Admin

Admin

Never in my life did I envisage getting into the forefront of partisan politics. Not in the current Nigerian political reality. Little did I contemplate the untoward verbal irony whereby someone does the direct opposite of what he swore not to do (impulsively for the greater good).
A typical example of this is seen in the gospel of St. John 7:8–10, where the Lord told his disciples that He will not go up to Jerusalem for the Jewish feast of the tabernacle, but afterwards, he found himself attending the same event albeit secretly.
 
I have been one of the fierce critics of sociopolitical actors who manifestly kept Nigeria in a perpetual underdeveloped status, but I dreaded getting involved in the "game" for fear that a tiny drop of water into an ocean makes no difference. But as discomforting as public affairs analysis is, I had elected to persist in it. Who then will bell the cat if people don't join the game to change it from within?
 
2023 and the irresistible need to salvage the seemingly irredeemable Nigeria saw me pushing for good governance through my keypad. I made heavy literary investment in the Obidient movement, that one of my extended elder brothers — veteran Journalist and Columnist, Ike Abonyi had to connect me with Peter Obi via his phone number for a closer relationship. The blue app of Mark Zuckerberg — Facebook censored me multiple times for this cause. I accepted it as a validation emblem that I am on a good cause. We could not attain the major aim of the Obidient movement because of the double tragedy of a biased electoral umpire and broad daylight miscarriage of justice; but we were satisfied with the good work we put in. Moral theology rightly teaches that "the end doesn't always justify the end."
 
To His Imperial Majesty, Emperor Haile Selassie I: "The reward for the job well done is not in the recognition of others, nor in public praise. Neither is it measured solely by the monetary return earned by the workman. It comes rather, in the inner satisfaction that accompanies the knowledge that the work accomplished represents the best of which we are capable."
 
The shock of "Obi is coming..." that didn't materialize weakened the very sinews of many objective writers and critics. Congenital writers like Ezugwu Okike Esq almost lost appetite for the use of pen. All of us went into inadvertent sabbatical. However, with attenuated zeal, I managed to continue authoring my weekly column. "Nigeria doesn't deserve the enthusiasm we expend on daily basis churning out exhortations in tabloids" I said in my mind.
 
It was in this valley of despair that I was, refusing to sing the Lord's song in a "strange" land (Ps. 137:1-4), when my State Governor, His Excellency, Governor Peter Ndubuisi Mbah made one of the landmark appointments of his administration. He went to the exalted altar of innovation where competency is the chief priest, to appoint a veteran Broadcaster and my friend of over 23 years — Aka Eze Aka as Honourable Commissioner for Information and Communication. My spirit got enlivened. Immediately, I enlisted as part of his backroom technical team. The job description was simple: elucidate on State Government policies, especially the ones misconstrued or misinterpreted by the public, such as the ongoing reclamation of displaced motor parks across the State.
Aka knew that I could go to any length to support his office to achieve set objectives. The easiest job on earth is to serve an honest gentleman.
 
While I work remotely for him, I was primed for a grassroot project for another good guy, my friend and ally — Hon. Onyekachi C. Ugwu (Ahmed), whose time was long overdue to bring his ambition to lead my Local Government Area to the path of integral development as her Executive Chairman to bear. Together with Aka, we formed a three-sided polygon to engender good governance for our Community. While we were on it, the dice fell on Aka, to fly the flag of the ruling party for the Chairmanship position. Immediately this news was confirmed, Aka naturally called to inform me. Ahmed handed me a list of names selected to  work with me in the Media office, with a specific instruction: "we are emptying the lofty plans we had for the office into Aka's manifesto. He will deliver on the mandate of our people"
 
This Media Team which is now arguably the most popular arm of the Aka Eze Aka Campaign Council was inaugurated a month ago to function independently, (but synergically) with the Campaign Council which came alive two weeks later.
Since I assumed office as the Director General of Aka Eze Aka Media Team, my life never remained the same. Aka (like my Boss — High Chief Anterus C. Eze) doesn't take "No" for an answer, therefore I was stretched at both extremes to deliver on the terms of reference along with my other team members. All his public statements, media engagements, as well as his interaction with the everyday people of Udenu were pruned and analyzed prospectively and retrospectively on our desk.
 
I, "who," in the apt words of Dr. Osmond Agbo was merely "moonlighting in journalism," found myself advising a media Giant, a professional broadcaster like Aka on the art of sociopolitical media engagement. The same I, who, dreaded being in the foray of political corporeality have inevitably been throwing myself in front of cameras, promoting Aka's candidature, answering questions from Journalists and assuaging his good governance agenda further down the tiniest strata of Udenu citizenry.
 
But then, who wouldn't like to work for Aka Eze Aka? Remember my earlier submission above: "the noblest job is to work for an honest gentleman" — a man loved by his people. You don't break sweat selling his personality. You can never run out of content writing promotional materials about him.
 
As the Campaign climaxes on ceases today, 24 hours to the September 21 polls, I am reflecting on how far I have ran down the lane of political image-making, and I felt like everything is possible, once common interests are sought after, and the right man is projected.
 
In summary, the release of timetable for the 2024 Local Council elections by Enugu State Independent Electoral Commission (ENSIEC) set the stage for political dancehall artists. The month-long amphitheatre performance by different dramatis personae saw Aka Eze Aka got the highest ovation. Even the opposition has resigned to fate, as a chunk of their supporters collapsed their structures in favour of Aka, seeing him as a unity (consensus) candidate.
 
I will stop here till after the election. 
May daylight spare us.
 
✍️Jude Eze.
(To be continued...)

 

In 2021, Mrs. Maria Igbinedion, the 85-year-old mother of former Edo State governor Chief Lucky Igbinedion, was tragically murdered by her domestic worker, Dominion Okoro. The sorrow is deepened by the fact that her murder was driven by the desire to steal her jewelry and other cherished items, gifts from her children.

This shocking event sent ripples through Nigerian society, exposing the risks that domestic workers can pose to families. It emphasizes the need for thorough vetting and continuous monitoring of domestic staff, as well as addressing any issues in the employer-employee dynamic.

Before the tragic death of Mrs. Igbinedion, which left her family—her children Bright, Michael, and others—grieving the premature loss of their mother at the hands of a worker driven by greed and malice, similar cases of domestic workers murdering their employers had occurred in Nigeria.

In 2015, Nigerian businessman Oyibo Amachree was brutally murdered by his driver and domestic worker. In 2016, 78-year-old Chief Mrs. Olusola Olubunmi was killed by her domestic worker, and in 2018, Lagos businessman Mr. Tunde Sunmonu met the same fate.

