You must have followed the Kemi Badenoch controversy: the wily Nigerian politicians’ penchant to ride on people’s back suffered a ghastly diplomatic accident! Thinking they could use her to shine and claim undeserved credit, Mrs. Kemi Badenoch, the newly-elected British Leader of Opposition/Shadow Prime Minister, Britain’s budding “Iron Lady” cast in the mould of Margaret Thatcher, gave a top Nigerian government official “the ignore”, to quote the inimitable Fela’s lawyer, the late Kanmi Ishola-Osobu! What a bloodied nose without as much as throwing a punch!

Here, in “Tan’fe’ani and Kemi Badenoch”, Professor Babafemi A. Badejo not only lay bare the crass illiteracy of an egocentric government official and a loquacious politician seeking relevance but also analysed the gaffe that may return to haunt this and succeeding Nigerian governments for some time to come. Read on:

“Any Yoruba speaker of a certain age would easily link Tan’fe’ani with Ebenezer Obey’s philosophical lyrics: “Tan’fe’ani, tan’fe’ani: Eniyan o fe ni fo’ro, tan’fe’ani”. Literally, Obey’s lyrics suggest that human beings resent the success of others and would rather prefer their demise or downfall.

“This came to my mind with respect to a good number of commentaries made by Nigerians on the result of the leadership election of the British Conservative Party, which saw Mrs. Olukemi (Kemi) Badenoch breaking the ceiling to become the first black person to lead a major party in the United Kingdom, in the combined sense of being the leader of His Majesty’s Opposition, a potential Head of Government or Shadow Prime Minister, so to say.

"Mrs. Abike Dabiri-Erewa, the CEO of the Nigerians in Diaspora Commission (NIDCOM), felt it was her duty to congratulate and celebrate Badenoch in the regular Nigerian style of identifying with the successful. However, Dabiri-Erewa claimed that her gesture towards Badenoch was met with rejection. Rather than keep quiet as a diplomat/consular official would do, Dabiri-Erewa thought it newsworthy to take to Channels TV to question the “Nigerianess” of Kemi.

"In a display of limited understanding of international dynamics, Mrs. Dabiri-Erewa made an ill-conceived comparison by highlighting her support for Ms. Chidimma Adetshina, the first runners-up at the recently-concluded Miss Universe competition, while implying that Mrs. Badenoch might one day return to seek her assistance. But this is not a Nollywood storyline, for goodness sake! 

"I wish Kemi the occupation of 10 Downing Street but even if she does not become the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom for whatever reason, what would she have lost from the history she has just made? In such a situation where ill-action contributes to Kemi not attaining the top seat, what can Nigeria (or any of its over-rated citizens like Dabiri-Erewa) do you influence British politics?

"It was not only Mrs. Abike Dabiri-Erewa who over-valued her worth and relevance at the international level. Femi Fani-Kayode (FFK), as usual, blasted on all cylinders, casting aspersion on Mrs. Badenoch for “snubbing” the Nigerian government. To think that Mrs. Dabiri-Erewa represented the Nigerian government vis-à-vis the British leader of opposition shows the novice that FFK is (in such matters) in spite of his claim to knowledge. NIDCOM is unknown to the Vienna Conventions on Diplomatic/Consular relations.

"Nigeria’s High Commission in the United Kingdom serves as the legitimate representative of the Nigerian government and, in that capacity, could appropriately extend fraternal greetings to the Leader of the Opposition. Prof. Bola Akinterinwa, despite his complex but well-argued “thesis, antithesis, and synthesis” on this issue, got it right: Mrs. Dabiri-Erewa could have reached out to Mrs. Badenoch privately as a well-meaning Yoruba elder. In my view, her decision to go public on Channels TV, resembling the fiery rhetoric of FFK, only cast them both in the light of “tan’fe’ani”.  

"It is important that Mrs. Kemi Badenoch has ignored all the noise, focusing instead on her duties towards building a viable Shadow Cabinet and leading her party as His Majesty’s Leader of Government Opposition. Mrs. Badenoch exercised her associational right by emphasizing her being British. She is exercising a fundamental right known to Nigeria’s 1999 Constitution in section 29. She is not Nigeria’s Ambassador to the UK - and she does not want to be! Too bad for the Nigerians who want to appropriate her!

"Mrs. Badenoch stated publicly that the circumstances of her upbringing drove her out of Nigeria. She has spoken of some of the hardship she endured growing up - like fetching water from a mile away and carrying chairs. She forgot to mention the ubiquitous NEPA that made those of my age depend on lanterns to study! However, I have read many who refute this, arguing that Kemi attended the same school as their children and did not endure the hardship she described. 

"Some have, however, overly romanticised the life of the Nigerian academic of the 1990s. My children and I can attest to the hardship we faced when I could not afford basic things as a struggling lecturer who had to care for my immediate relations during a time when public servants were expressly banned from supplementing their income through any form of additional work, whether mental or physical, beyond what the government paid them.

"From all accounts, the late Dr. Femi Adegoke, a.k.a 'Fariga' (meaning someone who will not kow-tow or be cowered), Mrs. Badenoch’s father, fought injustice around him, from when he was at Ibadan Grammar School to his time at the College of Medicine, Idiaraba where, as Prof. Oladapo Ashiru informed us, Femi Adegoke’s original 'Fariga' was changed to 'Farigo', both symbolising a fighting spirit against injustice. Are those examining Kemi considering her early politicisation against corruption, injustice, and military rule, which set her apart from her contemporaries?

"Were the issues Kemi cited as driving her away from Nigeria unique to her time? As an undergraduate, I carried chairs from one classroom to another—something children in public schools of my children’s generation still do. In some parts of Nigeria today, students continue to carry their chairs from home to school. As a child, I fetched water from a stream about five miles away and many children in Nigeria still do due to the normalisation of corruption, perpetuated by critics of Mrs. Badenoch and stemming from leaders who, in a just society, should be in jail for embezzling resources meant for infrastructural development.

