
Admin
Mike Ozekhome Writes IGP As Enugu Police Command Faces Extortion Allegations in N62 Million Scandal, Makes Demands, Probe
[OPINION] Unlike Kate Henshaw, Some Nigerian Celebrities Mistake Controversy For Achievement - Isaac Asabor
In the contemporary Nigerian entertainment industry, an unsettling trend has emerged: the glorification of controversy as a means of remaining relevant. Some celebrities, either ignorantly or deliberately, believe that being constantly embroiled in controversy equates to success. This misguided ideology is fueled by the unquenchable thirst for public attention, social media engagement, and brand endorsement deals. However, the reality is that controversy, when not carefully managed, often leads to a damaging reputation, career stagnation, and, in some cases, irreparable downfall.
Given the allure of controversy, it is little wonder that the Nigerian entertainment industry is replete with celebrities who thrive on controversy. From musicians to actors, influencers, and reality TV stars, many have mastered the art of staying in the headlines through scandalous actions and statements. The rise of social media platforms such as Instagram, Twitter, and TikTok has further enabled this trend, allowing celebrities to instantly engage millions with provocative content.
Some celebrities see controversy as a surefire way to remain relevant, especially in an industry where public attention is fleeting. They stir public emotions by engaging in online feuds, making outrageous statements, or displaying socially unacceptable behavior. The resultant buzz generates clicks, shares, and comments, creating the illusion of fame and influence. In reality, this notoriety often comes at a great cost.
Unfortunately, there is a price of controversial fame, and which is damagingly costly. While controversy might bring temporary fame, it seldom leads to lasting success. In Nigeria, we have seen celebrities who were once household names fade into obscurity due to their inability to transition from scandal-driven popularity to substance-driven success. A case in point is some musicians who gained fame through provocative lyrics and gimmicks but struggled to maintain relevance when public interest shifted.
Brands and corporate organizations, which play a crucial role in the financial sustenance of celebrities, are cautious about associating with individuals who thrive on controversy. While some may leverage scandalous moments for short-term marketing, they often distance themselves when the public backlash becomes intense. The result is that these celebrities, despite their online fame, struggle to secure long-term deals and endorsements.
At the core of this issue is ignorance. Many of these celebrities do not understand that being relevant in entertainment goes beyond social media outrage. They lack the awareness that true success comes from talent, consistency, and personal brand management. A musician who invests in controversy rather than refining their artistry will soon be overtaken by those who focus on their craft. An actor who engages in endless social media drama rather than improving their skills will be left behind when the industry evolves.
Unfortunately, some of these celebrities do not realize the negative impact of their actions until it is too late. Many fail to build a solid legacy and eventually find themselves sidelined when public sentiment turns against them. Some even resort to desperate measures, such as fake scandals and publicity stunts, just to remain in the limelight.
Looking at the issue from the perspective of the role of social media and the press, it is germane to opine that social media has played a significant role in fostering this culture of controversy. With the increasing demand for content and entertainment, many blogs and media outlets thrive on sensational stories. This has created an ecosystem where celebrities feel pressured to stay relevant by any means necessary.
Moreover, the rise of clickbait journalism has further worsened the situation. Many online platforms prioritize engagement over credibility, publishing stories that sensationalize controversies involving celebrities. This cycle of controversy and media exploitation fuels the perception that remaining in the public eye, regardless of the circumstances, is a sign of success.
Rather than relying on controversy, Nigerian celebrities should focus on building lasting careers rooted in talent, discipline, and strategic brand management. There are numerous examples of Nigerian entertainers who have remained relevant for decades without resorting to controversy. These individuals have consistently delivered quality work, maintained professionalism, and cultivated strong relationships within the industry.
A prime example is Kate Henshaw, an actress who has remained relevant in Nollywood not through controversy but through talent, hard work, and professionalism. Kate Henshaw has built an enviable career by focusing on her craft, making strategic career moves, and maintaining a scandal-free public image. Her ability to reinvent herself over the years and stay at the top of her game without indulging in unnecessary drama is a testament to the fact that talent and integrity are the true determinants of success.
Similarly, Nigerian comedians such as Basketmouth and Ali Baba have stayed relevant without unnecessary drama. Their ability to evolve, create meaningful content, and maintain professionalism has ensured their continued success in an industry where many have come and gone.
It is imperative to educate upcoming entertainers on the dangers of building a career on controversy. Entertainment academies, mentorship programs, and industry stakeholders must emphasize the importance of personal branding, ethics, and professionalism. Young talents should understand that while controversy may offer temporary fame, it is not a sustainable strategy for success.
Furthermore, the media has a responsibility to promote stories that celebrate talent, innovation, and hard work rather than solely focusing on controversies. By shifting the narrative, the industry can encourage celebrities to prioritize substance over scandal.
While controversy may provide short-term attention, it is not an achievement. The ignorance of some Nigerian celebrities in mistaking controversy for success is a dangerous trend that must be addressed. True success in the entertainment industry is built on talent, consistency, and professionalism. Until celebrities begin to prioritize these values over cheap publicity, the industry will continue to witness a cycle of fleeting fame and regretful downfalls.
The time has come for Nigerian celebrities to rise above controversy and embrace meaningful engagement with their audience. In the end, history remembers those who leave a legacy of impact, not those who merely trended for the wrong reasons. Kate Henshaw remains a shining example of a celebrity who has built a lasting and respectable career through dedication, talent, and integrity, proving that real success transcends the fleeting nature of controversy.