One of the most horrifying recent cases was the murder of Dr. Aribemchukwu Ajumogobia, the daughter of Justice Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia. On July 31, 2024, Dr. Ajumogobia was found dead outside their Parkview, Lagos residence. Following an investigation, a 21-year-old housemaid, Abigail Peter, a 35-year-old driver, Olatunji Oluwasegun, and a 45-year-old security guard, Umaru Mamman, admitted to killing her. They revealed that they had gagged and stabbed her in the neck, intending to steal cash and valuables.

It is heartbreaking that the stolen items were likely of little value, yet a promising young doctor in her early thirties lost her life due to the greed of domestic workers who conspired to carry out such a heinous act.

The disturbing rise in violent crimes committed by domestic staff against their employers is not unique to Nigeria. In fact, a quick online search shows that such crimes are prevalent across the African continent and even on a global scale.

Here are a few examples of such murders in Africa: In 2019, a 79-year-old woman in South Africa was killed by her domestic worker. In 2018, a couple in Kenya was murdered by their domestic worker, and in Uganda in 2017, a 60-year-old woman faced a similar fate at the hands of her domestic worker.

Globally, this trend can be seen in other countries as well. In 2019, a 61-year-old woman in France was murdered by her domestic worker. In India, a 70-year-old woman was killed by her domestic worker in 2018. In the United States, a 65-year-old woman was murdered by her caregiver in 2019.

The question remains: what drives domestic workers to murder their employers? Several factors have been identified, including greed fueled by financial struggles, stress from work, mental health issues, personal grudges, and social and economic inequality. Other contributing factors include poor working conditions, mistreatment by employers, low wages, exploitation, and the absence of proper background checks for domestic workers.

Given these statistics and factors, the troubling trend of domestic workers killing or poisoning their employers, who are essentially their benefactors, is becoming a global problem. In Nigeria, it is quickly becoming a national crisis, nearing epidemic proportions. Recently, news broke about Ronke, the wife of David Edevbie, a former Delta State finance commissioner and 2023 gubernatorial candidate, narrowly escaping a deadly plot by her domestic staff, who had laced her breakfast with a sleep-inducing drug.

Thankfully, she locked herself in her section of their Parkview Estate, Ikoyi home before succumbing to the drug's effects. Had she not done so, she might have been another victim of domestic worker violence, which has been growing alarmingly. The timing of her escape is particularly chilling, as it occurred just one month after the tragic murder of Justice Ajumogobia’s daughter, also in Parkview Estate, Ikoyi, Lagos.

There are numerous similar incidents across the country that have garnered media attention, along with many others that have not. For example, in southwestern Nigeria, a maid bought rat poison with the intent to put it in a pot of soup, which could have been consumed by an entire family. The family might have all been killed if she hadn’t been caught before carrying out her deadly plan.

Considering the severity of these situations, it's clear that this disturbing trend has sparked serious concerns about household safety in Nigeria. This problem must be addressed urgently before it escalates into a full-blown crisis.

However, amid these grim stories of domestic workers turning against their employers, there are solutions to this growing threat. Some of the key remedies involve better communication, diligent background checks, and proper training. As Miyamoto Musashi wisely said:
"The purpose of today's training is to defeat yesterday's understanding."
To reduce and possibly prevent future occurrences of such crimes, experts recommend several steps for employers. These include conducting thorough background checks on domestic workers, fostering open and effective communication, and ensuring fair treatment of staff—especially since some domestic workers have faced abuse from their employers.

Additionally, employers must ensure that domestic workers receive fair compensation and are provided with humane working conditions. Training in conflict resolution should also be introduced, along with stronger security measures, such as restricting access to certain areas of the home. Such steps may have helped protect Mrs. Ronke Edevbie, as shown by her recent experience.

These measures could serve as vital models to address this crisis in Nigeria. As the saying goes, "nothing is new under the sun." From available records of similar crimes in other countries, it’s evident that the strategies mentioned earlier have been effective in places where domestic worker violence has been curbed. This has led to a noticeable reduction in such crimes.

For example, countries like the US, UK, and Singapore have stringent background check and verification processes before hiring domestic workers. In Nigeria, the absence of such measures is glaring, and the need for their introduction is urgent. This is further highlighted by the fact that the employee responsible for Dr. Ajumogobia’s murder was reportedly newly hired without a proper vetting process.

Currently, domestic worker providers in Nigeria operate informally and without regulation. There is a pressing need for regulated employment agencies to screen and train domestic workers before placing them in homes. In many advanced countries, regulated agencies ensure domestic workers are properly vetted, trained, and placed in appropriate households. The rise in these crimes in Nigeria may be due, in part, to the absence of such a system here, making it crucial to establish one without delay.

There was a time when child trafficking posed a major threat in Nigeria, leading to the creation of the National Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons (NAPTIP) to address and combat the issue. Similarly, it is now crucial for both the Executive and Legislative branches of government to take urgent action and create legislation to deal with the current crisis. In this context, countries like the Philippines, Indonesia, and South Africa have introduced labor laws that protect domestic workers, including provisions for minimum wages, paid leave, and protection from abuse.

Recently, Nigeria approved a new minimum wage of N70,000, and Senate President Godswill Akpabio confirmed that it applies to domestic workers. However, clarification is needed from the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and relevant government bodies about the standing of domestic workers, as the current minimum wage legislation only applies to employers with more than 15 employees.

Given this, the proposed agency would focus on the training and support of domestic workers. Some countries already offer training for both employers and workers to foster healthy relationships, improve conflict resolution, and promote cultural understanding. In certain places, domestic workers also undergo psychological evaluations to identify any potential mental health concerns before being placed in homes.

Government support is not the only solution. Based on research, community-based initiatives and support groups can also help address the socio-economic challenges that domestic workers face, acting as a safety net. Religious institutions, like churches and mosques, have a vital role to play in this process. Additionally, law enforcement and the prosecution of domestic worker-related crimes must be strengthened to deter future violence against employers.

Several international examples demonstrate the effectiveness of these approaches. For instance, the Philippines, which sends the highest number of domestic workers abroad and is one of the top three nations for foreign exchange remittances, has established the Overseas Workers Welfare Administration (OWWA). This agency has significantly improved the management of domestic workers. Likewise, Singapore has a maid levy and mandatory training to regulate the sector, and in the United States, the National Domestic Workers Alliance (NDWA) ensures proper oversight and protection for domestic workers.

Domestic workers—whether they are security guards, housemaids, or drivers—play a critical role in society, especially when they work closely with our loved ones. It is essential that their activities are carefully monitored, just as other countries have done. This is the central argument of this discussion, and I hope it emphasizes the need for the Nigerian government to take responsibility and put in place safeguards to address this growing issue. While these concerns may seem minor, they can have significant and potentially devastating effects on society.