"I salute Mrs. Badenoch and appreciate her work. She has more than associated with her primordial roots by not changing or 'Englifying' her name. Her appearance remains Yoruba, which is not the same as the associational 'Nigerianess' that Mrs. Dabiri-Erewa was searching for. If, against all odds, Mrs. Badenoch’s critical stance resonates with those in political power and leads to a meaningful reduction in the grand theft of our national resources, it would be cause for celebration. Such a shift would represent a significant victory for the vast majority of Nigerians.

"I agree with Mrs. Badenoch that Nigeria is a corrupt country as shown on a daily basis. Some would say that the UK is also corrupt. Fair enough. But there are fundamental differences. Corruption in the UK is not as widespread as it is in Nigeria. Furthermore, British politicians do not boast about corruption as normal, unlike in Nigeria where anti-corruption institutions choose who to prosecute on the basis of the offender’s political party, in the shifting alliances of thieves that we call political parties. Unlike in Nigeria, if you are caught in the UK, you are prosecuted and not given a higher national office as well as national honours!

"David Cameron as British Prime Minister referred to Nigeria and Afghanistan as being 'fantastically corrupt'. What was President Muhammadu Buhari’s response? He did not walk out of the anti-corruption summit that the UK had called. Instead, he reportedly said he was shocked and embarrassed. His spokesman added that the UK Prime Minister was probably speaking of governments before Buhari’s. We later knew that corruption grew under Buhari, just as many accounts are showing about the current administration of Bola Tinubu. 

"Badenoch has rightly added corruption and its debilitating impact on Nigeria as part of her focus. Given the impact of corruption in Nigeria driving immigrants who would have loved to remain in Nigeria to the UK, I hope she does not drop this focus!

"Those who consider themselves more patriotic by criticising Kemi for speaking basic truths should channel their energy into pressuring government at all levels to act responsibly. This will ensure that Kemi and others like her would have no reason to 'denigrate' Nigeria, sparing us the need to hang our heads in shame on the international stage.

"I agree with Dr. Sola Oni, the leader of the Yoruba Party in the UK, who differed with Mrs. Badenoch on reparations for slavery, colonialism, and today’s neo-colonialism. As the British leader of opposition, it is understandable that her views are different from ours. It is for us to carry out a principled campaign to change the views of Mrs. Badenoch’s voters. 

"A lot is available from sound pan-Africanist positions to try and persuade Mrs. Badenoch to think otherwise. Since the wealth created from the past of short-changing Africa is still being held on to, the British of today cannot reject responsibilities for that past. On our part, we should address the nagging governance problems of leadership deficit and corruption still driving many other Kemis away from here in the 'Japa' syndrome that our government appears helpless against”.

Need we say more?  

Former Ondo State Military Governor, Navy Commodore Olabode George (retd), is reported to be asking serial presidential candidate and former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar, to symbolically fall on his sword by taking himself out of the 2027 presidential race of the opposition Peoples’ Democratic Party.

Governor George told Vice President Abubakar: “My advice is this. You will be 81 years old in 2027, and you have been contesting since 1993. This is the time for you to calm down and act like an elder. I appeal to you, in the name of the Almighty Allah that you serve, to take it easy and leave everything for posterity.”

Vice President Abubakar, who turned 78 two days ago, lost the presidential slot of the Social Democratic Party, one of the “political parastatals” contrived for the tortuous transmission programme of the government of military President Ibrahim Babangida, to Bashorun MKO Abiola, presumed winner of Nigeria’s freest and fairest presidential election.

Since 2007, Vice President Abubakar has variously been a presidential candidate or presidential aspirant of the Action Congress of Nigeria and the People’s Democratic Party in 2007, 2011, 2015, 2019, and 2023, and has famously lost each attempt.

Also, Governor George is concerned that the People’s Democratic Party is crumbling under the weight of members who placed their personal interests above country, sometimes by flirting with the ruling All Progressives Congress while yet remaining in the People’s Democratic Party.

“Falling on the sword” is an old Roman practice whereby a disgraced or defeated soldier falls on the point of his sword or stabs himself in the stomach. In pre-colonial days, Yoruba kings who fell out of favour “opened the calabash” and drank the poisonous potion therein to death.

In modern days, falling on the sword or opening the calabash have become metaphors for individuals to resign high political or corporate offices or accept responsibilities for mistakes by themselves or on behalf of the group they lead.

That is why Kimberly Cheatle resigned as Director of the US Secret Service after President Trump was shot by Thomas Mathew Crooks at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. Though she was not physically at the rally, she was obliged to accept responsibility for the security lapses.

While Governor George may have spoken out whispered sentiments within the ranks of the People’s Democratic Party for Vice President Abubakar to yield the ground to younger aspirants, that may not be an exactly democratic move; it looks like a subtle ploy to make way for some preferred aspirants.

Well, of course, Governor George can buttress his argument with the example of America’s Democratic Party that got President Joe Biden to drop out of the 2024 presidential race for Vice President Kamala Harris to take the ticket, which she eventually lost to former President Donald Trump.

President Biden, 82, was persuaded to yield the presidential slot to Vice President Harris because of his poor showing, which was attributed to ageing, during the presidential debate against President Trump. Age is the argument that Governor George, who turned 79 last week Thursday, is advancing for Vice President Abubakar, who will be 81 in 2027, to recuse himself from the 2027 presidential race.

But really, that call should be the responsibility of the People’s Democratic Party primaries. Section 84 of Nigeria’s Electoral Act spells out the elaborate statutory steps that political parties must follow to elect candidates for political positions through direct, indirect, or consensus procedures.

And according to Section 131 of Nigeria’s Constitution, “A person shall be qualified for election to the office of the President if (a) he is a citizen of Nigeria by birth; (b) he has attained the age of forty years; (c) he is a member of a political party and he is sponsored by that political party and (d) he has been educated to be educated up to at least School Certificate level or its equivalent.”

Related News Atiku slams Tinubu's loan policies, warns of devastating economic consequences No agreement to give Atiku 2027 presidential ticket – PDP Tinubu appoints Atiku’s ex-spokesperson media aide

Maybe Governor George and his cohorts within the People’s Democratic Party should hinge their strategy on Section 131(c), which gives political parties the authority to choose to present a candidate for election through their primaries that must be supervised or witnessed by the Independent National Electoral Commission as required by the Constitution.