[OPINION] Shame To Death: Ayo Adebanjo And Edwin Clarke’s Words On The Marble Will Never Be Silenced - Isaac Asabor
Death may have stolen the mortal presence of Ayo Adebanjo and Edwin Clarke, but it has failed woefully to silence their voices. These two towering figures, who dedicated their lives to speaking truth to power, left behind words that remain inscribed on the marble of Nigeria’s conscience. Their unwavering advocacy for justice, equity, and good governance continues to resonate, serving as a moral compass in a nation riddled with corruption, ethnic strife, and leadership failure. With their departure, a gaping void has been created in sincere and fearless advocacy, leaving Nigeria bereft of two of its most courageous voices.
The demise of these legendary nationalists is not just a loss to their families or political affiliates; it is a grievous wound inflicted upon the very soul of Nigeria. For decades, Adebanjo and Clarke stood firm, unyielding in their quest for a better Nigeria. Their words, bold and piercing, unsettled the corrupt and comforted the oppressed. In a country where sycophancy has become a thriving industry and many so-called activists have succumbed to the seductive embrace of power, these two men remained unbought and unbowed. Their advocacy was neither for self-enrichment nor for the fleeting applause of the public but for the collective good of all Nigerians.
To start with, the indelible mark of Ayo Adebanjo would always be remembered by posterity. Pa Adebanjo, a staunch Awoist, was a man of impeccable integrity. Throughout his political career and his time as a leader of Afenifere, the Yoruba socio-political group, he consistently stood on the side of justice. He was unapologetic in his criticism of bad governance, regardless of who was in power. His fearless denunciation of the misrule of successive governments was legendary. From the military era to the civilian dispensation, Adebanjo never wavered in calling out injustices, be it electoral fraud, economic mismanagement, or constitutional imbalance.
He advocated for true federalism, knowing that the lopsided structure of Nigeria was a recipe for perpetual discontent. He often argued that without restructuring, Nigeria would continue to grope in darkness, hamstrung by an over-centralized system that stifles progress and breeds marginalization. Unlike many of his contemporaries who compromised their principles for political expediency, Adebanjo remained steadfast, rejecting any form of inducement that could silence his voice.
With his passing, the Nigerian political landscape has lost a moral conscience. His absence is already being felt as the Lagos House of Assembly (LAHA) grapples with a leadership crisis that lacks direction, accountability, and sincerity. Who will now speak with his level of courage, experience, and moral authority? Ayo Adebanjo’s death is not just an end; it is a painful punctuation in Nigeria’s history of fearless advocacy.
Regarding Edwin Clarke, he was unarguably the Voice of the Niger Delta and Nigeria’s Conscience. If Adebanjo was the voice of the Yoruba, Edwin Clarke was the indomitable lion of the Niger Delta. A man whose life was devoted to the pursuit of justice for his people, Clarke embodied the struggle for resource control, equity, and fairness. He was a formidable critic of successive governments that exploited the Niger Delta while leaving its people in abject poverty.
For decades, Clarke raised his voice against the environmental degradation, economic deprivation, and political marginalization of the Niger Delta. He did not hesitate to confront presidents, governors, and international oil companies over their injustices. His advocacy led to several policy changes, including increased derivation funds and the creation of interventionist agencies, even though corruption later crippled many of these initiatives.
Clarke was also a nationalist in every sense of the word. While fighting for his region, he never lost sight of the broader Nigerian question. He championed the cause of true federalism, national unity, and good governance. His pen and voice never ceased to challenge impunity, corruption, and the lack of accountability among Nigeria’s leaders. His words were powerful, reverberating across ethnic and political divides, forcing the powerful to listen, even when they pretended not to.
His death has created a vacuum that is difficult to fill. The Niger Delta, and indeed Nigeria, has lost a fearless advocate, a man who could speak truth to power without fear of retribution. In an era where many voices of opposition have been co-opted, silenced, or drowned in the sea of compromise, Clarke’s unwavering stance was a beacon of hope. Without him, who will confront the exploitation of the Niger Delta? Who will remind the government of its failures in governance, resource management, and national unity?
Without a doubt, their absence since the last few days can best be described to be a tragedy. Their exit is a tragedy not just because of their mortality, but because of the widening gap in sincere advocacy they have left behind. Their passing has exposed a disturbing reality: the absence of a new generation of leaders willing to speak truth to power without fear or personal gain.
In today’s Nigeria, many self-acclaimed activists and social commentators have compromised their integrity. Some have been silenced with political appointments, others have been bought over with financial inducements, and many have been cowed by threats and intimidation. The result is a society where sycophants and opportunists dominate public discourse while genuine voices of reason are increasingly scarce.
Yet, their words remain. They may be gone, but their voices are immortal. Their speeches, interviews, and writings continue to serve as a reminder of what true advocacy looks like. Their legacies remain a template for future generations who dare to challenge power and demand accountability.
Despite their exit from the world stage, death should be ashamed because their voices speak still. Death, you have failed! You may have taken their bodies, but you have not silenced their words. Shame on you, for the words of Ayo Adebanjo and Edwin Clarke remain on the marble of Nigeria’s history, eternally speaking truth to power. Every time a leader acts against the interest of the people, their voices will rise in condemnation. Every time injustice rears its ugly head, their words will echo as a rebuke. Every time Nigeria drifts into the abyss of misrule, their legacy will serve as a reminder that some men dared to stand, speak, and fight.