Some readers might question why I have chosen to focus on such a sensitive topic—one that evokes sadness and grief, and which some may prefer to forget. In essence, why revisit painful memories?
My response is that l share the pains of the families of the victims of domestic workers violence because it is something that is relatable.
In 2017, l suffered the tragedy of lossing my 18 years old adorable daughter , Kikaose Ebiye-Onyibe who was on track to graduate as a lawyer from the university of Birmingham in England. Her sudden passage which was a result of a badly performed surgery for appendix in Gold Cross hospital, now Lagoon hospital on Bourdilon road, ikoyi,Lagos , had a profound effect on me and my family.
Since l did not want a similar tragedy to happen to other families owing to ignorance and not having anyone to advocate for potential victims as patients in hospitals, where some shady activities can happen in the theatre ,l shared my family’s sad experience in a book titled: “Beyond Loss And Grief. The Story of Kikaose Ebiye-Onyibe,a Survivor’s Manual for Coping With the Loss of a Child”.
It is a personal memoir which l believe helped to shine the light on the painful experience of grief. ln a chapter titled “United ln Grief” l listed prominent and ordinary Nigerians including the sitting president, serving and ex-governors and musicians as well as sports enthusiats who lost their young children under tragic circumstances as aimed to share in their grief.
It is my hope that l would achieve a similar goal with this media intervention aimed at gingering the authorities into taking actions to end the rising tide of domestic workers killing their employeres before another such avoidable tragedy befalls another family.

 

Magnus Onyibe,an entrepreneur,public policy analyst ,author,democracy advocate,development strategist,alumnus of Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy,Tufts University, Massachusetts,USA and a former commissioner in Delta state government, sent this piece from Lagos, Nigeria.

Many Nigerians have never heard of the expression ‘’federal might’’ as an important factor in gubernatorial elections until Gov. Godwin Obaseki started talking about it in the weeks leading to the September 21 election in his state. He told the press that Senator Adams Oshiomhole and other APC stalwarts in the state were planning to rig the election and impose their candidate, Senator Monday Okpebholo, on the state with the use of ‘’Federal Might’’. Okpebholo won the election, polling 291,667 votes to beat Obaseki’s candidate, Asue Ighodalo of PDP, who got 247,274 votes and Labour Party’s Olumide Akpata, who got a paltry 22,763 votes. But did Federal Might play a role in APC’s victory? Perhaps. I have participated in three governorship elections in Akwa Ibom State as a communications strategist and I have seen first hand how politicians crave the use of Federal Might to secure victory. This article is therefore based on by my personal experiences.

Federal Might is the deployment of federal resources, especially the security forces, to intimidate and harass opponents in order to create ample environment for the favoured party to rig election, often with the collusion of INEC. To procure Federal Might, an influential political figure in Abuja must give orders to the IGP and/or the Army chief to deploy excessive number of policemen and soldiers to the affected state with specific instructions to cow the opposition politicians and arrest some, if need be. Federal Might also entails INEC colluding with one party to the disadvantage of the others. Federal Might is therefore more valuable to a politician, especially those seeking to defeat a strong incumbent, than any other support he can get.

There are a few signs of the presence of Federal Might during an election. As soon as the policemen or ‘’federal forces’’ arrive the state to be captured, the leader of the command, typically an AIG, will establish contact with the favoured governorship candidate; and his first order of business is to arrest selected members of the opposition. The arrested men are usually influential leaders who command the respect of their party members. To create maximum impact, the arrest will happen at night and they’d be whisked off to Abuja before dawn. No doubt, the incarceration creates considerable embarrassment and trauma from the governor to the rank-and-file members of the party affected party.

The detention of some PDP henchmen, including local government chairmen in Edo, by the police in Abuja was an unmistakable early signal that Federal Might was being activated prior to the election. Despite Gov. Obaseki’s cries and Asue Ighodalo’s lamentations, the police did not explain the rational for the arrest and no charges have been brought against them till today.

Another sign of Federal Might is the disposition of the Resident Electoral Commissioner. If the REC is newly posted to the state just before the election, or if he had been found to be too chummy with members of one party, and INEC refuses to redeploy him out of the state despite pleas from the other party, then Federal Might is suspected. For some time, the PDP in Edo State has asked INEC to transfer the REC, Dr. Anugbum Onuoha, out of the state because he is a cousin of the FCT Minister, Nyesome Wike. Wike is a PDP member who as Rivers State governor helped APC win the presidential election in his state and as a reward, is now serving in the APC controlled federal government. It is enough reason to expect the REC to be biased. But INEC refused to budge, with the REC arguing that that his family relationship with Wike would not becloud his sense of duty. By refusing to move the REC from Edo, INEC failed to give all parties a sense of fairness and appearance of a level playing ground. An umpire, including a football referee, must be fair and be seen to be unbiased in all materials particular.

A REC is the number one electoral official in the state and if he decides to work against you in any election in your state, you’d be swimming against the currents and the chance of a loss is greater than 90%. An unconscionable REC has an arsenal of weapons he can use against a party he dislikes. He can, for example, substitute genuine result sheets with fake ones; instigate late arrival of voting materials in some areas to suppress voting and even blatantly facilitate forgery at the collation centers. Even after the elections, a REC can frustrate aggrieved parties from accessing the voting materials in preparation for litigation. I saw that play out in 2015 and 2019 in Akwa Ibom. However, to succeed in his wicked schemes, the REC must have the cooperation of the electoral officers (EOs) who are the chief superintendents of elections at the local government areas. In the 2015 governorship election in Akwa Ibom State, we had a REC who was openly biased against one of the two major parties. It was the most flagrant case of bias by a senior electoral official ever recorded in history. The REC eventually retired from INEC into stupendous wealth. In Edo State, the PDP is currently complaining that some of the results announced at the State Collation Center in Benin are different from what was uploaded on INEC’s iREV portal. That’s a very serious allegation that borders on the integrity of INEC.

The 2019 governorship election in Akwa Ibom State was an eye-opener on how Federal Might could work or fail to work. In August 2018, Senator Godswill Akpabio had decamped to APC from the PDP, thereby giving members and supporters of his new party the assurances that he would flip the state. we can all recall the infamous ‘’Warsaw saw War’’ statement, which further fueled tensions and frightened the PDP and the state government. At a stakeholders’ meeting of PDP in the Government House, a crestfallen member reportedly asked the governor, ‘’Your excellency, we don’t have INEC; we don’t have the police; what are we going to do’’? It was a poignant question for a party that had controlled the centre for 16 years and had known the importance of Federal Might.