As a former National Vice President (Southwest Zone) and, later, Deputy National Chairman (South), Governor George should have enough clout within the People’s Democratic Party to rally votes for or against Vice President Abubakar ahead of the party’s 2027 primaries.

Maybe Governor George should allow Vice President Abubakar’s doctors to speak to the state of his health before asking him to recuse himself on account of age. Indeed, all presidential aspirants of the People’s Democratic Party may be required to submit themselves to a medical board for medical examination.

One good advantage of a medical board is that Nigeria would have avoided the type of constitutional crisis that occurred when President Umaru Yar’Adua finally succumbed to the illness that was pointed out to former President Olusegun Obasanjo, who adamantly anointed and made him his successor.

Reports say that Governor George had once called for the resignation of Vice President Abubakar from the People’s Democratic Party for defecting to the Action Congress party in 2027. If he carries his battle and manoeuvres into the treacherous trenches of the People’s Democratic Party, he would have been acting within his constitutional rights as a citizen and participant in the democratic process of Nigeria.

Some of the negatives he could present against the presidential ambition of Vice President Abubakar may include the $16.5 billion that Abubakar himself admitted that the Obasanjo government that he served threw at contractors who never performed electricity contracts awarded to them.

Another negative against Vice President Abubakar could be the gaffe that he committed when he thought that he was playfully telling a female interviewer that he would sell Nigeria’s assets to his friends if he became president.

He could also accuse Vice President Abubakar of living in the United Arab Emirates from where he comes in just ahead of elections to see if he could somehow snag the presidency of Nigeria as if it were there for the picking.

It indeed looks as if his presence in Nigeria has largely been through the auspices of his exceedingly competent media handlers, who have been faithful in performing their duties to keep his name in the minds of the Nigerian electorate, who are probably unaware that he almost does not live in the country.

And while Governor George and his group are at it, they must also be aware of CREEVP—the Committee for the Re-election of the Vice President—made up of admirers and cronies, some of whom may have profited from the days of Abubakar as Vice President of Nigeria.

It should not be a surprise to anyone that such individuals will surely want those happy days to be here again. No one likes the motion of their gravy train to stop. And they would do everything they consider necessary to keep it going.

Governor George must acknowledge that some members of the People’s Democratic Party think the world of Vice President Abubakar and are still convinced that he can bring the presidential oyster to the party, and they must have their say.

Even if you do not like his face, you cannot deny Vice President Abubakar his right to his presidential ambition. But you can work for your preferred candidate to defeat him.

Lekan Sote

The coming on stream, or, rather the resurrection of the Port Harcourt Refinery is exceedingly good news at a time at which good news has become a very scarce commodity in our nation.

It was, to say the least, a great and most embarrassing national shame that we have not had functioning refineries in a major oil producing country for decades and this long awaited breakthrough is most heartwarming to put it mildly.

How we keep allowing national assets to rot and go to waste right under our noses is still a mystery to me because corruption and ineptitude aside, I still cannot fathom how a nation could be so clumsy as to keep serially inflicting grotesque harm upon itself.

The Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation Limited, NNPCL, is our one and only national oil company - Dangote Refinery, massive as it is, is still just another private company and cannot pretend to be our collective asset or try to displace our true and authentic IOC which was, is and shall remain the NNPCL.

We must all commend and encourage the NNPCL team as they reposition the oil and gas sector towards better days ahead for all Nigerians.

I hope those with an axe to grind with the NNPCL's Group Managing Director, Mele Kyari, and have been angling to take his job for themselves can be forthright enough to hide their faces in shame and leave him alone to fix the oil and gas sector for all of us.

Under Mele's watch we have seen record restoration of our oil and gas production, drastic reduction in oil theft and now local refining of crude by our national oil company.

We should all be proud of him and his team at NNPCL.

Lastly and most importantly, I would urge all and sundry, regardless of their political leanings or inclinations to, at least, acknowledge President Bola Tinubu for this great milestone and incontestable achievement.

I have many differences with my President as many are well aware but I will not fail to acknowledge, commend and celebrate him for what he does right and the resurrection of petroleum refining in Nigeria is something good he will always be remembered for.

Onokpasa, a lawyer, is Chairman, Tinubu Media Support Group and writes from Abuja.

The Oyo State government and some stakeholders have advocated the speedy passage of National digital economy and e-governance bill to ensure accountability and transparency in governance.

The stakeholders who gathered in Ibadan on Tuesday, said the passage of the Bill would smoothen government activities and boost government-citizen engagement.

This was the submission of speakers at a stakeholders’ engagement on the National Digital Economy and E-Governance Bill held in Ibadan.

Speaking during the event, the Minister for communications, innovation and digital economy, Olatunbosun Tijani represented by Banke Ajagunna, noted that the importance of the bill cannot be underestimated as it will enhance the digital economy and build trust between the government and the people. 

The Minister called on Nigerians and the National Assembly to give the bill the needed support.

According to him, the consultative engagement is going on in all the states of the federation to seek the input of stakeholders on the bill.

He submitted that the National Digital Economy and E-Governance Bill, 2024, is a significant step forward in Nigeria’s digital transformation journey.

This bill, according to him, aims to drive economic growth through digital technology, improve public service delivery, and create a competitive environment for the Nigerian digital economy.

He noted that in a bid to migrate Nigeria into a smart country, the Federal Government through the Ministry of Communications, Innovation and Digital Economy proposed the National Digital Economy and E-Governance Bill.

The Minister said the bill offers numerous opportunities for businesses to innovate and expand, with improved digital infrastructure and a supportive regulatory environment. Individuals will also benefit from improved access to digital services and better governance through e-Governance initiatives.

He highlighted the advantages of E-governance bill to include Economic Transformation and Establishment of a regulatory foundation to encourage digital commerce, cross-border trade, and innovation, positioning Nigeria as a major player in Africa's digital landscape.

He added that the bill, when passed will encourage Modernized, Citizen-Centric Public Services.

“It will facilitate the digital transformation of government services to make them more transparent, accessible, and responsive to citizens.”

He also said the bill will ensure Digital Access for All, saying, “it will promote infrastructure and digital literacy programs to make digital services accessible across Nigeria, including underserved regions.”