The challenge now falls upon us, the living, to pick up the mantle they have left behind. We must not allow their voices to fade into oblivion. The struggle for a better Nigeria is far from over, and the battle for justice, equity, and good governance must continue. If we let fear or personal comfort silence us, we betray not only their memory but also the future of Nigeria.
As we mourn the passing of these two titans, let us not just eulogize them in words but in action. Let us embody the principles they stood for. Let us reject injustice, corruption, and the tyranny of bad leadership. Let us demand accountability and refuse to be cowed into submission.
For as long as Nigeria remains, the words of Ayo Adebanjo and Edwin Clarke will remain etched in history, speaking truth to power. And to death, we say: shame on you!
[OPINION] Azu at 60: The art of giving the self - Louis Odion
Professionally, tomes have been written or said about his significant contributions to Nigerian letters, as a consistent public intellectual of more than three decades standing. For this particular purpose, I choose to bear testimony of a slightly different dimension of the Azu enigma: a deep commitment to family values. His professional accomplishments are arguably matched by the equal success in building an adorable home, with his kids turning out excellently well.
In conversation around African culture, the art of giving is often characterised as binary. The material and the immaterial. Whereas the former consists of gifting, say, gold and silver; the latter involves the intimacy of donating, say, time.
Without denying the value of a material gift, there can, of course, be no disputing the nobility in devoting time to the pursuit of the interests of others. For, in the materialist world, we are classified either as billionaire, millionaire, simply comfortable or poor. Which means that our ability to give is contingent upon what providence has endowed us with.
But while the size of our wealth may vary individually, time is definitely a leveller of all. So, it can be seen that to give of one’s time — a resource universally fixed for everyone — is to truly give more indeed.
This is how I choose to define the essence of Azubuike Ishiekwene, a friend who sticks closer than a brother. Journalism had introduced us more than three decades ago in Lagos; first, as acquaintances, and, despite a wide age gap, we became buddies, then brothers, and collaborators. I count him among that special tribe instinctively wired and eager to volunteer of their allotted daily 24 hours often in the service of those not in the position to give anything in return.
It is often said that the factor of woman or money is the bane of friendship between two males. But for more than a quarter of a century that Azu and I became what the Yoruba classify as “kori kosun” (intimate friends), we have never quarrelled for one day. Which is a reflection of his temperance and tolerance.
I, therefore, count myself among the countless beneficiaries of his generosity of spirit, which is quite ecumenical in texture. You only need to hint Azu of a difficulty — whether professional or personal — and, in the next moment, he has everything already worked out clinically, like an oracle in terms of solution options.
Indeed, his spare frame belies an immense capacity for hard work and laser focus. Not until a dire medical warning came a few years ago did Azu, for instance, finally agree to accept a major lifestyle change: muting his phone after 10 p.m. Over the years, he had become addicted to an editor’s hazardous routine – working for 24 hours.
But regardless, with the furious force of a soldier ant, Azu still juggles a lot of things at once: business manager, columnist, writer, reporter, speaker, mentor, etc. The amazing thing is the adroitness he brings to bear on each of these responsibilities.
Even at that, he yet has this uncanny way of inserting himself into other people’s world and inheriting their battles or yokes, so to speak.
That same spirit undoubtedly led him into countless volunteer organisations like the Open Fees NGO, which is committed to putting underprivileged children through school. One of its beneficiaries happens to be Azu’s own former gateman, now in medical school. When we started National Life newspapers in 2008, I drew immeasurably from Azu’s hands-on experience as Controller at THE PUNCH.
It was in the course of similarly pushing the boundaries of “community service” that he, for instance, had met his “missing rib” in the 80s. Then, Azu was roving around the idyllic campus of UNILAG, following the proverbial “October Rush,” when he bumped onto a needy JAMBITE trying to sort out her registration. Characteristically, the “Good Samaritan” took over her burden. Thereafter, one thing led to another, and he and Rume became an item on the Akoka campus.

The rest is now history.
That same spirit undoubtedly led him into countless volunteer organisations like the Open Fees NGO, which is committed to putting underprivileged children through school. One of its beneficiaries happens to be Azu’s own former gateman, now in medical school. When we started National Life newspapers in 2008, I drew immeasurably from Azu’s hands-on experience as Controller at THE PUNCH. And for the years that I served as Information Commissioner in Edo State and had to cope with the choking pressure of office, he was my backroom booster, who would help deliver excellent papers rapidly, at no cost. I also did not have to worry much about any backstabbers in the often-treacherous media space. Azu had my back fully covered.
Maybe that has to do with his growing up in the rough and tumble of what used to be Lagos’ most iconic ghetto in the ‘70s and ‘80s — Ajegunle, where the sense of community was strong and loyalty was a religion. No wonder, one of Azu’s favourite songs is Akon’s folksy “Ghetto.”
Professionally, tomes have been written or said about his significant contributions to Nigerian letters, as a consistent public intellectual of more than three decades standing. For this particular purpose, I choose to bear testimony of a slightly different dimension of the Azu enigma: a deep commitment to family values. His professional accomplishments are arguably matched by the equal success in building an adorable home, with his kids turning out excellently well.
Suffice to add that as our friendship deepened over the years, so did our individual families become integrated. Before my own kids left home for university, “Big Mummy” (Rume) made it a point of duty to host them on weekends, from time to time, at their Magodo, Lagos, home.