The governor, Mr. Udom Emmanuel, seeking reelection, appeared beleaguered, cowed and insecure, but he was very clever. While his party, PDP, was campaigning hard, going from village to village, APC members were engrossed in endless meetings, planning and waiting for the arrival of the Federal Might. Besides, APC was bereft of the cohesion and stamina required to mount an effective assault against the PDP which had governed the state since 1999. The arrival of Akpabio in a way became an Achilles heel for the APC as some members’ resentments against him was beginning to sap the party of its mojo. In the welter of all the tensions in the state, anger in APC and frustration in the PDP, the governor sneaked into Abuja and struck a deal with the people in ASO Rock, including the then chief of Staff to the President, who received a huge erosion-control contract from the state government, in exchange for a support to the governor and his party. It was a masterstroke. With that, the table turned against APC in the state. Its cry for the redeployment of the REC, Mike Igini, who had appeared as a pro-PDP person and the request for support from the police and army, were completely rebuffed by Abuja. No Federal Might was forthcoming and, of course, APC lost the election woefully. Members began to heap blame on President Buhari for not helping out with the expected ‘’Federal Might’’. There’s no name they did not call Buhari.

Now, with the victory of APC in Edo over the weekend, APC members in Akwa Ibom State were once again jubilant, hoping that there is now a better chance for the Federal Might in 2027. ‘’Buhari did not care about the party in our state; but Asiwaju understands the game’’, an APC chieftain told me, after sharing a video of Akpabio and others dancing in Benin. Really? I told him that there are other circumstances that played out in Edo that may not happen in Akwa Ibom in 2027. For one, Obaseki’s fight with the powerful Oba of Benin and his meanness to his erstwhile deputy, Philip Shuaibu, were not helpful.

In the aftermath of the just-concluded gubernatorial election, it has become clear that the defeat of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) can largely be attributed to a combination of political missteps, most notably the exit of Philip Shaibu, the deputy governor, and Governor Godwin Obaseki’s tendency to burn bridges with political allies. These events highlight a broader lesson for politicians: the need to manage crises and strained relationships with fellow leaders, as failure to do so can unravel the strongest political alliances and weaken a party’s electoral chances.

Philip Shaibu’s departure from the PDP earlier in the political cycle sent shockwaves through the party. As a key political figure in Edo State and a grassroots mobilizer, Shaibu had been instrumental in ensuring Governor Obaseki’s political success, especially during their joint defection from the All Progressives Congress (APC) to the PDP. His exit, however, was driven by mounting differences with Obaseki and a growing sense of isolation. As deputy governor, Shaibu became disillusioned with the way Obaseki managed internal affairs, leaving him little room to operate politically. His eventual exit did not just hurt the PDP but also reflected deeper cracks within the party structure.

Shaibu’s exit robbed the PDP of his loyal following in Edo North, a critical stronghold, significantly weakening the party’s voting base. Moreover, it sent a clear message to voters and supporters: if the party’s own leadership could not remain united, how could they be trusted to lead the state effectively? Shaibu’s defection highlighted the consequences of poor crisis management and failure to maintain healthy relationships among political allies, which became a key factor in the PDP’s electoral defeat.

 

However, Shaibu’s departure was only one symptom of a larger issue. Governor Obaseki’s penchant for alienating key political allies has been a recurring problem throughout his tenure. Over the years, he has distanced himself from powerful figures and internal party leaders, creating a reputation for burning bridges. His fallout with political allies, both within Edo State and at the national level, had weakened his support base well before the election.

One of the most notable instances of Obaseki’s tendency to burn bridges was his public clash with the PDP leadership shortly after his re-election in 2020. The governor’s refusal to fully integrate into the party’s structure caused a rift between him and core PDP members, many of whom felt sidelined. Obaseki’s perceived lack of commitment to party unity bred resentment, creating internal divisions that festered until they reached a breaking point.

This inability to manage political relationships not only weakened the PDP but also cost the governor the confidence of party faithful and the electorate. In a political landscape where loyalty and unity are critical, Obaseki’s habit of severing ties with key allies made it difficult for the party to present a unified front, further damaging their prospects in the election.

 

Beyond internal party issues, Obaseki’s administration struggled to deliver tangible democratic dividends to the people of Edo State. Voters became increasingly frustrated with the lack of visible progress in critical sectors such as infrastructure, employment, and economic empowerment. Despite numerous promises, many citizens felt the administration was more focused on political wrangling than delivering real benefits to the people.

This perception of underperformance became a potent weapon for the opposition, which capitalized on the growing dissatisfaction. Obaseki’s failure to demonstrate meaningful progress on the ground further alienated voters, who began to see his administration as disconnected from their daily struggles. By the time the election arrived, the PDP was fighting an uphill battle against not just a united opposition but also widespread discontent among its traditional supporters.

The PDP’s loss in the Edo gubernatorial election serves as a cautionary tale for politicians across Nigeria. The exit of Shaibu and Obaseki’s deteriorating relationships with political allies underscore the critical importance of managing crises and maintaining alliances. In politics, relationships are often the glue that holds parties and administrations together, especially during challenging times. Leaders must be adept at conflict resolution, compromise, and managing strained partnerships, as the failure to do so can have devastating electoral consequences.

This lesson is particularly relevant to other political figures currently facing internal discord. In Rivers State, for example, the strained relationship between Governor Siminalayi Fubara and former Governor Nyesom Wike has been making headlines. Fubara and Wike, both of whom played significant roles in the PDP’s political dominance in Rivers, are now at odds, with signs of growing friction. If not managed properly, their conflict could have similar consequences as seen in Edo, weakening the party’s base and giving the opposition room to make gains.

Likewise, in states where political relationships are strained, this scenario serves as a warning. Politicians must prioritize the management of internal conflicts and maintain open channels of communication with their allies. Failing to do so risk the kind of fragmentation that plagued the PDP in Edo and contributed to its eventual defeat.

The collapse of the PDP’s electoral fortunes in Edo State can be traced back to a series of avoidable political missteps, most notably, the exit of Philip Shaibu and Governor Obaseki’s inability to maintain strong alliances. In the complex world of Nigerian politics, where personal relationships and grassroots mobilization are key to electoral success, political leaders must learn to manage crises with care. Obaseki’s experience should serve as a reminder to politicians across the country, especially in states like Rivers and beyond, that political bridges should be built and maintained, not burned.

 

As the PDP reflects on its defeat, the lessons from this election should resonate beyond Edo State. Politicians everywhere should take heed: mismanagement of internal conflicts, coupled with a failure to deliver democratic dividends, can derail even the most promising political careers. Only through careful crisis management and alliance-building can they hope to maintain the trust of the electorate and secure lasting political success.