Speaking earlier, the Senior Special Assistant on ICT and E-Governance to the Governor, Mr. Bayo Akande hailed the federal government’s National Digital Economy and E-Governance Bill.

Mr. Akande, who observed that the nation is overdue for a digital economy, which is the order of the day, added that this bill will drive economic growth through digital technology.

According to Akande, “Despite advances in technology, Nigeria's digital economy faces critical challenges, Nigeria lags behind countries with robust e-governance frameworks that empower citizens and protect consumer data. Without intervention, Nigeria risks losing economic opportunities in an increasingly digital world.”

He added, “though Oyo has already started to introduce digital methods in the governance space of the state, as the state recently deployed Business Process Automation, in a bid to make Oyo state government services go paperless, the bill is a step in the right direction.” 

It also seeks to create export-oriented capacities in Nigeria’s digital economy, support international digital trade and investments, and provide a legal framework for these activities.

In attendance were various stakeholders including several Tech Ecosystem leaders.

E-signed:

Prince Dotun Oyelade,

Commissioner for Information and Orientation,

Oyo State.

When I set out to do a commentary on the Unizik vice chancellorship tussle last week Tuesday, November 19, 2024, it was clear to me that the piece would be indictful.  My mental conclusion after assessing accounts of the crisis was that the VC contraption engineered by the Greg Mbadiwe led Governing Council had to be dismantled. I also realised that the essay would be fairly long. And while the newspaper audience do not generally mind long but informed essay, I could not say the same for social media. I therefore decided to break the work into two components. I eventually finished the Part 1 the following day Wednesday. Thirty minutes later, before I could send it out for publication, a friend sent me the Federal Ministry of Education statement nullifying Professor Bernard Odoh's appointment and also dissolving the Greg Mbadiwe chaired Governing Council. The cheering news however could create the misleading impression that my article was prompted by the development. After weighing the various implications, I chose to publish the script without any adjustment - even at the risk of blunting the prophetic tip of my essay. 

On that note of the federal government's intervention, I salute the President, Bola Tinubu and the Minister of Education,   Dr Tunji Alausa

for the prompt and decisive arrest of the disorder at Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka. The sack of Associate Professor Bernard Odoh and R.I. Nwokike from the positions of Vice Chancellor and Registrar respectively is unassailable. The conditions precedent for attainment of the positions were not fulfilled. Abuja rose to the responsibilities of leadership and administration by her action. Government's intervention was necessary to avert further caricature of the offices; and towards restoring public confidence in the system. Other players, notably local and national leadership of ASUU, professional associations, individuals, who stood up for requisite standards deserve to be complimented. The corrective measures also announced for the University of Illorin suggest a firm resolve to deal with the excesses in the system.

 Media reports of Dr Bernard Odoh's rejection of the reversal of his VC appointment - which reports have not been refuted - flashed another shade of recalcitrance. Who could be so defiant to constituted authority? Although the angry threat of resuming at the VC's office the following day was not lived up to, the outburst suggested  disorientation with the norm of public service. It was a reflection of disconnect with  responsibility of position which even Mbadiwe, the daring enforcer was not infected with. The ambitious Imo State - born politician promptly understood the game was over and ducked out of sight without a word. It later emerged that amidst the turbulence generated by the capture of the vice chancellorship, Odoh had set up a disciplinary panel for  containment of the opposition. In the face of escalating tension on campus, the panel, with the speed of sound, had gotten busy issuing summons! The loss of the sense of scandal is a pointer to how things have deteriorated in our system; how the academic values cum  environment are increasingly being devalued. Associate Professor Odoh and Greg Mbadiwe were not alone. The caricature made of the system could not have gone this far without the collaboration of some other academics at Unizik. For how long will this devaluation of the university system go on? 

 It was only ten years ago that Unizik emerged hurt from the muddled hot water of another VC appointment. Like the 2024 episode, the 2014 selection process was marred by the intrusion of extraneous factors. What was supposed to be a transparent run of merit - and had actually started as such - got caught in a web of other interests. In Daily Sun feature of June 17, 2014, captioned "Unizik and Universities' Rusting Gold", I cautioned that  that the violence to the system from compromised selection exercises would linger into the future. I followed up that intervention with another engagement in ThisDay of Sunday, July 27, 2014 titled: "Unizik VC: A Flawed Selection". The crux of the matter was that at the expiration of Prof Boniface Egboka's term of office in 2014, Prof Greg Nwakoby who came tops in the three man shortlist made by the Selection Board was voted down by the Governing Council in preference for Prof Joseph Ahaneku.

Defending it's reinvention of the selection wheel, the Governing Council held that it was not bound by the performance order of the shortlist as it was not the final stage. The Council (and Ahaneku's supporters) emphasised that in vetting of the shortlist, the scale tipped in favour of Ahaneku, hence his appointment as Vice Chancellor. The Council's argument was superfluous, merely serving to deflect from the games being played. The provisions of  Universities (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1993 as well as Amendment Act of 2007 do not contemplate the Governing Council as another selection panel. The role of the Governing Council is to confirm the Selection Board's nomination for appointment except in the event of serious allegation against the candidate. Professor Nwakoby who would later become Vice Chancellor of Anambra State University then defined the problem. He pointedly accused a member of the Governing Council from the southeast of having demanded sixty million naira from him as condition for becoming VC. The allegation was repeated at intervals during the appointment standoff. Not a word was heard from the identified member of Council. It later emerged that Nwakoby, a professor of law, had recorded the bribe demand. Regrettably, things went from the bad of 2014 to worse of 2024. Who knows what it takes to catapult an associate Professor to vice chancellor over and above experienced professors!

There's a theory that the stampeded appointments at Unizik, in this case, the vice chancellorship, was about the next Anambra State governorship election scheduled for November 2025. It is speculated that a group in the APC was pulling the strings of appointment towards softening the ground for their choice candidate. By convention, the role of state returning officer is often assigned to a vice chancellor. By the same token, a pliable VC could compile a list of loyalists to serve as local government area returning officers. While this view may only be considered as conjecture, established grounds of deep political exposure on the part of academics would lend probability to this theory. If this was the conceived game of some groups in the APC, it doubly makes acknowledgement of the federal government's response necessary. If it will take complimenting the positive steps of an underperforming government to achieve greater results, so be it.