By mid-2000s, frustration with ASUU’s prolonged strike eventually pushed the Ishiekwenes into pulling their first daughter, Ashioma, from University of Lagos (UNILAG) and enrolling her in a top university in the US, putting them under financial pressure. I should know. Azu and I have been involved in a lot of collaborations — both intellectual and entrepreneurial — yielding some money. Since I hadn’t started paying “serious school fees” as my kids were still in primary school in the 2000s, I invested mostly in properties. Azu’s share of whatever we made went almost entirely offshore into school fees and upkeep allowances in hard currencies. In fact, I used to tease him then as being Nigeria’s unacknowledged best authority on the black market, in terms of ascertaining the prevailing exchange rate of either the US dollar or British pound to the naira.
Happily, Ashioma earned both her first and second degrees in flying colour in Chemical Engineering. The second child, Meke, the chubbier version of the dad, studied Law in the UK, while Nkechi earned her PhD from New York university in 2024.
Before Ewan, Ese and Joshua too departed home for the university, the transition rite was never complete without a pep talk from Uncle Azu. Often mixing humour with a certain patriarchal sagacity, Azu would first praise them for excelling in their WAEC examinations and then admonish them to, when weary or tempted, always remember our sacrifices as parents and, above all, forever uphold the family’s good name, which we laboured hard to build.
From time to time, Azu never forgets to wire them money in continued expression of a shared commitment and affection. So much that his courier in the US inadvertently almost fell into bankruptcy on one occasion. The guy had mistakenly added an extra “0” to the dollar figure he sent my first son. Almost immediately, the poor guy dialled Ese’s number frantically, to no avail. Soon, I was contacted to quickly alert the boy not to assume that he had hit a jackpot.
While exchanging banters on the sidelines of the occasion that fateful day, the often-magisterial Chief Anenih chose to first blanch Azu literally, by giving him a condescending look from head to toe, before remarking with sardonic humour: “You already look so lean. By the time you people at PUNCH cough out damages to me at the court, I wonder if you’d have any flesh remaining on your bones.”
Curiously, after repeated dialling, I too could not reach Ese.
Which kind wahala be dis?!
Suspense.
It was not until after what seemed like an eternity that Azu eventually called back to announce that Ese had refunded the excess. The momentary “digital disappearance” was because Ese’s phone battery had gone flat.

God forbid thing!
That said, let it also be noted that Azu’s trademark smile however hides one thing: an immense capacity for mischief. Such that when victims of his caustic pen finally meet him in flesh, they are often left wondering if there is any pound of flesh to be exacted from him. I recall vividly a rather hilarious encounter we had with Chief Tony Anenih (of blessed memory) over two decades ago at a social event. The putative “Mr Fix It” of PDP had prior slammed a multi-billion naira libel suit on THE PUNCH over an unflattering news story. To worsen matters, all that while Azu never stopped peppering the PDP supremo in his column in SATURDAY PUNCH.
While exchanging banters on the sidelines of the occasion that fateful day, the often-magisterial Chief Anenih chose to first blanch Azu literally, by giving him a condescending look from head to toe, before remarking with sardonic humour: “You already look so lean. By the time you people at PUNCH cough out damages to me at the court, I wonder if you’d have any flesh remaining on your bones.”
We all laughed deliriously.
With Azu, it is always “yabis” unlimited, with him giving as much as he takes. In fact, he has a unique gift to make others laugh at his expense. A classic example is the recall, several years ago, of his experience during a trip to Thailand. On hearing Azu bemoan having severe body aches after a tortuous flight from Africa to Asia, his empathetic host (a fellow Nigerian) had recommended that he went for a body massage. Pronto, Azu jumped into a pair of jeans, T-shirt and sneakers, and headed for the parlour down the street.
Not until he was ushered into a dimly-lit room and a barely clothed damsel sashayed in, did Azu become conscious of the actual implication of a full body massage “with a happy ending.”
Of course, Thailand is notorious for sex tourism, which is insidiously executed through the ubiquity of “innocuous” massage parlours.
As a “Pastor”, Azu quickly did a cross sign for divine fortification against temptation on a foreign soil. Then, the young lady, scared of the prospect of losing revenue and a certain backlash from her Madam, broke down in tears.
Not to worry, Azu agreed to pay for services not rendered as a compromise that fateful night in Bangkok.
I laughed when he narrated this story to me, unwilling to be drawn into a debate as to my own possible response in the same circumstance.
Happy 60th birthday! Azu.
Louis Odion is a Fellow of the Nigerian Guild of Editors
We’re Coming With New Inflation Rate, We’ve Not Said Prices Have Come Down – NBS Clarifies
The Statistician-General of the Federation, Adeyemi Adeniran, has advised Nigerians to disregard reports that inflation has come down.
Naija News reports that Adeniran explained that the report the Nigeria Bureau of Statistics (NBS) released was not the current inflation rate in the country.
In an interview with Arise News, on Tuesday night, he stated that NBS did not say prices of goods have come down in markets. He said what the report measured was how fast the price of goods is increasing in the country using the 2024 base.
He further explained that NBS decided to dump the 2009 base for the 2024 base to provide accurate data measuring the current inflationary pressures within the economy.
“The present government has been coming out with policies just to make things work better for the country. And there’s nothing wrong in that projection that government made. What we are doing as a responsible statistics office is to provide data, accurate data, that reflect present inflationary pressure within the economy. The government can now use to drive the objective of achieving that goal,” he said.