 

The cure lies in voter education, accountability, and a renewed sense of political engagement, especially among the youth. Until the electorate begins to hold their leaders accountable and refuse to be swayed by short-term rewards, Nigeria will continue to recycle ineffective leaders. The time has come for Nigerians to break free from this political captivity and demand the leaders they truly deserve. The future of the nation depends on it.

 

Stockholm Syndrome is a psychological condition where victims of kidnapping or abuse develop an emotional attachment to their captors. In the context of Nigerian politics, the same principle applies, but here, the “captors” are the political elite, and the “victims” are the millions of Nigerian voters who repeatedly return these leaders to power, despite their continued misrule and empty promises.

Nigerians seem to be caught in a cycle where the very leaders who have contributed to their hardship are continually re-elected, even after successive failures in governance. Just like victims of Stockholm Syndrome, the electorate has developed a strange attachment to these politicians, even when they inflict harm. The question, however, is: why does this happen, and how can Nigeria’s electorate is cured of this cycle of political captivity?

In every election cycle, politicians flood the media with extravagant promises. They pledge to fix roads, create jobs, improve education, and boost the economy. The speeches are compelling, the campaigns grand, and the promises plentiful. Yet, year after year, many of these promises go unfulfilled. Roads remain dilapidated, unemployment grows, the economy falters, and public services deteriorate. Despite this, many voters remain loyal to the very politicians who have failed to deliver.

 

This dynamic mirrors Stockholm syndrome in that the electorate seems to form an attachment to their “captors”, politicians who, instead of bringing progress and development, subject them to increased hardship. For instance, after several administrations of failed leadership in Nigeria, the same political class, whether at the federal, state, or local level, continues to dominate, gaining votes, especially during elections.

Nigeria’s post-colonial history provides context for this attachment. The country has experienced multiple forms of governance, military dictatorships, civilian rule, and corrupt democracies. This turbulent political history has bred a culture of political impunity, where politicians face few consequences for failing to deliver on their promises.

Since the return to democracy in 1999, Nigeria has witnessed the rise of politicians who promise sweeping reforms but fail to achieve substantial change. The Fourth Republic, which began with much hope, soon saw leaders like President Olusegun Obasanjo, who, despite his achievements in stabilizing the country after years of military rule, was unable to significantly reduce poverty or corruption. His successors, Umaru Yar’Adua, Goodluck Jonathan, and Muhammadu Buhari, followed with their own brand of promises, but the country has seen little progress in addressing systemic issues like corruption, unemployment, and failing infrastructure.

 

This cycle of repeated disappointments, however, has not translated into a shift in electoral choices. In 2015, for example, Nigerians voted out Goodluck Jonathan after he was perceived as failing to address rampant corruption and insecurity. In his place came Muhammadu Buhari, a former military leader who promised to fight corruption, improve security, and revive the economy. However, by the end of his second term, many Nigerians were grappling with economic hardship, inflation, and worsening insecurity. Nevertheless, Buhari remained popular in certain regions, with voters unwilling to consider alternatives.

One of the reasons for this electoral behavior is the pervasive culture of political patronage. In many Nigerian elections, votes are often swayed not by policies or governance track records, but by handouts, bags of rice, money, and other incentives distributed by politicians during campaigns. These tokens of patronage create a temporary sense of loyalty among the electorate, causing them to overlook the larger issues of poor governance and corruption. Just like victims of Stockholm Syndrome, who may cling to small acts of kindness from their captors, Nigerian voters often latch onto these short-term benefits and ignore the long-term harm.

This was clearly visible in Nigeria’s 2019 general elections, where politicians across parties relied on vote-buying and last-minute handouts to secure electoral victories. In exchange for these material gifts, voters give away the next four years of their lives to leaders who are often disconnected from the realities of the common man.

 

Moreover, the fear of change plays a significant role in reinforcing this political Stockholm Syndrome. Many Nigerians have grown so accustomed to poor leadership that they have internalized the idea that change is risky. Voters often cling to familiar faces, even when those faces are responsible for their suffering. This fear of the unknown keeps the electorate trapped in a vicious cycle where the same ineffective leaders are continuously recycled into power.

For example, in the buildup to the 2023 general elections, the political establishment fielded familiar candidates, such as Bola Tinubu, a political heavyweight in Lagos and former governor, who won the presidency. Despite the challenges Nigerians have faced under previous administrations, the electorate largely returned to voting along traditional lines, ethnic, regional, and party loyalty, rather than considering fresh alternatives. This highlights the deep-rooted fear of experimenting with new leadership.

Beyond economic incentives, Nigeria’s complex social fabric also plays a role in perpetuating Stockholm Syndrome among voters. Many political decisions in Nigeria are influenced by ethnic and religious sentiments. Politicians exploit these divisions to garner support, creating a sense of tribal loyalty that binds the electorate to them regardless of their performance.

 

For instance, in the northern part of Nigeria, political leaders often use religion and regional identity to consolidate power. MuhammaduBuhari, for example, enjoyed unwavering support from his northern base, despite widespread dissatisfaction with his leadership from other regions of the country. This attachment is less about governance and more about shared identity. Voters defend their “captors” not because they believe they are performing well, but because they view them as “one of us.” This emotional attachment prevents them from holding their leaders accountable.

Breaking free from this political Stockholm Syndrome will require a massive shift in voter awareness. First and foremost, voters need to recognize the power they hold in a democracy. Elections are the most important tool through which citizens can hold their leaders accountable. Voting should not be treated as a mere transaction in exchange for temporary benefits but should be seen as a long-term investment in the future of the country.

To achieve this, civil society organizations, political activists, and the media need to intensify efforts to educate the electorate. Voter education campaigns should focus on explaining the impact of governance on daily life, highlighting how decisions made by politicians affect everything from the price of food to the availability of jobs, healthcare, and electricity. These campaigns must also debunk the myths that make voters cling to underperforming leaders, such as ethnic loyalty or fear of change.

 

Additionally, investigative journalism can help expose the corruption and mismanagement that often go unnoticed. Holding leaders accountable is critical in ensuring that voters make informed choices. Journalists and activists should continue to scrutinize politicians, bringing their failures to light and reminding the public that promises must be backed by actions, not empty rhetoric.

The role of Nigeria’s youth cannot be underestimated in this movement for change. As the country’s largest voting demographic, young people hold the key to breaking this cycle of political captivity. With access to social media and increased political awareness, the youth have the power to demand better governance.

By rejecting the status quo and embracing new ideas and candidates, Nigeria’s youth can play a crucial role in steering the country away from the grip of corrupt political elites. The youth must reject the crumbs of political patronage and focus on long-term solutions that address the systemic challenges Nigeria faces.