In past and current cases of leadership succession in public universities, the Governing Councils have proved to be part of the problem. They have acted in such a manner as to constitute one of the parties to the dispute. Their extent of involvement in affairs of the institutions appears to be growing by the day. The increased interest in internal operations creates room for partisanship on the part of some members. At another level, the might - is - right - conditioning of the political class comes into play. Very often, politicians outnumber other categories in both the headship and general membership of the Councils. It would be naive to dismiss the gradual importation of political culture into the ivory tower by Council member - politicians. Succession processes in academic institutions are not designed as tests of political competency. And they are not intended to measure popularity of candidates either. But this is what politicians are introducing by making the Governing Councils a kind of electoral college.  Governments should consider replacing politicians in the Councils with retired  lecturers and former vice chancellors. What better way to talk about square pegs in square holes?

Nigerians may want to use this opportunity to take a second look at the office of vice chancellor. It would appear that the office has been impacted by the Nigerian environment in such a way that learning pursuits is no longer it's mainstay. It's not just about the declining serenity in the campuses. The concern here is  about the seeming shift from the centre of academic industry to pyramid of power. In recent times, the office has shed it's traditional, staid outlook for an unapologetic, bold flamboyance. The feeling of fraternity between the VC and fellow professors has dwindled. In the new era of establishment rule, it's a matter of boss - staff relationship. 

Nigeria's power configuration has reached the shores of our higher educational institutions. 

Positions of Vice Chancellors, Provosts, Rectors are evolving into executive authorities with their own power of patronage. Some vice chancellors are for all practical purposes, mini Governors, in the nature of their undertakings and style of operation. It is now fashionable to run an administrative machinery of special advisers, special assistants and personal assistants to the head of institution. Recall that a Personal Assistant on Media & Publicity, Charles Otu issued a combative statement that disregarded the sack of Bernard Odoh as Unizik VC. While some of these aides are recruited on contract from outside, lecturers who are paid to teach and research, are drafted to take up the other slots. And in tune with their executive clout, heads of institutions move around in convoy of vehicles trailed by security officers! Blaring sirens may not be too far, too long in coming. In the light of the commendable surgical operation at Unizik, the Minister of Education is invited to commission a study on reforms for refocused leadership in academic institutions.

Lagos State Security Trust Fund (LSSTF) on Monday announced the postponement of the "Annual Town Hall Meeting on Security with the Governor" initially slated for Thursday, November 28, 2024, at the Civic Centre, Victoria Island. 

The Fund, in a statement signed by its Executive Secretary/CEO, Dr. Abdurrazaq Balogun, to announce the postponement of the meeting, said the new date for the event is December 18, 2024.

Balogun said the event, which is expected to be attended by Lagos State Governor Mr. Babajide Sanwo-Olu, heads of security agencies, and critical stakeholders, among others, will now be held at the Lagos House, Ikeja, by 11 am prompt. 

The Town Hall Meeting on Security with the Governor is an annual event where the Lagos State Security Trust Fund gives an account of its stewardship in the last one year.

It is said that seeing is believing. But for the Nigerian, seeing alone may not be enough. There must be certainty and palpability not only to the sensory apparatuses but also to logic. Bottomline, there must be plausibility. I will attempt to put some logic into what Nigerians are witnessing today as regards the overhauled Port Harcourt Refinery.

I was a witness to history yesterday, November 26, 2024 -- the inauguration of the old Port Harcourt Refinery. Yes, it has come alive again. It is operational. To put it in our lingo, ‘’it is working’’. It has received a new elixir after many years of lethargy.

The 60,000 barrels-per-day old Port Harcourt Refinery, which was established in 1965, had suffered a series of aborted potential. Certain previous administrations had failed to restart this critical national asset. In March 2021, the Buhari administration awarded the contract for the rehabilitation of the refinery and repair works began in phases.

In his statement welcoming the revival of the plant, President Bola Tinubu, whose strong and courageous leadership brought to realisation this seeming holy grail, acknowledged the elemental role of former President Muhammadu Buhari in initiating the comprehensive rehabilitation of all the refineries and thanked the African Export-Import Bank for its support in financing the project.

The President also directed the speedy reactivation of the new Port Harcourt Refinery, the Warri Refinery, and the Kaduna Refinery. This is in furtherance of his vision of ensuring the nation’s energy security and independence, as well as economic advancement.

The President has undertaken bold and surgical reforms in the oil and gas sector. He issued five executive orders to unlock over $2.5 billion in oil and gas investments, among other initiatives. With his support for achieving local refining capacity, today, the billions of dollars previously spent annually on petrol subsidy, which puts pressure on the naira, can be repurposed, and with new opportunities opening up in the sector.

The launch of the revamped plant on Tuesday was successful but not without an expected sputter of heterogenous reactions. Nigerians are happy to see the revival of this often noised but slumbering asset. It is happening in their lifetime. Most young people, including myself, were not born when this refinery was set up. In fact, many were not born when the refinery was functional and only grew to hear about its spasms of failures. It is a living, puffing, and breathing labyrinth of engines today.

Putting clarity to misleading claims over the resuscitated plant, the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL) explained thus: ‘’The Old Port Harcourt Refinery is currently operating at 70% of its installed capacity, with plans to ramp up to 90%. The refinery is producing the following daily outputs:

‘’Straight-Run Gasoline (Naphtha): Blended into 1.4 million liters of Premium Motor Spirit (PMS or petrol)

‘’Kerosene: 900,000 liters

‘’Automotive Gas Oil (AGO or Diesel): 1.5 million liters

‘’Low Pour Fuel Oil (LPFO): 2.1 million liters

‘’Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG): Additional volumes

‘’It is worth noting that the refinery incorporates crack C5, a blending component from our sister company, Indorama Petrochemicals (formerly Eleme Petrochemicals), to produce gasoline that meets required specifications. Blending is a standard practice in refineries globally, as no single unit can produce gasoline that fully complies with any country’s standards without such processes.

‘’Additionally, we have made substantial progress on the new Port Harcourt Refinery, which will begin operations soon without prior announcements.’’