The Statistician-General of the Federation explained that in the 2024 base 960 items were collected into a basket of measurement and assigned weights.
He stressed that the new inflation report said that inflation remained high but prices are moving up slowly.
“When we talk about rebasing, as I said, we are moving from 2009, that was the old basing, to 2024. In the 2009 goods and services, the basket that we have, we have 740 items in that basket. In this newly rebased period, 2024, we have 960 items in the basket. And the weight assigned to each of these products in the basket is not the same. So to that extent, we cannot be comparing the 2009 base year result, which gave us 34.8% in December with this current January 2025 inflation rates. So they are not comparable. So saying that inflation moved from 34.8% to 24.48% is not the interpretation.
“We are coming with a new inflation rate for the country that showed the present inflationary pressure in the economy. So that government knows what actually is the correct situation.
“So the new inflation rate is saying that prices are moving up, but in a slower rate. That’s what inflation measures. Inflation is measuring when prices are going up. At what rate are those prices moving up? You may have in a particular month, depending on the situation, the price will be moving rapidly, changing rapidly. And in another month or period of the year, you will see inflation not moving. The prices can still be going up, but not as much as it used to be. That’s what inflation is measuring. The rate at which prices are moving,” he stated.
He dismissed the misinterpretation of the report that food prices have come down.
He continued, “It’s different from the actual prices that people are paying for goods and services. So as we said, inflation is 24.48%. It doesn’t mean the prices of goods and services in the market have changed. But the rate by which some of the items are changing prices is what inflation is measuring. So we are not saying prices have come down generally in the market.”
[NaijaNews]
BATTLE OF WITS: Lagos, Other State Assemblies Involved In Speakership Crisis
On Monday, the crisis rocking the Lagos State House of Assembly came to a head when security operatives disrupted plenary.
There was commotion at the Assembly as the security operatives sealed off offices of Speaker Mojisola Meranda, her deputy, and clerk of the House.
Lagos Assembly scenario reactivates memories of similar incidents that occurred in others states across the country.
In this report, Daily Trust highlights some state houses of assemblies that have had leadership crises.
LAGOS
There was chaos at the Lagos State House of Assembly on Monday, as the Department of State Service (DSS) invaded the assembly, allegedly on the orders of the clerk.
In the ensuing melee, the lawmakers forcefully gained entry into the hallowed chamber and declared their support for the Speaker, Mojisola Meranda.
The Governance Advisory Council, the highest decision-making body of the All Progressives Congress in Lagos State, has, however, reaffirmed its plans to meet with President Bola Tinubu over the ongoing crisis in the state House of Assembly.
The fresh rift followed the militarisation of the Assembly complex by officials of the DSS on Monday.
The crisis deepened following moves by ousted Speaker Mudashiru Obasa to return to the House.
Obasa, who was removed by the majority of the lawmakers on January 13, 2025, approached the court last week to seek redress.
The lawmaker dragged the Assembly and the new Speaker before a Lagos State high court in Ikeja, claiming that the lawmakers were wrong to have removed him when the Assembly was in recess.
RIVERS
Twenty-seven members of the Rivers State House of Assembly had in December 2023, “dumped” the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) for the All Progressives Congress (APC) at the heat of political crisis in the state.
The lawmakers led by Speaker Martins Amaewhule, are loyal to a former governor of the state, Nyesom Wike, who is currently the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).
Their “defection” followed the feud between Wike and his successor, Governor Siminalayi Fubara, over political control in the state. It also led to multiple litigations.
Meanwhile, a five-member House led by Speaker Victor Oko Jumbo is loyal to Governor Fubara.
OGUN
In January 2024, Olakunle Oluomo was impeached as Speaker of the Ogun State Assembly Speaker by 18 members of the House.
He was immediately replaced by another ranking lawmaker, Oludaisi Elemide, representing the Odeda state constituency.
Oluomo was reportedly at the June 12 Cultural Centre, Kuto, Abeokuta—a few metres away from the Assembly complex— attending the swearing-in of customary court judges by the governor when his colleagues moved against him.
Governor Dapo Abbiodun, in a statement by his Special Adviser on Media, Kayode Akinmade, linked Oluomo’s impeachment to long-standing “internal wrangling in the Assembly that had persisted and degenerated despite several interventions.”
ONDO
On June 2, 2023, armed security men sealed off the Ondo State House of Assembly following an alleged plot to impeach the Speaker, Bamidele Oloyelogun.
This came a few hours after a letter purportedly written by the embattled Speaker announced his resignation.
The letter, according to reports, was hurriedly written by the Speaker to escape being impeached a few days to the expiration of the 9th Assembly which he led.
The two gates leading to the complex were blocked by the security operatives.
Olamide Oladiji was elected Speaker of the House on 4 June 2023.
NASARAWA
In 2023, the intrigues, twists and turns in the leadership crisis that engulfed the Nasarawa State House of Assembly tore the Assembly into two factions, with each claiming legitimacy to its leadership.
Daniel Ogazi and Ibrahim Balarabe Abdullahi, both of the All Progressives Congress (APC), emerged speakers of the Assembly at different sittings.
While Abdullahi, the immediate past Speaker, who sought a third term, was elected during a sitting at the Ministry for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs in Lafia, Ogazi emerged Speaker during a sitting at the Assembly complex.