 

Nigeria’s political Stockholm Syndrome is a complex issue rooted in decades of poor governance, political patronage, and social divisions. However, just like victims of Stockholm Syndrome eventually break free from their captors, the Nigerian electorate can also be liberated from this cycle of attachment to poor leadership.

The cure lies in voter education, accountability, and a renewed sense of political engagement, especially among the youth. Until the electorate begins to hold their leaders accountable and refuse to be swayed by short-term rewards, Nigeria will continue to recycle ineffective leaders. The time has come for Nigerians to break free from this political captivity and demand the leaders they truly deserve. The future of the nation depends on it.

As the dust settles after the gubernatorial elections, the people of Edo State are left wondering: “Has Edo finally chosen the Governor in Monday Okpebholo?” This question is not just one of curiosity but a reflection of years of pent-up frustration. Since Nigeria transitioned to democracy in 1999, Edo has had governors who entered office with grand promises of change, only for those promises to wither once they took power.

Governor after governor has been greeted with optimism, but as their tenures progressed, Edolites found themselves disillusioned, betrayed by leaders whose actions did not align with their campaign manifestos. The most recent example is Governor Godwin Obaseki, whose administration began with high hopes of industrial growth, infrastructural improvements, and financial prudence. While there have been pockets of achievement, many residents feel that the Obaseki’s two-termed tenure has left Edo State much as it found it, burdened by underdevelopment, decaying infrastructure, and a struggling economy.

This growing skepticism has cast a shadow over Monday Okpebholo’s victory. Despite the optimism that comes with a new leader, many are approaching this change with a blend of hope and caution. As Mr. Osahon Igbinovia, a small business owner in Benin City put it: “We have been burnt before. Obaseki came in with so many promises, but look at the state of things now, roads are still bad, and jobs are still scarce. Okpebholo has to be different, or else we will be back here in four years asking the same question.”

 

Edo State, historically known for its rich culture and strategic importance, has long struggled with leadership challenges. From the tenure of Chief Lucky Igbinedion, marred by corruption allegations, to Adams Oshiomhole’s populist approach, which resonated with many but eventually left a mix of successes and failures, the leadership cycle in Edo has been marked by high expectations followed by declining trust.

Governor Godwin Obaseki was elected with the promise of continuity and improvement, riding on the wave of Oshiomhole’s achievements. He campaigned on a platform of transparency, economic revival, and infrastructural development, pledging to modernize Edo and transform it into a business hub. However, as his tenure draws to a close, it is evident that many of those grand promises have not materialized as expected. The disconnect between the government’s claimed achievements and the daily realities of the average Edo citizen is stark.

Mr. Benson Orumwense, a retired civil servant, lamented: “We thought Obaseki would be different because he came in as a technocrat, someone who understood how to manage people and resources. But, in the end, it feels like we are still stuck in the same cycle, bad roads, failing hospitals, and nothing to show for the billions of naira allocated for development.”

 

The state of Edo’s infrastructure is particularly emblematic of the leadership failures. From pothole-riddled roads to poorly maintained public services, the gap between the promises made and the current state of things has left many Edolites wondering if Okpebholo can truly bring about the change the state desperately needs.

Monday Okpebholo, known popularly as “Akpakomiza,” presents himself as a man of the people, someone deeply connected to the grassroots, having come from humble beginnings. His political rise has been accompanied by the narrative that he understands the struggles of the average Edo citizen, given his own life story of rising through the ranks from poverty to prominence.

His campaign rhetoric focused on infrastructure development, job creation, and building a self-sufficient economy in Edo. Unlike Obaseki, who was perceived as being distanced from the people, Okpebholo promises to maintain close ties with the grassroots, a strategy that endeared him to voters during the campaign. His promises to revitalize agriculture, improve healthcare, and bring a new wave of industrialization have struck a chord with the populace.

 

However, the people of Edo have heard similar promises before. Mr. Lucky Ehiosun, a political observer, explained the prevailing sentiment: “Okpebholo’s story resonates with people, especially those from rural areas. But leadership is not just about your past; it is about your ability to deliver on your promises. He has to prove that he is not like the others who came before him.”

In particular, Edolites are keenly watching to see how Okpebholo addresses the state’s infrastructural decay. Over the years, residents have expressed frustrations over the deplorable state of roads, inadequate healthcare facilities, and the slow pace of economic growth. Many believe that unless the governor takes a firm stand on these issues within his first 100 days, he will face the same criticisms that have plagued past administrations.

Across the state, residents are speaking out about their hopes and concerns for the new administration. In Uromi, a professional colleague of this writer on phone voiced his thoughts: “We need a governor who will actually listen to us. The roads in the rural areas are terrible, and it is hard to transport our goods to the market. Okpebholo must focus on helping farmers and making the roads passable.”

 

A civil rights advocate, Mr. Chukwuma Eze, also shared his concerns: “The government needs to prioritize the welfare of the people over politics. If Okpebholo is serious, he will address the issues of unemployment and underemployment in the state. We need industries that will create jobs for our youth.”

Meanwhile, in Benin City, a youth leader, Osaro Osayande, emphasized the need for transparency in governance: “We have had governors who come in and make decisions without consulting the people. Okpebholo needs to be different. He must engage with the community, hold town halls, and actually involve the people in the decision-making process. That is the only way to build trust.”

Mr. Martins Eboigbe, in his counsel to Okpebholo, emphasized the importance of showing respect to the revered Benin Monarch, noting that such an attitude is not only a sign of humility but also a strategic move that resonates deeply with the people of Edo State. “In our rich cultural history,” Eboigbe stated, “the Oba is the embodiment of the people’s identity, unity, and tradition. Disrespecting the crown is seen as a grave taboo among Edolites, and anyone who does so risks alienating themselves from the very people they wish to lead.” He urged Okpebholo to align himself with the values that the Benin Kingdom holds dear, as doing so would earn him the favor of the people and place him in their good graces.

 

Furthermore, Eboigbe pointed out that Edolites have a profound reverence for their Oba, a sentiment that transcends politics and influences how leaders are perceived and accepted. “Any disregard for the monarchy,” he cautioned, “could result in a permanent stain on your public image.” He urged Okpebholo to seek the blessing and approval of the royal house, as those who honor the Benin throne often find themselves embraced by the people. Respecting the Oba is not only an obligation but also a strategic necessity for anyone aspiring to hold a leadership position in Edo State.

As Monday Okpebholo steps into the Edo State Government House, he must be keenly aware that the burden of expectations is heavy. The people of Edo are tired of empty promises and half-measures. They want a leader who will act decisively, focus on long-term development, and rebuild trust between the government and its citizens.