During a guided tour, journalists, industry leaders, and other stakeholders were conducted around the organs of the facility. From the control room to the processing units, the tanks, and the loading area where trucks were stationed to lift products. The plant was well and running.

Speaking during a ceremony to herald the onset of product loading at the refinery, Mr. Mele Kyari, GCEO of NNPCL, described the beginning of the loadout activities as a significant achievement for Nigeria. He thanked President Tinubu for his support and understanding towards the project and for his persistence to ensure energy security for the country.

He also thanked the NNPC Ltd Board of Directors and the entire staff for their support and commitment, which led to the reactivation of the refinery, and Nigerians for their patience and for the genuine expectations on the company to deliver on the other refineries.

There are well-founded concerns about the sustainability of the refinery. This is the plausibility factor. But one thing is certain about the Tinubu administration, there will be no unfinished business as regards securing Nigeria economically and ensuring the best outcomes for citizens across all sectors. With every horizon comes fresh possibilities, the administration is determined in its purpose of advancing the nation.

Fredrick Nwabufo is Senior Special Assistant to President on Public Engagement

The Joint Aviation Trade Unions' Forum-JATUF, the umbrella body for all aviation unions in Nigeria, over the weekend, honoured the Honourable Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Mr. Festus Keyamo, SAN, with the Leadership and Excellence Award. The award, which celebrates his visionary leadership and contributions to advancing Nigeria’s aviation sector, was presented during the 2nd Edition of the Aviation Union’s Leadership Conference on held at Radisson Blu Hotel, Lagos.

Representing the Minister at the event, Mr. Henry Agbebire, Director of Special Duties at the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria-FAAN, conveyed Mr. Keyamo’s heartfelt gratitude. The Minister commended JATUF for its efforts in fostering synergy within the aviation industry and lauded this year’s conference theme, “Synergy for Safety and Productivity: Management-Labour Collaboration,” as both timely and essential to the sector’s growth.

In his goodwill message, Mr. Keyamo emphasized the critical role of partnership in achieving safety and productivity in aviation.

“Safety and productivity are non-negotiable imperatives in aviation. Achieving these objectives requires a shared vision and concerted action by all stakeholders, especially the management and labour arms of the sector. As the Honourable Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, I recognize and deeply value the critical role aviation unions play in maintaining workforce morale, advocating for best practices, and ensuring the seamless operation of our industry,” he stated.

The Minister reaffirmed his commitment to fostering strong collaborations between the government and aviation unions, highlighting transparency, fairness, and open communication as foundational principles of his leadership.

“I am committed to strengthening our collaboration with aviation unions, ensuring open lines of communication, and addressing concerns with fairness and transparency. Our collective efforts have already yielded positive outcomes, and I am proud of the constructive relationships we have built so far. Together, we can achieve the shared vision of a resilient, efficient, and globally competitive aviation industry,” he added.

The Leadership and Excellence Award underscores Mr. Keyamo’s dedication to tackling the challenges within the aviation sector while building partnerships that prioritize safety, productivity, and innovation.

The event attracted key stakeholders from the aviation sector, who lauded the Minister’s proactive initiatives in addressing critical issues and driving sustainable development in the industry.

Tunde Moshood 

Special Adviser on Media and Communications to the Honourable Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development

The impending return of Donald Trump to the White House – with an almost lily-white team of cabinet appointees – follows an overwhelming victory in which his Republican Party also won the Senate and the House, and represents one of the greatest political comebacks in history.

The twice-impeached Trump is the first convicted felon to become president having been found guilty of  paying hush money to a porn star called Stormy Daniels.

Snow White

Trump is truly a phenomenon. He is, though, more like the wicked witch who has picked seven political dwarfs than Snow White. A billionaire businessman and reality show host who metamorphosed into a hate-spewing, white supremacist, nativist politician, he narrowly won the 2016 presidency.

Trump has now been able to convince a multi-racial working class and struggling middle-class majority to vote against their own interests through alchemic appeals to improving their economic condition by launching  tariff wars (against China and the rest of the world) and deporting – at an initial estimated cost of $315 billion – most of the 13 million illegal immigrants in America.

Just as during Trump’s first chaotic presidency (2017-2020), these policies are likely to cause self-inflicted harm, massively increasing the $35.4 trillion national debt, resulting in widespread labour shortages (an estimated half of U.S. farm workers are illegal), and raising food prices for the bottom 80 per cent of Americans. During his first tenure, Trump enacted $1.5 trillion of tax cuts, mostly for the super-rich.

It is highly unlikely that any other Republican politician could have achieved this improbable victory. Ironically, the Latinos and blacks who voted for Trump in larger than expected numbers, have scarcely seen themselves represented in the incoming president’s ministerial nominees. Without Trump at the head of the ticket in 2028, Republicans may well struggle to mobilise a majority from the shrinking white population. The Grand Old Party’s Faustian bargain to sell its soul to the Devil, could ironically damage its long-term electoral prospects. America’s misogyny must also be probed, having rejected two flawless campaigns by the entitled Hillary Clinton and the joyful Kamala Harris.

While disgruntled voters may well have liked Harris’s optimistic message, they rejected the messenger. Paradoxically, while they accepted Trump as the messenger who best embodied their anger and frustration, they did not necessarily embrace his message. America’s liberal elite also has profound questions to answer, having clearly lost the country through what many Americans feel is a Wokeish abandonment of traditional values. The talking heads on CNN and MSNBC as well as the pundits in the New York Times and the Washington Post must finally realise that America has tuned out of their self-obsessed, rambling echo chamber, and that what is going on in their newsrooms and studios is totally detached from what is actually happening across the country. This election definitively showed that Beyoncé, Taylor Swift, and George Clooney may be talented artists, but have zero political clout.

The vengeful Trump has recently made cabinet appointments which suggest he has learned nothing from his first presidency. As he painfully discovered during his first term, running a government as complicated as America’s is not like running Facebook where you hire the best talent and get out of their way.

Trump recruited capable politicians, generals, and technocrats in his first term, but then fell out with many of them as they refused to enforce his sometimes autocratic whims, insisting on allegiance to the U.S. Constitution rather than to a mercurial King.