The emergence of both Abdullahi and Ogazi, aside from factionalising the Assembly, threw up issues regarding the validity of anyone laying claim to the office of the speaker.
BENUE
In 2018, the impeached Speaker, Benue House of Assembly, Terkimbi Ikyange, was suspended by his colleagues for six months for what they called “unparliamentary behaviour”
The legislators took the decision during their sitting at the Old Banquet Hall of Government House, Makurdi.
The legislators could not hold their parliamentary session at the Assembly complex because the police locked the main entrance to the building.
The action compelled some legislators to scale the Assembly high walls to enter the premises only to discover that the chambers were also securely locked.
Following their inability to hold their sitting at the Assembly complex, they relocated to the Government House Banquet Hall to conduct their business.
Publish details of dormant accounts, unclaimed balances — CBN to Nigerian Banks
Amid efforts to sanitise the financial sector, the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN has directed all banks and financial institutions to publicly disclose details of dormant accounts, unclaimed balances, and other financial assets on their official websites.
The apex bank disclosed in a recent circular, titled “Guidelines on Management of Dormant Accounts, Unclaimed Balances, and Other Financial Assets in Banks and Other Financial Institutions in Nigeria.”
According to the circular, banks are expected to publish details of dormant accounts, unclaimed balances, and other financial assets on their websites and at least two in national newspapers.
“In furtherance thereof, and in response to enquiries from stakeholders regarding the possible breach of the Nigeria Data Protection Act, 2023 (NDPA), banks and other financial institutions are required to note the following.
“1. Information to be published on banks’ websites as well as the association’s website (where applicable) shall include the name of the account, the type of account, the name of the bank, and the branch where the account is domiciled ONLY.
“Information to be published annually in at least two national daily newspapers or the premises of state and unit microfinance banks shall also convey the details as listed in (2) above.”
Earlier, DAILY POST reported that CBN announced fresh guidelines on the management of dormant accounts, unclaimed balances, and other financial assets.
This directive follows an earlier order issued by CBN on July 19, 2024, mandating banks and financial institutions to transfer unclaimed balances and dormant account funds to the apex bank’s designated accounts.
Trump to exclude Musk from space-related gov’t decisions
The United States President, Donald Trump on Tuesday said billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk will be excluded from space-related decision-making.
Trump made this remark at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida in reply to a question about Musk’s potential conflicts of interest amid his efforts to cut government spending, according to media reports.
“So anything to do with possibly even space, we won’t let Elon partake in that,” he told reporters.
The White House has said Musk would recuse himself from any conflicts of interest between his business interests and efforts to reduce government spending via the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
On Monday, regarding Musk’s role in the Trump administration, the White House said he is a White House employee and senior adviser to the president.
It added that Musk is not an employee of DOGE, he has no decision-making authority.
Trump said Tuesday that Musk could be called an “employee” or “consultant.”
(Xinhua/NAN)
[OPINION] Bloodbath in Osun and the Lagos political tremor - Jide Ojo
February 17, 2025, will go down in the annals of Lagos and Osun states as epochal and Black Monday. There was a political tremor in the Lagos State House of Assembly as operatives of the Directorate of State Security reportedly invaded the Assembly Complex locking out staff and sealing up the offices of the speaker, deputy speaker and acting clerk; in the State of Osun, there was a free-for-all in many premises of the 30 local government areas of the state over the attempt by the sacked LGA chairmen and councillors elected under the All Progressives Congress to resume back to office citing a purported Appeal Court judgement. In the ensuing fracas in Osun, at least six people were murdered and scores of others wounded with property worth millions of naira destroyed.
Starting with the Osun bloodshed, the remote cause of the political crisis was the October 15, 2022, local government election conducted by the then-outgoing governor of the state, Alhaji Gboyega Oyetola said to be the nephew of President Bola Tinubu. Recall that he had lost the July 16, 2022 reelection bid to the Peoples Democratic Party candidate, Senator Ademola Adeleke. The 2022 LG election conducted by the Osun State Independent Electoral Commission was said not to comply with the provision of the state electoral law. It was, therefore, challenged in court by some opposition political parties among whom was the PDP in Osun. It was reported that two High Courts had sacked the LGA chairmen and councillors. Governor Adeleke, thereafter, appointed caretaker committees to manage the affairs of the councils pending when another election takes place.
Osun State Independent Electoral Commission has fixed this weekend, Saturday, February 22, 2025, as the date for the new local government election. News reports said APC members bought forms, conducted primaries and are preparing for this Saturday’s election. Suddenly, there is said to be a purported Court of Appeal judgement in Akure reinstating the sacked APC chairmen and councillors. This has been debunked by the governor and the PDP. In fact, last Sunday, February 16, 2025, Governor Ademola Adeleke addressed a press conference where he asked President Tinubu to call his nephew, and incumbent Minister of Marine and Blue Economy, Oyetola, to order.
At a press briefing on Sunday, Adeleke alleged, “The bone of contention is the brazen effrontery to return to office council chairmen sacked by a subsisting court judgment using a different court decision, which has no consequential order.” He stated further, “Let me make it clear that the said council Chairmen were sacked before I was sworn in as governor of Osun State, contrary to the lies being peddled that the chairmen and councillors were sacked by my Executive Order. For emphasis, l want to state that I had nothing to do with the sacking of the chairmen and councillors produced by the Osun 2022 local government polls. The chairmen and councillors were sacked by two different judgments of the Federal High Court Osogbo. I call on Mr President to instruct the National Security Adviser and the Attorney General of the Federation to personally verify the fact that the Court of Appeal judgement did not reinstate the sacked local government chairmen and councillors,” he said.