The key areas that will define his legacy include infrastructural renewal, job creation, and transparency in governance. He must prioritize fixing Edo’s crumbling infrastructure, from its rural roads to urban centers, ensuring that development reaches all corners of the state. His focus on economic growth must also translate into job creation, especially for the youth, whose unemployment rate remains alarmingly high.

 

However, beyond policy, Okpebholo must also work to restore the faith of the people in their leadership. After years of disappointment, the people of Edo deserve a governor who not only makes promises but delivers on them.

As Mr. AghoEsosa, a local artisan puts it: “We are tired of being fooled. Okpebholo has to be the one to break the cycle. If he does, Edo will finally be on the path to greatness. If not, we will be back to square one, looking for another leader.”

The question remains: “Has Edo found the right leader in Monday Okpebholo?” Only time will tell if he can rise to the occasion and lead Edo to a brighter future.

 President Bola Tinubu is currently presiding over the Federal Executive Council (FEC) meeting at the Council Chamber of the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

Naija News understands that the meeting is being held amidst plan to reshuffle is cabinet.

 

Before the commencement of the council meeting, Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Senator George Akume, commended President Tinubu for his commitment to democracy through “the conduct of free and fair election in Edo State.”

Akume also commended the leadership of Edo State chapter of the All Progressives Congress (APC) following the victory of Monday Okpebholo.

He said, “We want to use this opportunity, Mr. Chairman, to congratulate the people of Edo State, particularly the APC family, properly guided by the father of APC, in their fantastic outing, recording a huge victory, which had eluded the APC for over eight years.

“The election has been adjudged to be free and fair and that is what Mr. President has always stood for. We want to thank you, Mr. President, for being committed to the electoral process and ethos of democracy.

“Once again, we thank our family members of the APC from Edo state for this wonderful showing.”

The SGF also formally notified the council of the passing a former Minister of Women Affairs and Youth Development, Mrs Salome Jankada.

Mrs Salome Jankada was a Minister of Women Affairs and Youth Development in the administration of former President Olusegun Obasanjo.

The council then observed a minute silence in honour of the late former council member, who died in August 27 this year.

Those in attendance at the meeting include the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Senator George Akume, the National security Adviser, NSA, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu and the Chief of Staff to the President, Rt. Hon. Femi Gbajabiamila.

Majority of the Ministers were also in attendance.

[NaijaNews]

Some residents who infiltrated the Internally Displaced Persons camps for flood victims in Borno State have stated that they were forced to enter the camps due to the current hardship in the country.

The residents, mostly women, disclosed this during an interactive session with our correspondent in Maiduguri on Monday.

They expressed that the economic situation in the country is no longer bearable, and they cannot sit idly by while trucks of food items and cash enter the camps daily without being beneficiaries.

Speaking with one of the residents who infiltrated the camp at Ajilari Community Secondary School, Aisha Kuda, she said, “We are suffering from hunger; our children have started stealing due to poverty. Our girls are getting unwanted pregnancies because they are lured with money.

 

That is why we are going there to get something to eat.”
“We are pleading with the government to help us as they are helping the IDPs because we are in a critical condition too,” she pleaded.

Safiya Abdullahi stressed that it is unjust to overlook those affected by the flood who are residing with relatives instead of in the camps.

“We are hungry. Not everyone can stay in the camp because some have relatives who are not affected, just like myself. This does not mean we should be exempted. When the flood came, my family was displaced from Gwange, and we left to stay with my relative in Wulari. When we heard about the food and cash distribution in Bakassi camp, we went there.

 

“Upon getting there, they said we were not eligible to receive items. This happened the day the governor visited to share 10,000 Naira in the camp,” she stated.

On her part, Hannah Johnson, a Maiduguri resident, mentioned that she was aware of the different church denominations that have donated to the camp.

“I know some churches, including Dunamis and Apostle Suleiman’s church, have donated. Even though it was meant for those in the camp, some of us were affected by the flood, and we decided to stay out of the camp. How can you remove us from the list of beneficiaries?”

She continued, “I was in Yerwa camp a few days ago, and they said we wouldn’t benefit as long as we are not living in the camp. I went back home with nothing. This is uncalled-for.”

PUNCH reported that the governor of the state, Babagana Zulum, alleged the infiltration of camps by people not affected by the flood.

Following the allegation, he directed that only camps being operated in schools would be closed to allow learning activities to fully resume across the state.

[Punch]

Anthony Joshua insists his career is “far from over” following his devastating knockout defeat to Daniel Dubois at Wembley, which raised doubts about his future in boxing.

Joshua was aiming to become a three-time world champion by claiming the IBF world heavyweight title on Saturday but was knocked out in the fifth round in front of a record-breaking official attendance of more than 98,000.

The 34-year-old was floored four times by Dubois and many people called for Joshua to retire afterwards.

 

But the British former Olympic champion released a video on X on Monday saying his journey in boxing is not over yet, with a potential rematch with Dubois as well as another all-British clash with Tyson Fury options in the future.

Joshua said he was determined to take the positives from the situation despite his mauling — the fourth defeat of a 32-fight career in boxing.

“What a rollercoaster journey, but do you know what the problem is? It is far from over yet,” he said.

“We’ve done it once, we’ve done it twice, doing it a third time hasn’t been easy but I believe it is something I can achieve. It’s about making the right steps forward, working hard, improving and it has to come from here (heart) more than anything.

“It’s only been a day but I know when I sit back I know I’ve got a lot of this (heart), thanks for your support, thanks for being on this rollercoaster journey with me.

“Keep your seatbelts tight because deep down in here I know we have a lot more to bring to this game.”

Vanguard News

 

On Saturday, September 21, 2024, Yiaga Africa deployed the Process and Results  Verification for Transparency (PRVT) methodology to observe the Edo State governorship election. This involved 300 stationary and 25 roving observers,  covering a representative sample of polling units across all 18 LGAs. The PRVT enables Yiaga Africa to independently assess the quality of election day processes  and verify the accuracy of the official election results as announced by INEC.

Yiaga Africa observers also deployed to the State and LGA results collation  centers to observe the process, ensuring timely and accurate reporting of the election process. Yiaga Africa has successfully deployed this methodology in two Presidential elections and sixteen off-cycle governorship elections.

Yiaga Africa’s election day situation analysis statement highlighted logistical challenges that led to delays in the commencement of accreditation and voting at various polling units across the state. Inadequate planning in the supply of  vehicles for transporting ad hoc officials and election materials, along with the absence of accompanying security personnel, further exacerbated the delays.

Yiaga Africa also condemns acts of violence and disruption of voting and results collation process by political thugs and hoodlums, particularly violence directed at voters and election officials. These unwholesome acts undermine the integrity of the elections. Yiaga Africa extends its sympathies to citizens and polling officials who suffered severe injuries and loss of valuable properties due to these attacks and violence. Yiaga Africa calls on security agencies to thoroughly investigate these cases of attacks and intimidation against voters and polling officials.

