Counts 6 and 7 respectively.

(NAN)

Nasir Idris, governor of Kebbi, says he remains committed to the All Progressives Congress (APC) and has no plans to defect.

A viral message had claimed that Idris and four other APC governors were finalising plans to defect to the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) before the 2027 elections.

This follows growing coalition talks among opposition politicians seeking to wrest power from the ruling APC.

Former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar has been at the forefront of “strategic meetings” around the proposed coalition.

In a statement on Sunday, Ahmed Idris, the governor’s spokesperson, described the report linking his principal and four other governors to a new political alliance as “ridiculously malicious”.

The spokesperson dismissed the claim as “a huge joke” crafted by “the most uninteresting political comedians”.

“His Excellency would have chosen to ignore the report as a dance of mad fellows dancing naked in the marketplace, but for the avoidance of doubt, Governor Idris wishes to state categorically that he is not a political prostitute,” the statement reads.

“This report is not only false, but it is a huge joke cracked by the most uninteresting political comedians.

“He is made in APC by APC and for APC. He will be the last person to leave his reliable and formidable party for any coalition, no matter who the architects and builders are.

“Comrade Nasir Idris is a leader who loves his people. The people of Kebbi State love him with a passion and beyond comment.

“The people of Kebbi state are completely in APC, and he can therefore not afford to abandon his people and embrace strangers.

“According to the KAURAN GWANDU, “I’m completely focused on making Kebbi State better and consolidating the gains and successes of our party and our leader, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

“If they tell you again that Kaura is likely to leave his APC, tell them I will be the last man standing.”

The governor added that his administration remains committed to the welfare of the people and to the continued growth of the state under the APC.

[TheCable]

Before 2015, Muhammadu Buhari had already attained near-mythical status in northern Nigeria. His name was a household one, his presence commanding spontaneous crowds wherever he went. Unlike the orchestrated gatherings of today, pre-APC Buhari rallies were largely organic — a stark contrast to the “crowd-renting” culture now thriving in the harsh realities of hunger and desperation. The hunger has created an entire ecosystem where crowds are hired for pittances, their purpose often forgotten mid-chant. But let’s move past that: “Ebi kii wo inu, ki oro mi wo” — when hunger bites, reason flees. “The crowd industry” is topic for another day.

The much-cited “12 million votes” that followed Buhari is no myth. In 2003, he secured 32% of the national votes against a sitting President, Olusegun Obasanjo. He replicated similar figures three times, each time consistently delivering over 12 million votes, except in 2007 when another northerner, Umaru Musa Yar’Adua, momentarily dampened his dominance. Yet even against fellow northerners like Atiku Abubakar, Buhari’s pull remained formidable.

In 2015, Buhari commanded an unwavering core northern loyalty, backed by a voter population exceeding 30 million. His support base displayed a cult-like devotion — fierce, unexplainable, and at times, almost desperate for affirmation.

To many, Buhari embodies the ideal northern Muslim leader — an image crafted around perceived virtues of integrity, simplicity, and frugality, resonating strongly with the large poor population. His portrayal as incorruptible finds its roots in 2001 when Buhari openly championed the adoption of Sharia law across northern states. After President Obasanjo made remarks hinting at a possible halt to Sharia implementation, Buhari countered boldly, declaring that Sharia would “sweep across the country”. That stance, controversial as it was, boosted his reputation among northern faithful and later became a campaign liability in 2015 — one he overcame spectacularly, losing only three northern states.

Curiously, many analysts argue that Buhari himself is not a deeply religious individual and that his presidency showed little sign of any intent to “Islamise” Nigeria. His 2001 pronouncements were likely astute political moves, calculated to anchor his political fortunes in the conservative North. Regardless, his popularity has not waned. After eight years in office, he returned to Katsina State to a hero’s welcome, and more recently, was similarly celebrated in Kaduna — the place he fondly calls home.