So that was the background to the Osun State political crisis that was witnessed last Monday. A newspaper on Monday reported, “No fewer than six persons reportedly lost their lives on Monday as the dispute over the status of former local government chairmen of Osun State turned bloody. At least, two persons were feared killed in Iragbiji, Boripe Local Government Areas of Osun State, while several others were wounded in other LGs in the state following the resumption of officials elected on the platform of the All Progressives Congress in the October 15, 2022 LG elections in the state at the council secretariats. Also, in Ikire, Irewole LGA, the APC council chairman, Remi Abass, was shot dead by suspected political thugs. In Ilesa, a former Commissioner for Works under Governor Gboyega Oyetola, Engineer Remi Omowaye, narrowly escaped being killed as his vehicle was riddled with bullets while his office was set ablaze.”
Will this Saturday’s election go on as scheduled? Doubtful. Why are the political gladiators in Osun fighting over the control of the local government areas? It is simply because of the 2026 governorship election in Osun State and the 2027 general elections. Both APC and PDP want to plant their loyalists into the councils ahead of these two elections. They will be the foot soldiers for the parties during the forthcoming elections. It is already an open secret that former Governor Oyetola with the backing of his uncle, the incumbent President will likely have a rematch of 2022 next year with the incumbent governor of the state. Both of them will be seeking reelection for their second and final term in office. This will be their third term of locking horns in an electoral contest. The first was in 2018 when Oyetola won through a controversial supplementary election. The second time was in July 2022 when Adeleke won. So, it is a matter of ego, grit and political sagacity. Governor Adeleke is from an illustrious Adeleke dynasty in Ede while Oyetola, who was a former Chief of Staff to Rauf Aregbesola as a governor, will be counting on the backing of President Tinubu who is rumoured to have family ties in Iragbiji, Osun State.
As for the Lagos House of Assembly political brouhaha, it has a long history as the former Speaker of Lagos State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. Mudashiru Obasa, has several times been alleged to have abused his office and engaged in gross misconduct. Political gladiators in Lagos said that he had fallen out of favour with the powerful non-state actor group called the Governance Advisory Council. He was reported to have been rude to Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu and disrespected the GAC, especially during the presentation of the 2025 budget presentation exercise on Thursday, November 21, 2024. Obasa was said to have kept the governor waiting for four hours and the GAC members for five hours without apology. He purportedly made a snide remark at the governor during the budget presentation exercise. Grapevine sources claimed that several reconciliatory meetings had been held in the past and that President Tinubu even facilitated another one during his Christmas/New Year vacation in Lagos last December. Not a few also believed that he was nursing political ambition to be governor in 2027.
Obasa is not a featherweight in politics. He is indeed a heavyweight having been holding political offices since 1999. He was first elected councillor in Agege Local Government and in 2003 became a member of the Lagos State House of Assembly. He has won election into the assembly a record six times. He has also been speaker of the Lagos Assembly since 2015. Despite his political clout, he could not ward off his removal, which took place on Monday, January 13, 2025. His sack, which he is now contesting in court, has purportedly caused division in the once-united Governance Advisory Council. President Tinubu was reported not to be in support of his removal while there have been a lot of behind-the-scenes moves to get the newly elected speaker Mojisola Meranda to resign either for Obasa to be reinstated and allowed to resign or for someone from Lagos West Senatorial District to replace him. Meranda and the governor are said to be from the same senatorial district.
The challenge is that the new Speaker, Rt. Hon. Mosjisola Meranda is an indigene and a member of a royal family in Lagos while Obasa and indeed all the former governors of Lagos are said not to be originally from Lagos but are settlers. In addition, women groups are resisting any attempt to remove Meranda as she is the first female speaker of the Lagos House of Assembly. That is why the action of DSS last Monday is said to be overreach and may have been influenced by external forces wanting to get Meranda out of her exalted seat, at all costs. Time will tell how all these political imbroglios will eventually pan out but I sue for peace in Osun and Lagos States.
[OPINION] Northern elite versus President Tinubu - Lekan Sote
Some members of Northern Nigeria’s political establishment are fond of stamping their feet and threatening to withdraw (voting) support to Southern Nigerian presidents who do not kowtow to their (sometimes unfair) demands.
They nearly succeeded in using the National Economic Council, made up of the vice president, governors of the 36 states and the Central Bank of Nigeria, to railroad President Bola Tinubu into dropping the new tax bills.
They are now using the approaching 2027 presidential election to blackmail him. Presidential aide, Tunde Rahman, notes, “President Tinubu has barely spent two years in office, yet political opponents (are)… in a desperate move to grab power in 2007.”
He identified opposition politicians, enemies within the All Progressives Congress and erstwhile APC stalwarts as the culprits. Though he excluded the Northern Nigerian political establishment, he made the deft observation that “power rotation between the North and South over two terms, may work against the opposition”.
Ahead of the 2023 general elections, Dr Hakeem Baba-Ahmed, now ensconced within the Tinubu Presidency, was notable in threatening that the political North could vote for another Northern Nigerian to succeed former President Muhammadu Buhari. Politics, he averred, was, after all, a game of numbers.
The other member of the tag team, Prof. Usman Yusuf, is currently facing probable storm-in-a-tea-cup corruption charges, years after former President Muhammadu Buhari placed him on a forced administrative leave from the Nigeria Health Insurance Scheme.