Statement on INEC’s official results

Yiaga Africa’s estimates are based on official results announced at the polling unit, from a representative random sample of polling units. As highlighted in our pre-election report, Yiaga Africa will amongst other factors consider the quality of election day processes in assessing whether the 2024 Edo governorship satisfies the electoral integrity test. In this regard, Yiaga Africa considered the integrity of accreditation, voting, counting, and collation of results.

INEC consistently applied its guidelines in managing the accreditation and voting process in a significant number of polling units. Despite some isolated incidents of inadequate election materials, the BVAS machines functioned optimally, and all voters in the queue by 2:30pm were allowed to vote, despite the late opening of polls. The polling officials uploaded polling unit results on the IReV in a timely manner, making it possible for citizens to access polling unit level results.

However, the incidents of results manipulation and disruptions during ward and local government collation in Ikpoba/Okha, Etsako West, Egor and Oredo LGAs, including intimidation of INEC officials, observers and party agents and the collation of results contrary to the provisions of the Electoral Act and INEC guidelines, severely undermine the credibility of the election results.

Inconsistencies in the officially announced results

Based on reports received from the sampled polling units, Yiaga Africa can project the expected vote shares for each party within a narrow margin. However, Yiaga Africa is only able to verify the election outcome if it falls within its estimated margins. If the official results do not fall within Yiaga Africa’s estimated ranges, then the results may have been manipulated.

According to INEC, the All Progressive Congress (APC) received 51.1% of the votes, People’s Democratic Party (PDP) 43.3% of the votes, and the Labor Party garnered 4.0% of the votes. Based on reports from 287 of 300 (96%) sampled polling units, Yiaga Africa’s statistical analysis shows inconsistencies in the official results announced by INEC. For instance, the official results announced by INEC for APC in Oredo and Egor, LGAs fall outside the PRVT estimate. In Esan West LGA, the official results for PDP fall outside the PRVT estimates. Also, in Oredo LGA, the official results as announced for LP fall outside the PRVT estimates.

These inconsistencies with Yiaga Africa’s PRVT estimates indicate that the results were altered at the level of collation.

The disparities between the official results released by INEC and Yiaga Africa’s PRVT estimates indicate manipulation of results during the collation process.

Yiaga Africa strongly condemns the actions of some biased INEC officials who altered figures during collation including the actions of some security officials who interfered with the collation process. Yiaga Africa notes that the cases of disruption in Ikpoba/Okha, Etsako West, Egor, and Oredo LGAs in the course of collation created opportunities for election manipulation, raising significant concerns about the credibility and integrity of the results collation process.

Turnout Estimates

INEC’s turnout and rejected ballots for the 18 LGA released are consistent with Yiaga Africa WTV PRVT estimates. Yiaga Africa is able to estimate that turnout is between 20.9% and 24.1% (22.5% ± 1.6%), while INEC’s official result is 22.4%. Similarly, Yiaga Africa estimates for rejected ballots are between 2.2% and 3.2% (2.7% ± 0.5%).

Yiaga Africa notes that in terms of turnout, voters did not meet the resilience test as voter turnout plummeted despite high PVC collection rates recorded for the governorship election. In this election, only 22.4% of the voters turned out to exercise their civic rights, lower than the 27% turnout observed in 2020.

Nevertheless, Yiaga Africa commends the resilience of the voters who turned out despite the rain and voting delays, staying back to fulfill their civic duties.

Recommendations

  1. Yiaga Africa calls for the immediate investigation and prosecution of polling officials and collation officers who are engaged in results manipulation and flagrant violations of the guidelines on results collation.
  1. Yiaga Africa calls on INEC to urgently clarify the inconsistencies in some of the results, especially election results from Oredo, Egor, Esan West and LGAs.
  1. INEC should issue detailed guidelines for exercising its powers to review declarations and returns made contrary to provisions of the Electoral Act and regulations and guidelines. This should include procedures for receiving complaints, timeframe, format and who is eligible to submit complaints.
  1. It is imperative to integrate the IReV and electronic transmission of results into the electoral legal framework to confer legality on polling unit level results uploaded on the portal. To this end, the National Assembly should expeditiously amend the Electoral Act to make electronic transmission of results mandatory.

Conclusion

As noted in our pre-election reports, Yiaga Africa emphasized that the 2024 Edo governorship election would be assessed against three key parameters: the resilience test, impartiality test, and integrity test.

On the resilience test, despite early warnings of potential violence and adverse  weather conditions, voter turnout was low. While voters were given the  opportunity to exercise their rights, many chose not to participate, resulting in a partial failure of the resilience test. Nevertheless, Yiaga Africa commends the resilience and patience of voters who did turn out, particularly in the face of logistical challenges and rainfall that caused late opening of polls.

On the impartiality test, Yiaga Africa monitored the role of security agencies and their engagement with the process. While there were isolated incidents of  intimidation, the security forces largely acted professionally, ensuring a peaceful  and secure environment on election day. However, reports of interference

during the results collation process, including the denial of access to accredited observers and party agents at collation centers, cast doubt on the neutrality of some security personnel. Additionally, the disruption of result collation raises concerns about the distribution and effectiveness of security deployment for the election.

Lastly, on the integrity test, Yiaga Africa concludes that the 2024 Edo governorship election fails the electoral integrity test due to the lack of transparency in the results collation process, which led to the manipulation of results. While key processes such as accreditation, voting, counting, and recording of results at the polling unit substantially complied with procedures, the results collation process was compromised by the actions of some baised INEC officials in connivance with other actors. This manipulation severely undermines the overall integrity of the election.

As Yiaga Africa stated after the 2023 general elections and the off-cycle governorship elections of Bayelsa, Imo, and Kogi states in 2023, as well as the inconsistencies in the Edo state governorship election results, especially for the LGAs identified in the reports, it is abundantly clear that drastic steps are now needed for fundamental electoral reforms to restore public confidence in the electoral process, especially the urgent need for political actors to change their attitude towards politics.

 

The Watching The Vote project is “Driven by Data – For All Nigerians – Beholden to None!”

 

Signed.

Dr. Aisha Abdullahi

Chair of the 2024 Edo

Election Mission

 

Samson Itodo

Executive Director,

Yiaga Africa

 

For media inquiries, please contact Jennifer Dafwat, Media Officer, Yiaga Africa. Tel. +234 (0) 806 899 5644, Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Learn more about

#WatchingTheVote at www.watchingthevote.org or on social media on Facebook at facebook.com/yiaga.org or on Twitter @YIAGA.