In Working with Buhari, Femi Adesina, the president’s spokesman, recounts in Chapter 4 (“The Wailing Wailers”) how Buhari’s popularity in the north endured despite harsh criticisms and oppositions. Large crowds continued to welcome him enthusiastically during visits — a testament to his resilient support base.

Similarly, the seasoned journalist, Farooq Kperogi, put it succinctly: “Given the oversized influence of Islamic clerics in shaping public opinion in Muslim Northern Nigeria, no amount of logic, evidence-based reasoning, economic hardship, etc., will make the littlest dent on Buhari’s popularity in the Muslim North.”

Buhari’s silence, often criticised elsewhere, remains a language well understood by his northern followers.

In the 2023 elections, he was accused of not vigorously supporting his party’s candidate, Bola Tinubu. Though Buhari made a symbolic display by flashing his voter’s slip after casting his ballot for the APC, the damage had been done. Tinubu lost several strongholds, and whispers persist that Buhari subtly leaned toward Atiku during the election.

Yet Atiku is hardly Buhari. For all his attempts, Atiku remains an impostor in the quest for the northern crown. Winning national elections in Nigeria demands strategic galvanising — something Atiku has never mastered. Unlike Buhari, who inspired a mass movement, Atiku’s political fortunes lean heavily on deep pockets rather than organic followership.

In 2015, it was Tinubu and his ACN-led coalition that provided Buhari the national machinery to convert his 12 million cult following into presidential victory. In 2023, it was Nasir el-Rufai in the north and Nyesom Wike with his G5 friends in the south that oiled Tinubu’s path to Aso Rock.

Atiku’s weakness remains glaring: he has neither invested in people nor built structures. A political nomad at heart, he has no crop of protégés who can swear by him. His restlessness — hopping from one party to another — has made it difficult to birth genuine loyalty. Even the likes of Kwankwaso and Zulum stand taller today among the northern political elite.

However, as long as Nigeria’s electorate remains intentionally impoverished, the currency of election-day handouts will continue to purchase loyalty — albeit temporarily. Poverty remains the most potent voter mobiliser in our polity.

One wonders if the recent flurry of political visits to Kaduna — with Atiku among them — signals a growing acknowledgment of who still holds the North’s heart. Is the kingmaker role being courted again?

Buhari has been vilified, even by members of his own party, who accuse him of presiding over Nigeria’s worst economic decline. The numbers are unforgiving: Nigeria’s GDP shrank from nearly $600 billion in 2014 (pre-Buhari) to around $360 billion by 2023.

Critics are right — Buhari did not deliver on his economic promises. The naira weakened disastrously, and rather than creating jobs, his administration presided over record job losses. His heavy use of “ways and means” borrowing left a debt burden that future generations will carry.

Yet, despite his monumental failures, Buhari’s mystique in the north remains untouched. He has publicly declined invitations to support any political coalition, maintaining a surface-level loyalty to Tinubu. His careful aloofness signals a quiet acknowledgment of the old alliance — but it is his personal bond with the North that still speaks the loudest.

Karl Marx famously said that “history repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce.”

In Buhari’s case, however, history appears stubbornly stuck in its first act. Despite criticisms, economic hardship, and unmet expectations, northern Nigeria’s affection for Buhari remains remarkably undiluted. As 2027 approaches, it is not a farcical imitation of past glories that inspires the region, but a genuine, almost nostalgic yearning for the man they still see as their champion. In a political landscape quick to discard old heroes, Buhari’s bond with the north defies Marx’s cynical progression — refusing to slip into farce.

As 2027 draws nearer, Buhari’s posture — whether active or silent — will matter. His perceived leanings could shape alliances, tilt balances, and ultimately decide who emerges victorious. Despite Tinubu’s tireless efforts to consolidate the south, he needs no reminder that no politician becomes President of Nigeria by losing the North by a wide margin.

And that is exactly where Buhari steps back into the centre of the story.

Who is visiting Buhari next? Goodluck Jonathan? Or PO himself?

At this point, Nigerian politicians have lost their ability to surprise me.