And his legal prosecution is looking like a political persecution. While the Northern Elders’ Forum declared his arrest as politically motivated, Sheikh Ahmad Gumi, his acquaintance of 49 years, warns President Tinubu against sycophants who may want to destroy his goodwill (in Northern Nigeria?)
But the law must run its course for Prof Yusuf, who childishly splayed in the media a photograph of himself and Sheikh Gumi, at a rural Oyo North town, maybe as a cheeky game-baiting of Yoruba nation agitator, Sunday “Igboho” Adeyemo, who confronted a Fulani that he thought was a threat to the Yoruba.
The myth of Northern voting supremacy is probably accentuated by the decision of Northern APC governors who defied President Buhari and insisted that presidential power should return to Southern Nigeria, a fulfilment of an agreement embedded in the Constitution of the opposition People’s Democratic Party.
Of course, the massive vote that President Tinubu received in Northern Nigeria gives the impression of the North honouring that gentleman’s agreement. It is commendable that the Northern governors and the electorate voted accordingly.
It confers a great economic advantage on Northern Nigeria: The number of unemployed Northern youths (who are also running away from insurgency and banditry) in Southern Nigeria shows why even Northern Nigerian plebians bought into the project of a Southern Nigerian president.
If they had voted otherwise, they (and their Sahel cousins, mostly in the ECOWAS breakaway Alliance of Sahelian States) may be going through tough and expensive visa procedures to cross the border to come and drive “keke NAPEP” or serve as night guards with free accommodation in Southern Nigeria.
Northern Nigeria could have retained the presidency using Section 135(5) of Nigeria’s Constitution, which says, “In default of a candidate duly elected under subsection (4) of this section, the Independent National Electoral Commission shall… arrange for another election… and a candidate at such election shall be… duly elected to the office of President if he has a majority of the votes cast at the election.”
But if they had taken advantage of that provision, with its simple majority, which does not require winning one-quarter of votes in at least two-thirds of the states in Nigeria, as provided in Section 135(4), the “Northern President” may by now be ruling Nigeria north of River Niger only!
Southern Nigeria, whose governors declared in 2022 that the next President should come from Southern Nigeria, may have aligned with separatist tendencies within their domains, and Nigeria may have been balkanised. God forbids!
The days of Northern Nigeria annulling an election, or disregarding gentleman’s agreements, to deny other regions of the presidency of Nigeria have gone past its sell-by date. No region of Nigeria will accept that disrespect anymore.
Northern Nigerian military boys took advantage of the blunder of Head of State Major General JTU Aguiyi-Ironsi (helped by his Igbo law professor compatriot) who abrogated the 1954 Constitutional Conference resolution for a federal system with strong regional governments for Nigeria.
Former Kaduna State Governor Nasir el Rufai, who appeared to have led the Northern APC Governors to insist that Bola Tinubu, and not Senate President Lawan, should be APC’s presidential candidate may not have been in love with Tinubu.
But he knew realpolitik, the politics of reality, common sense and expediency. He and his cohort knew that a presidential candidate from Northern Nigeria could have meant game over. The separatist Indigenous People of Biafra and Yoruba nation agitators were watching with hawk-like concentration.
If the hunch by Aminu Jaji, representing Kaura Namoda/Birnin Magaji Federal Constituency of Zamfara State in the National Assembly, is correct, namely, that “el Rufai is more focused in 2027”, maybe neither el Rufai nor the Northern Nigerian political establishment is a long-distance political runner.
And el Rufai, Arewa Consultative Forum, the Northern political establishment and former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, who seem determined to upset the regional presidential pact, must accept responsibility if Southern Nigeria responds in kind.
To rework a pregnant phrase from the Yoruba of Southwest Nigeria, if a branch snapped, the bird would fly away. The Northern Nigerian vote for Tinubu is probably the glue that is helping to achieve former Head of State General Yakubu Gowon’s dream of keeping Nigeria one.
The Chairman of the APC and former Governor of Kano State, Dr Umar Ganduje, has pinched his Northern Nigerian compatriots in the back, to warn them of the probable consequences of failing to return President Tinubu (or at least another Southern Nigerian) to Aso Rock in 2027.
Ganduje said: “Our President, who has come from the south, is going, Insha Allah, for the second term in 2027. And after that, it will be the turn of the northern part of the country.” But the Arewa Consultative Forum insists that the North cannot wait till 2031 for the presidency.
Though their argument that the North cannot be compelled to re-elect Tinubu in 2027 is spot on, they must, however, realise that if the next President is not Tinubu, it had better be another Southern Nigerian. To borrow a phrase from former American President Barack Obama, “Elections have consequences.” Another pregnant, and realistic, phrase from the streets says, “This country belongs to all of us.”
When Margaret Thatcher was Prime Minister of Britain, she once vehemently declared that the idea of Britain losing the Falkland Islands to Argentina was “unthinkable!” One could also assert that the idea that the presidency is going back to the North in 2027 is unthinkable.
But the North should stop this unnecessary “shakara” posturing and remember that they started this “me-too” attitude, which they have used as an equal opportunity platform to (sometimes) gain (undue) advantage over their Southern compatriots.
But then, maybe Nigerians should agree with Dr Usman Bugaje of ACF, who is wondering (albeit without passion) why Nigerians should be arguing over the region of presidential candidates instead of their competencies.