This time, he is picking adherents of his right-wing MAGA (Make America Great Again) gospel, shamelessly prioritising loyalty over competence. Many of these nominees, however, have little experience of heading large bureaucracies. We can therefore expect more scandals, sackings, and stepping downs.

 Four flawed dwarfs

There has already been an early casualty among Trump’s four flawed political dwarfs: his controversial pick for Attorney-General, Matt Gaetz, a Congressman who survived charges of child-trafficking before a report  of a Congressional investigation into alleged sexual misconduct with a 17-year old minor, drug use, and illegal acceptance of gifts was recently concluded.

Gaetz threatened to defund or close down the Justice Department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Deeply unpopular even among Republican legislators, he recently stepped down amidst much unease in the Senate which confirms cabinet appointments.

Defence Secretary nominee, Peter Hegseth, is singularly unqualified to lead the three million-strong $2 trillion a year department. A presenter on the right-wing Fox News, Hegseth is a neo-conservative who was “radicalised” by the September 2001 terrorist attacks on the U.S. into supporting crusading wars in Afghanistan and Iraq which he now considers to have been a $5 trillion exercise in profligacy. Hegseth has thus opposed American spending in Ukraine, and described NATO as “totally corrupted.”

Trump’s pick for Defence Secretary wears prominent tattoos associated with Islamophobic crusading white Christian neo-Nazis, and has threatened to fire wokeish generals who promote diversity and inclusion in the military. Hegseth has vociferously attacked women and “trans-lesbian” soldiers who have patriotically served their country. He has defended American soldiers accused of war crimes. He has compared anti-racist U.S. civil society groups like Black Lives Matter and Antifa to Islamic terrorists. His second wife divorced him after he impregnated a fellow Fox news producer, and he also settled a rape allegation through a non-disclosure financial payment.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is the scion of the legendary Democratic family, chosen by Trump to head the Department of Health and Human Services with an annual budget of $1.7 trillion. Kennedy has argued that no vaccine is safe and effective. He was a one-time heroin-snorting addict and self-confessed sex addict who accused his family of being victims of “hypnosis”. Kennedy had an adulterous affair with journalist, Olivia Nuzzi, and three other women have since claimed sexual affairs with him.

Trump’s nominee for national intelligence director, Tulsi Gabbard, transformed from being a liberal Democrat to a right-wing Republican Trump loyalist. She has often been portrayed as a Putin-supporting Russian intelligence asset. Gabbard has also reportedly been involved with a secretive Hare Krishna-linked sect called the Science of Identity Foundation renowned for its Islamophobia, homophobia, and vegetarianism.

 Three troublesome dwarfs

Among Trump’s three troublesome dwarfs, Secretary of State nominee, Hispanic Senator Marco Rubio, has experience but lacks substance. The Reversible Rubio has become a sycophantic Trump loyalist, having previously been one of his strongest critics during the 2016 Republican primaries. The Cuban-descended Rubio is an anti-China hawk who strongly despises the Chinese Communist Party which actually practices unbridled capitalism. Rubio also backs Trump’s calls for reducing American spending in Ukraine and getting Europeans to stump up more cash for their own defence. However, he previously led senatorial efforts to stall any American withdrawal from NATO.

National Security Adviser nominee, Mike Waltz, was a former Green Beret and former U.S. Congressman. A Trump loyalist, he has backed vice-president J.D. Vance’s MAGA approach of reducing spending on Ukraine and the Middle East to counter China more effectively. Waltz, however, has solid experience in this field, having served on Congressional committees on foreign affairs, armed services, and intelligence. He regards America’s military missions in Afghanistan and Iraq to have been hubristic, and has argued that ill-equipped NATO troops did more harm than good in Afghanistan.

The seventh dwarf is Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, who used Twitter/X to spread disinformation and spent $130 million to help Trump regain the White House.

An émigré whose formative years were spent in the militaristic milieu of apartheid South Africa, Musk appears to have embraced Trump’s white supremacy. He has long benefitted from U.S. government contracts, and has pending investigations with its Securities and Exchange Commission.

Musk has been tasked with heading up the Orwellian-sounding Department of Government Efficiency, with a pledge to slash $2 trillion (nearly a third of the budget) in government spending.

This would be politically suicidal given that popular programmes like Social Security and Medicare, which Trump has promised to protect, account for much of these costs.  Trump also seems determined to launch an ill-advised purge against what he calls the “deep state” by removing the job security of over 50,000 federal bureaucrats.

MAGA lunatics are about to take over the American asylum. This horror show is coming soon to a theatre near you. This will be no fairytale with a happy ending.

Professor Adebajo is a Senior Research Fellow at the University of Pretoria’s Centre for the Advancement of Scholarship in South Africa.

The phenomenon of Nigerian support for Donald Trump, despite his stance on immigration, is indeed complex and seemingly paradoxical. During and after the U.S. election, many Nigerians, especially through social media, expressed strong support for Trump and shared his posts, including those who have never travelled to the U.S. Some even created sticker designs inspired by Nigerian culture featuring Trump. This phenomenon raises questions about whether these individuals have forgotten that Trump is a staunch supporter of strict immigration policies, with strong allegations of anti-Africa foreign policy stance. Obviously, many Nigerians seem to prioritise other aspects of his persona and policies that resonate with them, reflecting the complex nature of political support where certain values can overshadow conflicting positions.

Nigerians, and by extension Africans, are believed to be at the receiving end of Trump's anti-immigration policies. His previous administration imposed travel bans on Nigeria and other African countries, citing national security concerns, which could potentially be reinstated, limiting the ability of Nigerians to enter the U.S. His prior administration's policies led to considerable backlogs in visa processing, with current wait times for interviews reaching two to three years; these delays could worsen if similar policies are reintroduced.

Stricter immigration policies, including mass deportation operations and a focus on border control, may create a more hostile environment for all immigrants, even if not directly targeting Nigerians. While some experts suggest that legitimate students and professionals may not be heavily impacted, there are concerns about increased scrutiny and potential restrictions on study and work visas.

Trump's Consistent Hardline Stance on Immigration

Donald Trump's immigration stance has remained consistent from his 2016 campaign through his 2024 election victory. In 2016, he vowed to deport illegal immigrants. His 2017 executive order suspended visas from seven Muslim-majority countries and halted the refugee programme. After winning in 2024, Trump pledged to conduct "the largest domestic deportation operation in American history," stating, "We will pick them up and we will send them back to their countries." He also promised to "seal up the border" and implement "strong ideological screening of all immigrants."

These policies are seen as targeting non-white communities, particularly African Americans and Asian Americans. Critics argue that Trump's immigration policies disproportionately affect people of colour, citing mass deportations and travel bans. His use of racially charged language, such as referring to certain nations as "shithole countries" and describing immigration as an "invasion," has been criticised for supporting white supremacist ideologies and potentially contributing to increased hate crimes. Proposals to end birthright citizenship and implement "ideological screening" further fuel concerns about discrimination against non-white communities in the U.S.

Despite Trump's controversial rhetoric and policies perceived as targeting non-white Americans, somehow these demographic groups, including African Americans and Asian Americans, have shown support for him across political divides.

Based on the exit poll data and analysis provided, Donald Trump made significant gains among minority voters in the 2024 election. Approximately 13% of Black voters supported Trump, an increase from previous elections. Latino voters showed a substantial shift, with about 45% to 46% backing Trump, up from 32% in 2020. This change was particularly pronounced among Latino men, with 45% voting for Trump. Research showed that Trump also performed well among younger voters, securing 43% of those under 30. This shift indicates that what political strategist Mike Madrid who noted that not all non-white Americans see themselves as marginalized is true, thereby contributing to Trump's appeal among diverse voter bases. Why?

Is there a connection between Trump's support and sympathy for his persecution during the elections?

Though there is no clear evidence regarding this, still seems that the 2024 election campaign saw a strong link between support for Trump and sympathy for his perceived persecution. The July 2024 assassination attempt tended to boost his support, casting him as a martyr figure. The ceaseless barrage of attacks from mainstream media tended to achieve the opposite result of attracting voters to Trump.

Similarly, Trump's campaign framed his legal battles as political persecution, resonating with his base while religious language portrayed him as a protector of faith, appealing to evangelical voters. Thus, the assassination attempt amplified Trump's narrative of being victimised by "enemies" or Democrats. Many Christian voters viewed his persecutions as spiritual warfare. Trump adviser Kash Patel once indicated that a second Trump administration would actively target journalists for prosecution, further emphasising the notion of political persecution against those who criticised or investigated him.

What About Nigerians Who Are Not in the US? Why Do They Support Trump?

It is also more surprising that some Nigerians outside the US still strongly support Trump. Despite Trump's controversial rhetoric about Africa, some Nigerians supported him due to his stance on conservative social issues, particularly abortion and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBTQ+) rights. This is evident in Daddy Hezekiah (Victor Onukogu), the founder of Living Christ Mission in Onitsha, Anambra State, who led his church members in a march supporting Trump's re-election in 2020.  They carried placards reading "Trump 2020" and "God for President Trump," singing songs that translated to "We will gain victory ... pray for Trump to win." 

No doubt, Daddy Hezekiah's support was largely based on Trump's conservative stance on abortion and LGBT issues. That is why Jude Feranmi Adejuwon, a Nigerian political activist and writer explained that; "If the church supports Trump, it would be because of the manifesto of the Republicans; namely a zero tolerance for abortion and LGBT issues. For example, Trump was the first sitting president to speak in person at the annual March for Life."

Hence, some of those supporters viewed Trump as a defender of traditional Christian values, particularly his opposition to abortion and LGBT rights. Consequently, Nigerian Christians, especially evangelicals, aligned with Trump's conservative stance on these social issues, seeing him as a bulwark against what they perceive as liberal threats to religious beliefs and traditional family values.

That is why Pastor. Samuel Adebayo from Lagos, Nigeria, in 2024 stated, "Trump stands for traditional Christian values in an increasingly secular world. That is why we have raised an altar praying for him to win so the Bible can become a reference point in not just America but the world."

Aside from the issues of Christian and traditional family values, there are other Nigerians and politicians like Hon. Ehiozuwa Agbonayinmma, a former member of Nigeria's House of Representatives who also expressed support for Trump, stating that Republican administrations have shown more support for Nigeria. Others support Trump's "America First" policy and wish Nigeria's leaders would also prioritise their own citizens the way Americans do.

No doubt, Trump's support for cryptocurrency is another significant factor contributing to his popularity among some Nigerians. His pro-crypto platform resonates with enthusiasts who view digital currencies as avenues for economic growth and financial inclusion. During his campaign, Trump pledged to make the US "the crypto capital of the planet" and promised to appoint crypto-friendly regulators, appealing to those frustrated with current regulations. Following his election victory, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies saw significant price increases, reinforcing the belief that his presidency would benefit the crypto market. 

This particular stance contrasts with his opponents' skepticism, making Trump more appealing to crypto supporters in Nigeria. These voices span from 2019 to 2024, showing consistent support for Trump among certain Nigerian religious and political figures despite his controversial statements about African nations.

What About Those Who Do Not Support Trump?

While some Nigerians support Donald Trump, many do not for various reasons. His history of making derogatory comments about African nations, including calling them "shithole countries," has alienated many. Also, Trump's restrictive immigration policies, such as the 2020 travel ban affecting Nigeria, have been viewed negatively by those seeking opportunities in the US. Critics also highlight his perceived disregard for human rights and democratic norms and concerns that his "America First" policies could harm Nigeria's economy. Again, Trump's skepticism of climate change and behaviour especially his insensitivity that cryptocurrency could cause more global warming clashes with the cultural values of many Nigerians who are not in the crypto world.

Psychological and Emotional Factors of Trump's Support

Trump's support can be explained through various psychological and emotional factors. His rhetoric resonates with feelings of frustration and a desire for change while his blunt communication is seen as authentic. This creates a sense of belonging among supporters often overriding rational policy considerations. Furthermore, fear and anxiety about economic insecurity and cultural change drive his messaging while cognitive dissonance leads some to double down on their beliefs despite contradictory evidence. Hence, many view Trump as a straightforward leader who rejects the establishment. These factors combine to create a strong emotional attachment to Trump illustrating the sentimental nature of political support and his win in the just concluded US election.